Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021

Evaluating the Impact of Intensive Case Management for Severe Vocational Injuries on Work Incapacity and Costs

Authors: Rolando Leiva, Lise Rochaix, Noémie Kiefer, Jean-Claude K. Dupont

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 4/2021

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the impact of an intensive case management program on sick leave days, permanent work incapacity levels and treatment costs for severe vocational injuries set up by the French National Insurance Fund in five health insurance districts. Methods The method employed relies on a four-step matching procedure combining Coarsened Exact Matching and Propensity Score Matching, based on an original administrative dataset. Average Treatment effects on the Treated were estimated using a parametric model with a large set of covariates. Results After one-year follow-up, workers in the treatment group had higher sickness absence rates, with 22 extra days, and the program led to 2.7 (95% CI 2.3–3.1) times more diagnoses of permanent work incapacity in the treatment group. With an estimated yearly operational cost of 2,722 € per treated worker, the average total extra treatment cost was 4,569 € for treated workers, which corresponds to a cost increase of 29.2% for the insurance fund. Conclusions The higher costs found for the treatment group are mainly due to longer sick leave duration for the moderate severity group, implying higher cash transfers in the form of one-off indemnities. Even though workers in the treated group have more diagnoses of permanent work incapacity, the difference of severity between groups is small. Our results on longer sick leave duration are partly to be explained by interactions between the case managers and the occupational physicians that encouraged patients to stay longer off-work for better recovery, despite the higher costs that this represented for the insurance fund and the well-documented adverse side effects of longer periods off-work.

Available only for authorised users

Kersbergen AL. Case management: a rich history of coordinating care to control costs. Nurs Outlook. 1996;44(4):169–172.PubMedCrossRef

Somme D, Corvol A, Couturier Y, Pimouguet C, Moreau O, Perivier S, Balard F, de Stampa M. New professional field in France. The training needs of case managers. Santé Publique. 2015;S1(HS):61–66.

Iles RA, Wyatt M, Pransky G. Multi-faceted case management: reducing compensation costs of musculoskeletal work injuries in Australia. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):478–488.PubMedCrossRef

Scholz SM, Andermatt P, Tobler BL, Spinnler D. Work incapacity and treatment costs after severe accidents: standard versus intensive case management in a 6-year randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(3):319–331.PubMedCrossRef

Young AE, Wasiak R, Roessler RT, McPherson KM, Anema JR, van Poppel MNM. Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):543–556.PubMedCrossRef

Belin A, Dupont C, Oulès L, Kuipers Y, Fries-Tersch E, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Rehabilitation and return to work: analysis report on EU and Member States systems and programmes. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2016.

Eggert S. Psychosocial factors affecting employees’ abilities to return to work. AAOHN J. 2010;58(2):5.

Vogel N, Schandelmaier S, Zumbrunn T, Ebrahim S, de Boer WE, Busse JW, Kunz R. Return-to-work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Work Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017.

Franche R-L, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. The Institute for Work & Health (IWH) workplace-based RTW intervention literature review research team. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–631.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Cullen KL, Irvin E, Collie A, Clay F, Gensby U, Jennings PA, Hogg-Johnson S, Kristman V, Laberge M, McKenzie D, Newnam S, Palagyi A, Ruseckaite R, Sheppard DM, Shourie S, Steenstra I, Van Eerd D, Amick BC. Effectiveness of workplace interventions in return-to-work for musculoskeletal, pain-related and mental health conditions: an update of the evidence and messages for practitioners. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):1–15.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Alamgir H, Tompa E, Koehoorn M, Ostry A, Demers PA. Costs and compensation of work-related injuries in British Columbia sawmills. Occup Environ Med. 2007;64(3):196–201.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Leigh JP. Economic burden of occupational injury and illness in the United States. Milbank Q. 2011;89(4):728–772.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

13.

Meijer EM, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW. Evaluation of effective return-to-work treatment programs for sick-listed patients with non-specific musculoskeletal complaints: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2005;78(7):523–532.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Caliendo M, Kopeinig S. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. J Econ Surv. 2008;22(1):31–72.CrossRef

15.

