Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2021

01-06-2021 | Original Article

Eye-tracking in dentistry: what do children notice in the dental operatory?

Authors: Gregory R. Celine, Vanessa V. Y. Cho, Alexandr Kogan, Robert P. Anthonappa, Nigel. M. King

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To determine, using eye-tracking technology, (i) what children notice the most when they look at images of dental operatories and (ii) the effect of distractors on gaze pattern.

Materials and methods

Forty-one children aged 4–12 years (21 girls, 19 boys) viewed 13 images of dental operatories taken from different perspectives on a computer screen. One child was excluded due to calibration issues with the eye-tracking equipment. Areas of interest (AOI’s) were pre-defined on each image, then a Tobii X2-60 eye-tracking camera was used to track the location of participant’s gaze. Count of participants to fixate and mean length of fixation (LOF) for each AOI were measured.

Results

Significant differences in the mean LOF was noticed for bracket tables, handpieces, and the dental chair. Significantly differences in mean LOF between different areas of the images were noted where distractors (cartoons) were added.

Conclusions

When viewing images of dental operatories on a computer screen, children fixated most on the bracket tables, handpieces, and dental chairs. The addition of distractors was able to change where they looked. Eye-tracking was able to effectively assess where the children looked.

Clinical relevance

The findings demonstrate that children have inherent preferences for where they fixate when viewing images of a dental operatory. This has not previously been known and will allow customization of dental operatories where children will be treated.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Celine GR, Cho V, Kogan A, Anthonappa R, King N (2018) Eye-tracking in dentistry: what do children notice in the dentist? J Dent 78:72–75CrossRef Celine GR, Cho V, Kogan A, Anthonappa R, King N (2018) Eye-tracking in dentistry: what do children notice in the dentist? J Dent 78:72–75CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Henderson JM, Smith TJ (2009) How are eye fixation durations controlled during scene viewing? Further evidence from a scene onset delay paradigm. Vis Cogn 17:1055–1082CrossRef Henderson JM, Smith TJ (2009) How are eye fixation durations controlled during scene viewing? Further evidence from a scene onset delay paradigm. Vis Cogn 17:1055–1082CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chawarska K, Shic F (2009) Looking but not seeing: atypical visual scanning and recognition of faces in 2 and 4-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 39:1663–1672CrossRef Chawarska K, Shic F (2009) Looking but not seeing: atypical visual scanning and recognition of faces in 2 and 4-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 39:1663–1672CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Petursdottir AI, Aguilar G (2016) Order of stimulus presentation influences children’s acquisition in receptive identification tasks. J Appl Behav Anal 49:58–68CrossRef Petursdottir AI, Aguilar G (2016) Order of stimulus presentation influences children’s acquisition in receptive identification tasks. J Appl Behav Anal 49:58–68CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Eye-tracking in dentistry: what do children notice in the dental operatory?
Authors
Gregory R. Celine
Vanessa V. Y. Cho
Alexandr Kogan
Robert P. Anthonappa
Nigel. M. King
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03689-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2021 Go to the issue