Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Functional, motor, and sensory assessment instruments upon nerve repair in adult hands: systematic review of psychometric properties

Authors: Marisa de Cássia Registro Fonseca, Valéria Meireles Carril Elui, Emily Lalone, Natália Claro da Silva, Rafael Inácio Barbosa, Alexandre Márcio Marcolino, Flávia Pessoni Faleiros Macedo Ricci, Joy C. MacDermid

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Outcome after nerve repair of the hand needs standardized psychometrically robust measures. We aimed to systematically review the psychometric properties of available functional, motor, and sensory assessment instruments after nerve repair.

Methods

This systematic review of health measurement instruments searched databases from 1966 to 2017. Pairs of raters conducted data extraction and quality assessment using a structured tool for clinical measurement studies. Kappa correlation was used to define the agreement prior to consensus for individual items, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess reliability between raters. A narrative synthesis described quality and content of the evidence.

Results

Sixteen studies were included for final critical appraisal scores. Kappa ranged from 0.31 to 0.82 and ICC was 0.81. Motor domain had manual muscle testing with Kappa from 0.72 to 0.93 and a dynamometer ICC reliability between 0.92 and 0.98. Sensory domain had touch threshold Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments (SWM) as the most responsive measure while two-point discrimination (2PD) was the least responsive (effect size 1.2 and 0.1). A stereognosis test, Shape and Texture Identification (STI), had Kappa test-retest reliability of 0.79 and inter-rater reliability of 0.61, with excellent sensibility and specificity. Manual tactile test had moderate to mild correlation with 2PD and SWM. Function domain presented Rosén-Lundborg score with Spearman correlations of 0.83 for total score. Patient-reported outcomes measurements had ICC of 0.85 and internal consistency from 0.88 to 0.96 with Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation with higher score for reliability and Spearman correlation between 0.38 and 0.89 for validity.

Conclusions

Few studies included nerve repair in their sample for the psychometric analysis of outcome measures, so moderate evidence could be confirmed. Manual muscle test and Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer dynamometer had excellent reliability but insufficient data on validity or responsiveness. Touch threshold testing was more responsive than 2PD test. The locognosia test and STI had limited but positive supporting data related to validity. Rosén-Lundborg score had emerging evidence of reliability and validity as a comprehensive outcome following nerve repair. Few questionnaires were considered reliable and valid to assess cold intolerance. There is no patient-reported outcome measurement following nerve repair that provides comprehensive assessment of symptoms and function by patient perspective.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jaquet JB, Luijsterburg AJ, Kalmijn S, Kuypers PD, Hofman A, Hovius SE. Median, ulnar, and combined median-ulnar nerve injuries: functional outcome and return to productivity. J Trauma. 2001;51:687–92.CrossRef Jaquet JB, Luijsterburg AJ, Kalmijn S, Kuypers PD, Hofman A, Hovius SE. Median, ulnar, and combined median-ulnar nerve injuries: functional outcome and return to productivity. J Trauma. 2001;51:687–92.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rosberg HE, Carlsson KS, Dahlin LB. Prospective study of patients with injuries to the hand and forearm: costs, function, and general health. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2005;39:360–9.CrossRef Rosberg HE, Carlsson KS, Dahlin LB. Prospective study of patients with injuries to the hand and forearm: costs, function, and general health. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2005;39:360–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fonseca MCR, Mazzer N, Barbieri CH, Elui VMC. Hand injuries: a retrospective study. Rev Bras Ortop. 2006;41:181–6. Fonseca MCR, Mazzer N, Barbieri CH, Elui VMC. Hand injuries: a retrospective study. Rev Bras Ortop. 2006;41:181–6.
4.