Sears JM, Blanar L, Bowman SM. Predicting work-related disability and medical cost outcomes: a comparison of injury severity scoring methods. Injury. 2014;45(1):16–22.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Sears JM, Blanar L, Bowman SM, Adams D, Silverstein BA. Predicting work-related disability and medical cost outcomes: estimating injury severity scores from workers’ compensation data. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(1):19–31.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Bültmann U, Sherson D, Olsen J, Hansen CL, Lund T, Kilsgaard J. Coordinated and tailored work rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation undertaken with workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):81–93.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Jensen C, Jensen OK, Nielsen CV. Sustainability of return to work in sick-listed employees with low-back pain. Two-year follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing multidisciplinary and brief intervention. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13(1):156.

19.

Stuart EA. Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Stat Sci. 2010;25(1):1–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

20.

Langi FLFG, Oberoi A, Balcazar FE, Awsumb J. Vocational rehabilitation of transition-age youth with disabilities: a propensity-score matched study. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(1):15–23.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Streibelt M, Bürger W, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Bethge M. Effectiveness of graded return to work after multimodal rehabilitation in patients with mental disorders: a propensity score analysis. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):180–189.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Hagen T. Evaluation of a placement coaching program for recipients of disability insurance benefits in Switzerland. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(1):72–90.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Greifer N. Covariate Balance Tables and Plots: A Guide to the cobalt Package. [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/cobalt/vignettes/cobalt_A0_basic_use.html.

24.

Normand S-LT, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E, Ayanian JZ, Ryan TJ, Cleary PD, McNeil BJ. Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(4):387–398.

25.

Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28(25):3083–3107.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

26.

Stuart EA, Lee BK, Leacy FP. Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(8, Supplement):S84.e1–S90.e1.

27.

Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA. Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Polit Anal. 2007;15(3):199–236.CrossRef

28.

Rubin DB. Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: application to the tobacco litigation. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2001;2(3):169–188.CrossRef

29.

Stuart EA, Rubin DB. Best practices in quasi-experimental designs: matching methods for causal inference. In: Best practices in quantitative methods. Thousand Oaks California: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2008. p. 155–176.

30.

Linden A. Graphical displays for assessing covariate balance in matching studies. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21(2):242–247.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York; 2016.

32.

Jones AM, Rice N, Zantomio F. Acute Health shocks and labour market outcomes. HEDG Dep Econ Univ York WP 1604 [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Jul 28]; Available from: https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2752356.

33.

Jones AM, Rice N, Zantomio F. Acute health shocks and labour market outcomes: evidence from the post crash era. Econ Hum Biol. 2020;36:100811.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Iacus SM, King G, Porro G. Causal inference without balance checking: coarsened exact matching. Polit Anal. 2012;20(1):1–24.CrossRef

35.

Hlobil H, Staal JB, Spoelstra M, Ariëns GA, Smid T, van Mechelen W. Effectiveness of a return-to-work intervention for subacute low-back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31(4):249–257.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Schandelmaier S, Ebrahim S, Burkhardt SCA, de Boer WEL, Zumbrunn T, Guyatt GH, Busse JW, Kunz R. Return to work coordination programmes for work disability: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(11):e49760.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

37.

Arnetz BB, Sjögren B, Rydéhn B, Meisel R. Early workplace intervention for employees with musculoskeletal-related absenteeism: a prospective controlled intervention study. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45(5):499–506.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Verbeek JH, van der Weide WE, van Dijk FJ. Early occupational health management of patients with back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2002;27(17):1844–1850.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Bonde JP, Rasmussen MS, Hjøllund H, Svendsen SW, Kolstad H, Jensen LD, Wieclaw J. Occupational disorders and return to work: a randomized controlled study. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(4):230–235.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Kuoppala J, Lamminpää A. Rehabilitation and work ability: a systematic literature review. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(10):796–804.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Norbye AD, Omdal AV, Nygaard ME, Romild U, Eldøen G, Midgard R. Do patients with chronic low back pain benefit from early intervention regarding absence from work? Spine. 2016;41(21):E1257-64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

42.

Heiden M, Lyskov E, Nakata M, Sahlin K, Sahlin T, Barnekow-Bergkvist M. Evaluation of cognitive behavioural training and physical activity for patients with stress-related illnesses: A randomized controlled study. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(5):366–373.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and well-being? London: The Station Office; 2006.

