Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Gastrectomy | Research article

Early experience with total robotic D2 gastrectomy in a low incidence region: surgical perspectives

Authors: Tom Mala, Dag Førland, Caroline Skagemo, Tom Glomsaker, Hans Olaf Johannessen, Egil Johnson

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Few European centers have reported on robotic gastrectomy for malignancy. We report our early experience with curative-intent total robotic gastrectomy.

Materials and methods

The Intuitive Surgery Da Vinci Surgical System Xi 4 armed robot was used. Routine D2 lymphadenectomy was applied.

Results

Some 27 patients with adenocarcinoma (n = 18), hereditary cancer susceptibility (n = 8) and premalignancy (n = 1) were allocated to robotic gastrectomy, three were excluded due to inoperability during surgery. Median (range) age was 66 (18–87) years, 14 (58.3%) were females and body mass index was 25.5 (22.1–33.5) kg/m2. Total gastrectomy was performed in 19 (79.2%) and subtotal in five (20.8%) patients. One (4.2%) procedure was converted to laparotomy. Procedural time was 273 (195–427) minutes. Three (12.5%) patients were reoperated within 30 days, one (4.2%) died. Serious complications (Clavien Dindo IIIb or more) occurred in three (12.5%) patients. Postoperative hospital stay was 10 (6–43) days. Fourteen of 16 (87.5%) patients with adenocarcinoma/premalignancy received radical resections. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 20 (11–34). Eleven (73.3%) patients with adenocarcinoma had T3/T4 tumors and 6 (40%) had TNM stage III or more.

Conclusion

Total robotic D2 gastrectomy appears feasible and safe during early introduction in a low incidence region.
Literature
2.
go back to reference van Boxel GI, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a European perspective. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22:909–19.CrossRef van Boxel GI, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a European perspective. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22:909–19.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Strong VE, Russo AE, Nakauchi M, Schattner MA, Selby LV, Herrera G, et al. Robotic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in the USA: insights and oncologic outcomes in 220 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:742–50.CrossRef Strong VE, Russo AE, Nakauchi M, Schattner MA, Selby LV, Herrera G, et al. Robotic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in the USA: insights and oncologic outcomes in 220 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:742–50.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wu HY, Lin XF, Yang P, Li W. Pooled analysis of the oncological outcomes in robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Minim Access Surg. 2021;17:287–93.CrossRef Wu HY, Lin XF, Yang P, Li W. Pooled analysis of the oncological outcomes in robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Minim Access Surg. 2021;17:287–93.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Liao G, Zhao Z, Khan M, Li X. Comparative analysis of robotic gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in terms of their long-term oncological outcomes: a meta-analysis of 3410 gastric cancer patients. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17:86.CrossRef Liao G, Zhao Z, Khan M, Li X. Comparative analysis of robotic gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in terms of their long-term oncological outcomes: a meta-analysis of 3410 gastric cancer patients. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17:86.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yang C, Shi Y, Xie S, Chen J, Zhao Y, Qian F, et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic-versus laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching study. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:669.CrossRef Yang C, Shi Y, Xie S, Chen J, Zhao Y, Qian F, et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic-versus laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching study. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:669.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lu J, Zheng CH, Xu BB, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, et al. Assessment of robotic versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2021;273:858–67.CrossRef Lu J, Zheng CH, Xu BB, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, et al. Assessment of robotic versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2021;273:858–67.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ma J, Li X, Zhao S, Zhang R, Yang D. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2020;18:306.CrossRef Ma J, Li X, Zhao S, Zhang R, Yang D. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2020;18:306.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Solaini L, Avanzolini L, Pacilli CA, Cuchetti A, Cavaliere D, Ercolani G. Robotic surgery for gastric cancer in the west: a systematic review and meta-analyses of short- and long-term outcome. Int J Surg. 2020;83:170–5.CrossRef Solaini L, Avanzolini L, Pacilli CA, Cuchetti A, Cavaliere D, Ercolani G. Robotic surgery for gastric cancer in the west: a systematic review and meta-analyses of short- and long-term outcome. Int J Surg. 2020;83:170–5.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulik RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.CrossRef Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulik RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Murakami K, Obama K, Tsunoda S, Hisamori S, Nishigori T, Hida K, et al. Linear or circular stapler? A propensity score-matched, multicenter analysis of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy following totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:5265–73.CrossRef Murakami K, Obama K, Tsunoda S, Hisamori S, Nishigori T, Hida K, et al. Linear or circular stapler? A propensity score-matched, multicenter analysis of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy following totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:5265–73.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chen QY, Xie JW, Zhong Q, Wang JB, Lin JX, Lu L, et al. Safety and efficacy of indocyanine green tracer-guided lymph node dissection during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2020;155:300–11.CrossRef Chen QY, Xie JW, Zhong Q, Wang JB, Lin JX, Lu L, et al. Safety and efficacy of indocyanine green tracer-guided lymph node dissection during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2020;155:300–11.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Liu H, Kinoshita T, Tonouchi A, Kaito A, Tokunaga M. What are the reasons for a longer operation time in robotic gastrectomy than in laparoscopic gastrectomy for stomach cancer? Surg Endosc. 2019;33:192–8.CrossRef Liu H, Kinoshita T, Tonouchi A, Kaito A, Tokunaga M. What are the reasons for a longer operation time in robotic gastrectomy than in laparoscopic gastrectomy for stomach cancer? Surg Endosc. 2019;33:192–8.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Shibasaki S, Suda K, Obama K, Yoshida M, Uyama I. Should robotic gastrectomy become a standard surgical treatment option for gastric cancer? Surg Today. 2020;50:955–65.CrossRef Shibasaki S, Suda K, Obama K, Yoshida M, Uyama I. Should robotic gastrectomy become a standard surgical treatment option for gastric cancer? Surg Today. 2020;50:955–65.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Li Z, Li J, Li B, Bai B, Liu Y, Lian B, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:705–14.CrossRef Li Z, Li J, Li B, Bai B, Liu Y, Lian B, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:705–14.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rudloff U. Gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach: diagnosis and clinical perspectives. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2018;11:447–59.CrossRef Rudloff U. Gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach: diagnosis and clinical perspectives. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2018;11:447–59.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mala T, Førland DT, Vetti HH, Skagemo UC, Johannessen HO, Johnson E. Gastrisk adenokarsinom og proksimal ventrikkelpolypose—en sjelden form for arvelig magesekkreft. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2020;140(7):676–79. Mala T, Førland DT, Vetti HH, Skagemo UC, Johannessen HO, Johnson E. Gastrisk adenokarsinom og proksimal ventrikkelpolypose—en sjelden form for arvelig magesekkreft. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2020;140(7):676–79.
Metadata
Title
Early experience with total robotic D2 gastrectomy in a low incidence region: surgical perspectives
Authors
Tom Mala
Dag Førland
Caroline Skagemo
Tom Glomsaker
Hans Olaf Johannessen
Egil Johnson
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01576-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue