Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Geriatrics
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Exploring the impact of information and communication technologies on loneliness and social isolation in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review of reviews

Authors: Mari Gunnes, Ida-Camilla Løe, Jorid Kalseth

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recognizing the escalating public health concerns of loneliness and social isolation in aging populations, this study seeks to comprehensively explore the potential of information and communication technology (ICT)-based interventions to address these issues among older adults. This scoping review of reviews aims to map and synthesize existing evidence on the effectiveness and scope of ICT interventions targeting loneliness and social isolation in community-dwelling older adults, elucidating types of technology, impacts, facilitators, barriers, and research gaps.

Methods

Following the Joanna Briggs Institute framework, we systematically searched eight diverse databases identifying relevant published reviews. We included English-written, peer-reviewed reviews of all types, with no limits regarding time of publication about ICTs targeting loneliness and/or social isolation for community-dwelling older adults. Eligible reviews were analysed and summarized, offering a holistic narrative of the reported types of ICTs and their impact, the identified facilitators and barriers influencing the implementation and adoption of ICT interventions, and the research gaps identified in the literature.

Results

The review included 39 publications published between 2012 and 2024, spanning systematic, scoping, and reviews of reviews. Various ICTs were reported, primarily social media virtual communities, followed by video-mediated friendly visits, conversational agents, social robots, exergames and online gameplay. Predominantly positive impacts on mitigating social isolation and loneliness were evident for these ICTs, although methodological diversity and contradictory findings complicated definite conclusions. Facilitators and barriers encompassed individual competencies, access and usage, and intervention design and implementation. Research gaps involved targeting specific subgroups, exploring innovative technologies, incorporating diverse study designs, improving research methodologies, and addressing usability and accessibility. Future research should focus on identifying elderly individuals who can benefit the most from ICT use, exploring novel technologies, using a wider range of study designs, and enhancing usability and accessibility considerations.

Conclusions

This review sheds light on the diverse range of ICTs, their impact, and the facilitators and barriers associated with their use. Future investigations should prioritize refining outcome measures, addressing gender differences, and enhancing the usability and accessibility of interventions. The involvement of older adults in the design process and the exploration of technological training interventions hold promise in overcoming barriers.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Social isolation and loneliness among older people: advocacy brief. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Licence: CC BY-NC_SA 3.0 IGO.
2.
Evans IEM, Martyr A, Collins R, Brayne C, Clare L. Social isolation and cognitive function in later life: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Anstey K, Peters R, editors. JAD. 2019;70(s1):S119–44.
3.
Kuiper JS, Zuidersma M, Oude Voshaar RC, Zuidema SU, van den Heuvel ER, Stolk RP, et al. Social relationships and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Ageing Res Rev. 2015;22:39–57.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Lara E, Martín-María N, De la Torre-Luque A, Koyanagi A, Vancampfort D, Izquierdo A, et al. Does loneliness contribute to mild cognitive impairment and dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Ageing Res Rev. 2019 Jul;52:7–16.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Leigh-Hunt N, Bagguley D, Bash K, Turner V, Turnbull S, Valtorta N, et al. An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness. Public Health. 2017;152:157–71.PubMedCrossRef
6.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: opportunities for the health care system. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2020. [cited 2023 Jan 13]. Available from: https://​www.​nap.​edu/​catalog/​25663
7.
Newman K, Wang AH, Wang AZY, Hanna D. The role of internet-based digital tools in reducing social isolation and addressing support needs among informal caregivers: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1495.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Mihalopoulos C, Le LKD, Chatterton ML, Bucholc J, Holt-Lunstad J, Lim MH, et al. The economic costs of loneliness: a review of cost-of-illness and economic evaluation studies. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020;55(7):823–36.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Fakoya OA, McCorry NK, Donnelly M. Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):129.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Perissinotto C, Holt-Lunstad J, Periyakoil VS, Covinsky K. A practical approach to assessing and mitigating loneliness and isolation in older adults. J American Geriatrics Soc. 2019;67(4):657–62.CrossRef
11.
12.
13.
Yang K, Victor C. Age and loneliness in 25 European nations. Ageing Soc. 2011;31(8):1368–88.CrossRef
14.
Ong AD, Uchino BN, Wethington E. Loneliness and health in older adults: a Mini-review and synthesis. Gerontol. 2016;62(4):443–9.CrossRef
15.
Gao Q, Prina AM, Prince M, Acosta D, Luisa Sosa A, Guerra M, et al. Loneliness among older adults in Latin America, China, and India: prevalence, correlates and association with mortality. Int J Public Health. 2021;31(66):604449.CrossRef
16.
Hossain MM, Purohit N, Khan N, McKyer ELJ, Ma P, Bhattacharya S, et al. Prevalence and correlates of loneliness in India: a systematic review. SocArXiv Papers; 2020. [cited 2023 Mar 31]. Available from: https://​osf.​io/​x4ctz.
17.
Yang K, Victor CR. The prevalence of and risk factors for loneliness among older people in China. Ageing Soc. 2008;28(3):305–27.CrossRef
18.
Cudjoe TKM, Roth DL, Szanton SL, Wolff JL, Boyd CM, Thorpe RJ. The epidemiology of social isolation: National Health and aging trends study. Carr D, editor. J Gerontol: Series B. 2020;75(1):107–13.CrossRef
19.
Nicholson NR. A review of social isolation: an important but Underassessed condition in older adults. J Primary Prevent. 2012;33(2–3):137–52.CrossRef
20.
Kotian DB, Mathews M, Parsekar SS, Nair S, Binu VS, Subba SH. Factors associated with social isolation among the older people in India. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2018;31(5):271–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Beard JR, Officer A, De Carvalho IA, Sadana R, Pot AM, Michel JP, et al. The world report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet. 2016;387(10033):2145–54.PubMedCrossRef
22.
23.
Masi CM, Chen HY, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A Meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2011;15(3):219–66.CrossRef
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
Boulton E, Kneale D, Stansfield C, Heron P, Sutcliffe K, Hayanga B, et al. Rapid systematic review of systematic reviews: what befriending, social support and low intensity psychosocial interventions, delivered remotely, may reduce social isolation and loneliness among older adults and how? [version 2; peer review: 2 approved with reservations] F1000Research. 2021;9:1368. https://​doi.​org/​10.​12688/​f1000research.​27076.​2.
29.
Joanna Briggs Institute. The Joanna Briggs institute reviewers’ manual 2015 methodology for JBI scoping reviews. The University of Adelaide; 2015.
30.
Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5(4):371–85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.CrossRef
32.
Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;20(5):69.CrossRef
33.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Choi M, Kong S, Jung D. Computer and internet interventions for loneliness and depression in older adults: a Meta-analysis. Healthc Inform Res. 2012;18(3):191.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
Fan Q. Utilizing ICT to prevent loneliness and social isolation of the elderly. A literature review Cuad Trab Soc. 2016;29(2):185–200.CrossRef
36.
Gasteiger N, Loveys K, Law M, Broadbent E. Friends from the future: a scoping review of research into robots and Computer agents to combat loneliness in older people. CIA. 2021;16:941–71.CrossRef
37.
Hagan R, Manktelow R, Taylor BJ, Mallett J. Reducing loneliness amongst older people: a systematic search and narrative review. Aging Ment Health. 2014;18(6):683–93.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Döring N, Conde M, Brandenburg K, Broll W, Gross HM, Werner S, et al. Can communication technologies reduce loneliness and social isolation in older people? A scoping review of reviews. IJERPH. 2022;19(18):11310.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
Balki E, Hayes N, Holland C. Effectiveness of technology interventions in addressing social isolation, connectedness, and loneliness in older adults: systematic umbrella review. JMIR Aging. 2022;5(4):e40125.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
Wister A, O’Dea E, Fyffe I, D. Cosco T. Technological interventions to reduce loneliness and social isolation among community-living older adults: a scoping review. Gerontechnol. 2021;20(2):1–16.CrossRef
41.
Fu Z, Yan M, Meng C. The effectiveness of remote delivered intervention for loneliness reduction in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychol. 2022;28(13):935544.CrossRef
42.
Petersen B, Khalili-Mahani N, Murphy C, Sawchuk K, Phillips N, Li KZH, et al. The association between information and communication technologies, loneliness and social connectedness: a scoping review. Front Psychol. 2023;22(14):1063146.CrossRef
43.
Campos W, Martinez A, Sanchez W, Estrada H, Castro-Sánchez NA, Mujica D. A systematic review of proposals for the social integration of elderly people using ambient intelligence and social networking sites. Cogn Comput. 2016;8(3):529–42.CrossRef
44.
Baker S, Warburton J, Waycott J, Batchelor F, Hoang T, Dow B, et al. Combatting social isolation and increasing social participation of older adults through the use of technology: a systematic review of existing evidence. Austral J Ageing. 2018;37(3):184–93.CrossRef
45.
Chen YRR, Schulz PJ. The effect of information communication technology interventions on reducing social isolation in the elderly: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(1):e18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
47.
Fuss B, Dorstyn D, Ward L. Computer-mediated communication and social support among community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review of cross-sectional data. Austral J Ageing. 2019;38(4):E103–13.CrossRef
48.
Heins P, Boots LMM, Koh WQ, Neven A, Verhey FRJ, de Vugt ME. The effects of technological interventions on social participation of community-dwelling older adults with and without dementia: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2021;10(11):2308. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​jcm10112308.
49.
Ibarra F, Baez M, Cernuzzi L, Casati F. A systematic review on technology-supported interventions to improve old-age social wellbeing: loneliness, social isolation, and connectedness. J Healthcare Eng. 2020;2020:2036842. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1155/​2020/​2036842.
50.
51.
Khosravi P, Rezvani A, Wiewiora A. The impact of technology on older adults’ social isolation. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;63:594–603.CrossRef
52.
Latikka R, Rubio-Hernández R, Lohan ES, Rantala J, Nieto Fernández F, Laitinen A, et al. Older adults’ loneliness, social isolation, and physical information and communication Technology in the era of ambient assisted living: a systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(12):e28022.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
Morris ME, Adair B, Ozanne E, Kurowski W, Miller KJ, Pearce AJ, et al. Smart technologies to enhance social connectedness in older people who live at home. Australas J Ageing. 2014;33(3):142–52.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Nef T, Ganea RL, Müri RM, Mosimann UP. Social networking sites and older users - a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25(7):1041–53.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Newman L, Stoner C, Spector A. Social networking sites and the experience of older adult users: a systematic review. Age Soc. 2021;41(2):377–402.CrossRef
56.
Nnabuko U, Anderson S. The effect of ICT on social support in healthcare: a systematic review. Iadis-Int J Comput Sci Inform Syst. 2018;13(1):14–32.
57.
58.
Shah SGS, Nogueras D, van Woerden HC, Kiparoglou V. Evaluation of the effectiveness of digital technology interventions to reduce loneliness in older adults: systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(6):e24712.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
59.
Wiwatkunupakarn N, Pateekhum C, Aramrat C, Jirapornchaoren W, Pinyopornpanish K, Angkurawaranon C. Social networking site usage: a systematic review of its relationship with social isolation, loneliness, and depression among older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2022;26(7):1318–26.PubMedCrossRef
60.
61.
62.
63.
Chen E, Wood D, Ysseldyk R. Online social networking and mental health among older adults: a scoping review. Canad J Aging. 2022;41(1):26–39.CrossRef
64.
