Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

External validation of a prediction model for surgical site infection after thoracolumbar spine surgery in a Western European cohort

Authors: Daniël M. C. Janssen, Sander M. J. van Kuijk, Boudewijn B. d’Aumerie, Paul C. Willems

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A prediction model for surgical site infection (SSI) after spine surgery was developed in 2014 by Lee et al. This model was developed to compute an individual estimate of the probability of SSI after spine surgery based on the patient’s comorbidity profile and invasiveness of surgery. Before any prediction model can be validly implemented in daily medical practice, it should be externally validated to assess how the prediction model performs in patients sampled independently from the derivation cohort.

Methods

We included 898 consecutive patients who underwent instrumented thoracolumbar spine surgery.
To quantify overall performance using Nagelkerke’s R2 statistic, the discriminative ability was quantified as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). We computed the calibration slope of the calibration plot, to judge prediction accuracy.

Results

Sixty patients developed an SSI. The overall performance of the prediction model in our population was poor: Nagelkerke’s R2 was 0.01. The AUC was 0.61 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54–0.68). The estimated slope of the calibration plot was 0.52.

Conclusions

The previously published prediction model showed poor performance in our academic external validation cohort. To predict SSI after instrumented thoracolumbar spine surgery for the present population, a better fitting prediction model should be developed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Godil SS, et al. Comparative effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis of local application of vancomycin powder in posterior spinal fusion for spine trauma: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(3):331–5.CrossRefPubMed Godil SS, et al. Comparative effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis of local application of vancomycin powder in posterior spinal fusion for spine trauma: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(3):331–5.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Fang XT, Wood KB. Management of postoperative instrumented spinal wound infection. Chin Med J. 2013;126(20):3817–21.PubMed Fang XT, Wood KB. Management of postoperative instrumented spinal wound infection. Chin Med J. 2013;126(20):3817–21.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Collins I, et al. The diagnosis and management of infection following instrumented spinal fusion. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(3):445–50.CrossRefPubMed Collins I, et al. The diagnosis and management of infection following instrumented spinal fusion. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(3):445–50.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Chen SH, et al. Postoperative wound infection after posterior spinal instrumentation: analysis of long-term treatment outcomes. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(3):561–70.CrossRefPubMed Chen SH, et al. Postoperative wound infection after posterior spinal instrumentation: analysis of long-term treatment outcomes. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(3):561–70.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fang A, et al. Risk factors for infection after spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(12):1460–5.CrossRef Fang A, et al. Risk factors for infection after spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(12):1460–5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Weinstein MA, McCabe JP, Cammisa FP Jr. Postoperative spinal wound infection: a review of 2,391 consecutive index procedures. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13(5):422–6.CrossRefPubMed Weinstein MA, McCabe JP, Cammisa FP Jr. Postoperative spinal wound infection: a review of 2,391 consecutive index procedures. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13(5):422–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sierra-Hoffman M, et al. Postoperative instrumented spine infections: a retrospective review. South Med J. 2010;103(1):25–30.CrossRefPubMed Sierra-Hoffman M, et al. Postoperative instrumented spine infections: a retrospective review. South Med J. 2010;103(1):25–30.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Glotzbecker MP, et al. What’s the evidence? Systematic literature review of risk factors and preventive strategies for surgical site infection following pediatric spine surgery. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(5):479–87.CrossRefPubMed Glotzbecker MP, et al. What’s the evidence? Systematic literature review of risk factors and preventive strategies for surgical site infection following pediatric spine surgery. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(5):479–87.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ho C, Sucato DJ, Richards BS. Risk factors for the development of delayed infections following posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(20):2272–7.CrossRef Ho C, Sucato DJ, Richards BS. Risk factors for the development of delayed infections following posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(20):2272–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lee MJ, et al. Predicting surgical site infection after spine surgery: a validated model using a prospective surgical registry. Spine J. 2014;14(9):2112–7.CrossRefPubMed Lee MJ, et al. Predicting surgical site infection after spine surgery: a validated model using a prospective surgical registry. Spine J. 2014;14(9):2112–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mirza SK, et al. Towards standardized measurement of adverse events in spine surgery: conceptual model and pilot evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mirza SK, et al. Towards standardized measurement of adverse events in spine surgery: conceptual model and pilot evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Mangram AJ, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital infection control practices advisory committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20(4):250–78. quiz 279-80CrossRefPubMed Mangram AJ, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital infection control practices advisory committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20(4):250–78. quiz 279-80CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Geubbels EL, et al. An operating surveillance system of surgical-site infections in the Netherlands: results of the PREZIES national surveillance network. Preventie van Ziekenhuisinfecties door surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000;21(5):311–8.CrossRefPubMed Geubbels EL, et al. An operating surveillance system of surgical-site infections in the Netherlands: results of the PREZIES national surveillance network. Preventie van Ziekenhuisinfecties door surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000;21(5):311–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Subramanyam R, et al. Systematic review of risk factors for surgical site infection in pediatric scoliosis surgery. Spine J. 2015;15(6):1422–31.CrossRefPubMed Subramanyam R, et al. Systematic review of risk factors for surgical site infection in pediatric scoliosis surgery. Spine J. 2015;15(6):1422–31.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cizik AM, et al. Using the spine surgical invasiveness index to identify risk of surgical site infection: a multivariate analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(4):335–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cizik AM, et al. Using the spine surgical invasiveness index to identify risk of surgical site infection: a multivariate analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(4):335–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Wang T, et al. Factors predicting surgical site infection after posterior lumbar surgery: a multicenter retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(5):e6042.CrossRef Wang T, et al. Factors predicting surgical site infection after posterior lumbar surgery: a multicenter retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(5):e6042.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lieber B, et al. Preoperative predictors of spinal infection within the National Surgical Quality Inpatient Database. World Neurosurg. 2016;89:517–24.CrossRefPubMed Lieber B, et al. Preoperative predictors of spinal infection within the National Surgical Quality Inpatient Database. World Neurosurg. 2016;89:517–24.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Vergouwe Y, et al. Substantial effective sample sizes were required for external validation studies of predictive logistic regression models. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(5):475–83.CrossRefPubMed Vergouwe Y, et al. Substantial effective sample sizes were required for external validation studies of predictive logistic regression models. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(5):475–83.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Chaichana KL, et al. Risk of infection following posterior instrumented lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease in 817 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20(1):45–52.CrossRefPubMed Chaichana KL, et al. Risk of infection following posterior instrumented lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease in 817 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20(1):45–52.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
External validation of a prediction model for surgical site infection after thoracolumbar spine surgery in a Western European cohort
Authors
Daniël M. C. Janssen
Sander M. J. van Kuijk
Boudewijn B. d’Aumerie
Paul C. Willems
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0821-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2018 Go to the issue