Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 11/2018

01-11-2018 | Original Paper

Evaluation of aortic stiffness by a new simplified 2D speckle tracking analysis

Authors: Luca Sabia, Eleonora Avenatti, Marco Cesareo, Dario Leone, Francesco Tosello, Franco Veglio, Alberto Milan

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 11/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Arterial stiffness is a marker of cardiovascular damage and an independent predictor of major cardiovascular events, usually assessed via Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (cfPWV). The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and usefulness of aortic strain analysis using a simplified transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) speckle-tracking (ST) based method. 60 consecutive patients with normal blood pressure and aortic dimensions underwent TTE and cfPWV evaluation. Strain analysis was performed on the largest section of the ascending aorta (aA) with a dedicated software; three couples of speckles were identified within the anterior and posterior aortic wall and transverse segments connecting each couple traced. Peak ascending Aorta Strain (PaAS) was defined as the averaged peak percentage deformation of these segments during the cardiac cycle; aortic stiffness index β2 was defined as 100 × Ln(SBP/DBP)/PaAS. 17 patients were excluded for suboptimal TTE images. In the 43 analyzed individuals (male 58%, age 63 years) PaAS was 5.5 [3.7–8.6] % with excellent inter and intra observer reproducibility (ICC 95% for both). PaAS showed significant correlation with age (r = − 0.64), aA diameter (r = − 0.45), cfPWV (r = − 0.41), stroke volume (r = − 0.41) and heart rate (r = − 0.49). Age remained the only independent determinant of PaAS in a multivariate analysis. β2 (10.8 [5.9–15.0]) showed significant direct correlation with age, Pulse pressure, aA diameter and cfPWV. A simplified strain analysis of the ascending aorta is technically feasible with good reproducibility; PaAS and β2 index correlate well with established parameters of arterial stiffness and might represent a new index in evaluating vascular biomechanics.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Milan A et al (2011) Arterial stiffness: from physiology to clinical implications. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 18:1–12CrossRef Milan A et al (2011) Arterial stiffness: from physiology to clinical implications. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 18:1–12CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cheng S et al (2010) Correlates of echocardiographic indices of cardiac remodeling over the adult life course: longitudinal observations from the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 122:570–578CrossRef Cheng S et al (2010) Correlates of echocardiographic indices of cardiac remodeling over the adult life course: longitudinal observations from the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 122:570–578CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pluta A et al (2015) Left ventricular remodeling and arterial remodeling in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 1–3. Ren Fail 37:1105–1110CrossRef Pluta A et al (2015) Left ventricular remodeling and arterial remodeling in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 1–3. Ren Fail 37:1105–1110CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Laurent S et al (2006) Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 27:2588–2605CrossRef Laurent S et al (2006) Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 27:2588–2605CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bruno RM et al (2017) Carotid and aortic stiffness in essential hypertension and their relation with target organ damage: the CATOD study. J Hypertens 35:310–318CrossRef Bruno RM et al (2017) Carotid and aortic stiffness in essential hypertension and their relation with target organ damage: the CATOD study. J Hypertens 35:310–318CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chirinos JA et al (2012) Arterial stiffness: basic concepts and measurement techniques. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 5:243–255CrossRef Chirinos JA et al (2012) Arterial stiffness: basic concepts and measurement techniques. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 5:243–255CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ecobici M, Voiculescu M (2017) Importance of arterial stiffness in predicting cardiovascular events. Rom J Intern Med 55:8–13CrossRef Ecobici M, Voiculescu M (2017) Importance of arterial stiffness in predicting cardiovascular events. Rom J Intern Med 55:8–13CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mancia G et al (2013) 2013 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC): ESH/ESC Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens 31:1925–1938CrossRef Mancia G et al (2013) 2013 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC): ESH/ESC Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens 31:1925–1938CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lang RM et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults:an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28:1–39.e14CrossRef Lang RM et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults:an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28:1–39.e14CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Townsend RR et al (2017) Arterial stiffness: recommendations and standardization. Pulse (Basel) 4:3–7CrossRef Townsend RR et al (2017) Arterial stiffness: recommendations and standardization. Pulse (Basel) 4:3–7CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cavalcante JL et al (2011) Aortic stiffness: current understanding and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:1511–1522CrossRef Cavalcante JL et al (2011) Aortic stiffness: current understanding and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:1511–1522CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Weber T et al (2009) Noninvasive determination of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity depends critically on assessment of travel distance: a comparison with invasive measurement. J Hypertens 27:1624–1630CrossRef Weber T et al (2009) Noninvasive determination of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity depends critically on assessment of travel distance: a comparison with invasive measurement. J Hypertens 27:1624–1630CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cho JY et al (2016) Evaluation of arterial stiffness by echocardiography: methodological aspects. Chonnam Med J 52:101–106CrossRef Cho JY et al (2016) Evaluation of arterial stiffness by echocardiography: methodological aspects. Chonnam Med J 52:101–106CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tosello F et al (2016) Out of proportion proximal aortic remodeling: a subclinical marker of early vascular ageing? A systematic review. Int J Cardiol 223:999–1006CrossRef Tosello F et al (2016) Out of proportion proximal aortic remodeling: a subclinical marker of early vascular ageing? A systematic review. Int J Cardiol 223:999–1006CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Safar ME et al (2010) Arterial aging–hemodynamic changes and therapeutic options. Nat Rev Cardiol 7:442–449CrossRef Safar ME et al (2010) Arterial aging–hemodynamic changes and therapeutic options. Nat Rev Cardiol 7:442–449CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Milan A et al (2013) Ascending aortic dilatation, arterial stiffness and cardiac organ damage in essential hypertension. J Hypertens 31:109–116CrossRef Milan A et al (2013) Ascending