go back to reference Trybus M, Lorkowski J, Brongel L, Hladki W. Causes and consequences of hand injuries. Am J Surg. 2006;192:52–7.CrossRef Trybus M, Lorkowski J, Brongel L, Hladki W. Causes and consequences of hand injuries. Am J Surg. 2006;192:52–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Saadat S, Eslami V, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Tehran, Iran. The incidence of peripheral nerve injury in trauma patients in Iran. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2011; 17:539–544.CrossRef Saadat S, Eslami V, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Tehran, Iran. The incidence of peripheral nerve injury in trauma patients in Iran. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2011; 17:539–544.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gupta A, Gupta AK, Uppal SK, Mittal RK, Garg R, Aggarwal N. Demographic profile of hand injuries in an industrial town of North India: a review of 436 patients. Indian J Surg. 2013;75:454-61.CrossRef Gupta A, Gupta AK, Uppal SK, Mittal RK, Garg R, Aggarwal N. Demographic profile of hand injuries in an industrial town of North India: a review of 436 patients. Indian J Surg. 2013;75:454-61.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dias JJ. Where does surgery for the injured hand figure in the health providers view: an international perspective. Int J Care Injured. 2006;37:1061–5.CrossRef Dias JJ. Where does surgery for the injured hand figure in the health providers view: an international perspective. Int J Care Injured. 2006;37:1061–5.CrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Devadoss A, Devadoss S. Hand injuries-still poorly managed. J Hand Microsurg. 2010;2:45–6.CrossRef Devadoss A, Devadoss S. Hand injuries-still poorly managed. J Hand Microsurg. 2010;2:45–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cederlund RI, Ramel E, Rosberg HE, Dahlin LB. Outcome and clinical changes in patients 3, 6, 12 months after a severe or major hand injury - can sense of coherence be an indicator for rehabilitation focus? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:286.CrossRef Cederlund RI, Ramel E, Rosberg HE, Dahlin LB. Outcome and clinical changes in patients 3, 6, 12 months after a severe or major hand injury - can sense of coherence be an indicator for rehabilitation focus? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:286.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference MacDermid JC. Measurement of health outcomes following tendon and nerve repair. J Hand Ther. 2005;18:297–312.CrossRef MacDermid JC. Measurement of health outcomes following tendon and nerve repair. J Hand Ther. 2005;18:297–312.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mafi P, Hindocha S, Dhital M, Saleh M. Advances of peripheral nerve repair techniques to improve hand function: a systematic review of literature. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:60–8.CrossRef Mafi P, Hindocha S, Dhital M, Saleh M. Advances of peripheral nerve repair techniques to improve hand function: a systematic review of literature. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:60–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gurbuz H, Aktas S, Calpur OU. Clinical evaluation of ulnar nerve repair at wrist level. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124:49–51.CrossRef Gurbuz H, Aktas S, Calpur OU. Clinical evaluation of ulnar nerve repair at wrist level. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124:49–51.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Novak CB, Mackinnon SE. Evaluation of nerve injury and nerve compression in the upper quadrant. J Hand Ther. 2005;18:230–40.CrossRef Novak CB, Mackinnon SE. Evaluation of nerve injury and nerve compression in the upper quadrant. J Hand Ther. 2005;18:230–40.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Novak CB, Anastakis DJ, Beaton DE, Katz J. Patient-reported outcome after peripheral nerve injury. J Hand Surg. 2009;34A:281–7.CrossRef Novak CB, Anastakis DJ, Beaton DE, Katz J. Patient-reported outcome after peripheral nerve injury. J Hand Surg. 2009;34A:281–7.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bell-Krotoski J. Sensibility testing: history, instrumentation and clinical procedures. In: Skirven TM, Lee Osterman A, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, editors. Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2011. Chap. 11. Bell-Krotoski J. Sensibility testing: history, instrumentation and clinical procedures. In: Skirven TM, Lee Osterman A, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, editors. Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2011. Chap. 11.
17.
go back to reference Henderson WR, Edin MB. Clinical assessment of peripheral nerve injuries. Lancet. 1948;20:801.CrossRef Henderson WR, Edin MB. Clinical assessment of peripheral nerve injuries. Lancet. 1948;20:801.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Moberg, E. The unsolved problem: How to test the functional value of hand sensibility. J Hand Ther. 1991;4:105–10.CrossRef Moberg, E. The unsolved problem: How to test the functional value of hand sensibility. J Hand Ther. 1991;4:105–10.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Moberg E. Objective methods for determining the functional value of sensibility in the hand. J Bone Joint Surg. 1958;40B:454–76.CrossRef Moberg E. Objective methods for determining the functional value of sensibility in the hand. J Bone Joint Surg. 1958;40B:454–76.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Dellon AL. A numerical grading scale for peripheral nerve function. J Hand Ther. 1993;6:152–60. Dellon AL. A numerical grading scale for peripheral nerve function. J Hand Ther. 1993;6:152–60.
