Top

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

Published in:

01-12-2012 | Original Article

Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after normal baseline colonoscopy in asymptomatic Chinese Mongolian over 50 years of age

Authors: Yinglong Huang, Xiaohua Li, Zhaoyang Wang, Bingzhong Su

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 12/2012

Abstract

Background

After normal colonoscopy, the 5-year risk of colorectal neoplasia is sufficiently low for asymptomatic people over 50 years of age. In China, the incidence of colorectal carcinoma of Mongolian people is higher than that of Han people. The aim of this study was to assess the 5-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after normal colonoscopy in asymptomatic Chinese Mongolian population.

Patients and methods

A cohort of asymptomatic Chinese Mongolian people (≥50 years old) were recruited and followed up with colonoscopy 5 years after colonoscopy. Baseline colonoscopy and follow-up colonoscopy findings were categorized based on the most advanced lesions: no adenoma, nonadvanced adenoma, and advanced adenoma. Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia in these people was assessed according to the rates of no baseline adenoma and advanced adenoma at the end of 5 years.

Results

A total of 480 of the 538 recruited people underwent follow-up colonoscopy at the end of 5 years. In people with no baseline adenoma, 27.3 % (82/301) was found to have any adenoma, and 1.7 % had advanced adenoma at follow-up colonoscopy. The risk of an advanced adenoma did not differ significantly between people with no adenoma at baseline and those with nonadvanced adenoma (relative risk (RR), 1.06; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.19–6.07). Advanced adenoma at baseline colonoscopy was the independent risk factor for advanced adenoma recurrence, compared with no adenoma at baseline (RR, 8.25; 95 % CI, 1.90–35.77).

Conclusion

The risk of advanced adenoma is low 5 years after the normal baseline colonoscopy, even in asymptomatic Chinese Mongolian population over 50 years of age.

Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329:1977–1981PubMedCrossRef

Newcomb PA, Storer BE, Morimoto LM et al (2003) Long-term efficacy of sigmoidoscopy in the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:622–625PubMedCrossRef

Muller AD, Sonnenberg A (1995) Prevention of colorectal cancer by flexible endoscopy and polypectomy. A case–control study of 32,702 veterans. Ann Intern Med 123:904–910PubMed

Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB et al (2006) Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:1259–1264PubMedCrossRef

Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV et al (2007) Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 133:1077–1085PubMedCrossRef

Moss SM, Hardcastle JD, Coleman DA et al (1999) Interval cancers in a randomized controlled trial of screening for colorectal cancer using a faecal occult blood test. Int J Epidemiol 28:386–390PubMedCrossRef

Pabby A, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL et al (2005) Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc 61:385–391PubMedCrossRef

Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M et al (2005) Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 129:34–41PubMedCrossRef

Leung K, Pinsky P, Laiyemo AO et al (2009) Ongoing colorectal cancer risk despite surveillance colonoscopy: the Polyp Prevention Trial Continued Follow-up Study. Gastrointest Endosc 71:111–117PubMedCrossRef

10.

Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH et al (2006) Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 56:143–159, quiz 184-145PubMedCrossRef

11.

Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM et al (2007) Case-control study supports extension of surveillance interval after colonoscopic polypectomy to at least 5 yr. Am J Gastroenterol 102:1739–1744PubMedCrossRef

12.

Laiyemo AO, Murphy G, Albert PS et al (2008) Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: predictive accuracy for advanced adenoma at 4 years. Ann Intern Med 148:419–426PubMed

13.

Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J (1992) Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 326:658–662PubMedCrossRef

14.

van Stolk RU, Beck GJ, Baron JA et al (1998) Adenoma characteristics at first colonoscopy as predictors of adenoma recurrence and characteristics at follow-up. The Polyp Prevention Study Group. Gastroenterology 115:13–18PubMedCrossRef

15.

Noshirwani KC, van Stolk RU, Rybicki LA et al (2000) Adenoma size and number are predictive of adenoma recurrence: implications for surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 51:433–437PubMedCrossRef

16.

Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Lin-Cooper C et al (2008) Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after negative screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 359:1218–1224PubMedCrossRef

17.

Leung WK, Lau JY, Suen BY et al (2009) Repeat-screening colonoscopy 5 years after normal baseline-screening colonoscopy in average-risk Chinese: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 104:2028–2034PubMedCrossRef

18.

Winawer SJ, Zauber AG (2001) Colonoscopic polypectomy and the incidence of colorectal cancer. Gut 48:753–754PubMedCrossRef

19.

Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM et al (2006) Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated? Gut 55:1145–1150PubMedCrossRef

20.

Singh H, Turner D, Xue L et al (2006) Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies. JAMA 295:2366–2373PubMedCrossRef

21.

Schatzkin A, Lanza E, Corle D et al (2000) Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Polyp Prevention Trial Study Group. N Engl J Med 342:1149–1155PubMedCrossRef

22.

Sansbury LB, Wanke K, Albert PS et al (2009) The effect of strict adherence to a high-fiber, high-fruit-and-vegetable, and low-fat eating pattern on adenoma recurrence. Am J Epidemiol 170:576–584PubMedCrossRef

23.

Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E et al (2006) Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 355:1863–1872PubMedCrossRef

24.

Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA et al (2009) A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 136:832–841PubMedCrossRef

25.

Pinsky PF, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL et al (2009) The yield of surveillance colonoscopy by adenoma history and time to examination. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:86–92PubMedCrossRef

26.

Fossi S, Bazzoli F, Ricciardiello L et al (2001) Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas in first-degree asymptomatic relatives of patients with colon cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 96:1601–1604PubMedCrossRef

27.

Reid ME, Marshall JR, Roe D et al (2003) Smoking exposure as a risk factor for prevalent and recurrent colorectal adenomas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:1006–1011PubMed

28.

Wallace K, Baron JA, Karagas MR et al (2005) The association of physical activity and body mass index with the risk of large bowel polyps. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:2082–2086PubMedCrossRef

Title: Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after normal baseline colonoscopy in asymptomatic Chinese Mongolian over 50 years of age
Authors: Yinglong Huang
Xiaohua Li
Zhaoyang Wang
Bingzhong Su
Publication date: 01-12-2012
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 12/2012
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1516-5

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after normal baseline colonoscopy in asymptomatic Chinese Mongolian over 50 years of age

Abstract

Background

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 12/2012

Letter to the editor: a meta-analysis of MMP-2 expression on the survival of patients with colorectal cancer

Influence of size and complexity of the hospitals in an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection

Mortality of colorectal cancer in Taiwan, 1971–2010: temporal changes and age–period–cohort analysis

Does body mass index impact the number of LNs harvested and influence long-term survival rate in patients with stage III colon cancer?

Genetic variation in insulin pathway genes and distal colorectal adenoma risk

Association between increased tumor necrosis factor alpha levels and acquired activated protein C resistance in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer