Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 7/2018

01-07-2018 | Scientific Article

Feasibility of using an inversion-recovery ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequence for quantification of glenoid bone loss

Authors: Ya-jun Ma, Justin West, Amin Nazaran, Xin Cheng, Heinz Hoenecke, Jiang Du, Eric Y. Chang

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 7/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To utilize the 3D inversion recovery prepared ultrashort echo time with cones readout (IR-UTE-Cones) MRI technique for direct imaging of lamellar bone with comparison to the gold standard of computed tomography (CT).

Materials and methods

CT and MRI was performed on 11 shoulder specimens and three patients. Five specimens had imaging performed before and after glenoid fracture (osteotomy). 2D and 3D volume-rendered CT images were reconstructed and conventional T1-weighted and 3D IR-UTE-Cones MRI techniques were performed. Glenoid widths and defects were independently measured by two readers using the circle method. Measurements were compared with those made from 3D CT datasets. Paired-sample Student’s t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients were performed. In addition, 2D CT and 3D IR-UTE-Cones MRI datasets were linearly registered, digitally overlaid, and compared in consensus by these two readers.

Results

Compared with the reference standard (3D CT), glenoid bone diameter measurements made on 2D CT and 3D IR-UTE-Cones were not significantly different for either reader, whereas T1-weighted images underestimated the diameter (mean difference of 0.18 cm, p = 0.003 and 0.16 cm, p = 0.022 for readers 1 and 2, respectively). However, mean margin of error for measuring glenoid bone loss was small for all modalities (range, 1.46–3.92%). All measured ICCs were near perfect. Digitally registered 2D CT and 3D IR-UTE-Cones MRI datasets yielded essentially perfect congruity between the two modalities.