44.

Vingård E, Alexanderson K, Norlund A. Chapter 9. Consequences of being on sick leave. Scand J Public Health. 2004;32(63_suppl):207–215.

45.

Andrén D, Svensson M. Part-time sick leave as a treatment method for individuals with musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(3):418–426.PubMedCrossRef

46.

Kools L, Koning P. Graded return-to-work as a stepping stone to full work resumption. J Health Econ. 2019;65:189–209.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Viikari-Juntura E, Kausto J, Shiri R, Kaila-Kangas L, Takala E-P, Karppinen J, Miranda H, Luukkonen R, Martimo K-P. Return to work after early part-time sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38(2):134–143.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Steenstra IA, Anema JR, van Tulder MW, Bongers PM, de Vet HCW, van Mechelen W. Economic evaluation of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick-leave due to low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(4):557–578.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Pélissier C, Fontana L, Chauvin F. Factors influencing return to work after illness in France. Occup Med. 2014;64(1):56–63.CrossRef

50.

Fassier J-B, Durand M-J, Caillard J-F, Roquelaure Y, Loisel P. Results of a feasibility study: barriers and facilitators in implementing the Sherbrooke model in France. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015;41(3):223–233.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Karine P. Health and job retention: preventing workers from becoming unemployed [Internet]. Haute Authorité de Santé; 2019 p. 200. Available from: https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2019-02/reco271_argumentaire_maintien_en_emploi_v1.pdf.

52.

Tomas-Bouil A, de Andrade V, Gagnayre R. Occupational health and therapeutic education for patients with asthma or chronic low back pain. Sante Publique (Bucur). 2016;28(3):321–330.CrossRef

53.

Lilley R, Davie G, Langley J, Ameratunga S, Derrett S. Do outcomes differ between work and non-work-related injury in a universal injury compensation system? Findings from the New Zealand Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):995.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

54.

CNSA. Assessment of MAIA devices and support for the implementation of recommendations. Final evaluation report. [Internet]. Caisse nationale de solidarité pour l’autonomie; 2017 [cited 2019 Nov 17]. Available from: https://www.cnsa.fr/rapport-devaluation-des-dispositifs-maia.

55.

Feuerstein M, Huang GD, Ortiz JM, Shaw WS, Miller VI, Wood PM. Integrated case management for work-related upper-extremity disorders: impact of patient satisfaction on health and work status. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45(8):803–812.PubMedCrossRef

56.

Heymans MW, de Vet HCW, Bongers PM, Knol DL, Koes BW, van Mechelen W. The effectiveness of high-intensity versus low-intensity back schools in an occupational setting: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2006;31(10):1075–1082.PubMedCrossRef

57.

Palmer KT, Harris EC, Linaker C, Barker M, Lawrence W, Cooper C, Coggon D. Effectiveness of community- and workplace-based interventions to manage musculoskeletal-related sickness absence and job loss: a systematic review. Rheumatology. 2012;51(2):230–242.PubMedCrossRef

Title: Evaluating the Impact of Intensive Case Management for Severe Vocational Injuries on Work Incapacity and Costs
Authors: Rolando Leiva
Lise Rochaix
Noémie Kiefer
Jean-Claude K. Dupont
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-09967-6

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Evaluating the Impact of Intensive Case Management for Severe Vocational Injuries on Work Incapacity and Costs

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Characteristics and Prognostic Factors for Return to Work in Public Safety Personnel with Work-Related Posttraumatic Stress Injury Undergoing Rehabilitation

Development of a Programme Theory for Early Intervention Vocational Rehabilitation: A Realist Literature Review

Determination of Perceived Levels of Physical Work Demand Thresholds, and Reliability and Responsiveness of the Modified-Spinal Function Sort Questionnaire in a Multidisciplinary Occupational Rehabilitation Setting

The Role of the Employer in Supporting Work Participation of Workers with Disabilities: A Systematic Literature Review Using an Interdisciplinary Approach

Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing Motivational Interviewing as a Return to Work Intervention in a Norwegian Social Insurance Setting: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation

Correction to: Job Crafting Among American Workers with Disabilities