Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Research

Factors predicting the outcome of customised foot orthoses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective cohort study

Authors: Marike van der Leeden, Karin Fiedler, Annelies Jonkman, Rutger Dahmen, Leo D Roorda, Dirkjan van Schaardenburg, Joost Dekker

Published in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research | Issue 1/2011

Abstract

Background

Conservative management of foot problems in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may consist of the prescription of customised foot orthoses. Indications for foot orthoses are not clear and the effectiveness of the intervention is highly variable among patients. Knowledge on which patients benefit the most from foot orthoses can help to select patients eligible for this type of intervention. The objective of the present study was to determine clinical and demographic factors that predict the outcome of customised foot orthoses on pain and disability in patients with RA.

Methods

A total of 135 RA patients who were supplied with customised foot orthoses were included in this prospective cohort study. Pain and disability were measured before and after the intervention period using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for foot pain, the Foot Function Index (FFI), the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and a 10-meter walking test. The intervention period consisted of one or more appointments with the podiatrist during which the foot orthoses were customised.

Swollen foot joint count, foot deformity scores, forefoot peak pressure, disease duration, age, gender, body mass index and baseline values of the outcome measures were selected as potential factors predicting outcome. Multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to determine factors associated with change in pain and disability (at P < 0.05).

Results

Disease duration was negatively associated with the change scores in NRS foot pain (P = 0.018), WOMAC pain (P = 0.001), FFI disability (P = 0.003) and WOMAC physical function (P = 0.002). Age was negatively associated with the change score in 10 meter walking time (P = 0.008). For all outcome measures baseline values were positively associated with the change scores (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Shorter disease duration predicted greater improvements in self-reported foot pain and disability, and younger age predicted greater improvements in walking time after intervention with foot orthoses. Also, higher baseline values of pain and disability predicted greater improvements. Referral for conservative management with foot orthoses in the early stage of RA seems important when aiming to achieve reduction in pain and improvement in daily activities.

Michelson J, Easley M, Wigley FM, Hellmann D: Foot and ankle problems in rheumatoid arthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 1994, 15 (11): 608-613.CrossRefPubMed

van der Leeden M, Steultjens M, Ursum J, Dahmen R, Roorda LD, van Schaardenburg D, Dekker J: The prevalence and course of forefoot impairments and walking disability in the first eight years of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthr Care Res. 2008, 59 (11): 1596-1602. 10.1002/art.24188.CrossRef

Otter SJ, Lucas K, Springett K, Moore A, Davies K, Cheek L, Young A, Walker-Bone K: Foot pain in rheumatoid arthritis prevalence, risk factors and management: an epidemiological study. Clin Rheumatol. 2010, 29 (3): 255-271. 10.1007/s10067-009-1312-y.CrossRefPubMed

Grondal L, Tengstrand B, Nordmark B, Wretenberg P, Stark A: The foot: still the most important reason for walking incapacity in rheumatoid arthritis: distribution of symptomatic joints in 1,000 RA patients. Acta Orthop. 2008, 79 (2): 257-261. 10.1080/17453670710015067.CrossRefPubMed

Rome K, Gow PJ, Dalbeth N, Chapman JM: Clinical audit of foot problems in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated at Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand. J Foot Ankle Res. 2009, 2: 16-10.1186/1757-1146-2-16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wickman AM, Pinzur MS, Kadanoff R, Juknelis D: Health-related quality of life for patients with rheumatoid arthritis foot involvement. Foot Ankle Int. 2004, 25 (1): 19-26.CrossRefPubMed

Combe B, Landewe R, Lukas C, Bolosiu HD, Breedveld F, Dougados M, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Hazes JM, Klareskog L, Machold K, Martin-Mola E, Nielsen H, Silman A, Smolen J, Yazici H: EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis: report of a task force of the European Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis. 2007, 66 (1): 34-45. 10.1136/ard.2005.044354.CrossRefPubMed

Egan M, Brosseau L, Farmer M, Ouimet MA, Rees S, Wells G, et al: Splints/orthoses in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003, CD004018-

Farrow SJ, Kingsley GH, Scott DL: Interventions for foot disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum. 2005, 53 (4): 593-602. 10.1002/art.21327.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Hawke F, Burns J, Radford JA, du Toit V: Custom-made foot orthoses for the treatment of foot pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008, 16 (3): CD006801-

11.

Clark H, Rome K, Plant M, O'Hare K, Gray J: A critical review of foot orthoses in the rheumatoid arthritic foot. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006, 45 (2): 139-145. 10.1093/rheumatology/kei177.CrossRef

12.

Silvester RN, Williams AE, Dalbeth N, Rome K: 'Choosing shoes': a preliminary study into the challenges facing clinicians in assessing footwear for rheumatoid patients. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010, 19;3 (1): 24-10.1186/1757-1146-3-24.CrossRef

13.

Woodburn J, Barker S, Helliwell PS: A randomized controlled trial of foot orthoses in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2002, 29 (7): 1377-1383.PubMed

14.

Hodge MC, Bach TM, Carter GM: novel Award First Prize Paper. Orthotic management of plantar pressure and pain in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999, 14 (8): 567-575. 10.1016/S0268-0033(99)00034-0.CrossRef

15.

Lindqvist E, Jonsson K, Saxne T, Eberhardt K: Course of radiographic damage over 10 years in a cohort with early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003, 62 (7): 611-616. 10.1136/ard.62.7.611.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Scott DL, Smith C, Kingsley G: Joint damage and disability in rheumatoid arthritis: an updated systematic review. Clin Exp Rheum. 2003, 21 (5 suppl 31): S-20-27.

17.

van der Leeden M, Steultjens M, Dekker JHM, Prins APA, Dekker J: The relationship of disease duration to foot function, pain and disability in rheumatoid arthritis patients with foot complaints. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007, 25 (2): 275-280.PubMed

18.

Sokka T, Kautiainen H, Hannonen P, Pincus T: Changes in health assessment questionnaire disability scores over five years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with the general population. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54 (10): 3113-3118. 10.1002/art.22130.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Sokka T, Toloza S, Cutolo M, Kautiainen H, Makinen H, Gogus F, Skakic V, Badsha H, Peets T, Baranauskaite A, Géher P, Ujfalussy I, Skopouli FN, Mavrommati M, Alten R, Pohl C, Sibilia J, Stancati A, Salaffi F, Romanowski W, Zarowny-Wierzbinska D, Henrohn D, Bresnihan B, Minnock P, Knudsen LS, Jacobs JW, Calvo-Alen J, Lazovskis J, Pinheiro Gda R, Karateev D, Andersone D, Rexhepi S, Yazici Y, Pincus T, QUEST-RA Group: Women, men, and rheumatoid arthritis: analyses of disease activity, disease characteristics, and treatments in the QUEST-RA study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009, 11 (1): R7-PubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Gonzalez A, Maradit Kremers H, Crowson CS, Ballman KV, Roger VL, Jacobsen SJ, O'Fallon WM, Gabriel SE: Do cardiovascular risk factors confer the same risk for cardiovascular outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients as in non-rheumatoid arthritis patients?. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008, 67 (1): 64-69. 10.1136/ard.2006.059980.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, Healey LA, Kaplan SR, Liang MH, Luthra HS: The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988, 31 (3): 315-324. 10.1002/art.1780310302.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Guldemond NA, Leffers P, Schaper NC, Sanders AP, Nieman FH, Walenkamp GH: Comparison of foot orthoses made by podiatrists, pedorthists and orthotists regarding plantar pressure reduction in The Netherlands. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005, 20 (6): 61-10.1186/1471-2474-6-61.CrossRef

23.

Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE: The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991, 44: 561-570. 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90220-4.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Kuyvenhoven MM, Gorter KJ, Zuithoff P, Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Post MW: The foot function index with verbal rating scales (FFI-5pt): A clinimetric evaluation and comparison with the original FFI. J Rheumatol. 2002, 29 (5): 1023-1028.PubMed

25.

Roorda LD, Jones CA, Waltz M, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM, van der Eijken JW, Willems WJ, Heyligers IC, Voaklander DC, Kelly KD, Suarez-Almazor ME: Satisfactory cross cultural equivalence of the Dutch WOMAC in patients with hip osteoarthritis waiting for arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004, 63 (1): 36-42. 10.1136/ard.2002.001784.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW: Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988, 15 (12): 1833-1840.PubMed

27.