Conclusions

The 3D IR-UTE-Cones MRI technique selectively visualizes lamellar bone, produces similar contrast to 2D CT imaging, and compares favorably to measurements made using 2D and 3D CT.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bhatia S, Ghodadra NS, Romeo AA, Bach BR, Verma NN, Vo ST, et al. The importance of the recognition and treatment of glenoid bone loss in an athletic population. Sports Health. 2011;3(5):435–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bhatia S, Ghodadra NS, Romeo AA, Bach BR, Verma NN, Vo ST, et al. The importance of the recognition and treatment of glenoid bone loss in an athletic population. Sports Health. 2011;3(5):435–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Saliken DJ, Bornes TD, Bouliane MJ, Sheps DM, Beaupre LA. Imaging methods for quantifying glenoid and Hill–Sachs bone loss in traumatic instability of the shoulder: a scoping review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:164.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saliken DJ, Bornes TD, Bouliane MJ, Sheps DM, Beaupre LA. Imaging methods for quantifying glenoid and Hill–Sachs bone loss in traumatic instability of the shoulder: a scoping review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:164.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Bishop JY, Jones GL, Rerko MA, Donaldson C, Group MS. 3-D CT is the most reliable imaging modality when quantifying glenoid bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(4):1251–6.CrossRefPubMed Bishop JY, Jones GL, Rerko MA, Donaldson C, Group MS. 3-D CT is the most reliable imaging modality when quantifying glenoid bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(4):1251–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Chang EY, Du J, Chung CB. UTE imaging in the musculoskeletal system. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41(4):870–83.CrossRefPubMed Chang EY, Du J, Chung CB. UTE imaging in the musculoskeletal system. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41(4):870–83.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chang EY, Du J, Bae WC, Chung CB. Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort echo time imaging of musculoskeletal tissues. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2015;19(4):375–86.CrossRefPubMed Chang EY, Du J, Bae WC, Chung CB. Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort echo time imaging of musculoskeletal tissues. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2015;19(4):375–86.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Carl M, Bydder GM, Du J. UTE imaging with simultaneous water and fat signal suppression using a time-efficient multispoke inversion recovery pulse sequence. Magn Reson Med. 2016;76(2):577–82.CrossRefPubMed Carl M, Bydder GM, Du J. UTE imaging with simultaneous water and fat signal suppression using a time-efficient multispoke inversion recovery pulse sequence. Magn Reson Med. 2016;76(2):577–82.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gurney PT, Hargreaves BA, Nishimura DG. Design and analysis of a practical 3D cones trajectory. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55(3):575–82.CrossRefPubMed Gurney PT, Hargreaves BA, Nishimura DG. Design and analysis of a practical 3D cones trajectory. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55(3):575–82.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Chen J, Chang EY, Carl M, Ma Y, Shao H, Chen B, et al. Measurement of bound and pore water T1 relaxation times in cortical bone using three-dimensional ultrashort echo time cones sequences. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77(6):2136–45.CrossRefPubMed Chen J, Chang EY, Carl M, Ma Y, Shao H, Chen B, et al. Measurement of bound and pore water T1 relaxation times in cortical bone using three-dimensional ultrashort echo time cones sequences. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77(6):2136–45.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Li S, Ma L, Chang EY, Shao H, Chen J, Chung CB, et al. Effects of inversion time on inversion recovery prepared ultrashort echo time (IR-UTE) imaging of bound and pore water in cortical bone. NMR Biomed. 2015;28(1):70–8.PubMed Li S, Ma L, Chang EY, Shao H, Chen J, Chung CB, et al. Effects of inversion time on inversion recovery prepared ultrashort echo time (IR-UTE) imaging of bound and pore water in cortical bone. NMR Biomed. 2015;28(1):70–8.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Horch RA, Gochberg DF, Nyman JS, Does MD. Clinically compatible MRI strategies for discriminating bound and pore water in cortical bone. Magn Reson Med. 2012;68(6):1774–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Horch RA, Gochberg DF, Nyman JS, Does MD. Clinically compatible MRI strategies for discriminating bound and pore water in cortical bone. Magn Reson Med. 2012;68(6):1774–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Du J, Carl M, Bydder M, Takahashi A, Chung CB, Bydder GM. Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging of cortical bone. J Magn Reson. 2010;207(2):304–11.CrossRefPubMed Du J, Carl M, Bydder M, Takahashi A, Chung CB, Bydder GM. Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging of cortical bone. J Magn Reson. 2010;207(2):304–11.