Damant J, Knapp M, Freddolino P, Lombard D. Effects of digital engagement on the quality of life of older people. Health Soc Care Commun. 2017;25(6):1679–703.CrossRef
65.
Rodrigues NG, Han CQY, Su Y, Klainin-Yobas P, Wu XV. Psychological impacts and online interventions of social isolation amongst older adults during COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. J Adv Nurs. 2022;78(3):609–44.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Thangavel G, Memedi M, Hedström K. Customized information and communication Technology for Reducing Social Isolation and Loneliness among Older Adults: scoping review. JMIR Mental Health. 2022;9(3):e34221. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2196/​34221.
67.
Chipps J, Jarvis MA, Ramlall S. The effectiveness of e-interventions on reducing social isolation in older persons: a systematic review of systematic reviews. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(10):817–27.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Gorenko JA, Moran C, Flynn M, Dobson K, Konnert C. Social isolation and psychological distress among older adults related to COVID-19: a narrative review of remotely-delivered interventions and recommendations. J Appl Gerontol. 2021;40(1):3–13.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Kusumota L, Diniz MAA, Ribeiro RM, Silva ILC da, Figueira ALG, Rodrigues FR, et al. Impact of digital social media on the perception of loneliness and social isolation in older adults. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2022;30:e3573.
70.
Casanova G, Zaccaria D, Rolandi E, Guaita A. The effect of information and communication technology and social networking site use on older People’s well-being in relation to loneliness: review of experimental studies. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(3):e23588.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
71.
72.
73.
Todd E, Bidstrup B, Mutch A. Using information and communication technology learnings to alleviate social isolation for older people during periods of mandated isolation: a review. Australas J Ageing. 2022;41(3):e227–39. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ajag.​13041.
74.
75.
Morris JH. Body, person and environment: why promoting physical activity (PA) with stroke survivors requires holistic thinking. Brain Impairment. 2016;17(1):3–15.CrossRef
76.
Noone C, McSharry J, Smalle M, Burns A, Dwan K, Devane D, et al. Video calls for reducing social isolation and loneliness in older people: a rapid review. Cochrane datab system rev. 2020;5(5):CD013632.
77.
Von Soest T, Luhmann M, Hansen T, Gerstorf D. Development of loneliness in midlife and old age: its nature and correlates. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020;118(2):388–406.CrossRef
78.
Rapp T, Ronchetti J, Sicsic J. Where are populations aging better? A global comparison of healthy aging across Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries. Value Health. 2022;25(9):1520–7.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Marques S, Swift HJ, Vauclair CM, Lima ML, Bratt C, Abrams D. ‘Being old and ill’ across different countries: social status, age identification and older people’s subjective health. Psychol Health. 2015;30(6):699–714.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Valtorta NK, Kanaan M, Gilbody S, Hanratty B. Loneliness, social isolation and social relationships: what are we measuring? A novel framework for classifying and comparing tools. BMJ Open. 2016 Apr;6(4):e010799.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
81.
82.
83.
Wang Y, Jiang W, Wu L. Association between age and loneliness in different residential type and gender groups: evidence from China. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23(1):43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
84.
Borys S, Perlman D. Gender Differences in Loneliness. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 1985;11(1):63–74.CrossRef
85.
Mannheim I, Schwartz E, Xi W, Buttigieg SC, McDonnell-Naughton M, Wouters EJM, et al. Inclusion of older adults in the research and Design of Digital Technology. IJERPH. 2019;16(19):3718.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
86.
Metadata
Title
Exploring the impact of information and communication technologies on loneliness and social isolation in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review of reviews
Authors
Mari Gunnes
Ida-Camilla Løe
Jorid Kalseth
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04837-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Geriatrics 1/2024 Go to the issue

Research

Association between sleep problems and functional disability in community-dwelling older adults

Research

Effects of virtual reality versus motor imagery versus routine physical therapy in patients with parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled trial

Research

The moderating effect of mental health and health insurance ownership on the relationships between physical multimorbidity and healthcare utilisation and catastrophic health expenditure in India

Research

Psychometric properties of Persian version of advance care planning questionnaire among older adults in Iran

Research

Prevalence of iron deficiency in patients admitted to a geriatric unit: a multicenter cross-sectional study

Research

Social support and cognitive activity and their associations with incident cognitive impairment in cognitively normal older adults
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Reserve your place

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

Read more

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits