Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | External Fixator | Research

Comparative analysis of external locking plate and combined frame external fixator for open distal tibial fractures: a comprehensive assessment of clinical outcomes and financial implications

Authors: Mohamed Lamin Bangura, Huasong Luo, Teng Zeng, Minglu Wang, Shangce Lin, Liang Chunli

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Open distal tibial fractures pose significant challenges regarding treatment options and patient outcomes. This retrospective single-centre study aimed to compare the stability, clinical outcomes, complications, and financial implications of two surgical interventions, namely the external locking plate and the combined frame external fixator, to manage open distal tibial fractures.

Methods

Forty-four patients with distal open tibial (metaphyseal extraarticular) fractures treated between 2020 and 2022 were selected and formed into two main groups, Group A and Group B. Group A (19 patients) are patients that underwent treatment using the external locking plate technique, while Group B (25 patients) received the combined frame external fixator approach. Age, gender, inpatient stay, re-operation rates, complications, functional recovery (measured by the Johner-Wrush score), pain ratings (measured by the Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]), and cost analyses were evaluated for each group. Statistical analyses using SPSS were conducted to compare the outcomes between the two groups.

Results

The research found significant variations in clinical outcomes, complications, and cost consequences between Group A and Group B. Group A had fewer hospitalisation periods (23.687.74) than Group B (33.5619.47). Re-operation rates were also considerably lower in Group A (26.3%) than in Group B (48%), owing to a greater prevalence of pin-tract infections and subsequent pin loosening in the combination frame external fixator group. The estimated cost of both techniques was recorded and analysed with the locking average of 26,619.69 ± 9,602.352 and the combined frame average of 39,095.64 ± 20,070.077.

Conclusion

This study suggests that although the two approaches effectively manage open distal tibia fractures, the locking compression plate approach (Group A) has an advantage in treating open distal tibia fractures. Shorter hospitalisation times, reduced re-operation rates, and fewer complications will benefit patients, healthcare systems, and budget allocation. Group A's functional recovery results demonstrate the locking plate technique's ability to improve recovery and patient quality of life. According to the cost analysis, the locking plate technique's economic viability and cost-effectiveness may optimise healthcare resources for open distal tibia fractures. These findings might improve patient outcomes and inform evidence-based orthopaedic surgery.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Rommens PM, Küchle R, Hofmann A, Hessmann MH. Intramedullary Nailing of Metaphyseal Fractures of the Lower Extremity. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2017;84(5):330–40 (English. PMID: 29351533).CrossRefPubMed Rommens PM, Küchle R, Hofmann A, Hessmann MH. Intramedullary Nailing of Metaphyseal Fractures of the Lower Extremity. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2017;84(5):330–40 (English. PMID: 29351533).CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lerner A, Reis ND, Soudry M. Primary external fixation. In: Lerner A, Soudry M, editors. Armed Conflict Injuries to the Extremities: A Treatment Manual. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2011. p. 133–62.CrossRef Lerner A, Reis ND, Soudry M. Primary external fixation. In: Lerner A, Soudry M, editors. Armed Conflict Injuries to the Extremities: A Treatment Manual. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2011. p. 133–62.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Franz D, Raschke M, Giannoudis PV, Leliveld M, Metsemakers WJ, Verhofstad MHJ, Craig JA, Shore J, Smith A, Muehlendyck C, Kerstan M, Fuchs T. Use of antibiotic coated intramedullary nails in open tibia fractures: A European medical resource use and cost-effectiveness analysis. Injury. 2021;52(7):1951–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.053. (Epub 2021 May 5 PMID: 34001375).CrossRefPubMed Franz D, Raschke M, Giannoudis PV, Leliveld M, Metsemakers WJ, Verhofstad MHJ, Craig JA, Shore J, Smith A, Muehlendyck C, Kerstan M, Fuchs T. Use of antibiotic coated intramedullary nails in open tibia fractures: A European medical resource use and cost-effectiveness analysis. Injury. 2021;52(7):1951–8. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​injury.​2021.​04.​053. (Epub 2021 May 5 PMID: 34001375).CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparative analysis of external locking plate and combined frame external fixator for open distal tibial fractures: a comprehensive assessment of clinical outcomes and financial implications
Authors
Mohamed Lamin Bangura
Huasong Luo
Teng Zeng
Minglu Wang
Shangce Lin
Liang Chunli
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-07097-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2023 Go to the issue