Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2/2024

21-12-2023 | Femoral Fracture | Trauma Surgery

Blocking screw (pin) technique to achieve an acceptable reduction in intramedullary of subtrochanteric femoral fractures: indications, techniques, and clinical outcomes

Authors: Yong-Cheol Yoon, Chang-Wug Oh, Joon-Woo Kim, Daniel W. R. Seng, Sung-Hyuk Yoon, Hyun Woo Kim

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 2/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Subtrochanteric femur fractures treated with intramedullary nails present biomechanical benefits, early weight-bearing, and reduced soft tissue damage, promoting bone union. However, improper reduction due to muscular forces and fragmented proximal bone increases nonunion risk. This study evaluates the efficacy of the blocking screw technique in preventing malalignment during intramedullary nailing.

Material and methods

In cases of subtrochanteric femoral fractures where malalignment, such as varus and anterior angulation, was anticipated during intramedullary nailing, proper reduction was ensured using blocking screw technique on the proximal bone fragment from the coronal or sagittal plane. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 25 patients (14 males, 11 females; average age 55.12 years) who were followed up for more than 1 year. The postoperative neck-shaft angle, anterior angulation angle, and limb length discrepancy were compared radiologically with those on the healthy side, and the presence and duration of bone union were measured. The Harris hip score was used for functional evaluation, and complications, including infection, were analyzed.

Results

At the final follow-up, primary bone union was achieved in 21/25 patients (84%), with an average bone union time of 21.81 weeks (range, 14–42 weeks). Of the four nonunions, bone union was achieved in three cases through bone grafting and supplemental plating and in the other case through intramedullary exchange, supplemental plating, and bone grafting. The femoral neck-shaft angle and anterior angulation showed no statistically significant differences compared with the healthy side, with averages of − 1.15° and − 1.4°, respectively. The limb length discrepancy was an average of − 2.4 mm. Regarding functional outcomes, the Harris hip score averaged 89.52 points (range 82–94 points).