21.
go back to reference Spicher C, Kohut MJ. At which stage of sensory recovery can a tingling sign be expected? A review and proposal for standardization and grading. J Hand Ther. 1999;12:298–308.CrossRef Spicher C, Kohut MJ. At which stage of sensory recovery can a tingling sign be expected? A review and proposal for standardization and grading. J Hand Ther. 1999;12:298–308.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Novak CB. Evaluation of hand sensibility: a review. J Hand Ther. 2001;14:266–72.CrossRef Novak CB. Evaluation of hand sensibility: a review. J Hand Ther. 2001;14:266–72.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Seftchick JL, DeTullio LM, Fedorczyk JM, Aulicino PL. Clinical examination of the hand. In: Skirven TM, Lee Osterman A, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, editors. Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2011. Chap. 6. Seftchick JL, DeTullio LM, Fedorczyk JM, Aulicino PL. Clinical examination of the hand. In: Skirven TM, Lee Osterman A, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, editors. Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2011. Chap. 6.
24.
go back to reference Rosén B, Lundborg G. A model instrument for the documentation of outcome after nerve repair. J Hand Surg. 2000;25A:535–43.CrossRef Rosén B, Lundborg G. A model instrument for the documentation of outcome after nerve repair. J Hand Surg. 2000;25A:535–43.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lundborg G. Assessment of outcome after nerve repair. Nerve injury and repair. Regeneration, reconstruction and cortical remodeling. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2004. p. 248. Lundborg G. Assessment of outcome after nerve repair. Nerve injury and repair. Regeneration, reconstruction and cortical remodeling. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2004. p. 248.
26.
go back to reference Fess EE. Guidelines for evaluation assessment instruments. J Hand Ther. 1995;8:144–48. Fess EE. Guidelines for evaluation assessment instruments. J Hand Ther. 1995;8:144–48.
27.
go back to reference Bucher C, Hume KI. Assessment following hand trauma: a review of some commonly employed methods. Brit J Hand Ther. 2002;7:79–84.CrossRef Bucher C, Hume KI. Assessment following hand trauma: a review of some commonly employed methods. Brit J Hand Ther. 2002;7:79–84.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Vordemvenne T, Langer M, Ochman S, Raschke M, Schult M. Long-term results after primary microsurgical repair of ulnar and median nerve injuries. A comparison of common score systems. Clin Neurol and Neurosurg. 2007;109:263–71.CrossRef Vordemvenne T, Langer M, Ochman S, Raschke M, Schult M. Long-term results after primary microsurgical repair of ulnar and median nerve injuries. A comparison of common score systems. Clin Neurol and Neurosurg. 2007;109:263–71.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lundborg G, Rosén B. Hand function after nerve repair. Acta Physiol. 2007;189:207–17.CrossRef Lundborg G, Rosén B. Hand function after nerve repair. Acta Physiol. 2007;189:207–17.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference MacDermid JC. Outcomes measurement in upper extremity practice. In: Skirven TM, Lee Osterman A, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, editors. Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2011. Chap. 16. MacDermid JC. Outcomes measurement in upper extremity practice. In: Skirven TM, Lee Osterman A, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, editors. Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2011. Chap. 16.
31.
go back to reference Badalamente M, Coffelt L, Elfar J, et al. Measurement scales in clinical research of the upper extremity, part 2: outcome measures in studies of the hand/wrist and shoulder/elbow. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:407–12.CrossRef Badalamente M, Coffelt L, Elfar J, et al. Measurement scales in clinical research of the upper extremity, part 2: outcome measures in studies of the hand/wrist and shoulder/elbow. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:407–12.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Badalamente M, Coffelt L, Elfar J, et al. Measurement scales in clinical research of the upper extremity, part 1: general principles, measures of general health, pain, and patient satisfaction. J Hand Surg. 2013;38:401–6.CrossRef Badalamente M, Coffelt L, Elfar J, et al. Measurement scales in clinical research of the upper extremity, part 1: general principles, measures of general health, pain, and patient satisfaction. J Hand Surg. 2013;38:401–6.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference MacDermid JC, Stratford P. Applying evidence on outcome measures to hand therapy practice. J Hand Ther. 2004;17:165–73.CrossRef MacDermid JC, Stratford P. Applying evidence on outcome measures to hand therapy practice. J Hand Ther. 2004;17:165–73.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Law M, MacDermid JC. Evidence-based rehabilitation. 2nd ed; 2008. Law M, MacDermid JC. Evidence-based rehabilitation. 2nd ed; 2008.
35.
go back to reference MacDermid JC. An introduction to evidence-based practice for hand therapists. J Hand Ther. 2004;17:105–17.CrossRef MacDermid JC. An introduction to evidence-based practice for hand therapists. J Hand Ther. 2004;17:105–17.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference MacDermid JC, Grewal R, Macintyre NJ. Using an evidence-based approach to measure outcomes in clinical practice. Hand Clin. 2009;25:97–111.CrossRef MacDermid JC, Grewal R, Macintyre NJ. Using an evidence-based approach to measure outcomes in clinical practice. Hand Clin. 2009;25:97–111.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference De Vet HCW, Aberg M, Ljungberg C, Edin E, Jenmalm P, Millqvist H, Nordh E, Wiberg M. Considerations in evaluating new treatment alternatives following peripheral nerve injuries: a prospective clinical study of methods used to investigate sensory, motor and functional recovery. J Plast Reconst Aest Surg. 2007;60:103–13.CrossRef De Vet HCW, Aberg M, Ljungberg C, Edin E, Jenmalm P, Millqvist H, Nordh E, Wiberg M. Considerations in evaluating new treatment alternatives following peripheral nerve injuries: a prospective clinical study of methods used to investigate sensory, motor and functional recovery. J Plast Reconst Aest Surg. 2007;60:103–13.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Aberg M, Ljungberg C, Edin E, Jenmalm P, Millqvist H, Nordh E, Wiberg M. Considerations in evaluating new treatment alternatives following peripheral nerve injuries: a prospective clinical study of methods used to investigate sensory, motor and functional recovery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60:103–13.CrossRef Aberg M, Ljungberg C, Edin E, Jenmalm P, Millqvist H, Nordh E, Wiberg M. Considerations in evaluating new treatment alternatives following peripheral nerve injuries: a prospective clinical study of methods used to investigate sensory, motor and functional recovery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60:103–13.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Scholz T, Krichevsky A, Sumarto A, Jaffurs D, Wirth GA, Paydar K, Evans GR. Peripheral nerve injuries: an international survey of current treatments and future perspectives. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2009;25:339–44.CrossRef Scholz T, Krichevsky A, Sumarto A, Jaffurs D, Wirth GA, Paydar K, Evans GR. Peripheral nerve injuries: an international survey of current treatments and future perspectives. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2009;25:339–44.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Bear-Lehman J, Colon Abreu B. Evaluating the hand: issues in reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 1989;69:33–41.CrossRef Bear-Lehman J, Colon Abreu B. Evaluating the hand: issues in reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 1989;69:33–41.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Kroll W. Reliability theory and research decision in selection of a criterion score. Res Q. 1967;38:412–9.PubMed Kroll W. Reliability theory and research decision in selection of a criterion score. Res Q. 1967;38:412–9.PubMed
42.
go back to reference De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine. A practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. Chap. 7CrossRef De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine. A practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. Chap. 7CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Dowrick SA, Gabbe BJ, Williamson OD, Cameron PA. Outcome instruments for the assessment of the upper extremity following trauma: a review. Injury, Int J Care Injured 2005; 36:468–476.CrossRef Dowrick SA, Gabbe BJ, Williamson OD, Cameron PA. Outcome instruments for the assessment of the upper extremity following trauma: a review. Injury, Int J Care Injured 2005; 36:468–476.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Jerosch-Herold C. Assessment of sensibility after nerve injury and repair: a systematic review of evidence for validity, reliability and responsiveness. J Hand Surg. 2005;30B:252–64.CrossRef Jerosch-Herold C. Assessment of sensibility after nerve injury and repair: a systematic review of evidence for validity, reliability and responsiveness. J Hand Surg. 2005;30B:252–64.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Jerosch-Herold C. An evidence-based approach to choosing outcome measures: a checklist for the critical appraisal of validity, reliability and responsiveness studies. Brit J Occup Ther. 2005;68:8.CrossRef Jerosch-Herold C. An evidence-based approach to choosing outcome measures: a checklist for the critical appraisal of validity, reliability and responsiveness studies. Brit J Occup Ther. 2005;68:8.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference MacDermid JC. Quality appraisal for clinical measurement research reports evaluation form and Intepretation guidelines. In: Evidence-based rehabilitation. Philadelphia: Slack Publishing; 2013. p. 387–8. MacDermid JC. Quality appraisal for clinical measurement research reports evaluation form and Intepretation guidelines. In: Evidence-based rehabilitation. Philadelphia: Slack Publishing; 2013. p. 387–8.
