Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2011

01-02-2011 | Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2010

Validity of the Alpha Angle Measurement on Plain Radiographs in the Evaluation of Cam-type Femoroacetabular Impingement

Authors: Cefin Barton, MB BCh, MRCS (Ed), FRCS (Tr&Orth), Matias J. Salineros, MD, Kawan S. Rakhra, MD, FRCPC, Paul E. Beaulé, MD, FRCSC

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement is secondary to lack of concavity at the anterosuperior femoral head-neck junction, resulting in reduced femoral head-neck offset and femoral head asphericity. This morphologic deformity can be detected by MRI and plain radiographs and quantified using the alpha angle.

Questions/purposes

We evaluated the accuracy and reproducibility of plain radiography in the diagnosis of cam-type deformity.

Methods

Sixty-eight patients (37 females, 31 males) with a mean age of 38 years (range, 17–60 years) were treated for intraarticular hip pathology with 43 hips having cam-type femoroacetabular impingement and 25 having isolated labral tears. All patients had alpha angle measurements made on plain radiographs (AP pelvis, crosstable lateral, Dunn view) and multiplanar MRI using an alpha angle of more than 50.5° as the gold standard.

Results

The Dunn view had a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 88%, positive predictive value of 93%, negative predictive value of 84%, and accuracy of 90% for diagnosing the cam deformity associated with femoroacetabular impingement. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the MRI and plain radiography values were 0.702, 0.552, and 0.349 for the Dunn, crosstable lateral, and AP views, respectively.

Conclusions

Our observations validate the clinical use of the Dunn view in the evaluation of the femoral head-neck contour in cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Level of Evidence

