Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 6/2010

01-12-2010

Using PACS Audit Data for Process Improvement

Authors: William (Bill) Gregg Jr, Mark Randolph, Denise H. Brown, Tommy Lyles, Sharrow (Dinnia) Smith, Horacio D’Agostino

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Today, all types of data are used in various ways to provide useful information. PACS Audit data have not been typically used as a data source although it includes information that can be used for various purposes such as process improvement (PI). In a typical radiology workflow, examinations do not show up on a radiologist’s unread worklist until the examination has been verified. An issue with clinical access to radiology reports was determined to be partly due to delays in the verification step. A PI goal was created to reduce this wait time. PACS audit data were mined using an in-house application to provide workflow time span information, and the particular span from arrived to verified was measured. The report also allowed specific examinations and users to be identified, and these data were used as a PI educational tool. The end result was a dramatic reduction in examinations taking longer than 1 h to be verified which reduced the time for report production and enhanced patient care.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Morgan MB, Branstetter BF, Lionetti D, Chang PJ: The radiology digital dashboard: effects on report turnaround time. J Digit Imaging 21:1:50–58, 2008CrossRef Morgan MB, Branstetter BF, Lionetti D, Chang PJ: The radiology digital dashboard: effects on report turnaround time. J Digit Imaging 21:1:50–58, 2008CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Stone G, Lekht A, Burris N, Williams C: Data collection and communications in the public health response to a disaster: rapid population estimate surveys and the Daily Dashboard in post-Katrina New Orleans. J Public Health Manag Pract 13:5:453–460, 2007 Stone G, Lekht A, Burris N, Williams C: Data collection and communications in the public health response to a disaster: rapid population estimate surveys and the Daily Dashboard in post-Katrina New Orleans. J Public Health Manag Pract 13:5:453–460, 2007
5.
go back to reference Minnigh TR, Gallet J: Maintaining quality control using a radiological digital X-ray dashboard. J Digit Imaging 22:1:84–88, 2009CrossRef Minnigh TR, Gallet J: Maintaining quality control using a radiological digital X-ray dashboard. J Digit Imaging 22:1:84–88, 2009CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gregg B, D’Agostino HD, Gonzalez Toledo EC: Creating an IHE ATNA based audit repository. J Digit Imaging 19:4:307–315, 2006CrossRef Gregg B, D’Agostino HD, Gonzalez Toledo EC: Creating an IHE ATNA based audit repository. J Digit Imaging 19:4:307–315, 2006CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gregg B: Maximizing the power of centricity PACS audit data. Presentation at GE User Summit, August 20, 2008, Washington, DC. Gregg B: Maximizing the power of centricity PACS audit data. Presentation at GE User Summit, August 20, 2008, Washington, DC.
8.
go back to reference Amis ES, Butler PF, Applegate KE, Birnbaum SB, Brateman LF, Hevezi JM, Mettler FA, Morin RL, Pentecost MJ, Smith GG, Strauss KJ, Zeman RK: American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 4:272–284, 2007CrossRefPubMed Amis ES, Butler PF, Applegate KE, Birnbaum SB, Brateman LF, Hevezi JM, Mettler FA, Morin RL, Pentecost MJ, Smith GG, Strauss KJ, Zeman RK: American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 4:272–284, 2007CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Using PACS Audit Data for Process Improvement
Authors
William (Bill) Gregg Jr
Mark Randolph
Denise H. Brown
Tommy Lyles
Sharrow (Dinnia) Smith
Horacio D’Agostino
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-009-9272-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

Journal of Digital Imaging 6/2010 Go to the issue