Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 4/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021

Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing Motivational Interviewing as a Return to Work Intervention in a Norwegian Social Insurance Setting: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation

Authors: Vegard Stolsmo Foldal, Marit Solbjør, Martin Inge Standal, Egil Andreas Fors, Roger Hagen, Gunnhild Bagøien, Roar Johnsen, Karen Walseth Hara, Heidi Fossen, Ida Løchting, Hedda Eik, Margreth Grotle, Lene Aasdahl

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate potential barriers and facilitators for implementing motivational interviewing (MI) as a return to work (RTW) intervention in a Norwegian social insurance setting. Methods A mixed-methods process evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial involving MI sessions delivered by social insurance caseworkers. The study was guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework using focus groups with the caseworkers. MI fidelity was evaluated through audio-recordings of MI sessions and questionnaires to sick-listed participants. Results Lack of co-worker and managerial support, time and place for practicing to further develop MI skills, and a high workload made the MI intervention challenging for the caseworkers. The MI method was experienced as useful, but difficult to master. MI fidelity results showed technical global scores over the threshold for “beginning proficiency” whereas the relational global score was under the threshold. The sick-listed workers reported being satisfied with the MI sessions. Conclusions Despite caseworker motivation for learning and using MI in early follow-up sessions, MI was hard to master and use in practice. Several barriers and facilitators were identified; these should be addressed before implementing MI in a social insurance setting.
Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03212118 (registered July 11, 2017).
Literature
3.
go back to reference Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and wellbeing? London: The Stationery Office; 2006. Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and wellbeing? London: The Stationery Office; 2006.
4.
go back to reference Schuring M, Robroek SJW, Otten FWJ, et al. The effect of ill health and socioeconomic status on labor force exit and re-employment: a prospective study with ten years follow-up in the Netherlands. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013;39(2):134–143.CrossRef Schuring M, Robroek SJW, Otten FWJ, et al. The effect of ill health and socioeconomic status on labor force exit and re-employment: a prospective study with ten years follow-up in the Netherlands. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013;39(2):134–143.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Spasova S, Bouget D, Vanhercke B. Sick pay and sickness benefit schemes in the European Union, Background report for the Social Protection Committee’s In-depth Review on sickness benefits (17 October 2016). European Social Policy Network (ESPN), European Commission, Brussels Spasova S, Bouget D, Vanhercke B. Sick pay and sickness benefit schemes in the European Union, Background report for the Social Protection Committee’s In-depth Review on sickness benefits (17 October 2016). European Social Policy Network (ESPN), European Commission, Brussels
6.
go back to reference OECD. Mental Health and Work: Norway. OECD Publishing; 2013. OECD. Mental Health and Work: Norway. OECD Publishing; 2013.
9.
go back to reference Schultz IZ, Chlebak CM, Law AK. Bridging the gap: evidence-informed early intervention practices for injured workers with nonvisible disabilities. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ, editors. Handbook of return to work from research to. practice. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 223–255.CrossRef Schultz IZ, Chlebak CM, Law AK. Bridging the gap: evidence-informed early intervention practices for injured workers with nonvisible disabilities. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ, editors. Handbook of return to work from research to. practice. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 223–255.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lambeek LC, van Mechelen W, Knol DL, Loisel P, Anema JR. Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life. British Medical Journal. 2010 Lambeek LC, van Mechelen W, Knol DL, Loisel P, Anema JR. Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life. British Medical Journal. 2010
11.
go back to reference Nieuwenhuijsen K, Faber B, Verbeek JH, Neumeyer-Gromen A, Hees HL, Verhoeven AC, et al. Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(12):CD006237. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Faber B, Verbeek JH, Neumeyer-Gromen A, Hees HL, Verhoeven AC, et al. Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(12):CD006237.
