Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 6/2016

01-12-2016

Factors Affecting Radiologist’s PACS Usage

Authors: Daniel Forsberg, Beverly Rosipko, Jeffrey L. Sunshine

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if any of the factors radiologist, examination category, time of week, and week effect PACS usage, with PACS usage defined as the sequential order of computer commands issued by a radiologist in a PACS during interpretation and dictation. We initially hypothesized that only radiologist and examination category would have significant effects on PACS usage. Command logs covering 8 weeks of PACS usage were analyzed. For each command trace (describing performed activities of an attending radiologist interpreting a single examination), the PACS usage variables number of commands, number of command classes, bigram repetitiveness, and time to read were extracted. Generalized linear models were used to determine the significance of the factors on the PACS usage variables. The statistical results confirmed the initial hypothesis that radiologist and examination category affect PACS usage and that the factors week and time of week to a large extent have no significant effect. As such, this work provides direction for continued efforts to analyze system data to better understand PACS utilization, which in turn can provide input to enable optimal utilization and configuration of corresponding systems. These continued efforts were, in this work, exemplified by a more detailed analysis using PACS usage profiles, which revealed insights directly applicable to improve PACS utilization through modified system configuration.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Weiss DL, Siddiqui KM, Scopelliti J: Radiologist assessment of PACS user interface devices. J Am Coll Radiol 3:265–273, 2006CrossRefPubMed Weiss DL, Siddiqui KM, Scopelliti J: Radiologist assessment of PACS user interface devices. J Am Coll Radiol 3:265–273, 2006CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Atkins MS, Fernquist J, Kirkpatrick AE, Forster BB: Evaluating interaction techniques for stack mode viewing. J Digit Imaging 22:369–382, 2009CrossRefPubMed Atkins MS, Fernquist J, Kirkpatrick AE, Forster BB: Evaluating interaction techniques for stack mode viewing. J Digit Imaging 22:369–382, 2009CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lidén M, Andersson T, Geijer H: Alternative user interface devices for improved navigation of CT datasets. J Digit Imaging 24:126–134, 2011CrossRefPubMed Lidén M, Andersson T, Geijer H: Alternative user interface devices for improved navigation of CT datasets. J Digit Imaging 24:126–134, 2011CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Goo JM, Choi JY, Im JG, et al: Effect of Monitor Luminance and Ambient Light on Observer Performance in Soft-Copy Reading of Digital Chest Radiographs. Radiology 232:762–766, 2004CrossRefPubMed Goo JM, Choi JY, Im JG, et al: Effect of Monitor Luminance and Ambient Light on Observer Performance in Soft-Copy Reading of Digital Chest Radiographs. Radiology 232:762–766, 2004CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Nagy P, Siegel EL, Hanson T, Kreiner L, Johnson K, Reiner B: PACS reading room design. Semin Roentgenol 38:244–255, 2003CrossRefPubMed Nagy P, Siegel EL, Hanson T, Kreiner L, Johnson K, Reiner B: PACS reading room design. Semin Roentgenol 38:244–255, 2003CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Siddiqui KM, Chia S, Knight N, Siegel EL: Design and ergonomic considerations for the filmless environment. J Am Coll Radiol 3:456–467, 2006CrossRefPubMed Siddiqui KM, Chia S, Knight N, Siegel EL: Design and ergonomic considerations for the filmless environment. J Am Coll Radiol 3:456–467, 2006CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hugine A, Guerlain S, Hedge A: User evaluation of an innovative digital reading room. J Digit Imaging 25:337–346, 2012CrossRefPubMed Hugine A, Guerlain S, Hedge A: User evaluation of an innovative digital reading room. J Digit Imaging 25:337–346, 2012CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Horii SC, Feingold ER, Kundel HL, et al: PACS Workstation functions: usage differences between radiologists and MICU physicians. Med Imaging Int Soc Opt Photon 2711:266–271, 1996 Horii SC, Feingold ER, Kundel HL, et al: PACS Workstation functions: usage differences between radiologists and MICU physicians. Med Imaging Int Soc Opt Photon 2711:266–271, 1996
