Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 2/2011

01-02-2011

Pregnancy Intentions Among Women Who Do Not Try: Focusing on Women Who Are Okay Either Way

Authors: Julia McQuillan, Arthur L. Greil, Karina M. Shreffler

Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Are women who are intentional about pregnancy (trying to or trying not to get pregnant) systematically different from women who are “okay either way” about getting pregnant? We use a currently sexually active subsample (n = 3,771) of the National Survey of Fertility Barriers, a random digit dialing telephone survey of reproductive-aged women (ages 25–45) in the United States. We compare women who are trying to, trying not to, or okay either way about getting pregnant on attitudes, social pressures, life course and status characteristics using bivariate analyses (chi-square tests for categorical and ANOVA tests for continuous variables). Multivariate multinomial logistic regression provides adjusted associations. Most women say that they are trying not to get pregnant (71%) or are okay either way (23%); few are trying to get pregnant. Among women with no prior pregnancies (n = 831), more say that they are trying to get pregnant (14%) but a similar percentage are okay either way (26%). Several characteristics distinguish those trying to from those okay: fertility intentions, importance of motherhood, age, parity, race/ethnicity and self identifying a fertility problem. Additional characteristics are associated with trying not to get pregnant compared to being okay: ideal number of children, wanting a baby, trusting conception, relationship satisfaction, race ethnicity, economic hardship, and attitudes about career success. Women who are “okay either way” about pregnancy should be assessed separately from women who are intentional (trying to, trying not to) about pregnancy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brown, S. S., & Eisenberg, L. (Eds.). (1995). The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Brown, S. S., & Eisenberg, L. (Eds.). (1995). The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2.
go back to reference Morgan, S. P. (1982). Parity-specific fertility intentions and uncertainty: The United States, 1970 to 1976. Demography, 19, 315–334.CrossRefPubMed Morgan, S. P. (1982). Parity-specific fertility intentions and uncertainty: The United States, 1970 to 1976. Demography, 19, 315–334.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Greil, A. L., & McQuillan, J. (2010). “Trying times”: Medicalization, intent, and ambiguity in the definition of infertility. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 24, 137–156.CrossRefPubMed Greil, A. L., & McQuillan, J. (2010). “Trying times”: Medicalization, intent, and ambiguity in the definition of infertility. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 24, 137–156.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Santelli, J. S., Rochat, R., Hatfield-Timajchy, K., Gilbert, B. C., Curtis, K., Cabral, R., et al. (2003). The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34, 206–211. Santelli, J. S., Rochat, R., Hatfield-Timajchy, K., Gilbert, B. C., Curtis, K., Cabral, R., et al. (2003). The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34, 206–211.
5.
go back to reference Santelli, J. S., Lindberg, L. D., Orr, M. G., Finer, L. B., & Speizer, I. (2009). Toward a multidimensional measure of pregnancy intentions: Evidence from the United States. Studies in Family Planning, 40, 87–100.CrossRefPubMed Santelli, J. S., Lindberg, L. D., Orr, M. G., Finer, L. B., & Speizer, I. (2009). Toward a multidimensional measure of pregnancy intentions: Evidence from the United States. Studies in Family Planning, 40, 87–100.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference White, L., & McQuillan, J. (2006). No longer intending: The relationship between relinquished fertility intentions and distress. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 478–490.CrossRef White, L., & McQuillan, J. (2006). No longer intending: The relationship between relinquished fertility intentions and distress. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 478–490.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Williams, L., Abma, J., & Piccinino, L. J. (1999). The correspondence between intention to avoid childbearing and subsequent fertility: A prospective analysis. Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 220–227.CrossRefPubMed Williams, L., Abma, J., & Piccinino, L. J. (1999). The correspondence between intention to avoid childbearing and subsequent fertility: A prospective analysis. Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 220–227.