Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 1/2022

Open Access 01-03-2022

First Contact Practitioners’ (FCPs) and General Practitioners’ Perceptions Towards FCPs Delivering Vocational Advice to Patients with Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Qualitative Investigation of the Implementation Potential of the I-SWAP Initiative

Authors: Benjamin Saunders, Nadine E. Foster, Jonathan C. Hill, Gail Sowden, Nicola Evans, Annette Bishop, Siobhan Stynes, Krysia Dziedzic, Laura Campbell, Gabrielle Rankin, Paula Salmon, Gwenllian Wynne-Jones

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is a common cause of work absence. The recent SWAP (Study of Work And Pain) randomised controlled trial (RCT) found that a brief vocational advice service for primary care patients with MSK pain led to fewer days’ work absence and provided good return-on-investment. The I-SWAP (Implementation of the Study of Work And Pain) initiative aimed to deliver an implementation test-bed of the SWAP vocational advice intervention with First Contact Practitioners (FCP). This entailed adapting the SWAP vocational advice training to fit the FCP role. This qualitative investigation explored the implementation potential of FCPs delivering vocational advice for patients with MSK pain. Methods Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 10 FCPs and 5 GPs. Data were analysed thematically and findings explored using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). Results I-SWAP achieved a degree of ‘coherence’ (i.e. made sense), with both FCPs and GPs feeling FCPs were well-placed to discuss work issues with these patients. However, for many of the FCPs, addressing or modifying psychosocial and occupational barriers to return-to-work was not considered feasible within FCP consultations, and improving physical function was prioritised. Concerns were also raised that employers would not act on FCPs’ recommendations regarding return-to-work. Conclusion FCPs appear well-placed to discuss work issues with MSK patients, and signpost/refer to other services; however, because they often only see patients once they are less suited to deliver other aspects of vocational advice. Future research is needed to explore how best to provide vocational advice in primary care settings.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and well-being? London, UK: The Stationary Office; 2006. Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and well-being? London, UK: The Stationary Office; 2006.
3.
go back to reference Letrilliart L, Barrau A. Difficulties with the sickness certification process in general practice and possible solutions: A systematic review. Eur J Gen Pract. 2012;4:219–28.CrossRef Letrilliart L, Barrau A. Difficulties with the sickness certification process in general practice and possible solutions: A systematic review. Eur J Gen Pract. 2012;4:219–28.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sowden G, Main CJ, van der Windt DA, Burton K, Wynne-Jones G. The development and content of the vocational advice intervention and training package for the study of work and pain (SWAP) trial (ISRCTN 52269669). J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29:395–405.CrossRef Sowden G, Main CJ, van der Windt DA, Burton K, Wynne-Jones G. The development and content of the vocational advice intervention and training package for the study of work and pain (SWAP) trial (ISRCTN 52269669). J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29:395–405.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wynne-Jones G, Artus M, Bishop A, Lawton SA, Lewis M, Jowett S, Kigozi J, Main C, Sowden G, Wathall S, Burton AK, van der Windt DA, Hay EM, Foster NE, The SWAP Study Team. Effectiveness and costs of a vocational advice service to improve work outcomes in patients with musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a cluster randomised trial. Pain. 2018;159(1):128–38.CrossRef Wynne-Jones G, Artus M, Bishop A, Lawton SA, Lewis M, Jowett S, Kigozi J, Main C, Sowden G, Wathall S, Burton AK, van der Windt DA, Hay EM, Foster NE, The SWAP Study Team. Effectiveness and costs of a vocational advice service to improve work outcomes in patients with musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a cluster randomised trial. Pain. 2018;159(1):128–38.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Welsh VK, Sanders T, Richardson JC, Wynne-Jones G, Jinks C, Mallen CD. Extending the authority for sickness certification beyond the medical profession: the importance of ‘boundary work.’ BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:100.CrossRef Welsh VK, Sanders T, Richardson JC, Wynne-Jones G, Jinks C, Mallen CD. Extending the authority for sickness certification beyond the medical profession: the importance of ‘boundary work.’ BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:100.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference NHS Health Education England. First Contact Practitioners and Advanced Practitioners in Primary Care: (Musculoskeletal) A Roadmap to Practice, 2020. NHS Health Education England. First Contact Practitioners and Advanced Practitioners in Primary Care: (Musculoskeletal) A Roadmap to Practice, 2020.
9.
go back to reference Halls S, Thomas R, Stott H, Cupples ME, Kersten P, Cramp F, Foster D, Walsh N. Provision of first contact physiotherapy in primary care across the UK: a survey of the service. Physiotherapy. 2020;108:2–9.CrossRef Halls S, Thomas R, Stott H, Cupples ME, Kersten P, Cramp F, Foster D, Walsh N. Provision of first contact physiotherapy in primary care across the UK: a survey of the service. Physiotherapy. 2020;108:2–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Stynes S, Goodwin R, Bishop A. National evaluation of First Contact Practitioner (FCP) model of primary care: Patient characteristics, outcomes and qualitative evaluation, 2020. Stynes S, Goodwin R, Bishop A. National evaluation of First Contact Practitioner (FCP) model of primary care: Patient characteristics, outcomes and qualitative evaluation, 2020.
11.
go back to reference Robert G, Cornwell J, Locock L, Purushotham A, Sturmey G, Gager M. Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services. BMJ. 2015;350:g7714.CrossRef Robert G, Cornwell J, Locock L, Purushotham A, Sturmey G, Gager M. Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services. BMJ. 2015;350:g7714.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Porcheret M, Main C, Croft P, McKinley R, Hassell A, Dziedzic K. Development of a behaviour change intervention: a case study on the practical application of theory. Implement Sci. 2014;9:42.CrossRef Porcheret M, Main C, Croft P, McKinley R, Hassell A, Dziedzic K. Development of a behaviour change intervention: a case study on the practical application of theory. Implement Sci. 2014;9:42.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference May CR, Mair F, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, Murray E, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Gunn J, Montori V. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009;4:29.CrossRef May CR, Mair F, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, Murray E, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Gunn J, Montori V. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009;4:29.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Parry KW. Constant comparison. In: Lewis-Beck MS, Bryman A, Liao TF, editors. The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods, vol. 1. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2004. p. 180–1. Parry KW. Constant comparison. In: Lewis-Beck MS, Bryman A, Liao TF, editors. The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods, vol. 1. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2004. p. 180–1.
15.
go back to reference Morse JM, Singleton J. Exploring the technical aspects of “Fit” in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2001;11(6):841–7.CrossRef Morse JM, Singleton J. Exploring the technical aspects of “Fit” in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2001;11(6):841–7.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, Dowrick C, Finch T, Kennedy A, Mair F, O’Donnell C, Ong BN, Rapley T, Rogers A, May CR. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):63.CrossRef Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, Dowrick C, Finch T, Kennedy A, Mair F, O’Donnell C, Ong BN, Rapley T, Rogers A, May CR. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):63.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Erwin J, Chance-Larsen K, Backhouse M, Woolf AD. Exploring what patients with musculoskeletal conditions want from first point-of-contact health practitioners. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2020;0:1–7. Erwin J, Chance-Larsen K, Backhouse M, Woolf AD. Exploring what patients with musculoskeletal conditions want from first point-of-contact health practitioners. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2020;0:1–7.
18.
go back to reference Greenhalgh S, Selfe J, Yeowell J. A qualitative study to explore the experiences of first contact physiotherapy practitioners in the NHS and their experiences of their first contact role. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020;50:102267.CrossRef Greenhalgh S, Selfe J, Yeowell J. A qualitative study to explore the experiences of first contact physiotherapy practitioners in the NHS and their experiences of their first contact role. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020;50:102267.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sanders T, Wynne-JonesG Artus M, Ong BN, Foster NE. Acceptability of a vocational advice service for patients consulting in primary care with musculoskeletal pain: a qualitative exploration of the experiences of general practitioners vocational, advisors and patients. Scandinavian J Public Health. 2017;47(1):78–85.CrossRef Sanders T, Wynne-JonesG Artus M, Ong BN, Foster NE. Acceptability of a vocational advice service for patients consulting in primary care with musculoskeletal pain: a qualitative exploration of the experiences of general practitioners vocational, advisors and patients. Scandinavian J Public Health. 2017;47(1):78–85.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, Briggs M, Carr E, Barker K. A synthesis of qualitative research exploring the barriers to staying in work with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(6):566–72.CrossRef Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, Briggs M, Carr E, Barker K. A synthesis of qualitative research exploring the barriers to staying in work with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(6):566–72.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Frederiksen P, Karsten MMV, Indahl A, Bendix T. What challenges manual workers’ ability to cope with back pain at work, and what influences their decision to call in sick? J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25:707–16.CrossRef Frederiksen P, Karsten MMV, Indahl A, Bendix T. What challenges manual workers’ ability to cope with back pain at work, and what influences their decision to call in sick? J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25:707–16.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Coole C, Birks E, Watson PJ, Drummond A. Communicating with employers: experiences of occupational therapists treating people with musculoskeletal conditions. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24:585–95.CrossRef Coole C, Birks E, Watson PJ, Drummond A. Communicating with employers: experiences of occupational therapists treating people with musculoskeletal conditions. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24:585–95.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Besen E, Young AE, Shaw WS. Returning to work following low back pain: towards a model of individual psychosocial factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25:25–37.CrossRef Besen E, Young AE, Shaw WS. Returning to work following low back pain: towards a model of individual psychosocial factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25:25–37.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
First Contact Practitioners’ (FCPs) and General Practitioners’ Perceptions Towards FCPs Delivering Vocational Advice to Patients with Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Qualitative Investigation of the Implementation Potential of the I-SWAP Initiative
Authors
Benjamin Saunders
Nadine E. Foster
Jonathan C. Hill
Gail Sowden
Nicola Evans
Annette Bishop
Siobhan Stynes
Krysia Dziedzic
Laura Campbell
Gabrielle Rankin
Paula Salmon
Gwenllian Wynne-Jones
Publication date
01-03-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-09992-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 1/2022 Go to the issue