Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 6/2013

01-12-2013 | Genetic Counseling: A Global Perspective

Ethical and Professional Challenges of Genetic Counseling – the Case of Austria

Authors: Brigitte Gschmeidler, Magdalena Flatscher-Thoeni

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Genetic counseling is gaining in importance with the increasing application of genetic testing for diagnosis and clinical treatment. Genetic counseling often raises ethical and professional challenges and prior research has categorized them into 16 domains. The purpose of this study was to analyze the situation in Austria on the basis of these challenges and discuss it in the national and international context. While in some countries there is a special profession for genetic counseling, in Austria it is provided by medical geneticists or other physicians in the context of their specialization. Psychosocial professionals might be consulted or brought in if necessary. Results from 95 survey respondents (including physicians and psychosocial professionals) revealed a greater interest in the topic of genetic counseling by medical specialists other than medical geneticists. The most frequently encountered challenges among physicians were informed consent, organizational constraints, withholding information, and attaining/maintaining proficiency. The psychosocial professionals experienced maintaining proficiency and organizational constraints as the prevalent challenges. Additional findings and practice implications are presented.
Footnotes
1
Neo-Socratic dialogue is a method for systematically reflecting basic, ethical questions in a small group based on the participants’ personal experiences (Grießler et al. 2009, p. 280).
 
2
It is currently in revision.
 
4
As in many cases the invitation was sent to an institutional contact with the request to forward it the exact number of people invited cannot be established.
 
5
Original statement in German: Meinungsfreiheit und Entscheidungsfreiheit des Klienten ist höchstes Gut.
 
Literature
go back to reference Abad-Perotín, R., Asúnsolo-Del Barco, À., & Silva-Mato, A. (2011). A survey of ethical and professional challenges experienced by Spanish health-care professionals that provide genetic counseling services. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21(1), 85–100.PubMedCrossRef Abad-Perotín, R., Asúnsolo-Del Barco, À., & Silva-Mato, A. (2011). A survey of ethical and professional challenges experienced by Spanish health-care professionals that provide genetic counseling services. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21(1), 85–100.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Alliman, S., McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D., Lian, F., James, C., & LeRoy, B. (2009). A comparative analysis of ethical and professional challenges experienced by Australian and U.S. genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18(4), 379–394.PubMedCrossRef Alliman, S., McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D., Lian, F., James, C., & LeRoy, B. (2009). A comparative analysis of ethical and professional challenges experienced by Australian and U.S. genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18(4), 379–394.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bartels, D. M., LeRoy, B. S., McCarthy, P., & Caplan, A. L. (1997). Nondirectiveness in genetic counseling: a survey of practitioners. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 72(2), 172–179.PubMedCrossRef Bartels, D. M., LeRoy, B. S., McCarthy, P., & Caplan, A. L. (1997). Nondirectiveness in genetic counseling: a survey of practitioners. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 72(2), 172–179.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Blaicher, W., Bodamer, O., Buchta, C., Haas, O., Maier, M., Peintinger, M., et al. (2006). Genetische Betreuung: Bundesministerium für Gesundheit und Frauen und dialog<>gentechnik. Blaicher, W., Bodamer, O., Buchta, C., Haas, O., Maier, M., Peintinger, M., et al. (2006). Genetische Betreuung: Bundesministerium für Gesundheit und Frauen und dialog<>gentechnik.
go back to reference BMGF (2002). Gentechnikbuch: 2. Kapitel. Leitlinien für die genetische Beratung (beschlossen von der Gentechnikkommission am 24. Juni 2002). BMGF (2002). Gentechnikbuch: 2. Kapitel. Leitlinien für die genetische Beratung (beschlossen von der Gentechnikkommission am 24. Juni 2002).
go back to reference Bower, M. A., Veach, P. M., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2002). A survey of genetic counselors’ strategies for addressing ethical and professional challenges in practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(3), 163–186.PubMedCrossRef Bower, M. A., Veach, P. M., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2002). A survey of genetic counselors’ strategies for addressing ethical and professional challenges in practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(3), 163–186.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bowles Biesecker, B., & Marteau, T. M. (1999). The future of genetic counselling: an international perspective. Nature Genetics, 22(2), 133–137.PubMedCrossRef Bowles Biesecker, B., & Marteau, T. M. (1999). The future of genetic counselling: an international perspective. Nature Genetics, 22(2), 133–137.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Cherkas, L. F., Harris, J. M., Levinson, E., Spector, T. D., & Prainsack, B. (2010). A survey of UK public interest in internet-based personal genome testing. PLoS One, 5(10), e13473.PubMedCrossRef Cherkas, L. F., Harris, J. M., Levinson, E., Spector, T. D., & Prainsack, B. (2010). A survey of UK public interest in internet-based personal genome testing. PLoS One, 5(10), e13473.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fiegl, J., Pritz, A., & Wagner, E. (1996). Richtlinien für die Psychotherapeutische und Soziale Beratung im Rahmen der Humangenetischen Beratung: Republik Österreich, Bundeskanzleramt, Sektion VI. Fiegl, J., Pritz, A., & Wagner, E. (1996). Richtlinien für die Psychotherapeutische und Soziale Beratung im Rahmen der Humangenetischen Beratung: Republik Österreich, Bundeskanzleramt, Sektion VI.
go back to reference Grießler, E., Littig, B., & Pichelstorfer, A. (2009). “Selbstbestimmung” in der genetischen Beratung: Argumentationsstruktur und Ergebnisse einer Serie neosokratischer Dialoge in Österreich und Deutschland. In I. Hirschberg, E. Grießler, B. Littig, & A. Frewer (Eds.), Ethische Fragen genetischer Beratung (pp. 277–302). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag. Grießler, E., Littig, B., & Pichelstorfer, A. (2009). “Selbstbestimmung” in der genetischen Beratung: Argumentationsstruktur und Ergebnisse einer Serie neosokratischer Dialoge in Österreich und Deutschland. In I. Hirschberg, E. Grießler, B. Littig, & A. Frewer (Eds.), Ethische Fragen genetischer Beratung (pp. 277–302). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.
go back to reference Hadolt, B., & Lengauer, M. (2009). Genetische Beratung in der Praxis. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag. Hadolt, B., & Lengauer, M. (2009). Genetische Beratung in der Praxis. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
go back to reference Howard, H., & Borry, P. (2012). Is there a doctor in the house? Journal of Community Genetics, 3(2), 105–112.PubMedCrossRef Howard, H., & Borry, P. (2012). Is there a doctor in the house? Journal of Community Genetics, 3(2), 105–112.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lowery, J. T., Byers, T., Axell, L., Ku, L., & Jacobellis, J. (2008). The impact of direct-to-consumer marketing of cancer genetic testing on women according to their genetic risk. Genetics in Medicine, 10(12), 888–894.PubMedCrossRef Lowery, J. T., Byers, T., Axell, L., Ku, L., & Jacobellis, J. (2008). The impact of direct-to-consumer marketing of cancer genetic testing on women according to their genetic risk. Genetics in Medicine, 10(12), 888–894.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2001). Ethical and professional challenges posed by patients with genetic concerns: a report of focus group discussions with genetic counselors, physicians, and nurses. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10(2), 97–119.CrossRef McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2001). Ethical and professional challenges posed by patients with genetic concerns: a report of focus group discussions with genetic counselors, physicians, and nurses. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10(2), 97–119.CrossRef
