Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 10/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Paper

Fibula regeneration following non-vascularized graft harvest in children

Authors: Anil Agarwal, Anubrat Kumar

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A peculiarity of non-vascularized fibular harvest is that the donor site regenerates new bone provided periosteum is preserved. We prospectively investigated the regenerated fibula quantitatively and studied clinical implications of non-regeneration.

Material and methods

The fibula was harvested using a periosteum preserving technique. Only fibulae from healthy legs were harvested. X-rays were done pre- and post-operatively at three and six months. Clinical assessment of donor limb included pain, gait, motor and sensory examination. Fibular regeneration was quantified using defined length and width criteria.

Results

There were 16 children with 21 harvested fibula. About 65 % of total fibular length was available for use as graft. There was regeneration of fibula similar to the pre-operative dimensions as early as six months in 71 % of cases. There were no clinical morbid findings as assessed at six months follow up despite non-continuity being observed in 29 % of cases. The predominant site for non-continuity was middle third-distal third junction.

Conclusions

Periosteal preserving non-vascularized fibula grafting was a low morbidity procedure. In two-third of the cases, there was regeneration of fibula comparable to pre-operative dimensions as early as six months. The non-continuous regeneration had no clinical implications.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mostafa MF, Fawzy SI (2015) Fibular strut graft for humeral aneurysmal bone cyst with varus deformity. Int Orthop 39:1391–1398CrossRefPubMed Mostafa MF, Fawzy SI (2015) Fibular strut graft for humeral aneurysmal bone cyst with varus deformity. Int Orthop 39:1391–1398CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Xin Z, Kim K, Jung S (2009) Regeneration of the fibula using a periosteum-preserving technique in children. Orthopedics 32:820PubMed Xin Z, Kim K, Jung S (2009) Regeneration of the fibula using a periosteum-preserving technique in children. Orthopedics 32:820PubMed
3.
go back to reference Sidhu AS (2010) Fibula—a bone with versatile uses. Punjab J Orthop 1:23–26 Sidhu AS (2010) Fibula—a bone with versatile uses. Punjab J Orthop 1:23–26
4.
go back to reference Matsuura M, Michi K, Ohno K, Egawa K, Takiguchi R (1999) Clinicoanatomic examination of the fibula: anatomic basis for dental implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14:879–884PubMed Matsuura M, Michi K, Ohno K, Egawa K, Takiguchi R (1999) Clinicoanatomic examination of the fibula: anatomic basis for dental implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14:879–884PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lee EH, Goh JC, Helm R, Pho RW (1990) Donor site morbidity following resection of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 72:129–131 Lee EH, Goh JC, Helm R, Pho RW (1990) Donor site morbidity following resection of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 72:129–131
6.
go back to reference Lambert KL (1971) The weight-bearing function of the fibula. A strain gauge study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 53:507–513PubMed Lambert KL (1971) The weight-bearing function of the fibula. A strain gauge study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 53:507–513PubMed
7.
go back to reference Goh JC, Mech AM, Lee EH, Ang EJ, Bayon P, Pho RW (1992) Biomechanical study on the load-bearing characteristics of the fibula and the effects of fibular resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 279:223–228PubMed Goh JC, Mech AM, Lee EH, Ang EJ, Bayon P, Pho RW (1992) Biomechanical study on the load-bearing characteristics of the fibula and the effects of fibular resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 279:223–228PubMed
8.
go back to reference Takebe K, Nakagawa A, Minami H, Kanazawa H, Hirohata K (1984) Role of the fibula in weight-bearing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 184:289–292PubMed Takebe K, Nakagawa A, Minami H, Kanazawa H, Hirohata K (1984) Role of the fibula in weight-bearing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 184:289–292PubMed
9.
go back to reference Segal D, Pick RY, Klein HA, Heskiaoff D (1981) The role of the lateral malleolus as a stabilizing factor of the ankle joint: preliminary report. Foot Ankle 2:25–29CrossRefPubMed Segal D, Pick RY, Klein HA, Heskiaoff D (1981) The role of the lateral malleolus as a stabilizing factor of the ankle joint: preliminary report. Foot Ankle 2:25–29CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nassr A, Khan MH, Ali MH, Espiritu MT, Hanks SE, Lee JY, Donaldson WF, Kang JD (2009) Donor-site complications of autogenous nonvascularized fibula strut graft harvest for anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion surgery: experience with 163 consecutive cases. Spine J 9:893–898CrossRefPubMed Nassr A, Khan MH, Ali MH, Espiritu MT, Hanks SE, Lee JY, Donaldson WF, Kang JD (2009) Donor-site complications of autogenous nonvascularized fibula strut graft harvest for anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion surgery: experience with 163 consecutive cases. Spine J 9:893–898CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Iamaguchi