47.
go back to reference Jerosch-Herold C. Measuring outcome in median nerve injuries. J Hand Surg. 1993;18:624–8.CrossRef Jerosch-Herold C. Measuring outcome in median nerve injuries. J Hand Surg. 1993;18:624–8.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Schreuders TAR, Roebroeck ME, Jaquet JB, Hovius SER, Stam HJ. Measuring the strength of the intrinsic muscles of the hand in patients with ulnar and median nerve injuries: reliability of the Rotterdam intrinsic hand myometer. J Hand Surg. 2004;29:318–24.CrossRef Schreuders TAR, Roebroeck ME, Jaquet JB, Hovius SER, Stam HJ. Measuring the strength of the intrinsic muscles of the hand in patients with ulnar and median nerve injuries: reliability of the Rotterdam intrinsic hand myometer. J Hand Surg. 2004;29:318–24.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Carlsson I, Cederlund R, Hoglund P, Lundborg G, Rosen B. Hand injuries and cold sensitivity: reliability and validity of cold sensitivity questionnaires. Dis & Rehab. 2008;30:1920–8.CrossRef Carlsson I, Cederlund R, Hoglund P, Lundborg G, Rosen B. Hand injuries and cold sensitivity: reliability and validity of cold sensitivity questionnaires. Dis & Rehab. 2008;30:1920–8.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Dias JJ, Rajan RA, Thompson JR. Which questionnaire is best? The reliability, validity and ease of use of the patient evaluation measure, the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand and the Michigan hand outcome measure. J Hand Surg. 2008;33:9–17.CrossRef Dias JJ, Rajan RA, Thompson JR. Which questionnaire is best? The reliability, validity and ease of use of the patient evaluation measure, the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand and the Michigan hand outcome measure. J Hand Surg. 2008;33:9–17.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Chen H, Ji X, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Tang P. Validation of the simplified Chinese (mainland) version of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH-CHNPLAGH). J Orthop Surg and Research. 2015;10:1–6.CrossRef Chen H, Ji X, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Tang P. Validation of the simplified Chinese (mainland) version of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH-CHNPLAGH). J Orthop Surg and Research. 2015;10:1–6.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Naidu SH, Panchik D, Chinchilli VM. Development and validation of the hand assessment tool. J Hand Ther. 2009;22:250–7.CrossRef Naidu SH, Panchik D, Chinchilli VM. Development and validation of the hand assessment tool. J Hand Ther. 2009;22:250–7.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Packham T, MacDermid JC. Measurement properties of the patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation: Rasch analysis of responses from a traumatic hand injury population. J Hand Ther. 2013;26:216–24.CrossRef Packham T, MacDermid JC. Measurement properties of the patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation: Rasch analysis of responses from a traumatic hand injury population. J Hand Ther. 2013;26:216–24.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Jerosch-Herold C, Rosén B, Shepstone L. The reliability and validity of the locognosia test after injuries to peripheral nerves in the hand. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88:1048–52.CrossRef Jerosch-Herold C, Rosén B, Shepstone L. The reliability and validity of the locognosia test after injuries to peripheral nerves in the hand. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88:1048–52.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Rosén B, Lundborg G. A new tactile gnosis instrument in sensibility testing. J Hand Ther. 1998;11:251–7.CrossRef Rosén B, Lundborg G. A new tactile gnosis instrument in sensibility testing. J Hand Ther. 1998;11:251–7.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Rosén B. Inter-tester reliability of a tactile gnosis test: the STI-test™. Brit J Hand Ther. 2003;8:98–101.CrossRef Rosén B. Inter-tester reliability of a tactile gnosis test: the STI-test™. Brit J Hand Ther. 2003;8:98–101.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Jerosch-Herold C. A study of the relative responsiveness of five sensibility tests for assessment of recovery after median nerve injury and repair. J Hand Surg. 2003;28:255–60.CrossRef Jerosch-Herold C. A study of the relative responsiveness of five sensibility tests for assessment of recovery after median nerve injury and repair. J Hand Surg. 2003;28:255–60.