Top

Published in:

01-10-2007

Examining the Behavior of a System: An Outcome Evaluation of a Coordinated Community Response to Domestic Violence

Authors: Laura F. Salazar, James G. Emshoff, Charlene K. Baker, Terrence Crowley

Published in: Journal of Family Violence | Issue 7/2007

Abstract

One goal of a coordinated community response (CCR) to domestic violence is to create an infrastructure that will facilitate systems-level, and ultimately societal-level change. This study evaluated whether a CCR implemented in two counties in Georgia would be effective at increasing criminal justice system sanctions for male domestic violence offenders (i.e., arrests, prosecutions, convictions, sentencing, and referrals to batterer intervention programs). Time series analyses revealed that, in both counties, there was a significant increase in arrests of male offenders; however, law enforcement agencies also arrested more women following the intervention. More men were sentenced to probation and to attend a batterer’s intervention program post-intervention in one county; in the second county, there was no change in these outcomes. Results highlight the importance of examining how a CCR may affect the behavior of criminal justice systems, especially in terms of the unintended consequences for women.

Babcock, J. C., & Steiner, R. (1999). The relationship between treatment, incarceration, and recidivism of battering: A program evaluation of Seattle’s coordinated community response to domestic violence. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 46–59.CrossRef

Bennett, L. W., & Williams, O. J. (2001). Intervention programs for man who batter. In C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson, & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on Violence Against Women (pp. 261–278). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Edwards, C. (1987). Public opinion on domestic violence: A review of the New Jersey survey. Response Victimization Women Children, 10, 6–9.

Finn, M. A., Blackwell, B. S., Stalans, L. J., Studdard, S., & Dugan, L. (2004). Dual arrest decisions in domestic violence cases: The influence of departmental policies. Crime and Delinquency, 50, 565–589.CrossRef

Georgia County Guide (1997). University of Georgia, Athens, GA.

Hagan, F. (2000). Research methods in criminal justice and criminology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Huisman, K., Martinez, J., & Wilson, C. (2005). Training police officers on domestic violence and racism. Violence Against Women, 11, 792–821.PubMedCrossRef

Hilton, N. Z. (1993). Legal responses to wife assault: Current trends and evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Hirschel, D., & Buzawa, E. S. (2002). Understanding the context of dual arrest with directions for future research. Violence Against Women, 8(12), 1449–1473.CrossRef

Iovanni, L., & Miller, S. L. (2001). Criminal justice system response to domestic violence: Law enforcement and the courts. In C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson, & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on Violence Against Women (pp. 303–328). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Judicial Qualifications Commission (1984). Judicial Code of Conduct of the State of Georgia. Retrieved January 13, 2006 from http://www.georgiacourts.org/agencies/jqc/Pages/canons.html.

Klein, E., Campbell, J. C., Solar, E., & Ghez, M. (1997). Ending domestic violence: Changing public perceptions/halting the epidemic. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Koski, P. R., & Mangold, W. D. (1988). Gender effects in attitudes about family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 3, 225–237.CrossRef

Lawrenz, F., Lembo, J. F., & Schade, T. (1988). Time series analysis of the effect of a domestic violence directive on the number of arrests per day. Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 493–498.CrossRef

Mancoske, R. J., Standifer, D., & Cauley, C. (1994). The effectiveness of brief counseling services for battered women. Research on Social Work Practices, 4, 53–63.CrossRef

Martin, M. E. (1997). Double your trouble: Dual arrest in family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 139–157.CrossRef

Maton, K. (2000). Making a difference: The social ecology of social transformation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 25–57.PubMedCrossRef

Miller, S. L. (2001). The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence. Criminal justice professionals and service providers respond. Violence Against Women, 7, 1339–1376.CrossRef

Murphy, C. M., Musser, P. H., & Maton, K. (1998). Coordinated community intervention for domestic abusers: Intervention system involvement and criminal recidivism. Journal of Family Violence, 13, 263–284.CrossRef

Prilleltensky, I. (1989). Psychology and the status quo. American Psychologist, 44, 795–802.CrossRef

Rosen, K. H., & Bezold, A. (1996). Dating violence and prevention: a didactic support groups for young women. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74, 521–525.