12.
go back to reference Vogel N, Schandelmaier S, Zumbrunn T, Ebrahim S, de Boer WE, Busse JW, Kunz R. Return-to-work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3(3):CD011618. Vogel N, Schandelmaier S, Zumbrunn T, Ebrahim S, de Boer WE, Busse JW, Kunz R. Return-to-work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3(3):CD011618.
14.
go back to reference Linnan L, Steckler A. Process Evaluation for public health interventions and research. California: Jossey-Bass San Francisco; 2002. Linnan L, Steckler A. Process Evaluation for public health interventions and research. California: Jossey-Bass San Francisco; 2002.
15.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–1327.CrossRef Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–1327.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Glasgow RE. The RE-AIM Framework: a systematic review of use over time. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(6):E38-46.CrossRef Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Glasgow RE. The RE-AIM Framework: a systematic review of use over time. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(6):E38-46.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Van Beurden KM, Vermeulen SJ, Anema JR, van der Beek AJ. A participatory return-to-work program for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders: a process evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(1):127–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9314-4.CrossRefPubMed Van Beurden KM, Vermeulen SJ, Anema JR, van der Beek AJ. A participatory return-to-work program for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders: a process evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(1):127–140. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10926-011-9314-4.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Malterud K. Kvalitative forskningsmetoder for medisin og helsefag: en innføring. 2017. Universitetsforlaget. Malterud K. Kvalitative forskningsmetoder for medisin og helsefag: en innføring. 2017. Universitetsforlaget.
22.
go back to reference Miller W, Rose G. Toward a theory of motivational interviewing. Am Psychol. 2009;64:527–537.CrossRef Miller W, Rose G. Toward a theory of motivational interviewing. Am Psychol. 2009;64:527–537.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: helping people change. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2013. p. 482. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: helping people change. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2013. p. 482.
25.
go back to reference Lai DT, Cahill K, Qin Y, Tang JL. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;20(1):CD006936. Lai DT, Cahill K, Qin Y, Tang JL. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;20(1):CD006936.
27.
go back to reference Westra HA, Constantino MJ, Antony MM. Integrating motivational interviewing with cognitive-behavioral therapy for severe generalized anxiety disorder: an allegiance-controlled randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016;84:768–782.CrossRef Westra HA, Constantino MJ, Antony MM. Integrating motivational interviewing with cognitive-behavioral therapy for severe generalized anxiety disorder: an allegiance-controlled randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016;84:768–782.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(513):305–312.PubMedPubMedCentral Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(513):305–312.PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference DiClemente CC, Corno CM, Graydon MM, Wiprovnick AE, Knoblach DJ. Motivational interviewing, enhancement, and brief interventions over the last decade: a review of reviews of efficacy and effectiveness. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017;31(8):862–887.CrossRef DiClemente CC, Corno CM, Graydon MM, Wiprovnick AE, Knoblach DJ. Motivational interviewing, enhancement, and brief interventions over the last decade: a review of reviews of efficacy and effectiveness. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017;31(8):862–887.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Flodgren GM, Berg RC. Motivational interviewing as a method to facilitate return to work: a systematic review. Oslo: National Institute of Public Health; 2017. p. 71. Flodgren GM, Berg RC. Motivational interviewing as a method to facilitate return to work: a systematic review. Oslo: National Institute of Public Health; 2017. p. 71.
31.
go back to reference Page KM, Tchernitskaia I. Use of motivational interviewing to improve return-to-work and work-related outcomes: a review. Aus J Rehabil Couns. 2014;20(1):38–49.CrossRef Page KM, Tchernitskaia I. Use of motivational interviewing to improve return-to-work and work-related outcomes: a review. Aus J Rehabil Couns. 2014;20(1):38–49.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Foldal VS, Standal MI, Aasdahl L, Hagen R, Bagøien G, Fors EA, et al. Sick-listed workers’ experiences with motivational interviewing in the return to work process: a qualitative interview study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):276.CrossRef Foldal VS, Standal MI, Aasdahl L, Hagen R, Bagøien G, Fors EA, et al. Sick-listed workers’ experiences with motivational interviewing in the return to work process: a qualitative interview study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):276.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Kramer Schmidt L, Andersen K, Søgaard Nielsen A. Differences in the delivery of motivational interviewing across three countries. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse. 2020:1–22 Kramer Schmidt L, Andersen K, Søgaard Nielsen A. Differences in the delivery of motivational interviewing across three countries. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse. 2020:1–22
38.
