Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 10/2014

01-10-2014 | Original Article

Gadobenate-dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for hepatic lesions in children

Authors: Govind B. Chavhan, Erika Mann, Binita M. Kamath, Paul S. Babyn

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 10/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging enhanced by hepatocyte-specific contrast media has been found useful to characterize liver lesions in adults and children.

Objective

To present our experience with gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced MRI for evaluation of focal liver lesions in children.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed gadobenate-dimeglumine-enhanced MR images obtained for evaluation of suspected hepatic lesions in 30 children. Signal characteristics on various sequences including 45- to 60-min hepatobiliary phase images were noted by two radiologists. Chart review identified relevant clinical details including history of cancer treatment, available pathology and stability of lesion size on follow-up imaging.

Results

Of the 30 children who had gadobenate-enhanced MRI, 26 showed focal lesions. Diagnoses in 26 children were focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) in 15, hemangiomas in 3, regenerating nodules in 3, focal fatty infiltration in 2, indeterminate lesions in 3, and one patient each with adenomas, hepatoblastoma and metastasis. Two patients had multiple diagnoses. All FNH lesions (39), all regenerative nodules (19) and an indeterminate lesion were iso- or hyperintense on hepatobiliary-phase images while all other lesions (28) were hypointense to hepatic parenchyma. The average follow-up period was 21.7 months.

