Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 1/2017

Open Access 01-08-2017 | Clinical Study

External validation of the diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma survival prediction model: a collaborative report from the International DIPG Registry and the SIOPE DIPG Registry

Authors: Sophie E. M. Veldhuijzen van Zanten, Adam Lane, Martijn W. Heymans, Joshua Baugh, Brooklyn Chaney, Lindsey M. Hoffman, Renee Doughman, Marc H. A. Jansen, Esther Sanchez, William P. Vandertop, Gertjan J. L. Kaspers, Dannis G. van Vuurden, Maryam Fouladi, Blaise V. Jones, James Leach

Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

We aimed to perform external validation of the recently developed survival prediction model for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), and discuss its utility. The DIPG survival prediction model was developed in a cohort of patients from the Netherlands, United Kingdom and Germany, registered in the SIOPE DIPG Registry, and includes age <3 years, longer symptom duration and receipt of chemotherapy as favorable predictors, and presence of ring-enhancement on MRI as unfavorable predictor. Model performance was evaluated by analyzing the discrimination and calibration abilities. External validation was performed using an unselected cohort from the International DIPG Registry, including patients from United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Basic comparison with the results of the original study was performed using descriptive statistics, and univariate- and multivariable regression analyses in the validation cohort. External validation was assessed following a variety of analyses described previously. Baseline patient characteristics and results from the regression analyses were largely comparable. Kaplan–Meier curves of the validation cohort reproduced separated groups of standard (n = 39), intermediate (n = 125), and high-risk (n = 78) patients. This discriminative ability was confirmed by similar values for the hazard ratios across these risk groups. The calibration curve in the validation cohort showed a symmetric underestimation of the predicted survival probabilities. In this external validation study, we demonstrate that the DIPG survival prediction model has acceptable cross-cohort calibration and is able to discriminate patients with short, average, and increased survival. We discuss how this clinico-radiological model may serve a useful role in current clinical practice.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Bartels U, Hawkins C, Vézina G et al (2011) Proceedings of the diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) Toronto Think Tank: advancing basic and translational research and cooperation in DIPG. J Neurooncol 105:119–125. doi:10.1007/s11060-011-0704-4 CrossRefPubMed Bartels U, Hawkins C, Vézina G et al (2011) Proceedings of the diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) Toronto Think Tank: advancing basic and translational research and cooperation in DIPG. J Neurooncol 105:119–125. doi:10.​1007/​s11060-011-0704-4 CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Jansen M, Veldhuijzen van Zanten S, Sanchez Aliaga E et al (2015) Survival prediction model of children with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma based on clinical and radiological criteria. Neuro Oncol 17:160–166. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nou104 CrossRefPubMed Jansen M, Veldhuijzen van Zanten S, Sanchez Aliaga E et al (2015) Survival prediction model of children with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma based on clinical and radiological criteria. Neuro Oncol 17:160–166. doi:10.​1093/​neuonc/​nou104 CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Veldhuijzen van Zanten SE, Baugh J, Chaney B et al (2017) Development of the SIOPE DIPG network, registry and imaging repository: a collaborative effort to optimize research into a rare and lethal disease. J Neurooncol. doi:10.1007/s11060-016-2363-y PubMedCentral Veldhuijzen van Zanten SE, Baugh J, Chaney B et al (2017) Development of the SIOPE DIPG network, registry and imaging repository: a collaborative effort to optimize research into a rare and lethal disease. J Neurooncol. doi:10.​1007/​s11060-016-2363-y PubMedCentral
7.
10.
go back to reference Van Houwelingen HC (2000) Validation, calibration, revision and combination of prognostic survival models. Stat Med 19:3401–3415CrossRefPubMed Van Houwelingen HC (2000) Validation, calibration, revision and combination of prognostic survival models. Stat Med 19:3401–3415CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Barkovich AJ, Krischer J, Kun LE et al (1990) Brain stem gliomas: a classification system based on magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Neurosurg 16(2):73–83CrossRef Barkovich AJ, Krischer J, Kun LE et al (1990) Brain stem gliomas: a classification system based on magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Neurosurg 16(2):73–83CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Choodari-Oskooei B, Royston P, Parmar MKB (2012) A simulation study of predictive ability measures in a survival model I: explained variation measures. Stat Med 31:2627–2643. doi:10.1002/sim.4242 CrossRefPubMed Choodari-Oskooei B, Royston P, Parmar MKB (2012) A simulation study of predictive ability measures in a survival model I: explained variation measures. Stat Med 31:2627–2643. doi:10.​1002/​sim.​4242 CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Su Y-S, Gelman A, Hill J et al (2011) Multiple imputation with diagnostics (mi)in R: opening windows into the black box. J Stat Softw 45:1–31CrossRef Su Y-S, Gelman A, Hill J et al (2011) Multiple imputation with diagnostics (mi)in R: opening windows into the black box. J Stat Softw 45:1–31CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Broniscer A, Laningham FH, Sanders RP et al. Young age may predict a better outcome for children with diffuse pontine glioma (2008). Cancer 113:566–572. doi:10.1002/cncr.23584 Broniscer A, Laningham FH, Sanders RP et al. Young age may predict a better outcome for children with diffuse pontine glioma (2008). Cancer 113:566–572. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​23584
21.
go back to reference Altman DG, Royston P (2000) What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med 19:453–473CrossRefPubMed Altman DG, Royston P (2000) What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med 19:453–473CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Jansen MHA, Veldhuijzen van Zanten SEM, Heymans MW et al (2016) Commentary on “Histone H3F3A and HIST1H3B K27M mutations define two subgroups of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas with different prognosis and phenotypes”. Acta Neuropathol 131:793–794. doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1567-8 CrossRefPubMed Jansen MHA, Veldhuijzen van Zanten SEM, Heymans MW et al (2016) Commentary on “Histone H3F3A and HIST1H3B K27M mutations define two subgroups of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas with different prognosis and phenotypes”. Acta Neuropathol 131:793–794. doi:10.​1007/​s00401-016-1567-8 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
External validation of the diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma survival prediction model: a collaborative report from the International DIPG Registry and the SIOPE DIPG Registry
Authors
Sophie E. M. Veldhuijzen van Zanten
Adam Lane
Martijn W. Heymans
Joshua Baugh
Brooklyn Chaney
Lindsey M. Hoffman
Renee Doughman
Marc H. A. Jansen
Esther Sanchez
William P. Vandertop
Gertjan J. L. Kaspers
Dannis G. van Vuurden
Maryam Fouladi
Blaise V. Jones
James Leach
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2514-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 1/2017 Go to the issue