Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 1/2019

01-01-2019

Examining Temporal Trends in Documentation of Pregnancy Intentions in Family Planning Health Centers Using Electronic Health Records

Authors: Hannah R. Simons, Julia E. Kohn

Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives Few studies have examined the extent to which providers assess pregnancy intentions during clinical encounters. Our objective was to assess temporal trends in documentation of patient pregnancy intentions in electronic health records (EHR). Methods In this retrospective observational study using EHR data from 627,399 female patients visiting 214 family planning centers in 2012–2014, we assessed changes in the prevalence of pregnancy intention documentation with piecewise log-binomial regression models. We examined bivariate associations between patient/visit characteristics and pregnancy intention documentation in each year, and associations between patients’ pregnancy intentions and contraceptive methods. Results The proportion of patients with a documented pregnancy intention increased sharply from the end of 2012 (42%) to the midpoint of 2013 (85%; adjusted quarterly prevalence ratio [APR] = 1.40, 95% CI 1.36–1.45). Thereafter, the rate of change slowed as documentation approached the maximum possible frequency (93%; APR = 1.01, 95% CI 1.00–1.02). Documentation varied by all patient/visit characteristics in 2012 and 2013; in 2014, there were no clinically significant differences. Among patients with a documented intention, 97% were not planning a pregnancy in the next year. Women not planning a pregnancy were more likely to use a most/moderately effective contraceptive method than those planning a pregnancy (73 vs. 35%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions for Practice Improvements in pregnancy intention documentation co-occurred with changes to EHR templates (e.g., placement of structured data fields) and with provider-focused initiatives promoting reproductive life planning. Patients’ pregnancy intentions aligned with contraceptive use; however, these findings cannot address whether assessment of intentions affects contraceptive use.
Literature
go back to reference Gavin, L., et al. (2014). Providing quality family planning services: Recommendations of the CDC and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs. MMWR Recommendations and Reports, 63(RR04), 1–29.PubMed Gavin, L., et al. (2014). Providing quality family planning services: Recommendations of the CDC and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs. MMWR Recommendations and Reports, 63(RR04), 1–29.PubMed
go back to reference Lu, M. (2007). Recommendations for preconception care. American Family Physician, 76 (3), 397–400.PubMed Lu, M. (2007). Recommendations for preconception care. American Family Physician, 76 (3), 397–400.PubMed
go back to reference McQuillan, J., Greill, A. L., & Shreffer, K. M. (2011). Pregnancy intentions among women who do not try: Focusing on women who are okay either way. Maternal Child Health Journal, 15(2), 178–187.CrossRefPubMed McQuillan, J., Greill, A. L., & Shreffer, K. M. (2011). Pregnancy intentions among women who do not try: Focusing on women who are okay either way. Maternal Child Health Journal, 15(2), 178–187.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Examining Temporal Trends in Documentation of Pregnancy Intentions in Family Planning Health Centers Using Electronic Health Records
Authors
Hannah R. Simons
Julia E. Kohn
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2590-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Maternal and Child Health Journal 1/2019 Go to the issue