Conclusions

In subtrochanteric femoral fractures, the blocking screw technique effectively prevents malalignment during intramedullary nailing, ensuring not only appropriate reduction but also high bone union rates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Giannoudis PV, Ahmad MA, Mineo GV, Tosounidis TI, Calori GM, Kanakaris NK (2013) Subtrochanteric fracture non-unions with implant failure managed with the “Diamond” concept. Injury 44:S76-81PubMedCrossRef Giannoudis PV, Ahmad MA, Mineo GV, Tosounidis TI, Calori GM, Kanakaris NK (2013) Subtrochanteric fracture non-unions with implant failure managed with the “Diamond” concept. Injury 44:S76-81PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Celebi L, Can M, Muratli H, Yagmurlu M, Yuksel H, Bicimoğlu A (2006) Indirect reduction and biological internal fixation of comminuted subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Injury 37:740–750PubMedCrossRef Celebi L, Can M, Muratli H, Yagmurlu M, Yuksel H, Bicimoğlu A (2006) Indirect reduction and biological internal fixation of comminuted subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Injury 37:740–750PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Grønhaug KML, Dybvik E, Matre K, Östman B, Gjertsen JE (2023) Comparison of intramedullary nails in the treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures: an observational study of 13, 232 fractures in the Norwegian hip fracture register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 105:1227–1236PubMedCrossRef Grønhaug KML, Dybvik E, Matre K, Östman B, Gjertsen JE (2023) Comparison of intramedullary nails in the treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures: an observational study of 13, 232 fractures in the Norwegian hip fracture register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 105:1227–1236PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kim JW, Oh CW, Park KH, Oh JK, Yoon YC, Hong W et al (2023) The role of an augmentative plating in the management of femoral subtrochanteric nonunion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143:4915–4919PubMedCrossRef Kim JW, Oh CW, Park KH, Oh JK, Yoon YC, Hong W et al (2023) The role of an augmentative plating in the management of femoral subtrochanteric nonunion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143:4915–4919PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Xie H, Xie L, Wang J, Chen C, Zhang C, Zheng W (2019) Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of subtrochanteric fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 63:43–57PubMedCrossRef Xie H, Xie L, Wang J, Chen C, Zhang C, Zheng W (2019) Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of subtrochanteric fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 63:43–57PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lee PC, Hsieh PH, Yu SW, Shiao CW, Kao HK, Wu CC (2007) Biologic plating versus intramedullary nailing for comminuted subtrochanteric fractures in young adults: a prospective, randomized study of 66 cases. J Trauma 63:1283–1291PubMed Lee PC, Hsieh PH, Yu SW, Shiao CW, Kao HK, Wu CC (2007) Biologic plating versus intramedullary nailing for comminuted subtrochanteric fractures in young adults: a prospective, randomized study of 66 cases. J Trauma 63:1283–1291PubMed
8.
go back to reference Imerci A, Canbek U, Karatosun V, Karapınar L, Yeşil M (2015) Nailing or plating for subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a non-randomized comparative study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25:889–894PubMedCrossRef Imerci A, Canbek U, Karatosun V, Karapınar L, Yeşil M (2015) Nailing or plating for subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a non-randomized comparative study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25:889–894PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Burnei C, Popescu G, Barbu D, Capraru F (2011) Intramedullary osteosynthesis versus plate osteosynthesis in subtrochanteric fractures. J Med Life 4:324–329PubMedPubMedCentral Burnei C, Popescu G, Barbu D, Capraru F (2011) Intramedullary osteosynthesis versus plate osteosynthesis in subtrochanteric fractures. J Med Life 4:324–329PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Panteli M, Vun JS, West RM, Howard A, Pountos I, Giannoudis PV (2022) Subtrochanteric femoral fractures and intramedullary nailing complications: a comparison of two implants. J Orthop Traumatol 23:27PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Panteli M, Vun JS, West RM, Howard A, Pountos I, Giannoudis PV (2022) Subtrochanteric femoral fractures and intramedullary nailing complications: a comparison of two implants. J Orthop Traumatol 23:27PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
go back to reference von Rüden C, Hungerer S, Augat P, Trapp O, Bühren V, Hierholzer C (2015) Breakage of cephalomedullary nailing in operative treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:179–185CrossRef von Rüden C, Hungerer S, Augat P, Trapp O, Bühren V, Hierholzer C (2015) Breakage of cephalomedullary nailing in operative treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:179–185CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Damany D, Parker M, Gurusamy K, Upadhyay P (2006) Complications of subtrochanteric fractures. A meta-analysis of 39 studies involving 1835 fractures. Orthop Proc 88:168–168 Damany D, Parker M, Gurusamy K, Upadhyay P (2006) Complications of subtrochanteric fractures. A meta-analysis of 39 studies involving 1835 fractures. Orthop Proc 88:168–168
14.
go back to reference Kasha S, Yalamanchili RK (2020) Management of subtrochanteric fractures by nail osteosynthesis: a review of tips and tricks. Int Orthop 44:645–653PubMedCrossRef Kasha S, Yalamanchili RK (2020) Management of subtrochanteric fractures by nail osteosynthesis: a review of tips and tricks. Int Orthop 44:645–653PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF (2018) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium—2018. J Orthop Trauma 32:S1–S10PubMedCrossRef Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF (2018) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium—2018. J Orthop Trauma 32:S1–S10PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yoon RS, Donegan DJ, Liporace FA (2015) Reducing subtrochanteric femur fractures: tips and tricks, do’s and don’ts. J Orthop Trauma 29:S28–S33PubMedCrossRef Yoon RS, Donegan DJ, Liporace FA (2015) Reducing subtrochanteric femur fractures: tips and tricks, do’s and don’ts. J Orthop Trauma 29:S28–S33PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Yoon YC, Oh CW, Sim JA, Oh JK (2020) Intraoperative assessment of reduction quality during nail fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. Injury 51:400–406PubMedCrossRef Yoon YC, Oh CW, Sim JA, Oh JK (2020) Intraoperative assessment of reduction quality during nail fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. Injury 51:400–406PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gavaskar A, Srinivasan P, Balamurugan J, Raj RV, Sagar K, Kirubakaran P (2021) Retrograde entry portal for cephalomedullary nailing in difficult subtrochanteric fractures. Injury 52:2010–2015PubMedCrossRef Gavaskar A, Srinivasan P, Balamurugan J, Raj RV, Sagar K, Kirubakaran P (2021) Retrograde entry portal for cephalomedullary nailing in difficult subtrochanteric fractures. Injury 52:2010–2015PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yoon YC, Oh CW, Oh JK (2020) An intuitive and simple technique for accurate insertion point selection and precise Poller (blocking) screw insertion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140:1431–1435PubMedCrossRef Yoon YC, Oh CW, Oh JK (2020) An intuitive and simple technique for accurate insertion point selection and precise Poller (blocking) screw insertion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140:1431–1435PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Guo J, Zha J, Di J, Yin Y, Hou Z, Zhang Y (2021) Outcome analysis of intramedullary nailing augmented with Poller screws for treating difficult reduction fractures of femur and tibia: a retrospective cohort study. BioMed Res Int 2021:6615776PubMedPubMedCentral Guo J, Zha J, Di J, Yin Y, Hou Z, Zhang Y (2021) Outcome analysis of intramedullary nailing augmented with Poller screws for treating difficult reduction fractures of femur and tibia: a retrospective cohort study. BioMed Res Int 2021:6615776PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Yoon YC, Oh CW, Kim JW, Park KH, Oh JK, Ha SS (2022) Poller (blocking) screw with intramedullary femoral nailing for subtrochanteric femoral non-unions: clinical outcome and review of concepts. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48:1295–1306PubMedCrossRef Yoon YC, Oh CW, Kim JW, Park KH, Oh JK, Ha SS (2022) Poller (blocking) screw with intramedullary femoral nailing for subtrochanteric femoral non-unions: clinical outcome and review of concepts. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48:1295–1306PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Wang Z, Li K, Gu Z, Fan H, Li H (2021) The risk assessment model of fracture nonunion after intramedullary nailing for subtrochanteric femur fracture. Medicine 100:e25274PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wang Z, Li K, Gu Z, Fan H, Li H (2021) The risk assessment model of fracture nonunion after intramedullary nailing for subtrochanteric femur fracture. Medicine 100:e25274PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lotzien S, Rausch V, Schildhauer TA, Gessmann J (2018) Revision of subtrochanteric femoral nonunions after intramedullary nailing with dynamic condylar screw. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19:1–12CrossRef Lotzien S, Rausch V, Schildhauer TA, Gessmann J (2018) Revision of subtrochanteric femoral nonunions after intramedullary nailing with dynamic condylar screw. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19:1–12CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Barquet A, Mayora G, Fregeiro J, López L, Rienzi D, Francescoli L (2004) The treatment of subtrochanteric nonunions with the long gamma nail: twenty-six patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 18:346–353PubMedCrossRef Barquet A, Mayora G, Fregeiro J, López L, Rienzi D, Francescoli L (2004) The treatment of subtrochanteric nonunions with the long gamma nail: twenty-six patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 18:346–353PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kim JW, Kim JJ, Byun Y-S, Shon OJ, Oh HK, Park KC et al (2017) Factors affecting fracture location in atypical femoral fractures: a cross-sectional study with 147 patients. Injury 48:1570–1574PubMedCrossRef Kim JW, Kim JJ, Byun Y-S, Shon OJ, Oh HK, Park KC et al (2017) Factors affecting fracture location in atypical femoral fractures: a cross-sectional study with 147 patients. Injury 48:1570–1574PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Rhorer AS (2009) Percutaneous/minimally invasive techniques in treatment of femoral shaft fractures with an intramedullary nail. J Orthop Trauma 23:S2–S5PubMedCrossRef Rhorer AS (2009) Percutaneous/minimally invasive techniques in treatment of femoral shaft fractures with an intramedullary nail. J Orthop Trauma 23:S2–S5PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Hannah A, Aboelmagd T, Yip G, Hull P (2014) A novel technique for accurate Poller (blocking) screw placement. Injury 45:1011–1014PubMedCrossRef Hannah A, Aboelmagd T, Yip G, Hull P (2014) A novel technique for accurate Poller (blocking) screw placement. Injury 45:1011–1014PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Pape HC, Tarkin IS (2009) Intraoperative reduction techniques for difficult femoral fractures. J Orthop Trauma 23:S6–S11PubMedCrossRef Pape HC, Tarkin IS (2009) Intraoperative reduction techniques for difficult femoral fractures. J Orthop Trauma 23:S6–S11PubMedCrossRef
31.
33.
go back to reference Fielding JW, Cochran GVB, Zickel RE (1974) Biomechanical characteristics and surgical management of subtrochanteric fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 5:629–650PubMedCrossRef Fielding JW, Cochran GVB, Zickel RE (1974) Biomechanical characteristics and surgical management of subtrochanteric fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 5:629–650PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Streubel PN, Wong AH, Ricci WM, Gardner MJ (2011) Is there a standard trochanteric entry site for nailing of subtrochanteric femur fractures? J Orthop Trauma 25:202–207PubMedCrossRef Streubel PN, Wong AH, Ricci WM, Gardner MJ (2011) Is there a standard trochanteric entry site for nailing of subtrochanteric femur fractures? J Orthop Trauma 25:202–207PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Lee SJ, Lee SH, Park SS, Park HS (2015) Treatment of femur subtrochanteric fracture using the intramedullary long nail; comparison of closed reduction and minimal open reduction. J Korean Orthop Assoc 50:18–24CrossRef Lee SJ, Lee SH, Park SS, Park HS (2015) Treatment of femur subtrochanteric fracture using the intramedullary long nail; comparison of closed reduction and minimal open reduction. J Korean Orthop Assoc 50:18–24CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Robinson CM, Houshian S, Khan L (2005) Trochanteric-entry long cephalomedullary nailing of subtrochanteric fractures caused by low-energy trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2217–2226PubMed Robinson CM, Houshian S, Khan L (2005) Trochanteric-entry long cephalomedullary nailing of subtrochanteric fractures caused by low-energy trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2217–2226PubMed
37.
go back to reference Shukla S, Johnston P, Ahmad M, Wynn-Jones H, Patel A, Walton N (2007) Outcome of traumatic subtrochanteric femoral fractures fixed using cephalo-medullary nails. Injury 38:1286–1293PubMedCrossRef Shukla S, Johnston P, Ahmad M, Wynn-Jones H, Patel A, Walton N (2007) Outcome of traumatic subtrochanteric femoral fractures fixed using cephalo-medullary nails. Injury 38:1286–1293PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Wang J, Li H, Jia H, Ma X (2020) Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation in the treatment of subtrochanteric femur fractures: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 54:639–646PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wang J, Li H, Jia H, Ma X (2020) Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation in the treatment of subtrochanteric femur fractures: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 54:639–646PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Stedtfeld H-W, Mittlmeier T, Landgraf P, Ewert A (2004) The logic and clinical applications of blocking screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:17–25PubMedCrossRef Stedtfeld H-W, Mittlmeier T, Landgraf P, Ewert A (2004) The logic and clinical applications of blocking screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:17–25PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Van Dyke B, Colley R, Ottomeyer C, Palmer R, Pugh K (2018) Effect of blocking screws on union of infraisthmal femur fractures stabilized with a retrograde intramedullary nail. J Orthop Trauma 32:251–255PubMedCrossRef Van Dyke B, Colley R, Ottomeyer C, Palmer R, Pugh K (2018) Effect of blocking screws on union of infraisthmal femur fractures stabilized with a retrograde intramedullary nail. J Orthop Trauma 32:251–255PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Auston D, Donohue D, Stoops K, Cox J, Diaz M, Santoni B et al (2018) Long segment blocking screws increase the stability of retrograde nail fixation in geriatric supracondylar femur fractures: eliminating the “bell-clapper effect.” J Orthop Trauma 32:559–564PubMedCrossRef Auston D, Donohue D, Stoops K, Cox J, Diaz M, Santoni B et al (2018) Long segment blocking screws increase the stability of retrograde nail fixation in geriatric supracondylar femur fractures: eliminating the “bell-clapper effect.” J Orthop Trauma 32:559–564PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Krettek C, Stephan C, Schandelmaier P, Richter M, Pape H (1999) The use of Poller screws as blocking screws in stabilising tibial fractures treated with small diameter intramedullary nails. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:963–968PubMedCrossRef Krettek C, Stephan C, Schandelmaier P, Richter M, Pape H (1999) The use of Poller screws as blocking screws in stabilising tibial fractures treated with small diameter intramedullary nails. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:963–968PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Blocking screw (pin) technique to achieve an acceptable reduction in intramedullary of subtrochanteric femoral fractures: indications, techniques, and clinical outcomes
Authors
Yong-Cheol Yoon
Chang-Wug Oh
Joon-Woo Kim
Daniel W. R. Seng
Sung-Hyuk Yoon
Hyun Woo Kim
Publication date
21-12-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 2/2024
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-05156-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2024

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2/2024 Go to the issue