Level I, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Allen DJ, Beaule PE, Ramadan O, Doucette S. Prevalence of associated deformities and hip pain in patients with cam type femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:589–594.CrossRefPubMed Allen DJ, Beaule PE, Ramadan O, Doucette S. Prevalence of associated deformities and hip pain in patients with cam type femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:589–594.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bardakos NV, Villar RN. Predictors of progression of osteoarthritis in femoroacetabular impingement. A radiological study with a minimum of ten years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:162–169.CrossRefPubMed Bardakos NV, Villar RN. Predictors of progression of osteoarthritis in femoroacetabular impingement. A radiological study with a minimum of ten years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:162–169.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Beaule PE, Allen DJ, Clohisy JC, Schoenecker PE, Leunig M. The young adult with hip impingement: deciding on the optimal intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:210–221.CrossRefPubMed Beaule PE, Allen DJ, Clohisy JC, Schoenecker PE, Leunig M. The young adult with hip impingement: deciding on the optimal intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:210–221.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Beaule PE, Harvey N, Zaragoza EJ, LeDuff M, Dorey FJ. The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:9–15.CrossRefPubMed Beaule PE, Harvey N, Zaragoza EJ, LeDuff M, Dorey FJ. The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:9–15.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Beaule PE, LeDuff M, Zaragoza EJ. Quality of life following femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty for femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:773–779.CrossRefPubMed Beaule PE, LeDuff M, Zaragoza EJ. Quality of life following femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty for femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:773–779.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Beaule PE, Zaragoza EJ, Motamedic K, Copelan N, Dorey J. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoro-acetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1286–1292.PubMed Beaule PE, Zaragoza EJ, Motamedic K, Copelan N, Dorey J. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoro-acetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1286–1292.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaule PE, Kim Y-J, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ, Leunig M, Schoenecker PE, Millis M. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:47–66.CrossRefPubMed Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaule PE, Kim Y-J, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ, Leunig M, Schoenecker PE, Millis M. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:47–66.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Trousdale RT, Kim Y-J, Beaule PE, Morgan P, Steger-May K, Schoenecker PE, Millis M. Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:666–675.CrossRefPubMed Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Trousdale RT, Kim Y-J, Beaule PE, Morgan P, Steger-May K, Schoenecker PE, Millis M. Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:666–675.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dudda M, Albers C, Mamisch T, Werlen S, Beck M. Do normal radiographs exclude asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:651–659.CrossRefPubMed Dudda M, Albers C, Mamisch T, Werlen S, Beck M. Do normal radiographs exclude asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:651–659.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Eijer H, Leunig M, Mahomed N, Ganz R. Cross-table lateral radiographs for screening of anterior femoral head-neck offset in patients with femoro-acetabular impingement. Hip Int. 2001;11:37–41. Eijer H, Leunig M, Mahomed N, Ganz R. Cross-table lateral radiographs for screening of anterior femoral head-neck offset in patients with femoro-acetabular impingement. Hip Int. 2001;11:37–41.
12.
go back to reference Ganz R, Parvizi J, Leunig M, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular Impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–120.PubMed Ganz R, Parvizi J, Leunig M, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular Impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–120.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Gosvig KK, Jacobsen S, Palm H, Sonne-Holm S, Magnusson E. A new radiological index for assessing asphericity of the femoral head in cam impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1309–1316.CrossRefPubMed Gosvig KK, Jacobsen S, Palm H, Sonne-Holm S, Magnusson E. A new radiological index for assessing asphericity of the femoral head in cam impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1309–1316.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gosvig KK, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Gebuhr P. The prevalence of cam-type deformity of the hip joint: a survey of 4151 subjects of the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study. Acta Radiol. 2008;49:436–441.CrossRefPubMed Gosvig KK, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Gebuhr P. The prevalence of cam-type deformity of the hip joint: a survey of 4151 subjects of the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study. Acta Radiol. 2008;49:436–441.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Harris WH. Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;213:20–33.PubMed Harris WH. Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;213:20–33.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Ito K, Minka-II MA, Leunig S, Werlen S, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:171–176.CrossRefPubMed Ito K, Minka-II MA, Leunig S, Werlen S, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:171–176.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T, Ganz R, Leunig M. Comparision of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/asphericity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;445:181–185.PubMed Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T, Ganz R, Leunig M. Comparision of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/asphericity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;445:181–185.PubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. The contour fo the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:556–560.CrossRefPubMed Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. The contour fo the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:556–560.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Nouh MR, Schweitzer ME, Rybak L, Cohen J. Femoroacetabular impingement: can the alpha angle be estimated? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:1260–1262.CrossRefPubMed Nouh MR, Schweitzer ME, Rybak L, Cohen J. Femoroacetabular impingement: can the alpha angle be estimated? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:1260–1262.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Pfirrmann CW, Mengiardi B, Dora C, Kalverer F, Zanetti M, Hodler J. Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characterstic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology. 2006;240:778–785.CrossRefPubMed Pfirrmann CW, Mengiardi B, Dora C, Kalverer F, Zanetti M, Hodler J. Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characterstic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology. 2006;240:778–785.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Rakhra K, Sheikh AM, Allen DJ, Beaule PE. Comparison of MRI alpha angle measurement planes in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:660–665.CrossRefPubMed Rakhra K, Sheikh AM, Allen DJ, Beaule PE. Comparison of MRI alpha angle measurement planes in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:660–665.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Solomon L. Patterns of osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1976;58:176–183.PubMed Solomon L. Patterns of osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1976;58:176–183.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Stulberg SD, Cordell LD, Harris WH, Ramsey PL, MacEwen GD. Unrecognized childhood hip disease: a major cause of idiopathic osteoarthritis of the hip. In: Amstutz HC, ed. The Hip, Proceedings of the Third Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society. St. Louis, MO: C.V. Mosby; 1975:212–228. Stulberg SD, Cordell LD, Harris WH, Ramsey PL, MacEwen GD. Unrecognized childhood hip disease: a major cause of idiopathic osteoarthritis of the hip. In: Amstutz HC, ed. The Hip, Proceedings of the Third Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society. St. Louis, MO: C.V. Mosby; 1975:212–228.
25.
go back to reference Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson S. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis - what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1540–1552.CrossRefPubMed Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson S. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis - what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1540–1552.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Tanzer M, Noiseux N. Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis: the role of hip impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:170–177.CrossRefPubMed Tanzer M, Noiseux N. Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis: the role of hip impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:170–177.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Validity of the Alpha Angle Measurement on Plain Radiographs in the Evaluation of Cam-type Femoroacetabular Impingement
Authors
Cefin Barton, MB BCh, MRCS (Ed), FRCS (Tr&Orth)
Matias J. Salineros, MD
Kawan S. Rakhra, MD, FRCPC
Paul E. Beaulé, MD, FRCSC
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1624-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2011 Go to the issue

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2010

Modular Femoral Sleeve and Stem Implant Provides Long-term Total Hip Survivorship

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2010

THA After Acetabular Fracture Fixation: Is Frozen Section Necessary?

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2010

Hip Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Quantitative Measurement with Navigation