Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Study protocol

Evaluation of a Medical and Mental Health Unit compared with standard care for older people whose emergency admission to an acute general hospital is complicated by concurrent 'confusion': a controlled clinical trial. Acronym: TEAM: Trial of an Elderly Acute care Medical and mental health unit

Authors: Rowan H Harwood, Sarah E Goldberg, Kathy H Whittamore, Catherine Russell, John RF Gladman, Rob G Jones, Davina Porock, Sarah A Lewis, Lucy E Bradshaw, Rachel A Elliot, of Medical Crises in Older People Study Group (MCOP)

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients with delirium and dementia admitted to general hospitals have poor outcomes, and their carers report poor experiences. We developed an acute geriatric medical ward into a specialist Medical and Mental Health Unit over an eighteen month period. Additional specialist mental health staff were employed, other staff were trained in the 'person-centred' dementia care approach, a programme of meaningful activity was devised, the environment adapted to the needs of people with cognitive impairment, and attention given to communication with family carers. We hypothesise that patients managed on this ward will have better outcomes than those receiving standard care, and that such care will be cost-effective.

Methods/design

We will perform a controlled clinical trial comparing in-patient management on a specialist Medical and Mental Health Unit with standard care. Study participants are patients over the age of 65, admitted as an emergency to a single general hospital, and identified on the Acute Medical Admissions Unit as being 'confused'. Sample size is 300 per group. The evaluation design has been adapted to accommodate pressures on bed management and patient flows. If beds are available on the specialist Unit, the clinical service allocates patients at random between the Unit and standard care on general or geriatric medical wards. Once admitted, randomised patients and their carers are invited to take part in a follow up study, and baseline data are collected. Quality of care and patient experience are assessed in a non-participant observer study. Outcomes are ascertained at a follow up home visit 90 days after randomisation, by a researcher blind to allocation. The primary outcome is days spent at home (for those admitted from home), or days spent in the same care home (if admitted from a care home). Secondary outcomes include mortality, institutionalisation, resource use, and scaled outcome measures, including quality of life, cognitive function, disability, behavioural and psychological symptoms, carer strain and carer satisfaction with hospital care. Analyses will comprise comparisons of process, outcomes and costs between the specialist unit and standard care treatment groups.