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Hsu H-H, Kuo L-C, Kuan T-S, Yan H-C, Su F-C, Chiu H-Y, Shieh S-J. Determining the functional sensibility of the hand in patients with peripheral nerve repair: feasibility of using a novel manual tactile test for monitoring the progression of nerve regeneration. J Hand Ther. 2017;30:65–73.CrossRef Hsu H-H, Kuo L-C, Kuan T-S, Yan H-C, Su F-C, Chiu H-Y, Shieh S-J. Determining the functional sensibility of the hand in patients with peripheral nerve repair: feasibility of using a novel manual tactile test for monitoring the progression of nerve regeneration. J Hand Ther. 2017;30:65–73.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Rosén B, Jerosch-Herold C. Comparing the responsiveness over time of two tactile gnosis tests: two-point discrimination and the STI-test. Brit J Hand Ther. 2000;5:114–9.CrossRef Rosén B, Jerosch-Herold C. Comparing the responsiveness over time of two tactile gnosis tests: two-point discrimination and the STI-test. Brit J Hand Ther. 2000;5:114–9.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Brandsma JW, Schreuders TAR, Birke JA, Piefer A, Oostendorp R. Manual muscle strength testing: intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities for the intrinsic muscles of the hand. J Hand Ther. 1995;8:185–90.CrossRef Brandsma JW, Schreuders TAR, Birke JA, Piefer A, Oostendorp R. Manual muscle strength testing: intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities for the intrinsic muscles of the hand. J Hand Ther. 1995;8:185–90.CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Rosén B. Recovery of sensory and motor function after nerve repair. A rationale for evaluation. J Hand Ther. 1996;9:315–27.CrossRef Rosén B. Recovery of sensory and motor function after nerve repair. A rationale for evaluation. J Hand Ther. 1996;9:315–27.CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Watts AMI, Greenstock M, Cole RP. Outcome following the rehabilitation of hand trauma patients. The importance of subjective functional assessment. J Hand Surg. 1998;23B:485–9.CrossRef Watts AMI, Greenstock M, Cole RP. Outcome following the rehabilitation of hand trauma patients. The importance of subjective functional assessment. J Hand Surg. 1998;23B:485–9.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Lundborg G, Rosèn B. The two-point discrimination test-time for a re-appraisal? J Hand Surg. 2004;29B:418–22.CrossRef Lundborg G, Rosèn B. The two-point discrimination test-time for a re-appraisal? J Hand Surg. 2004;29B:418–22.CrossRef
64.
go back to reference Meek MF, Coert JH. Recovery of two-point discrimination function after digital nerve repair in the hand using resorbable FDA- and CE – approved nerve conduits. J Plast Reconst Surg. 2013;66:1307–15.CrossRef Meek MF, Coert JH. Recovery of two-point discrimination function after digital nerve repair in the hand using resorbable FDA- and CE – approved nerve conduits. J Plast Reconst Surg. 2013;66:1307–15.CrossRef
65.
go back to reference Bell-Krotoski J, Weinstein S, Weinstein C. Testing sensibility, including Touch - Pressure, Two-point Discrimination, Point Localization, and vibration. J Hand Ther. 1993;6:114–123.CrossRef Bell-Krotoski J, Weinstein S, Weinstein C. Testing sensibility, including Touch - Pressure, Two-point Discrimination, Point Localization, and vibration. J Hand Ther. 1993;6:114–123.CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Sahin F, Atalay NS, Akkaya N, Ercidogan O, Basakci B, Kuran B. The correlation of neurophysiological findings with clinical and functional status in patients following traumatic nerve injury. J Hand Surg. 2014;39B:199–206.CrossRef Sahin F, Atalay NS, Akkaya N, Ercidogan O, Basakci B, Kuran B. The correlation of neurophysiological findings with clinical and functional status in patients following traumatic nerve injury. J Hand Surg. 2014;39B:199–206.CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Paula MH, Barbosa RI, Marcolino AM, Elui VMC, Rosén B, Fonseca MCR. Early sensory re-education of the hand after peripheral nerve repair based on mirror therapy: a randomized controlled Trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20:58–65.CrossRef Paula MH, Barbosa RI, Marcolino AM, Elui VMC, Rosén B, Fonseca MCR. Early sensory re-education of the hand after peripheral nerve repair based on mirror therapy: a randomized controlled Trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20:58–65.CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Bathen M, Gupta R. Basic science of peripheral nerve injury and repair. In: Skirven TM, Lee Osterman A, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, editors. Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2011. Chap. 42. Bathen M, Gupta R. Basic science of peripheral nerve injury and repair. In: Skirven TM, Lee Osterman A, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, editors. Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2011. Chap. 42.