go back to reference McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2002). Commentary on genetic counseling - a profession in search of itself. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(3), 187–191.CrossRef McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2002). Commentary on genetic counseling - a profession in search of itself. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(3), 187–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Rantanen, E., Hietala, M., Kristoffersson, U., Nippert, I., Schmidtke, J., Sequeiros, J., et al. (2008a). Regulations and practices of genetic counselling in 38 European countries: the perspective of national representatives. European Journal of Human Genetics, 16(10), 1208–1216.PubMedCrossRef Rantanen, E., Hietala, M., Kristoffersson, U., Nippert, I., Schmidtke, J., Sequeiros, J., et al. (2008a). Regulations and practices of genetic counselling in 38 European countries: the perspective of national representatives. European Journal of Human Genetics, 16(10), 1208–1216.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rantanen, E., Hietala, M., Kristoffersson, U., Nippert, I., Schmidtke, J., Sequeiros, J., et al. (2008b). What is ideal genetic counselling? A survey of current international guidelines. European Journal of Human Genetics, 16(4), 445–452.PubMedCrossRef Rantanen, E., Hietala, M., Kristoffersson, U., Nippert, I., Schmidtke, J., Sequeiros, J., et al. (2008b). What is ideal genetic counselling? A survey of current international guidelines. European Journal of Human Genetics, 16(4), 445–452.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schwarzer, S. (2008). Beratung in unterschiedlichen Kontexten - Sozialarbeit, Psychologische Beratung, Lebensberatung, Seelsorge; Literaturbericht im Rahmen des Projektes: „GEN-DIALOG – Neo-Socratic Dialogues for Improved Genetic Counselling“. Vienna. Schwarzer, S. (2008). Beratung in unterschiedlichen Kontexten - Sozialarbeit, Psychologische Beratung, Lebensberatung, Seelsorge; Literaturbericht im Rahmen des Projektes: „GEN-DIALOG – Neo-Socratic Dialogues for Improved Genetic Counselling“. Vienna.
go back to reference Thierry, N., & Springer-Kremser, M. (2006). Psychosoziale und psychotherapeutische Aspekte der genetischen Beratung. Journal für Neurologie, Neurochirurgie und Psychiatrie, 7(4), 25–29. Thierry, N., & Springer-Kremser, M. (2006). Psychosoziale und psychotherapeutische Aspekte der genetischen Beratung. Journal für Neurologie, Neurochirurgie und Psychiatrie, 7(4), 25–29.
go back to reference Vlasak, I. (2009). Erwartungen und spätere Erfahrungen von Klient(inn)en: Zur Qualitätssicherung genetischer Beratung. In I. Hirschberg, E. Grießler, B. Littig, & A. Frewer (Eds.), Ethische Fragen genetischer Beratung (pp. 131–151). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag. Vlasak, I. (2009). Erwartungen und spätere Erfahrungen von Klient(inn)en: Zur Qualitätssicherung genetischer Beratung. In I. Hirschberg, E. Grießler, B. Littig, & A. Frewer (Eds.), Ethische Fragen genetischer Beratung (pp. 131–151). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.
go back to reference Vlasak, I., & Amann, G. (2005). Genetische Beratung aus der Sicht von Klient/innen. Journal für Fertilität und Reproduktion, 15(1), 13–20. Vlasak, I., & Amann, G. (2005). Genetische Beratung aus der Sicht von Klient/innen. Journal für Fertilität und Reproduktion, 15(1), 13–20.
go back to reference Walther, J.-U. (2004). Genetische Beratung und ihre Normen. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde, 152, 1217–1224.CrossRef Walther, J.-U. (2004). Genetische Beratung und ihre Normen. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde, 152, 1217–1224.CrossRef
go back to reference Weil, J. (2003). Psychosocial genetic counseling in the post-nondirective era: a point of view. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12(3), 199–211.PubMedCrossRef Weil, J. (2003). Psychosocial genetic counseling in the post-nondirective era: a point of view. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12(3), 199–211.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Weil, J., Ormond, K., Peters, J., Peters, K., Biesecker, B. B., & LeRoy, B. (2006). The relationship of nondirectiveness to genetic counseling: report of a workshop at the 2003 NSGC Annual Education Conference. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(2), 85–93.PubMedCrossRef Weil, J., Ormond, K., Peters, J., Peters, K., Biesecker, B. B., & LeRoy, B. (2006). The relationship of nondirectiveness to genetic counseling: report of a workshop at the 2003 NSGC Annual Education Conference. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(2), 85–93.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wilde, A., Meiser, B., Mitchell, P. B., Hadzi-Pavlovic, D., & Schofield, P. R. (2011). Community interest in predictive genetic testing for susceptibility to major depressive disorder in a large national sample. Psychological Medicine, 41(08), 1605–1613.PubMedCrossRef Wilde, A., Meiser, B., Mitchell, P. B., Hadzi-Pavlovic, D., & Schofield, P. R. (2011). Community interest in predictive genetic testing for susceptibility to major depressive disorder in a large national sample. Psychological Medicine, 41(08), 1605–1613.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ethical and Professional Challenges of Genetic Counseling – the Case of Austria
Authors
Brigitte Gschmeidler
Magdalena Flatscher-Thoeni
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9610-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

Journal of Genetic Counseling 6/2013 Go to the issue

Genetic Counseling: A Global Perspective

Development of Genetic Counseling Services in Taiwan

Genetic Counseling: A Global Perspective

Genetic Counseling Training in the Philippines

Genetic Counseling: A Global Perspective

Genetic Counseling: A Transnational Perspective

Genetic Counseling: A Global Perspective

Iceland—Genetic Counseling Services