10.
go back to reference Erickson BJ, Ryan WJ, Gehring DG, Beebe C: Clinician usage patterns of a desktop radiology information display application. J Digit Imaging 11:137–141, 1998CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Erickson BJ, Ryan WJ, Gehring DG, Beebe C: Clinician usage patterns of a desktop radiology information display application. J Digit Imaging 11:137–141, 1998CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
12.
go back to reference Forsberg D, Rosipko B, Sunshine JL: Analyzing PACS Usage Patterns by Means of Process Mining: Steps Toward a More Detailed Workflow Analysis in Radiology. J Digit Imaging 29:47–58, 2016CrossRefPubMed Forsberg D, Rosipko B, Sunshine JL: Analyzing PACS Usage Patterns by Means of Process Mining: Steps Toward a More Detailed Workflow Analysis in Radiology. J Digit Imaging 29:47–58, 2016CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Li X, Xue Y, Malin B: Towards understanding the usage pattern of web-based electronic medical record systems. World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM). 2011 I.E. Int Symp on a 1–7, 2011 Li X, Xue Y, Malin B: Towards understanding the usage pattern of web-based electronic medical record systems. World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM). 2011 I.E. Int Symp on a 1–7, 2011
14.
go back to reference Jameson A: Adaptive interfaces and agents. In: Human-Computer Interaction: Design Issues, Solutions, and Applications. 2009 Jameson A: Adaptive interfaces and agents. In: Human-Computer Interaction: Design Issues, Solutions, and Applications. 2009
15.
go back to reference Reiner B: Automating radiologist workflow, part 2: hands-free navigation. J Am Coll Radiol 5:1137–1141, 2008CrossRefPubMed Reiner B: Automating radiologist workflow, part 2: hands-free navigation. J Am Coll Radiol 5:1137–1141, 2008CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Zheng K, Padman R, Johnson MP, Diamond HS: An interface-driven analysis of user interactions with an electronic health records system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 16:228–237, 2009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zheng K, Padman R, Johnson MP, Diamond HS: An interface-driven analysis of user interactions with an electronic health records system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 16:228–237, 2009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Gregg Jr, WB, Randolph M, Brown DH, Lyles T, Smith SD, D’Agostino H: Using PACS audit data for process improvement. J Digit Imaging 23:674–680, 2010CrossRefPubMed Gregg Jr, WB, Randolph M, Brown DH, Lyles T, Smith SD, D’Agostino H: Using PACS audit data for process improvement. J Digit Imaging 23:674–680, 2010CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference van der Aalst WM: Business alignment: using process mining as a tool for Delta analysis and conformance testing. Requir Eng 10:198–211, 2005CrossRef van der Aalst WM: Business alignment: using process mining as a tool for Delta analysis and conformance testing. Requir Eng 10:198–211, 2005CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Dijkman R, Dumas M, van Dongen B, Käärik R, Mendling J: Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evaluation. Inf Syst 36:498–516, 2011CrossRef Dijkman R, Dumas M, van Dongen B, Käärik R, Mendling J: Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evaluation. Inf Syst 36:498–516, 2011CrossRef
20.
go back to reference van der Aalst WM: Process cubes: Slicing, dicing, rolling up and drilling down event data for process mining. In Asia Pacific Business Process Management. 1–22, 2013 van der Aalst WM: Process cubes: Slicing, dicing, rolling up and drilling down event data for process mining. In Asia Pacific Business Process Management. 1–22, 2013
Metadata
Title
Factors Affecting Radiologist’s PACS Usage
Authors
Daniel Forsberg
Beverly Rosipko
Jeffrey L. Sunshine
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9881-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Journal of Digital Imaging 6/2016 Go to the issue