69.
go back to reference Callahan AD. Sensibility assessment for nerve lesions in continuity and nerve lacerations. In: Skirven TM, Lee Osterman A, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, editors. Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2011. Chap. 14. Callahan AD. Sensibility assessment for nerve lesions in continuity and nerve lacerations. In: Skirven TM, Lee Osterman A, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, editors. Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2011. Chap. 14.
70.
go back to reference Brandsma JW, Schreuders TA. Sensible manual muscle strength testing to evaluate and monitor strength of the intrinsic muscles of the hand: a commentary. J Hand Ther. 2001;14:273–8.CrossRef Brandsma JW, Schreuders TA. Sensible manual muscle strength testing to evaluate and monitor strength of the intrinsic muscles of the hand: a commentary. J Hand Ther. 2001;14:273–8.CrossRef
71.
go back to reference Xu S, Morse AM, Lacy B, Baggett LS, Gogola GR. Peg restrained intrinsic muscle evaluator (PRIME): development, reliability, and normative values of a device to quantify intrinsic hand muscle strength in children. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36:894–903.CrossRef Xu S, Morse AM, Lacy B, Baggett LS, Gogola GR. Peg restrained intrinsic muscle evaluator (PRIME): development, reliability, and normative values of a device to quantify intrinsic hand muscle strength in children. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36:894–903.CrossRef
72.
go back to reference Jacquemin GL, Burns SP, Little JW. Measuring hand intrinsic muscle strength: normal values and interrater reliability. J Spinal Cord Med. 2004;27:460–7.CrossRef Jacquemin GL, Burns SP, Little JW. Measuring hand intrinsic muscle strength: normal values and interrater reliability. J Spinal Cord Med. 2004;27:460–7.CrossRef
73.
go back to reference Bohannon RW, Andrews AW. Interrater reliability of hand-held dynamometry. Phys Ther. 1987;67:931–3.CrossRef Bohannon RW, Andrews AW. Interrater reliability of hand-held dynamometry. Phys Ther. 1987;67:931–3.CrossRef
74.
go back to reference Shieh SJ, Hsu HY, Kuo LC, Su FC, Chiu HY. Correlation of digital sensibility and precision of pinch force modulation in patients with nerve repair. J Orthop Res. 2011;29:1210–5.CrossRef Shieh SJ, Hsu HY, Kuo LC, Su FC, Chiu HY. Correlation of digital sensibility and precision of pinch force modulation in patients with nerve repair. J Orthop Res. 2011;29:1210–5.CrossRef
75.
go back to reference Van de Ven-Stevens LA, Munneke M, Terwee CB, Spauwen PH, van der Linde H. Clinimetric properties of instruments to assess activities in patients with hand injury: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Reha- bil. 2009;90:151–69.CrossRef Van de Ven-Stevens LA, Munneke M, Terwee CB, Spauwen PH, van der Linde H. Clinimetric properties of instruments to assess activities in patients with hand injury: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Reha- bil. 2009;90:151–69.CrossRef
76.
go back to reference Galanakos SP, Zoubos AB, Johnson EO, Kanellopoulos AD, Soucacos PN. Outcome models in peripheral nerve repair: time for a reappraisal or for a novel? Microsurgery. 2012;32:326–33.CrossRef Galanakos SP, Zoubos AB, Johnson EO, Kanellopoulos AD, Soucacos PN. Outcome models in peripheral nerve repair: time for a reappraisal or for a novel? Microsurgery. 2012;32:326–33.CrossRef
77.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB. The COnsensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20:105–13.CrossRef Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB. The COnsensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20:105–13.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Functional, motor, and sensory assessment instruments upon nerve repair in adult hands: systematic review of psychometric properties
Authors
Marisa de Cássia Registro Fonseca
Valéria Meireles Carril Elui
Emily Lalone
Natália Claro da Silva
Rafael Inácio Barbosa
Alexandre Márcio Marcolino
Flávia Pessoni Faleiros Macedo Ricci
Joy C. MacDermid
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0836-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Systematic Reviews 1/2018 Go to the issue