Trial Registration number

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01136148
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Royal College of Psychiatrists: Who cares wins London. 2005 Royal College of Psychiatrists: Who cares wins London. 2005
2.
go back to reference Alzheimer's Society: Counting the Cost London. 2009 Alzheimer's Society: Counting the Cost London. 2009
3.
go back to reference Royal College of Psychiatrists: Raising the standard London. 2006 Royal College of Psychiatrists: Raising the standard London. 2006
4.
go back to reference Department of Health: Everybody's Business. 2006, London, Department of Health Department of Health: Everybody's Business. 2006, London, Department of Health
5.
go back to reference Department of Health: National dementia strategy. 2009, London, Department of Health Department of Health: National dementia strategy. 2009, London, Department of Health
7.
go back to reference Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD, Adams J, Rubenstein LZ: Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet. 1993, 342: 1032-6. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92884-V.CrossRefPubMed Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD, Adams J, Rubenstein LZ: Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet. 1993, 342: 1032-6. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92884-V.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Harwood RH, Porock D, King N, Edwards G, Hammond S, Howe L, Russell C, Howard S, Jones RG, Morrant JD: Development of a specialist medical and mental health unit for older people in an acute general hospital. University of Nottingham Medical Crises in Older People discussion paper series. 2010, ISSN 2044-4230 (accessed 28.12.10), 5, [http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/mcop/index.aspx] Harwood RH, Porock D, King N, Edwards G, Hammond S, Howe L, Russell C, Howard S, Jones RG, Morrant JD: Development of a specialist medical and mental health unit for older people in an acute general hospital. University of Nottingham Medical Crises in Older People discussion paper series. 2010, ISSN 2044-4230 (accessed 28.12.10), 5, [http://​www.​nottingham.​ac.​uk/​mcop/​index.​aspx]
10.
go back to reference Gladman JRF, Harwood RH, Conroy SP: Days at home: an outcome measure in studies of specialist services providing care for older people. University of Nottingham Medical Crises in Older People discussion paper series. 2010, ISSN 2044-4230 (accessed 28.12.10), 4, http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/mcop/index.aspx Gladman JRF, Harwood RH, Conroy SP: Days at home: an outcome measure in studies of specialist services providing care for older people. University of Nottingham Medical Crises in Older People discussion paper series. 2010, ISSN 2044-4230 (accessed 28.12.10), 4, http://​www.​nottingham.​ac.​uk/​mcop/​index.​aspx
11.
go back to reference Evans A, Perez I, Harraf F, Melbourn A, Steadman J, Donaldson N, Kalra L: Can differences in management processes explain different outcomes between stroke unit and stroke-team care?. Lancet. 2001, 358: 1586-92. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06652-1.CrossRefPubMed Evans A, Perez I, Harraf F, Melbourn A, Steadman J, Donaldson N, Kalra L: Can differences in management processes explain different outcomes between stroke unit and stroke-team care?. Lancet. 2001, 358: 1586-92. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06652-1.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Langhorne P, Dennis M: Stroke Units: an evidence based approach. BMJ books, London. 1998 Langhorne P, Dennis M: Stroke Units: an evidence based approach. BMJ books, London. 1998
14.
go back to reference Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: 'Mini-mental state'. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 1975, 12: 189-98. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.CrossRefPubMed Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: 'Mini-mental state'. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 1975, 12: 189-98. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Trzepacz PT, Mittal D, Torres R, Kanary K, Norton J, Jimerson N: Validation of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 Comparison With the Delirium Rating Scale and the Cognitive Test for Delirium. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001, 13: 229-242. 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13.2.229.CrossRefPubMed Trzepacz PT, Mittal D, Torres R, Kanary K, Norton J, Jimerson N: Validation of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 Comparison With the Delirium Rating Scale and the Cognitive Test for Delirium. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001, 13: 229-242. 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13.2.229.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference EuroQol Group: EuroQol - A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990, 16: 199-208.CrossRef EuroQol Group: EuroQol - A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990, 16: 199-208.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wade DT, Collin CL: The Barthel ADL index: a standard measure of physical disability?. Int Dis Studies. 1988, 10: 64-67.CrossRef Wade DT, Collin CL: The Barthel ADL index: a standard measure of physical disability?. Int Dis Studies. 1988, 10: 64-67.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J: The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994, 44: 2308-14.CrossRefPubMed Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J: The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994, 44: 2308-14.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Subbe CP, Kruger M, Gemmel L: Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions. Quarterly Journal of Medicine. 2001, 94: 521-6.CrossRef Subbe CP, Kruger M, Gemmel L: Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions. Quarterly Journal of Medicine. 2001, 94: 521-6.CrossRef
20.
21.
go back to reference Goldberg D: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Windsor: NFER-NELSON. 1992 Goldberg D: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Windsor: NFER-NELSON. 1992
22.
go back to reference Brooker D: Person Centred Dementia Care: Making Services Better (Bradford Dementia Group Good Practice Guides). London, Jessica Kingsley. 2006 Brooker D: Person Centred Dementia Care: Making Services Better (Bradford Dementia Group Good Practice Guides). London, Jessica Kingsley. 2006
23.
go back to reference Smith SC, Lamping DL, Banerjee S, Harwood R, Foley B, Smith P, Cook JC, Murray J, Prince M, Levin E, Mann A, Knapp M: Measurement of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development of a new instrument (DEMQOL) and an evaluation of current methodology. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England). 2005, 9 (10): 1-93. iii-iv Smith SC, Lamping DL, Banerjee S, Harwood R, Foley B, Smith P, Cook JC, Murray J, Prince M, Levin E, Mann A, Knapp M: Measurement of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development of a new instrument (DEMQOL) and an evaluation of current methodology. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England). 2005, 9 (10): 1-93. iii-iv
24.
go back to reference Harwood RH, Ebrahim S: The Manual of the London Handicap Scale. 1995, Nottingham, University of Nottingham Harwood RH, Ebrahim S: The Manual of the London Handicap Scale. 1995, Nottingham, University of Nottingham
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of a Medical and Mental Health Unit compared with standard care for older people whose emergency admission to an acute general hospital is complicated by concurrent 'confusion': a controlled clinical trial. Acronym: TEAM: Trial of an Elderly Acute care Medical and mental health unit
Authors
Rowan H Harwood
Sarah E Goldberg
Kathy H Whittamore
Catherine Russell
John RF Gladman
Rob G Jones
Davina Porock
Sarah A Lewis
Lucy E Bradshaw
Rachel A Elliot
of Medical Crises in Older People Study Group (MCOP)
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-123

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Trials 1/2011 Go to the issue