Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Orthopaedics
Published in: International Orthopaedics 10/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Paper

Total hip arthroplasty via the anterior approach: tips and tricks for primary and revision surgery

Authors: Philip J. York, Charles T. Smarck, Thierry Judet, Cyril Mauffrey

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Described for the first time in the 1950s, the direct anterior approach to the hip has been gaining in popularity over the last decade following the trend of minimally invasive surgery. This paper provides an overview of the approach and its indications and various uses and focuses on its utility in the revision setting. A detailed overview of the technique including tips and tricks as well as an explanation of common errors are included.

Method

Graphic and clinical study of the approach, indications and feasibility.

Results

The reported benefits of the direct anterior technique include enhanced post-operative recovery and respect for all the innervation and vascularization territories. It has been shown to be safe and effective in revision settings, to decrease the occurrence of heterotopic ossification, to enhance the accuracy of acetabular cup positioning, and to improve post-operative rehabilitation while having comparable outcomes in terms of loosening or component failure. Additionally, thromboembolic events have been shown to be decreased compared to other approaches. The most common reported complications in the revision setting is intra-operative fracture. The decision of a surgeon to transition to this approach, however, comes with a learning curve and potentially detrimental complications if done improperly.

Discussion

In addition to its appeal in the primary setting, the approach could possibly be a solution to decrease the morbidity associated with revision surgery through its use of a fresh tissue plane not previously traumatized with the primary approach.
Literature
1.
Prokopetz JJ, Losina E, Bliss RL, Wright J, Baron JA, Katz JN (2012) Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:251CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(1):128–133CrossRefPubMed
3.
Bozic KJ, Katz P, Cisternas M, Ono L, Ries MD, Showstack J (2005) Hospital resource utilization for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(3):570–576CrossRefPubMed
4.
Fehring TK, Odum SM, Fehring K, Springer BD, Griffin WL, Dennos AC (2010) Mortality following revision joint arthroplasty: is age a factor? Orthopedics 33(10):715PubMed
5.
Judet J, Judet R (1950) The use of an artificial femoral head for arthroplasty of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 32-B(2):166–173
6.
Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T (2005) Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:115–124CrossRefPubMed
7.
Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, Hirota S, Yoshikawa H (2009) A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series. J Arthroplasty 24(5):698–704CrossRefPubMed
8.
Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Pour AE, Hozack WJ (2010) Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25(5):671–679, e1 CrossRefPubMed
9.
Martin CT, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Clark CR (2013) A comparison of hospital length of stay and short-term morbidity between the anterior and the posterior approaches to total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28(5):849–854CrossRefPubMed
10.
Parvizi J, Rasouli MR, Jaberi M, Chevrollier G, Vizzi S, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ (2013) Does the surgical approach in one stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty affect blood loss? Int Orthop 37(12):2357–2362CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
De Anta-Diaz B, Serralta-Gomis J, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Benavidez E, Lopez-Prats FA (2016) No differences between direct anterior and lateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty related to muscle damage or functional outcome. Int Orthop
12.
Newman EA, Holst DC, Bracey DN, Russell GB, Lang JE (2015) Incidence of heterotopic ossification in direct anterior vs posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective radiographic review. Int Orthop
13.
Kobayashi H, Homma Y, Baba T, Ochi H, Matsumoto M, Yuasa T, Kaneko K (2015) Surgeons changing the approach for total hip arthroplasty from posterior to direct anterior with fluoroscopy should consider potential excessive cup anteversion and flexion implantation of the stem in their early experience. Int Orthop
14.
Unger AC, Schulz AP, Paech A, Jurgens C, Renken FG (2013) Modified direct anterior approach in minimally invasive hip hemiarthroplasty in a geriatric population: a feasibility study and description of the technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(11):1509–1516CrossRefPubMed
15.
Mast NH, Laude F (2011) Revision total hip arthroplasty performed through the Hueter interval. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(Suppl 2):143–148CrossRefPubMed
16.
Kennon R, Keggi J, Zatorski LE, Keggi KJ (2004) Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: beyond the minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 2):91–97PubMed
17.
Scemama C, Lestrat V, Combourieu B, Judet T (2015) Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty conversion of hip fusion. Int Orthop
18.
Seng BE, Berend KR, Ajluni AF, Lombardi AV Jr (2009) Anterior-supine minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: defining the learning curve. Orthop Clin North Am 40(3):343–350CrossRefPubMed
19.
Jewett BA, Collis DK (2011) High complication rate with anterior total hip arthroplasties on a fracture table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(2):503–507CrossRefPubMed
20.
Homma Y, Baba T, Sano K, Ochi H, Matsumoto M, Kobayashi H, Yuasa T, Maruyama Y, Kaneko K (2015) Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury with the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop
21.
Pavlanski R (1971) Modification of the Zahradnicek-Leveuf procedure in the case of subdislocating coxa valga with anteversion. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 57(Suppl 1):185–186PubMed
22.
Heller KD, Prescher A, Zilkens KW, Forst R (1997) Anatomic study of femoral vein occlusion during simulated hip arthroplasty. Surg Radiol Anat 19(3):133–137CrossRefPubMed
23.
Binns M, Pho R (1990) Femoral vein occlusion during hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (255); 168–172
24.
Alecci V, Valente M, Crucil M, Minerva M, Pellegrino CM, Sabbadini DD (2011) Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings. J Orthop Traumatol 12(3):123–129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Total hip arthroplasty via the anterior approach: tips and tricks for primary and revision surgery
Authors
Philip J. York
Charles T. Smarck
Thierry Judet
Cyril Mauffrey
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3125-3

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

International Orthopaedics 10/2016 Go to the issue

Original Paper

YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis

Original Paper

Peri-operative blood-loss after total hip arthroplasty can be significantly reduced with topical application of epsilon-aminocaproic acid

Original Paper

Morphologic and angular planning for cam resection in femoro-acetabular impingement: value of the omega angle

Original Paper

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of acetabular anterior column fractures using the two-incision minimally invasive approach and a preshaped three dimension plate

Original Paper

Displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: is there a consensus on treatment in Germany?

Letter to the Editor

Highlighting quality issues in “Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar fusion: a systematic review of complications” by Hu et al