Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2019

Open Access 01-06-2019

The Development and Content of the Vocational Advice Intervention and Training Package for the Study of Work and Pain (SWAP) Trial (ISRCTN 52269669)

Authors: G. Sowden, C. J. Main, D. A. van der Windt, K. Burton, G. Wynne-Jones

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose There are substantial costs associated with sickness absence and struggling at work however existing services in the UK are largely restricted to those absent from work for greater than 6 months. This paper details the development of an early Vocational Advice Intervention (VAI) for adult primary care consulters who were struggling at work or absent due to musculoskeletal pain, and the structure and content of the training and mentoring package developed to equip the Vocational Advisors (VAs) to deliver the VAI, as part of the Study of Work and Pain (SWAP) cluster randomised trial. Methods In order to develop the intervention, we conducted a best-evidence literature review, summarised evidence from developmental studies and consulted with stakeholders. Results A novel early access, brief VAI was developed consisting of case management and stepped care (three steps), using the Psychosocial Flags Framework to identify and overcome obstacles associated with the health-work interface. Four healthcare practitioners were recruited to deliver the VAI; three physiotherapists and one nurse (all vocational advice was actually delivered by the three physiotherapists). They received training in the VA role during a 4-day course, with a refresher day 3 months later, along with monthly group mentoring sessions. Conclusions The process of development was sufficient to develop the VAI and associated training package. The evidence underpinning the VAI was drawn from an international perspective and key components of the VAI have the potential to be applied to other settings or countries, although this has yet to be tested.
Literature
1.
2.
Black C, Frost D, Health at work—an independent review of sickness absence. London: The Stationary Office; 2011.
3.
4.
Jansson C, Mittendorfer-Rutz E, Alexanderson K. Sickness absence because of musculoskeletal diagnoses and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a nationwide Swedish cohort study. Pain. 2012;153(5):998–1005.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Helgesson M, Johansson B, Nordqvist T, Lundberg I, Vingard E. Sickness absence at a young age and later sickness absence, disability pension, death, unemployment and income in native Swedes and immigrants. Eur J Public Health. 2015;25(4):688–692.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
7.
Froud R, Patterson S, Eldridge S, Seale C, Pincus T, Rajendran D, Fossum C, Underwood M. A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the impact of low back pain on people’s lives. BMC Musculoskel Dis. 2014;15(1):50.CrossRef
8.
Waddell G, Burton AK. Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work: evidence review. Fac Occup Med. 2000;51(2):124–135.CrossRef
9.
van Duijn M, Eijkemans MJ, Koes BW, Marc A, Koopmanschap MA, Burton AK, Burdorf A. The effects of timing on the cost-effectiveness of interventions for workers on sick leave due to low back pain. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67(11):774–750.
10.
Waddell G, Burton AK, Kendall N. Vocational Rehabilitation: what works, for whom, and when? London: The Stationary Office; 2008.
11.
Loisel P. Intervention for return to work—what is really effective? Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31(4):245–247.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
Williams-Whitt K, ltmann UB, Amick B, Munir F, Tveito TH, Anema JR, the Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention. Workplace interventions to prevent disability from both the scientific and practice perspectives: a comparison of scientific literature, grey literature and stakeholder observations. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(4):417–433.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
15.
Bishop A, Wynne-Jones G, Lawton SA, Van der Windt D, Main C, Sowden G, Burton K, Lewis M, Jowett S, Sanders T, Hay EM. Foster NE and on behalf of the SWAP study team. Rationale, design and methods of the Study of Work and Pain (SWAP): a cluster randomised controlled trial testing the addition of a vocational advice service to best current primary care for patients with musculoskeletal pain. BMC Musculoskel Dis. 2015;15:232.CrossRef
16.
Wynne-Jones G, Artus M, Bishop A, Lawton SA, Lewis M, Jowett S, Kigozi J, Main C, Sowden G, Wathall S, Burton AK, van der Windt DA, Hay EM, Foster NE, the SWAP Study Team. Effectiveness and costs of a vocational advice service to improve work outcomes in patients with musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a cluster randomised trial. Pain. 2017;159(1):128–138.CrossRef
17.
Sanders T, Wynne-Jones G, Nio Ong B, Artus M, Foster N. Acceptability of a vocational advice service for patients consulting in primary care with musculoskeletal pain: a qualitative exploration of the experiences of general practitioners, vocational advisers and patients. Scand J Public Health. 2017. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​1403494817723194​.CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
Black C. Working for a healthier tomorrow. London: The Stationary Office; 2008.
20.
Kendall NAS, Linton SJ, Main CJ. Guide to assessing psychosocial yellow flags in acute low back pain: risk factors for long-term disability and work loss. Wellington: Accident Rehabilitation & Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand, and the National Health Committee, Ministry of Health; 1997.
21.
Pransky G, Shaw WS, Loisel P, Hong QN, Désorcy B. Development and validation of competencies for return to work coordinators. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(1):41–48.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Kendall NAS, Burton AK, Main CJ, Watson PJ. on behalf of the Flags Think-Tank. Tackling musculoskeletal problems: a guide for the clinic and workplace—identifying obstacles using the psychosocial flags framework. London: The Stationary Office; 2009.