Conclusion

Our experience with gadobenate-enhanced MRI indicates potential utility of gadobenate in the evaluation of pediatric hepatic lesions in differentiating FNH and regenerating nodules from other lesions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chung EM, Cube R, Lewis RB et al (2010) From the archives of the AFIP: pediatric liver masses: radiologic–pathologic correlation part 1. Benign tumors. Radiographics 30:801–826PubMedCrossRef Chung EM, Cube R, Lewis RB et al (2010) From the archives of the AFIP: pediatric liver masses: radiologic–pathologic correlation part 1. Benign tumors. Radiographics 30:801–826PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chung EM, Lattin GE Jr, Cube R et al (2011) From the archives of the AFIP: pediatric liver masses: radiologic–pathologic correlation part 2. Malignant tumors. Radiographics 31:483–507PubMedCrossRef Chung EM, Lattin GE Jr, Cube R et al (2011) From the archives of the AFIP: pediatric liver masses: radiologic–pathologic correlation part 2. Malignant tumors. Radiographics 31:483–507PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Do RK, Shaylor SD, Shia J et al (2011) Variable MR imaging appearances of focal nodular hyperplasia in pediatric cancer patients. Pediatr Radiol 41:335–340PubMedCrossRef Do RK, Shaylor SD, Shia J et al (2011) Variable MR imaging appearances of focal nodular hyperplasia in pediatric cancer patients. Pediatr Radiol 41:335–340PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Icher-De Bouyn C, Leciere J, Raimondo G et al (2003) Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia in children previously treated for a solid tumor. Incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Cancer 97:3107–3113CrossRef Icher-De Bouyn C, Leciere J, Raimondo G et al (2003) Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia in children previously treated for a solid tumor. Incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Cancer 97:3107–3113CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Benz-Bohm G, Hero B, Grossmann A et al (2010) Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver in longterm survivors of neuroblastoma: how much diagnostic imaging is necessary? Eur J Radiol 74:e1–e5PubMedCrossRef Benz-Bohm G, Hero B, Grossmann A et al (2010) Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver in longterm survivors of neuroblastoma: how much diagnostic imaging is necessary? Eur J Radiol 74:e1–e5PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Towbin AJ, Luo GG, Yin H et al (2011) Focal nodular hyperplasia in children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatr Radiol 41:341–349PubMedCrossRef Towbin AJ, Luo GG, Yin H et al (2011) Focal nodular hyperplasia in children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatr Radiol 41:341–349PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Anderson L, Gregg D, Margolis D et al (2010) Focal nodular hyperplasia in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant: case series. Bone Marrow Transplant 45:1357–1359PubMedCrossRef Anderson L, Gregg D, Margolis D et al (2010) Focal nodular hyperplasia in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant: case series. Bone Marrow Transplant 45:1357–1359PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Grazioli L, Morana G, Kirchin MA et al (2005) Accurate differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatic adenoma at gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging: prospective study. Radiology 236:166–177PubMedCrossRef Grazioli L, Morana G, Kirchin MA et al (2005) Accurate differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatic adenoma at gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging: prospective study. Radiology 236:166–177PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Meyers AB, Towbin AJ, Serai S et al (2011) Characterization of pediatric liver lesions with gadoxetate disodium. Pediatr Radiol 41:1183–1197PubMedCrossRef Meyers AB, Towbin AJ, Serai S et al (2011) Characterization of pediatric liver lesions with gadoxetate disodium. Pediatr Radiol 41:1183–1197PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tamrazi A, Vasanawala SS (2011) Functional hepatobiliary MR imaging in children. Pediatr Radiol 41:1250–1258PubMedCrossRef Tamrazi A, Vasanawala SS (2011) Functional hepatobiliary MR imaging in children. Pediatr Radiol 41:1250–1258PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Seale MK, Catalano OA, Saini S et al (2009) Hepatobiliary-specific contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree. Radiographics 29:1725–1748PubMedCrossRef Seale MK, Catalano OA, Saini S et al (2009) Hepatobiliary-specific contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree. Radiographics 29:1725–1748PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Anh SS, Kim MJ, Lim JS et al (2010) Added value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MR imaging in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 255:459–466CrossRef Anh SS, Kim MJ, Lim JS et al (2010) Added value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MR imaging in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 255:459–466CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ringe KI, Husarik DB, Sirlin CB et al (2010) Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of liver: part 1, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the noncirrhotic liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:13–28PubMedCrossRef Ringe KI, Husarik DB, Sirlin CB et al (2010) Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of liver: part 1, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the noncirrhotic liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:13–28PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zech CJ, Grazioli L, Breuer J et al (2008) Diagnostic performance and description of morphologic features of focal nodular hyperplasia in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging: results of multicenter trial. Invest Radiol 43:504–511PubMedCrossRef Zech CJ, Grazioli L, Breuer J et al (2008) Diagnostic performance and description of morphologic features of focal nodular hyperplasia in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging: results of multicenter trial. Invest Radiol 43:504–511PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fu GL, Du Y, Zee CS et al (2012) Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging: value of hepatobiliary phase for the detection of focal liver lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 36:14–19PubMedCrossRef Fu GL, Du Y, Zee CS et al (2012) Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging: value of hepatobiliary phase for the detection of focal liver lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 36:14–19PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Watanabe H et al (2010) Hepatic hemangioma and metastasis: differentiation with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced 3-T MRI. Am J Roentgenol 195:941–946CrossRef Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Watanabe H et al (2010) Hepatic hemangioma and metastasis: differentiation with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced 3-T MRI. Am J Roentgenol 195:941–946CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Shellock FG, Parker JR, Pirovano G et al (2006) Safety characteristics of gadobenate dimeglumine: clinical experience from intra- and interindividual comparison studies with gadopentetate dimeglumine. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:1378–1385PubMedCrossRef Shellock FG, Parker JR, Pirovano G et al (2006) Safety characteristics of gadobenate dimeglumine: clinical experience from intra- and interindividual comparison studies with gadopentetate dimeglumine. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:1378–1385PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Semelka RC, Hernandes Mde A, Stallings CG et al (2013) Objective evaluation of acute adverse events and image quality of gadolinium-based contrast agents (gadobutrol and gadobenate dimeglumine) by blinded evaluation. Pilot study. Magn Reson Imaging 31:96–101PubMedCrossRef Semelka RC, Hernandes Mde A, Stallings CG et al (2013) Objective evaluation of acute adverse events and image quality of gadolinium-based contrast agents (gadobutrol and gadobenate dimeglumine) by blinded evaluation. Pilot study. Magn Reson Imaging 31:96–101PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schneider G, Schurholz H, Kirchin MA et al (2013) Safety and adverse effects during 24 hours after contrast-enhanced MRI with gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) in children. Pediatr Radiol 43:202–211PubMedCrossRef Schneider G, Schurholz H, Kirchin MA et al (2013) Safety and adverse effects during 24 hours after contrast-enhanced MRI with gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) in children. Pediatr Radiol 43:202–211PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Schneider G, Maas R, Schultze Kool L et al (2003) Low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine versus standard dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: an intra-individual crossover comparison. Invest Radiol 38:85–94PubMedCrossRef Schneider G, Maas R, Schultze Kool L et al (2003) Low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine versus standard dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: an intra-individual crossover comparison. Invest Radiol 38:85–94PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Valentino PL, Ling SC, Ng VL et al (2014) The role of diagnostic imaging and liver biopsy in the diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia in children. Liver Int 34:227–234PubMedCrossRef Valentino PL, Ling SC, Ng VL et al (2014) The role of diagnostic imaging and liver biopsy in the diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia in children. Liver Int 34:227–234PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hanna RF, Aguirre DA, Kased N et al (2008) Cirrhosis-associated hepatocellular nodules: correlation of histopathologic and MR imaging features. Radiographics 28:747–769PubMedCrossRef Hanna RF, Aguirre DA, Kased N et al (2008) Cirrhosis-associated hepatocellular nodules: correlation of histopathologic and MR imaging features. Radiographics 28:747–769PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ferlicot S, Kobeiter H, Nhieu JTV et al (2004) MRI of atypical focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: radiology–pathology correlation. Am J Roentgenol 182:1227–1231CrossRef Ferlicot S, Kobeiter H, Nhieu JTV et al (2004) MRI of atypical focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: radiology–pathology correlation. Am J Roentgenol 182:1227–1231CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Gadobenate-dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for hepatic lesions in children
Authors
Govind B. Chavhan
Erika Mann
Binita M. Kamath
Paul S. Babyn
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 10/2014
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2975-3

Other articles of this Issue 10/2014

Pediatric Radiology 10/2014 Go to the issue