aortic dilatation, arterial stiffness and cardiac organ damage in essential hypertension. J Hypertens 31:109–116CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Vlachopoulos C et al (2010) Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:1318–1327CrossRef Vlachopoulos C et al (2010) Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:1318–1327CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Davies JI et al (2003) Pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity: a critical review of their strengths and weaknesses. J Hypertens 21:463–472CrossRef Davies JI et al (2003) Pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity: a critical review of their strengths and weaknesses. J Hypertens 21:463–472CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Morrison TM et al (2009) Circumferential and longitudinal cyclic strain of the human thoracic aorta: age-related changes. J Vasc Surg 49:1029–1036CrossRef Morrison TM et al (2009) Circumferential and longitudinal cyclic strain of the human thoracic aorta: age-related changes. J Vasc Surg 49:1029–1036CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Redheuil A et al (2010) Reduced ascending aortic strain and distensibility: earliest manifestations of vascular aging in humans. Hypertension 55:319–326CrossRef Redheuil A et al (2010) Reduced ascending aortic strain and distensibility: earliest manifestations of vascular aging in humans. Hypertension 55:319–326CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cuspidi C et al (2015) How to identify hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk? The role of echocardiography. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 22:113–117CrossRef Cuspidi C et al (2015) How to identify hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk? The role of echocardiography. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 22:113–117CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Vogt S et al (2016) Detailed measurement of wall strain with 3D speckle tracking in the aortic root: a case of bionic support for clinical decision making. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Rep 5:77–80CrossRef Vogt S et al (2016) Detailed measurement of wall strain with 3D speckle tracking in the aortic root: a case of bionic support for clinical decision making. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Rep 5:77–80CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Li Y et al (2016) Evaluation of myocardial strain and artery elasticity using speckle tracking echocardiography and high-resolution ultrasound in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 32:1063–1069CrossRef Li Y et al (2016) Evaluation of myocardial strain and artery elasticity using speckle tracking echocardiography and high-resolution ultrasound in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 32:1063–1069CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Geyer H et al (2010) Assessment of myocardial mechanics using speckle tracking echocardiography: fundamentals and clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:351–369 (quiz 453–355)CrossRef Geyer H et al (2010) Assessment of myocardial mechanics using speckle tracking echocardiography: fundamentals and clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:351–369 (quiz 453–355)CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Oishi Y et al (2008) A novel approach to assess aortic stiffness related to changes in aging using a two-dimensional strain imaging. Echocardiography 25:941–945CrossRef Oishi Y et al (2008) A novel approach to assess aortic stiffness related to changes in aging using a two-dimensional strain imaging. Echocardiography 25:941–945CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kim KH et al (2009) Usefulness of aortic strain analysis by velocity vector imaging as a new echocardiographic measure of arterial stiffness. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:1382–1388CrossRef Kim KH et al (2009) Usefulness of aortic strain analysis by velocity vector imaging as a new echocardiographic measure of arterial stiffness. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:1382–1388CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Teixeira R et al (2015) Circumferential vascular strain rate to estimate vascular load in aortic stenosis: a speckle tracking echocardiography study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31:681–689CrossRef Teixeira R et al (2015) Circumferential vascular strain rate to estimate vascular load in aortic stenosis: a speckle tracking echocardiography study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31:681–689CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Fritze O et al (2012) Age-related changes in the elastic tissue of the human aorta. J Vasc Res 49:77–86CrossRef Fritze O et al (2012) Age-related changes in the elastic tissue of the human aorta. J Vasc Res 49:77–86CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Honda T, Yano K et al (1994) Evaluation of aortic distensibility in patients with essential hypertension by using cine magnetic resonance imaging. Angiology 45:207–212CrossRef Honda T, Yano K et al (1994) Evaluation of aortic distensibility in patients with essential hypertension by using cine magnetic resonance imaging. Angiology 45:207–212CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Donato Aquaro G et al (2011) Elastic properties of aortic wall in patients with bicuspid aortic valve by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 108:81–87CrossRef Donato Aquaro G et al (2011) Elastic properties of aortic wall in patients with bicuspid aortic valve by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 108:81–87CrossRef
31.
go back to reference O’Rourke MF (2007) Arterial aging: pathophysiological principles. Vasc Med 12:329–341CrossRef O’Rourke MF (2007) Arterial aging: pathophysiological principles. Vasc Med 12:329–341CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Tomiyama H et al (2018) Longitudinal association among endothelial function, arterial stiffness and subclinical organ damage in hypertension. Int J Cardiol 253:161–166CrossRef Tomiyama H et al (2018) Longitudinal association among endothelial function, arterial stiffness and subclinical organ damage in hypertension. Int J Cardiol 253:161–166CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Safar ME (2018) Arterial stiffness as a risk factor for clinical hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol 15:97–105CrossRef Safar ME (2018) Arterial stiffness as a risk factor for clinical hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol 15:97–105CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Azadani AN et al (2012) Comparison of mechanical properties of human ascending aorta and aortic sinuses. Ann Thorac Surg 93:87–94CrossRef Azadani AN et al (2012) Comparison of mechanical properties of human ascending aorta and aortic sinuses. Ann Thorac Surg 93:87–94CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Van Bortel LM et al (2012) Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens 30:445–448CrossRef Van Bortel LM et al (2012) Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens 30:445–448CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of aortic stiffness by a new simplified 2D speckle tracking analysis
Authors
Luca Sabia
Eleonora Avenatti
Marco Cesareo
Dario Leone
Francesco Tosello
Franco Veglio
Alberto Milan
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 11/2018
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1400-7

Other articles of this Issue 11/2018

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 11/2018 Go to the issue