Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 12/2008

01-12-2008 | 2008 ssat plenary presentation

Factors Related to Anastomotic Dehiscence and Mortality After Terminal Stomal Closure in the Management of Patients with Severe Secondary Peritonitis

Authors: José L. Martínez, Enrique Luque-de-León, Pablo Andrade

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 12/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Management of severe secondary peritonitis (SSP) may require intestinal resections and bowel exteriorization due to an unacceptable high risk for anastomotic dehiscence (AD). Bowel exteriorization can be achieved through loop or terminal stomas. There are no studies addressing the fate of these latter. Our aim was to determine factors associated with AD and mortality in patients submitted to restoration of intestinal continuity after creation of terminal stomas as part of their operative management for SSP.

Patients and Methods

We analyzed prospectively collected databases on all consecutive patients with SSP submitted to restoration of intestinal continuity after having had terminal ileostomies (TI) or terminal colostomies (TC) as part of their operative management during a 30-month period. Several patient and disease and operative variables were evaluated as factors related to AD and mortality in this group of patients. Univariate statistical comparisons were made using Student’s t test for continuous variables and chi-square test when categorical variables were compared. Multivariate analyses were also performed.

Results

A total of 72 male patients and 36 female patients were included in the study; 54 had TI and 54 had TC. Median number of operations performed as part of their management for SSP (prior to stomal closure) was 2 (range, 1–15). A total of 76 (70%) had had diffuse peritonitis, and 39 (36%) required management with an open abdomen (26 of them with a skin-only closure technique). Median time interval between stomal creation and closure was 190 days (range, 14–2,192). Stapled and hand-sewn anastomoses were done in 24 and 84 patients, respectively. AD occurred in 11 patients (10%). Univariate analyses disclosed age ≥50 years (p < 0.05), high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (≥3; p < 0.01), history of chronic renal failure (p < 0.04), history of diffuse peritonitis (p < 0.05), management with an open abdomen (p < 0.05), and lower preoperative hemoglobin values (p < 0.05) as risk factors for AD. Only age ≥50 years prevailed after multivariate analyses. A total of seven patients died (6%). Factors associated with mortality were age ≥65 years (p < 0.02), high ASA score (≥3; p < 0.01), preoperative use of total parenteral nutrition (p < 0.02), lower preoperative hemoglobin values (p < 0.05), time interval between stomal creation and closure <3 months (p < 0.01), AD (p < 0.02), and need for reoperation after stomal closure (p < 0.02). After multivariate analyses, time interval between stomal creation and closure <3 months and need for reoperation were the only ones that prevailed as independent risk factors for mortality (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Although several variables were related to AD and mortality, waiting at least >3 months before attempting restoration of intestinal continuity seems to be the best approach and a practical recommendation in this group of challenging patients.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Shetty V, Teubner A, Morrison K, Scott NA. Proximal loop jejunostomy is a useful adjunct in the management of multiple intestinal suture lines in the septic abdomen. Br J Surg 2006;93(10):1247–1250. doi:10.1002/bjs.5473.PubMedCrossRef Shetty V, Teubner A, Morrison K, Scott NA. Proximal loop jejunostomy is a useful adjunct in the management of multiple intestinal suture lines in the septic abdomen. Br J Surg 2006;93(10):1247–1250. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​5473.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Calicis B, Parc Y, Caplin S, Frileux P, Dehni N, Ollivier JM, Parc R. Treatment of postoperative peritonitis of small-bowel origin with continuous enteral nutrition and succus entericus reinfusion. Arch Surg 2002;137(3):296–300. doi:10.1001/archsurg.137.3.296.PubMedCrossRef Calicis B, Parc Y, Caplin S, Frileux P, Dehni N, Ollivier JM, Parc R. Treatment of postoperative peritonitis of small-bowel origin with continuous enteral nutrition and succus entericus reinfusion. Arch Surg 2002;137(3):296–300. doi:10.​1001/​archsurg.​137.​3.​296.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Seid VE, Proscurshim I, Sousa AH Jr, Kiss DR, Linhares M, Sapucahy M, Gama-Rodrigues J. Loop ileostomy morbidity: timing of closure matters. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49(10):1539–1545. doi:10.1007/s10350-006-0645-8.PubMedCrossRef Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Seid VE, Proscurshim I, Sousa AH Jr, Kiss DR, Linhares M, Sapucahy M, Gama-Rodrigues J. Loop ileostomy morbidity: timing of closure matters. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49(10):1539–1545. doi:10.​1007/​s10350-006-0645-8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Oomen JL, Cuesta MA, Engel AF. Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure after surgery for complications of diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon is safe and possible in most patients. Dig Surg 2005;22(6):419–425. doi:10.1159/000091444.PubMedCrossRef Oomen JL, Cuesta MA, Engel AF. Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure after surgery for complications of diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon is safe and possible in most patients. Dig Surg 2005;22(6):419–425. doi:10.​1159/​000091444.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Robledo FA, Luque-de-León E, Suárez R, Sánchez P, de-la-Fuente M, Vargas A, Mier J. Open versus closed management of the abdomen in the surgical treatment of severe secondary peritonitis: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2007;8:63–72. doi:10.1089/sur.2006.8.016.CrossRef Robledo FA, Luque-de-León E, Suárez R, Sánchez P, de-la-Fuente M, Vargas A, Mier J. Open versus closed management of the abdomen in the surgical treatment of severe secondary peritonitis: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2007;8:63–72. doi:10.​1089/​sur.​2006.​8.​016.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kairaluoma M, Rissanen H, Kultti V, Mecklin JP, Kellokumpu I. Outcome of temporary stomas. A prospective study of temporary intestinal stomas constructed between 1989 and 1996. Dig Surg 2002;19(1):45–51. doi:10.1159/000052005.PubMedCrossRef Kairaluoma M, Rissanen H, Kultti V, Mecklin JP, Kellokumpu I. Outcome of temporary stomas. A prospective study of temporary intestinal stomas constructed between 1989 and 1996. Dig Surg 2002;19(1):45–51. doi:10.​1159/​000052005.PubMedCrossRef
21.
23.
go back to reference Riesener KP, Lehnen W, Höfer M, Kasperk R, Braun JC, Schumpelick V. Morbidity of ileostomy and colostomy closure: impact of surgical technique and perioperative treatment. World J Surg 1997;21(1):103–108. doi:10.1007/s002689900201.PubMedCrossRef Riesener KP, Lehnen W, Höfer M, Kasperk R, Braun JC, Schumpelick V. Morbidity of ileostomy and colostomy closure: impact of surgical technique and perioperative treatment. World J Surg 1997;21(1):103–108. doi:10.​1007/​s002689900201.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tilney HS, Sains PS, Lovegrove RE, Reese GE, Heriot AG, Tekkis PP. Comparison of outcomes following ileostomy versus colostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses. World J Surg 2007;31:1142–1151.PubMedCrossRef Tilney HS, Sains PS, Lovegrove RE, Reese GE, Heriot AG, Tekkis PP. Comparison of outcomes following ileostomy versus colostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses. World J Surg 2007;31:1142–1151.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Factors Related to Anastomotic Dehiscence and Mortality After Terminal Stomal Closure in the Management of Patients with Severe Secondary Peritonitis
Authors
José L. Martínez
Enrique Luque-de-León
Pablo Andrade
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 12/2008
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0714-5

Other articles of this Issue 12/2008

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 12/2008 Go to the issue