Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research

FDA orphan products clinical trial grants: assessment of outcomes and impact on rare disease product development

Authors: Kathleen L. Miller, Christine Mueller, Gumei Liu, Katherine I. Miller Needleman, Janet Maynard

Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Office of Orphan Products Development (OOPD) of the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has awarded over 700 grants to conduct clinical trials of medicals products for rare diseases since 1983, leading to over 70 marketing approvals. However, despite recent progress in rare disease product development, thousands of rare diseases still have no approved treatments. An assessment of this clinical trial grants program was undertaken to provide an in-depth analysis of the characteristics and outcomes of the program. Results of this analysis will be used to inform future goals of the program, as well as internal data collection to continue to maximize the program’s impact in supporting rare disease product development.

Results

Between fiscal years 2007—2011, OOPD funded 85 clinical trial grants. These grants spanned 18 therapeutic areas, included all pre-approval phases (Phases 1–3), and approximately 75% of the grants studied small molecule drugs. Nine (11%) product approvals, of seven drugs and two devices, were at least partially supported by grants funded within this 5-year timeframe. Four of the seven drugs approved were new molecular entities (NMEs). The average time from funding to approval was seven years. We also found a suggested association between collaboration with multiple types of stakeholders and the success of grants, where we defined success as either positive or negative study findings or a future marketing approval.

Conclusions

The clinical trials funded by OOPD provided valuable information for future product development, and there were a notable number of approvals that occurred using the support of the grants program. There was a suggested association between collaboration and successful outcomes. Efficient and innovative trial designs and collaboration among stakeholders appear vital to continue to effectively bring products to rare disease patients. Ongoing program assessments will ensure that the funding continues to be used to optimally meet the treatment needs of the rare disease community.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Seoane-Vazquez E, Rodriguez-Monguio R, Szeinbach SL, Visaria J. Incentives for orphan drug research and development in the United States. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008;3(1):33.CrossRef Seoane-Vazquez E, Rodriguez-Monguio R, Szeinbach SL, Visaria J. Incentives for orphan drug research and development in the United States. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008;3(1):33.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Westermark K. European regulation on orphan medicinal products: 10 years of experience and future perspectives. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(5):341.CrossRef Westermark K. European regulation on orphan medicinal products: 10 years of experience and future perspectives. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(5):341.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Patel S, Needleman KIM. Funding grants for rare diseases at the food and drug administration. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2013;1(2):99–102.CrossRef Patel S, Needleman KIM. Funding grants for rare diseases at the food and drug administration. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2013;1(2):99–102.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Imoisili MA, Mueller C, Needleman KIM. Fueling the development of products for rare diseases: the impact of the FDA’s orphan products grants program. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2014;2(8):807–15.CrossRef Imoisili MA, Mueller C, Needleman KIM. Fueling the development of products for rare diseases: the impact of the FDA’s orphan products grants program. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2014;2(8):807–15.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Griggs RC, Batshaw M, Dunkle M, Gopal-Srivastava R, Kaye E, Krischer J, et al. Clinical research for rare disease: opportunities, challenges, and solutions. Mol Genet Metab. 2009;96(1):20–6.CrossRef Griggs RC, Batshaw M, Dunkle M, Gopal-Srivastava R, Kaye E, Krischer J, et al. Clinical research for rare disease: opportunities, challenges, and solutions. Mol Genet Metab. 2009;96(1):20–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference IOM (Institute of Medicine). Rare diseases and orphan products: Accelerating research and development. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2010. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Rare diseases and orphan products: Accelerating research and development. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2010.
7.
go back to reference DiMasi JA, Feldman L, Seckler A, Wilson A. Trends in risks associated with new drug development: success rates for investigational drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87(3):272.CrossRef DiMasi JA, Feldman L, Seckler A, Wilson A. Trends in risks associated with new drug development: success rates for investigational drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87(3):272.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hay M, Thomas DW, Craighead JL, Economides C, Rosenthal J. Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(1):40–51.CrossRef Hay M, Thomas DW, Craighead JL, Economides C, Rosenthal J. Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(1):40–51.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Miller KL, Rabinovitz D, Kerr KW. Transition probabilities for clinical trials: investigating individual diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:658.CrossRef Miller KL, Rabinovitz D, Kerr KW. Transition probabilities for clinical trials: investigating individual diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:658.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG, Hansen RW. Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: new estimates of R&D costs. J Health Econ. 2016;47:20–33.CrossRef DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG, Hansen RW. Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: new estimates of R&D costs. J Health Econ. 2016;47:20–33.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wong CH, Siah KW, Lo AW. Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters. Biostatistics. 2019;20(2):273–86.CrossRef Wong CH, Siah KW, Lo AW. Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters. Biostatistics. 2019;20(2):273–86.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vaidya M. Ice bucket challenge cash may help derisk ALS drug research. Nat Med. 2014;20:1080.CrossRef Vaidya M. Ice bucket challenge cash may help derisk ALS drug research. Nat Med. 2014;20:1080.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fagnan DE, Gromatzky AA, Stein RM, Fernandez J-M, Lo AW. Financing drug discovery for orphan diseases. Drug Discov Today. 2014;19(5):533–8.CrossRef Fagnan DE, Gromatzky AA, Stein RM, Fernandez J-M, Lo AW. Financing drug discovery for orphan diseases. Drug Discov Today. 2014;19(5):533–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Woodcock J, LaVange LM. Master protocols to study multiple therapies, multiple diseases, or both. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):62–70.CrossRef Woodcock J, LaVange LM. Master protocols to study multiple therapies, multiple diseases, or both. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):62–70.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference McNamee LM, Walsh MJ, Ledley FD. Timelines of translational science: from technology initiation to FDA approval. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177371.CrossRef McNamee LM, Walsh MJ, Ledley FD. Timelines of translational science: from technology initiation to FDA approval. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177371.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dawkins HJ, Draghia-Akli R, Lasko P, Lau LP, Jonker AH, Cutillo CM, et al. Progress in rare diseases research 2010–2016: an IRDiRC perspective. Clin Transl Sci. 2018;11(1):11.CrossRef Dawkins HJ, Draghia-Akli R, Lasko P, Lau LP, Jonker AH, Cutillo CM, et al. Progress in rare diseases research 2010–2016: an IRDiRC perspective. Clin Transl Sci. 2018;11(1):11.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Litterman NK, Rhee M, Swinney DC, Ekins S. Collaboration for rare disease drug discovery research. F1000Research. 2014;3:261.CrossRef Litterman NK, Rhee M, Swinney DC, Ekins S. Collaboration for rare disease drug discovery research. F1000Research. 2014;3:261.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Merkel PA, Manion M, Gopal-Srivastava R, Groft S, Jinnah H, Robertson D, et al. The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016;11(1):66.CrossRef Merkel PA, Manion M, Gopal-Srivastava R, Groft S, Jinnah H, Robertson D, et al. The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016;11(1):66.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Marshall BC, Penland CM, Hazle L, Ashlock M, Wetmore D, Campbell PW, et al. Cystic fibrosis foundation: achieving the mission. Respir Care. 2009;54(6):788–95.CrossRef Marshall BC, Penland CM, Hazle L, Ashlock M, Wetmore D, Campbell PW, et al. Cystic fibrosis foundation: achieving the mission. Respir Care. 2009;54(6):788–95.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Stein S, Bogard E, Boice N, Fernandez V, Field T, Gilstrap A, et al. Principles for interactions with biopharmaceutical companies: the development of guidelines for patient advocacy organizations in the field of rare diseases. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018;13(1):18.CrossRef Stein S, Bogard E, Boice N, Fernandez V, Field T, Gilstrap A, et al. Principles for interactions with biopharmaceutical companies: the development of guidelines for patient advocacy organizations in the field of rare diseases. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018;13(1):18.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
FDA orphan products clinical trial grants: assessment of outcomes and impact on rare disease product development
Authors
Kathleen L. Miller
Christine Mueller
Gumei Liu
Katherine I. Miller Needleman
Janet Maynard
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-020-01514-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2020 Go to the issue