Rubin, A. (1991). The effectiveness of outreach counseling and support groups for battered women. Research on Social Work Practices, 1, 332–357.CrossRef

Salazar, L. F., & Cook, S. L. (2002). Violence against women: Is psychology part of the problem or the solution? A content analysis of psychological research from 1990 through 1999. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 410–421.CrossRef

Seidman, E. (1983). Unexamined premises of social problem solving. In E. Seidman (Ed.), Handbook of Social Intervention (pp. 48–67). Beverly Hills: Sage.

Shepard, M. (1992). Predicting batterer recidivism five years after intervention. Journal of Family Violence, 7, 167–178.CrossRef

Shepard, M. F. (1999). Evaluating a coordinated community response. In M. F. Shepard & E. L. Pence (Eds.), Coordinating community responses to domestic violence (pp. 169–191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Shepard, M. F., & Pence, E. L. (Eds.) (1999). Coordinating community responses to domestic violence. Lessons from Duluth and Beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Sigler, R. T. (1989). Domestic violence in context: An assessment of community attitudes. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Simon, L. M. J. (1995). A therapeutic jurisprudence approach to the legal processing of domestic violence cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 43–79.CrossRef

Steinman, M. (1990). Lowering recidivism among men who batter women. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 7, 124–132.

Stark, E. (2001). Health intervention with battered women: From crisis intervention to complex social prevention. In C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson, & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on Violence Against Women (pp. 45–70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Sullivan, C. M., & Allen, N. E. (2001). Evaluating coordinated community responses for abused women and their children. In S. A. Graham-Bermann, & J. L. Edleson (Eds.), Domestic Violence in the Lives of Children: The Future of Research, Intervention, and Social Policy (pp. 269–282). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef

Sullivan, C. M., Tan, C., Basta, J., Rumptz, M., & Davidson, W. S. (1992). An advocacy intervention for women with abusive partners: Initial evaluation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 309–332.PubMedCrossRef

Syers, M., & Edleson, J. L. (1992). The combined effects of coordinated criminal justice intervention in woman abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 490–502.CrossRef

Tolman, R. M., & Weisz, A. N. (1995). Coordinated community intervention for domestic violence: The effects of arrest and prosecution on recidivism of woman abuse perpetrators. Crime and Delinquency, 41, 481–495.CrossRef

Tutty, L. M., Bidgood, B. A., & Rothery, M. A. (1993). Support groups for battered women: Research on their efficacy. Journal of Family Violence, 8, 325–343.CrossRef

Valente, R. L., Hart, B. J., Zeya, S., & Malefyt, M. (2001). The violence against women act of 1994: The federal commitment to ending domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, and gender-based crimes of violence. In C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson, & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on Violence Against Women (pp. 279–302). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (2003). Community interventions and effective prevention. American Psychologist, 58, 441–448.PubMedCrossRef

Weisz, A. N. (1999). Legal advocacy for domestic violence survivors: The power of an informative relationship. Families in Society, 80, 138–147.

Title: Examining the Behavior of a System: An Outcome Evaluation of a Coordinated Community Response to Domestic Violence
Authors: Laura F. Salazar
James G. Emshoff
Charlene K. Baker
Terrence Crowley
Publication date: 01-10-2007
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Family Violence / Issue 7/2007
Print ISSN: 0885-7482
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2851
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9116-9

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Examining the Behavior of a System: An Outcome Evaluation of a Coordinated Community Response to Domestic Violence

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 7/2007

Child–Parent Violence: An Empirical Analysis of Offender, Victim, and Event Characteristics in a National Sample of Reported Incidents

Comparing Three Measures of Psychological Aggression: Psychometric Properties and Differentiation from Negative Communication

Coparenting Conflict and Parenting Behavior in Economically Disadvantaged Single Parent African American Families: The Role of Maternal Psychological Distress

Characteristics of Domestic Violence Offenders: Associations with Childhood Exposure to Violence

Children’s Direct Exposure to Types of Domestic Violence Crime: A Population-based Investigation

Langauge and Violence: Analysis of Four Discursive Operations