Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 1/2024

01-12-2024 | Fecal Incontinence | Methodology

Is percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) effective for fecal incontinence (FI) in adults compared with sham electrical stimulation? A meta-analysis

Authors: Can Luo, Dongmei Wei, Kaiyin Pang, Ling Mei, Yueyue Chen, Xiaoyu Niu

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Sacral nerve neuromodulation (SNM) has been considered the optimal second-line treatment for fecal incontinence (FI). However, SNM involves high cost and requires highly skilled operators. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) has emerged as an alternative treatment modality for FI, yielding varying clinical outcomes. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PTNS compared to sham electrical stimulation for FI.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies from May 12, 2012 to May 12, 2022.

Results

Four randomized controlled studies were included in this review, involving a total of 439 adult patients with FI (300 in the PTNS group and 194 in the sham electrical stimulation group). Our meta-analysis revealed that PTNS demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing weekly episodes of FI compared to the control groups (MD − 1.6, 95% CI − 2.94 to − 0.26, p = 0.02, I2 = 30%). Furthermore, a greater proportion of patients in the PTNS group reported more than a 50% reduction in FI episodes per week (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57–0.94, p = 0.02, I2 = 6%). However, no significant differences were observed in any domains of the FI Quality of Life (QoL) and St Mark’s incontinence scores (MD – 2.41, 95% CI – 5.1 to 0.27, p = 0.08, I2 = 67%). Importantly, no severe adverse events related to PTNS were reported in any of the participants.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis revealed that PTNS was more effective than sham stimulation in reducing FI episodes and led to a higher proportion of patients reporting more than a 50% reduction in weekly FI episodes.
Literature
1.
12.
go back to reference Kreydin EI, Chaudhry ZQ, Kazanjian KK, Lin AY (2019) Anal sphincteroplasty in the minimally invasive era: assessment of national trends and complications. Am Surg 85(1):46–51CrossRefPubMed Kreydin EI, Chaudhry ZQ, Kazanjian KK, Lin AY (2019) Anal sphincteroplasty in the minimally invasive era: assessment of national trends and complications. Am Surg 85(1):46–51CrossRefPubMed
23.
30.
go back to reference Bordeianou LG, Thorsen AJ, Keller DS et al (2023) The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 66(5):647–661CrossRef Bordeianou LG, Thorsen AJ, Keller DS et al (2023) The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 66(5):647–661CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) effective for fecal incontinence (FI) in adults compared with sham electrical stimulation? A meta-analysis
Authors
Can Luo
Dongmei Wei
Kaiyin Pang
Ling Mei
Yueyue Chen
Xiaoyu Niu
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-02910-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Techniques in Coloproctology 1/2024 Go to the issue