RB, Fucs PM, da Costa AC, Chakkour I (2011) Vascularised fibular graft for the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: long-term complications in the donor leg. Int Orthop 35:1065–1070CrossRefPubMed Iamaguchi RB, Fucs PM, da Costa AC, Chakkour I (2011) Vascularised fibular graft for the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: long-term complications in the donor leg. Int Orthop 35:1065–1070CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Omokawa S, Tamai S, Takakura Y, Yajima H, Kawanishi K (1996) A long-term study of the donor-site ankle after vascularized fibula grafts in children. Microsurgery 17:162–166CrossRefPubMed Omokawa S, Tamai S, Takakura Y, Yajima H, Kawanishi K (1996) A long-term study of the donor-site ankle after vascularized fibula grafts in children. Microsurgery 17:162–166CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Fragnière B, Wicart P, Mascard E, Dubousset J (2003) Prevention of ankle valgus after vascularized fibular grafts in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 408:245–251CrossRefPubMed Fragnière B, Wicart P, Mascard E, Dubousset J (2003) Prevention of ankle valgus after vascularized fibular grafts in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 408:245–251CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sulaiman AR, Wan Z, Awang S, Che Ahmad A, Halim AS, Ahmad Mohd Zain R (2015) Long-term effect on foot and ankle donor site following vascularized fibular graft resection in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 24:450–455CrossRefPubMed Sulaiman AR, Wan Z, Awang S, Che Ahmad A, Halim AS, Ahmad Mohd Zain R (2015) Long-term effect on foot and ankle donor site following vascularized fibular graft resection in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 24:450–455CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Nathan SS, Athanasian E, Boland PJ, Healey JH (2009) Valgus ankle deformity after vascularized fibular reconstruction for oncologic disease. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1938–1945CrossRefPubMed Nathan SS, Athanasian E, Boland PJ, Healey JH (2009) Valgus ankle deformity after vascularized fibular reconstruction for oncologic disease. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1938–1945CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Xijing H, Haopeng L, Liaosha J, Binshang L, Kunzheng W, Lvzhen M (2000) Functional development of the donor leg after vascularized fibula graft in childhood. J Pediatr Surg 35:1226–1229CrossRefPubMed Xijing H, Haopeng L, Liaosha J, Binshang L, Kunzheng W, Lvzhen M (2000) Functional development of the donor leg after vascularized fibula graft in childhood. J Pediatr Surg 35:1226–1229CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kanaya K, Wada T, Kura H, Yamashita T, Usui M, Ishii S (2002) Valgus deformity of the ankle following harvesting of a vascularized fibular graft in children. J Reconstr Microsurg 18:91–96CrossRefPubMed Kanaya K, Wada T, Kura H, Yamashita T, Usui M, Ishii S (2002) Valgus deformity of the ankle following harvesting of a vascularized fibular graft in children. J Reconstr Microsurg 18:91–96CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Pacelli LL, Gillard J, McLoughlin SW, Buehler MJ (2003) A biomechanical analysis of donor-site ankle instability following free fibular graft harvest. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:597–603PubMed Pacelli LL, Gillard J, McLoughlin SW, Buehler MJ (2003) A biomechanical analysis of donor-site ankle instability following free fibular graft harvest. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:597–603PubMed
19.
go back to reference Soejima O, Ogata K, Ishinishi T, Fukahori Y, Miyauchi R (1994) Anatomic considerations of the peroneal nerve for division of the fibula during high tibial osteotomy. Orthop Rev 23:244–247PubMed Soejima O, Ogata K, Ishinishi T, Fukahori Y, Miyauchi R (1994) Anatomic considerations of the peroneal nerve for division of the fibula during high tibial osteotomy. Orthop Rev 23:244–247PubMed
20.
go back to reference González-Herranz P, del Río A, Burgos J, López-Mondejar JA, Rapariz JM (2003) Valgus deformity after fibular resection in children. J Pediatr Orthop 23:55–59PubMed González-Herranz P, del Río A, Burgos J, López-Mondejar JA, Rapariz JM (2003) Valgus deformity after fibular resection in children. J Pediatr Orthop 23:55–59PubMed
21.
go back to reference Burchardt H (1983) The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 174:28–42PubMed Burchardt H (1983) The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 174:28–42PubMed
22.
go back to reference Steinlechner CW, Mkandawire NC (2005) Non-vascularised fibular transfer in the management of defects of long bones after sequestrectomy in children. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87:1259–1263CrossRef Steinlechner CW, Mkandawire NC (2005) Non-vascularised fibular transfer in the management of defects of long bones after sequestrectomy in children. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87:1259–1263CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Fibula regeneration following non-vascularized graft harvest in children
Authors
Anil Agarwal
Anubrat Kumar
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3233-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

International Orthopaedics 10/2016 Go to the issue