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Zabin, L. S., Huggins, G. R., Emerson, M. R., & Cullins, V. E. (2000). Partner effects on a woman’s intention to conceive: ‘Not with this partner’. Family Planning Perspectives, 32, 39–45.CrossRefPubMed Zabin, L. S., Huggins, G. R., Emerson, M. R., & Cullins, V. E. (2000). Partner effects on a woman’s intention to conceive: ‘Not with this partner’. Family Planning Perspectives, 32, 39–45.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference D’Angelo, D. V., Gilbert, B. C., Rochat, R. W., Santelli, J. S., & Herold, J. M. (2004). Differences between mistimed and unwanted pregnancies among women who have live births. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36, 192–197.CrossRefPubMed D’Angelo, D. V., Gilbert, B. C., Rochat, R. W., Santelli, J. S., & Herold, J. M. (2004). Differences between mistimed and unwanted pregnancies among women who have live births. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36, 192–197.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Finer, L. B., & Henshaw, S. K. (2006). Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38, 90–96.CrossRefPubMed Finer, L. B., & Henshaw, S. K. (2006). Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38, 90–96.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Barrett, G., & Wellings, K. (2002). What is a ‘planned’ pregnancy? Empirical data from a British study. Social Science and Medicine, 55, 545–557.CrossRefPubMed Barrett, G., & Wellings, K. (2002). What is a ‘planned’ pregnancy? Empirical data from a British study. Social Science and Medicine, 55, 545–557.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bachrach, C. A., & Newcomer, S. (1999). Intended pregnancies and unintended pregnancies: Distinct categories or opposite ends of a continuum? Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 251–252.CrossRefPubMed Bachrach, C. A., & Newcomer, S. (1999). Intended pregnancies and unintended pregnancies: Distinct categories or opposite ends of a continuum? Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 251–252.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Schoen, R., Astone, N. M., Kim, Y. J., Nathanson, C. A., & Fields, J. M. (1999). Do fertility intentions affect fertility behavior? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 790–799.CrossRef Schoen, R., Astone, N. M., Kim, Y. J., Nathanson, C. A., & Fields, J. M. (1999). Do fertility intentions affect fertility behavior? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 790–799.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kaufman, G. (2000). Do gender role attitudes matter? Family formation and dissolution among traditional and egalitarian men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 128–144.CrossRef Kaufman, G. (2000). Do gender role attitudes matter? Family formation and dissolution among traditional and egalitarian men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 128–144.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Stanford, J. B., Hobbs, R., Jameson, P., DeWitt, M. J., & Fischer, R. C. (2000). Defining dimensions of pregnancy intendedness. Maternal and Child Health, 4, 183–189.CrossRef Stanford, J. B., Hobbs, R., Jameson, P., DeWitt, M. J., & Fischer, R. C. (2000). Defining dimensions of pregnancy intendedness. Maternal and Child Health, 4, 183–189.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Stewart, S. D. (2002). The effect of stepchildren on childbearing intentions and births. Demography, 39, 181–197.CrossRefPubMed Stewart, S. D. (2002). The effect of stepchildren on childbearing intentions and births. Demography, 39, 181–197.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hayford, S. R., & Morgan, S. P. (2008). Religiosity and fertility in the United States: The role of fertility intentions. Social Forces, 86, 1163–1188.CrossRef Hayford, S. R., & Morgan, S. P. (2008). Religiosity and fertility in the United States: The role of fertility intentions. Social Forces, 86, 1163–1188.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sassler, S., Miller, A., & Favinger, S. M. (2009). ‘Planned’ parenthood? Fertility intentions and experiences among cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 206–232.CrossRef Sassler, S., Miller, A., & Favinger, S. M. (2009). ‘Planned’ parenthood? Fertility intentions and experiences among cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 206–232.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Finlay, A. (1996). Teenage pregnancy, romantic love, and social science: An uneasy relationship. In V. James & J. Gabe (Eds.), Health and sociology of the emotions (pp. 79–96). Oxford: Blackwell. Finlay, A. (1996). Teenage pregnancy, romantic love, and social science: An uneasy relationship. In V. James & J. Gabe (Eds.), Health and sociology of the emotions (pp. 79–96). Oxford: Blackwell.