23.
Hill JC, Whitehurst DGT, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, Konstantinou K, Main CJ, Mason E, Somerville S, Sowden G, Vohora K, Hay EM. A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of stratified primary care management for low back pain compared with current best practice: the STarT Back trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9802):1560–1571.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Foster NE, Mullis R, Hill JC, Lewis M, Whitehurst DGT, Doyle C, Konstantinou K, Main C, Somerville S, Sowden G, Wathall S, Young J, Hay EM. Effect of stratified care for low back pain in family practice (IMPaCT Back): a prospective population-based sequential comparison. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(2):102–111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
NICE Guidelines. Management of long-term sickness and incapacity for work. Guidance for primary care and employers on the management of long term sickness and incapacity. (PH19, 2009); March 2009.
26.
Nicholas MK, Watson PJ, Linton SJ, Main CJ. The identification and management of psychosocial risk factors (Yellow Flags) in patients with low back pain. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):737–753.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Shaw WS, Main CJ, Johnston V. Addressing occupational factors in the management of low back pain: implications for physical therapist practice. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):777–789.CrossRefPubMed
28.
VRA Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics for Vocational Rehabilitation Practitioners (Chair: Booth, D.). VRA: Doncaster; 2013.
29.
30.
31.
32.
Lewis M, Wynne-Jones G, Barton P, Whitehurst DGT, Wathall S, Foster NE, Hay EM, Windt VD. Should general practitioners issue a sick certificate to employees who consult for low back pain in primary care? J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(3):577–588.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
34.
Wynne-Jones G, Buck R, Varnava A, Phillips CJ, Main CJ. Impacts on work performance; what matters 6 months on? Occup Med. 2011;61(3):205–208.CrossRef
35.
36.
Hanson MA, Burton K, Kendall NAS, Lancaster RJ, Pilkington A. The costs and benefits of active case management and rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders. Health and Safety Executive. 2006.
37.
Von Korff M, Moore J. Stepped care for back pain: activating approaches for primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:911–917.CrossRef
38.
39.
MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RL, Irvin E. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257–269.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Mowlam A, Lewis J. Exploring how general practitioners work with patients on sick leave. Leeds: Department for Work and Pensions; 2005.
41.
42.
Bishop A, Foster NE, Thomas E, Hay EM. How does the self-reported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? A survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapists. Pain. 2008;135(102):187–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Sowden G, Hill J, Konstantinou K, Khanna M, Main C, Salmon P, Somerville S, Wathall S, Foster NE. Subgrouping for targeted treatment in primary care for low back pain: the treatment system and clinical training programmes used in the IMPaCT Back study. Fam Pract. 2012;29(1):50–62.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Sanders T, Ong BN, Sowden G, Foster N. Implementing change in physiotherapy: professions, contexts and interventions. J Health Organ Manag. 2014;1(28):96–114.CrossRef
45.
Main CJ, Sowden G, Hill JC, Watson PJ, Hay EM. Integrating physical and psychological approaches to treatment in low back pain: the development and content of the STarT Back trial’s ‘high-risk’ intervention. Physiotherapy. 2012;98(2):110–117.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Linton SJ, Boersma K, Traczykl M, Shaw W, Nicholas M. Early workplace communication and problem solving to prevent back disability: results of a randomised controlled trial among high risk workers and their supervisors. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(2):150–159.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Lambeek LC, Mechelen WV, Knol DL, Loisel P, Anema JR. Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life. BMJ. 2010;340:c1035.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Hillage J, Williams M, Marvell R, Shiels C, Gabbay M, Weston K, Humphreys I. Evaluation of the 2010–13 Fit for Work Service pilots: final report. Department for Work and Pensions. Report No. 896, 2015.
49.
Rannard A, Gabbay M, Sen D, Riley R, Britt D. Feasibility trial of GP and case-managed support for workplace sickness absence. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2014;15(3):252–261.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Development and Content of the Vocational Advice Intervention and Training Package for the Study of Work and Pain (SWAP) Trial (ISRCTN 52269669)
Authors
G. Sowden
C. J. Main
D. A. van der Windt
K. Burton
G. Wynne-Jones
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9799-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2019 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Managing Employees Undergoing Total Hip and Knee Replacement: Experiences of Workplace Representatives

OriginalPaper

Impact of a Safe Resident Handling Program in Nursing Homes on Return-to-Work and Re-injury Outcomes Following Work Injury

OriginalPaper

What Employer Actions Are Considered Most Important for the Return to Work of Employees with Cancer? A Delphi Study Among Employees and Employers

OriginalPaper

Determinants of Employment Outcome for the People with Schizophrenia Using the WHODAS 2.0

Brief Communication

Employees Diagnosed with Cancer: Current Perspectives and Future Directions from an Employer’s Point of View

OriginalPaper

Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ) to French: A Valid and Reliable Instrument to Assess Work Functioning