Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Original Article

Feasibility and effectiveness of automatic deep learning network and radiomics models for differentiating tumor stroma ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Authors: Hongfan Liao, Jiang Yuan, Chunhua Liu, Jiao Zhang, Yaying Yang, Hongwei Liang, Song Jiang, Shanxiong Chen, Yongmei Li, Yanbing Liu

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to compare the feasibility and effectiveness of automatic deep learning network and radiomics models in differentiating low tumor stroma ratio (TSR) from high TSR in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a total of 207 PDAC patients from three centers (training cohort: n = 160; test cohort: n = 47). TSR was assessed on hematoxylin and eosin-stained specimens by experienced pathologists and divided as low TSR and high TSR. Deep learning and radiomics models were developed including ShuffulNetV2, Xception, MobileNetV3, ResNet18, support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR). Additionally, the clinical models were constructed through univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and log-rank tests were conducted to compare the overall survival time between different TSR groups.

Results

To differentiate low TSR from high TSR, the deep learning models based on ShuffulNetV2, Xception, MobileNetV3, and ResNet18 achieved AUCs of 0.846, 0.924, 0.930, and 0.941, respectively, outperforming the radiomics models based on SVM, KNN, RF, and LR with AUCs of 0.739, 0.717, 0.763, and 0.756, respectively. Resnet 18 achieved the best predictive performance. The clinical model based on T stage alone performed worse than deep learning models and radiomics models. The survival analysis based on 142 of the 207 patients demonstrated that patients with low TSR had longer overall survival.

Conclusions

Deep learning models demonstrate feasibility and superiority over radiomics in differentiating TSR in PDAC. The tumor stroma ratio in the PDAC microenvironment plays a significant role in determining prognosis.

Critical relevance statement

The objective was to compare the feasibility and effectiveness of automatic deep learning networks and radiomics models in identifying the tumor-stroma ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Our findings demonstrate deep learning models exhibited superior performance compared to traditional radiomics models.

Key points

• Deep learning demonstrates better performance than radiomics in differentiating tumor-stroma ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
• The tumor-stroma ratio in the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma microenvironment plays a protective role in prognosis.
• Preoperative prediction of tumor-stroma ratio contributes to clinical decision-making and guiding precise medicine.

Graphical Abstract

Literature
38.
go back to reference Takahashi M, Kozawa E, Tanisaka M, Hasegawa K, Yasuda M, Sakai F (2016) Utility of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps obtained using 3.0T MRI for distinguishing uterine carcinosarcoma from endometrial carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25103 Takahashi M, Kozawa E, Tanisaka M, Hasegawa K, Yasuda M, Sakai F (2016) Utility of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps obtained using 3.0T MRI for distinguishing uterine carcinosarcoma from endometrial carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jmri.​25103
Metadata
Title
Feasibility and effectiveness of automatic deep learning network and radiomics models for differentiating tumor stroma ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Authors
Hongfan Liao
Jiang Yuan
Chunhua Liu
Jiao Zhang
Yaying Yang
Hongwei Liang
Song Jiang
Shanxiong Chen
Yongmei Li
Yanbing Liu
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01553-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Insights into Imaging 1/2023 Go to the issue