20.
go back to reference Luker, K. C. (1999). A reminder that human behavior frequently refuses to conform to models created by researchers. Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 248–249.CrossRefPubMed Luker, K. C. (1999). A reminder that human behavior frequently refuses to conform to models created by researchers. Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 248–249.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Sable, M. R., & Libbus, M. K. (2000). Pregnancy intention and pregnancy happiness: Are they different? Maternal and Child Health, 6, 181–187. Sable, M. R., & Libbus, M. K. (2000). Pregnancy intention and pregnancy happiness: Are they different? Maternal and Child Health, 6, 181–187.
22.
go back to reference Speizer, I. S., Santelli, J. S., Afable-Munsuz, A., & Kendall, C. (2004). Measuring factors underlying intendedness of women’s first and later pregnancies. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 26, 198–205.CrossRef Speizer, I. S., Santelli, J. S., Afable-Munsuz, A., & Kendall, C. (2004). Measuring factors underlying intendedness of women’s first and later pregnancies. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 26, 198–205.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hagewen, K. J., & Morgan, S. P. (2005). Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970–2002. Population and Development Review, 31, 507–527.CrossRefPubMed Hagewen, K. J., & Morgan, S. P. (2005). Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970–2002. Population and Development Review, 31, 507–527.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Lifflander, A., Gaydos, L. M. D., & Rowland Hogue, C. J. (2007). Circumstances of pregnancy: Low income women in Georgia describe the difference between planned and unplanned pregnancies. Maternal and Child Health, 11, 81–89.CrossRef Lifflander, A., Gaydos, L. M. D., & Rowland Hogue, C. J. (2007). Circumstances of pregnancy: Low income women in Georgia describe the difference between planned and unplanned pregnancies. Maternal and Child Health, 11, 81–89.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Rijken, A. J. (2009). Happy families, high fertility? Childbearing choices in the context of family and partner relationships. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University (ICS Dissertation Series no. 154), Utrecht, The Netherlands. Rijken, A. J. (2009). Happy families, high fertility? Childbearing choices in the context of family and partner relationships. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University (ICS Dissertation Series no. 154), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
26.
go back to reference Kost, K., Singh, S., Vaughan, B., Trussell, J., & Bankole, A. (2008). Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Contraception, 77, 10–21.CrossRefPubMed Kost, K., Singh, S., Vaughan, B., Trussell, J., & Bankole, A. (2008). Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Contraception, 77, 10–21.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Zabin, L. S. (1999). Ambivalent feelings about parenthood may lead to inconsistent contraceptive use and pregnancy. Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 250–251.CrossRefPubMed Zabin, L. S. (1999). Ambivalent feelings about parenthood may lead to inconsistent contraceptive use and pregnancy. Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 250–251.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Johnson, D. R., & White, L. K. (n.d.). National Survey of Fertility Barriers [Data file]. Retrieved from the Pennsylvania State University Population Research Institute Web site http://pennstate\sodapop\nsfb. Johnson, D. R., & White, L. K. (n.d.). National Survey of Fertility Barriers [Data file]. Retrieved from the Pennsylvania State University Population Research Institute Web site http://​pennstate\sodapop\nsfb.
29.
go back to reference McCarty, C., House, M., Harman, J., & Richards, S. (2006). Effort in phone survey response rates: The effects of vendor and client-controlled factors. Field Methods, 18, 72–188.CrossRef McCarty, C., House, M., Harman, J., & Richards, S. (2006). Effort in phone survey response rates: The effects of vendor and client-controlled factors. Field Methods, 18, 72–188.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pregnancy Intentions Among Women Who Do Not Try: Focusing on Women Who Are Okay Either Way
Authors
Julia McQuillan
Arthur L. Greil
Karina M. Shreffler
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-010-0604-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Maternal and Child Health Journal 2/2011 Go to the issue