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Han M, Rieke V, Scott SJ, Ozhinsky E, Salgaonkar VA, Jones PD, et al. Quantifying temperature-dependent T1 changes in cortical bone using ultrashort echo time MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2015;74(6):1548–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Han M, Rieke V, Scott SJ, Ozhinsky E, Salgaonkar VA, Jones PD, et al. Quantifying temperature-dependent T1 changes in cortical bone using ultrashort echo time MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2015;74(6):1548–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Huysmans PE, Haen PS, Kidd M, Dhert WJ, Willems JW. The shape of the inferior part of the glenoid: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2006;15(6):759–63.CrossRef Huysmans PE, Haen PS, Kidd M, Dhert WJ, Willems JW. The shape of the inferior part of the glenoid: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2006;15(6):759–63.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pauly JM, Conolly SI, Nishimura D, Macovski A. Slice-Selective Excitation for Very Short T2 Species. Amsterdam: ISMRM 8th Scientific Meeting & Exhibition; 1989. p. 28. Pauly JM, Conolly SI, Nishimura D, Macovski A. Slice-Selective Excitation for Very Short T2 Species. Amsterdam: ISMRM 8th Scientific Meeting & Exhibition; 1989. p. 28.
16.
go back to reference Huijsmans PE, Haen PS, Kidd M, Dhert WJ, van der Hulst VP, Willems WJ. Quantification of a glenoid defect with three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2007;16(6):803–9.CrossRef Huijsmans PE, Haen PS, Kidd M, Dhert WJ, van der Hulst VP, Willems WJ. Quantification of a glenoid defect with three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2007;16(6):803–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gyftopoulos S, Hasan S, Bencardino J, Mayo J, Nayyar S, Babb J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the measurement of glenoid bone loss. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(4):873–8.CrossRefPubMed Gyftopoulos S, Hasan S, Bencardino J, Mayo J, Nayyar S, Babb J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the measurement of glenoid bone loss. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(4):873–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lee RK, Griffith JF, Tong MM, Sharma N, Yung P. Glenoid bone loss: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology. 2013;267(2):496–502.CrossRefPubMed Lee RK, Griffith JF, Tong MM, Sharma N, Yung P. Glenoid bone loss: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology. 2013;267(2):496–502.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Stecco A, Guenzi E, Cascone T, Fabbiano F, Fornara P, Oronzo P, et al. MRI can assess glenoid bone loss after shoulder luxation: inter- and intra-individual comparison with CT. Radiol Med. 2013;118(8):1335–43.CrossRefPubMed Stecco A, Guenzi E, Cascone T, Fabbiano F, Fornara P, Oronzo P, et al. MRI can assess glenoid bone loss after shoulder luxation: inter- and intra-individual comparison with CT. Radiol Med. 2013;118(8):1335–43.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rerko MA, Pan X, Donaldson C, Jones GL, Bishop JY. Comparison of various imaging techniques to quantify glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013;22(4):528–34.CrossRef Rerko MA, Pan X, Donaldson C, Jones GL, Bishop JY. Comparison of various imaging techniques to quantify glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013;22(4):528–34.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Moroder P, Resch H, Schnaitmann S, Hoffelner T, Tauber M. The importance of CT for the pre-operative surgical planning in recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(2):219–26.CrossRefPubMed Moroder P, Resch H, Schnaitmann S, Hoffelner T, Tauber M. The importance of CT for the pre-operative surgical planning in recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(2):219–26.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Gyftopoulos S, Yemin A, Mulholland T, Bloom M, Storey P, Geppert C, et al. 3DMR osseous reconstructions of the shoulder using a gradient-echo based two-point Dixon reconstruction: a feasibility study. Skelet Radiol. 2013;42(3):347–52.CrossRef Gyftopoulos S, Yemin A, Mulholland T, Bloom M, Storey P, Geppert C, et al. 3DMR osseous reconstructions of the shoulder using a gradient-echo based two-point Dixon reconstruction: a feasibility study. Skelet Radiol. 2013;42(3):347–52.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gyftopoulos S, Beltran LS, Yemin A, Strauss E, Meislin R, Jazrawi L, et al. Use of 3D MR reconstructions in the evaluation of glenoid bone loss: a clinical study. Skelet Radiol. 2014;43(2):213–8.CrossRef Gyftopoulos S, Beltran LS, Yemin A, Strauss E, Meislin R, Jazrawi L, et al. Use of 3D MR reconstructions in the evaluation of glenoid bone loss: a clinical study. Skelet Radiol. 2014;43(2):213–8.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Stillwater L, Koenig J, Maycher B, Davidson M. 3D-MR vs. 3D-CT of the shoulder in patients with glenohumeral instability. Skelet Radiol. 2017;46(3):325–31.CrossRef Stillwater L, Koenig J, Maycher B, Davidson M. 3D-MR vs. 3D-CT of the shoulder in patients with glenohumeral instability. Skelet Radiol. 2017;46(3):325–31.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference De Wilde LF, Berghs BM, Audenaert E, Sys G, Van Maele GO, Barbaix E. About the variability of the shape of the glenoid cavity. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004;26(1):54–9.CrossRefPubMed De Wilde LF, Berghs BM, Audenaert E, Sys G, Van Maele GO, Barbaix E. About the variability of the shape of the glenoid cavity. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004;26(1):54–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Feasibility of using an inversion-recovery ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequence for quantification of glenoid bone loss
Authors
Ya-jun Ma
Justin West
Amin Nazaran
Xin Cheng
Heinz Hoenecke
Jiang Du
Eric Y. Chang
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-2898-4

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

Skeletal Radiology 7/2018 Go to the issue