Wolfe F, Kong SX: Rasch analysis of the Western Ontario MacMaster questionnaire (WOMAC) in 2205 patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999, 58 (9): 563-568. 10.1136/ard.58.9.563.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Grace EM, Gerecz EM, Kassam YB, Buchanan HM, Buchanan WW, Tugwell PS: 50-foot walking time: a critical assessment of an outcome measure in clinical therapeutic trials of antirheumatic drugs. Br J Rheumatol. 1988, 27 (5): 372-4. 10.1093/rheumatology/27.5.372.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Spiegel JS, Paulus HE, Ward NB, Spiegel TM, Leake B, Kane RL: What are we measuring? An examination of walk time and grip strength. J Rheumatol. 1987, 14 (1): 80-86.PubMed

30.

Ward MM: Clinical measures in rheumatoid arthritis: which are most useful in assessing patients?. J Rheumatol. 1994, 21 (1): 17-27.PubMed

31.

Van Riel PLCM, Schumacher HR: How does one assess early rheumatoid arthritis in daily clinical practice?. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2001, 15 (1): 67-76. 10.1053/berh.2000.0126.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Platto MJ, O'Connell PG, Hicks JE, Gerber LH: The relationship of pain and deformity of the rheumatoid foot to gait and an index of functional ambulation. J Rheumatol. 1991, 18 (1): 38-43.PubMed

33.

van der Leeden M, Dekker JH, Siemonsma PC, Lek-Westerhof SS, Steultjens MP: Reproducibility of plantar pressure measurements in patients with chronic arthritis: a comparison of one-step, two-step, and three-step protocols and an estimate of the number of measurements required. Foot Ankle Int. 2004, 25 (10): 739-744.PubMed

34.

Woodburn J, Hennessy K, Steultjens MP, McInnes IB, Turner DE: Looking through the 'window of opportunity': is there a new paradigm of podiatry care on the horizon in early rheumatoid arthritis?. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010, 3: 8-10.1186/1757-1146-3-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Peters MJ, Symmons DP, McCarey D, Dijkmans BA, Nicola P, Kvien TK, McInnes IB, Haentzschel H, Gonzalez-Gay MA, Provan S, Semb A, Sidiropoulos P, Kitas G, Smulders YM, Soubrier M, Szekanecz Z, Sattar N, Nurmohamed MT: EULAR evidence-based recommendations for cardiovascular risk management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other forms of inflammatory arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010, 69 (2): 325-331. 10.1136/ard.2009.113696.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W: Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain. 2004, 8 (4): 283-291. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.09.004.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Landorf KB, Radford JA: Minimal important difference: Values for the Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot function Index and Visual Analogue Scale. Foot. 2008, 18: 15-19. 10.1016/j.foot.2007.06.006.CrossRef

38.

Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G: Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum. 2001, 45 (4): 384-391. 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)45:4<384::AID-ART352>3.0.CO;2-0.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Steyerberg EW: Selection of main effects. Clinical Prediction Models, a practical appraoch to development, validation, and updating. 2009, New York: Springer, 191-211.

40.

Pratt DJ: A critical review of the literature of foot orthoses. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2000, 90 (7): 339-341.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Mann RA, Horton GA: Management of the foot and ankle in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1996, 22 (3): 457-476. 10.1016/S0889-857X(05)70282-9.CrossRefPubMed

42.

van der Heijde DM, van 't Hof M, van Riel PL, van De Putte LB: Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists. J Rheumatol. 1993, 20 (3): 579-581.PubMed

Title: Factors predicting the outcome of customised foot orthoses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective cohort study
Authors: Marike van der Leeden
Karin Fiedler
Annelies Jonkman
Rutger Dahmen
Leo D Roorda
Dirkjan van Schaardenburg
Joost Dekker
Publication date: 01-12-2011
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1757-1146
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-4-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Factors predicting the outcome of customised foot orthoses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective cohort study

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Forefoot pathology in rheumatoid arthritis identified with ultrasound may not localise to areas of highest pressure: cohort observations at baseline and twelve months

Is simulation training effective in increasing podiatrists' confidence in foot ulcer management?

Patient expectations of podiatric surgery in the United Kingdom

The impact of socio-economic disadvantage on rates of hospital separations for diabetes-related foot disease in Victoria, Australia

Foot kinematics in patients with two patterns of pathological plantar hyperkeratosis

Lower limb biomechanics during running in individuals with achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review