go back to reference White Paper 33. 2015–2016. Nav i en ny tid – for arbeid og aktivitet [Nav in a new age – for work and activity]. Oslo: Arbeids og sosialdepartementet [Oslo: Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs]. White Paper 33. 2015–2016. Nav i en ny tid – for arbeid og aktivitet [Nav in a new age – for work and activity]. Oslo: Arbeids og sosialdepartementet [Oslo: Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs].
40.
go back to reference Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51(3):390–395.CrossRef Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51(3):390–395.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Moyers TB, Manuel JK, Ernst D. Motivational interviewing treatment integrity coding manual 4.1. Unpublished manual. 2014. Moyers TB, Manuel JK, Ernst D. Motivational interviewing treatment integrity coding manual 4.1. Unpublished manual. 2014.
43.
go back to reference Jelsma JGM, Mertens V-C, Forsberg L, Forsberg L. How to measure motivational interviewing fidelity in randomized controlled trials: practical recommendations. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;43:93–99.CrossRef Jelsma JGM, Mertens V-C, Forsberg L, Forsberg L. How to measure motivational interviewing fidelity in randomized controlled trials: practical recommendations. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;43:93–99.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC. 2017. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC. 2017.
46.
go back to reference Beckman M, Forsberg L, Lindqvist H, Diez M, Eno Persson J, Ghaderi A. The dissemination of motivational interviewing in Swedish county councils: results of a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(7):e0181715.CrossRef Beckman M, Forsberg L, Lindqvist H, Diez M, Eno Persson J, Ghaderi A. The dissemination of motivational interviewing in Swedish county councils: results of a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(7):e0181715.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Torres A, Frain M, Tansey TN. The impact of motivational interviewing training on rehabilitation counselors: assessing working alliance and client engagement. A randomized controlled trial. Rehabilitation Psychology. 2019. Torres A, Frain M, Tansey TN. The impact of motivational interviewing training on rehabilitation counselors: assessing working alliance and client engagement. A randomized controlled trial. Rehabilitation Psychology. 2019.
48.
go back to reference Dunn C, Darnell D, Atkins DC, Hallgren KA, Imel ZE, Bumgardner K, et al. Within-provider variability in motivational interviewing integrity for three years after MI training: does time heal? J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016;65:74–82.CrossRef Dunn C, Darnell D, Atkins DC, Hallgren KA, Imel ZE, Bumgardner K, et al. Within-provider variability in motivational interviewing integrity for three years after MI training: does time heal? J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016;65:74–82.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Pace BT, Dembe A, Soma CS, Baldwin SA, Atkins DC, Imel ZE. A multivariate meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process and outcome. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017;31(5):524–533.CrossRef Pace BT, Dembe A, Soma CS, Baldwin SA, Atkins DC, Imel ZE. A multivariate meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process and outcome. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017;31(5):524–533.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Ose SO, Dyrstad K, Brattlid I, Slettebak R, Jensberg H, Mandal R, et al. Oppfølging av sykmeldte–fungerer dagens regime? SINTEF-rapport A. 2013;24297. Ose SO, Dyrstad K, Brattlid I, Slettebak R, Jensberg H, Mandal R, et al. Oppfølging av sykmeldte–fungerer dagens regime? SINTEF-rapport A. 2013;24297.
Metadata
Title
Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing Motivational Interviewing as a Return to Work Intervention in a Norwegian Social Insurance Setting: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation
Authors
Vegard Stolsmo Foldal
Marit Solbjør
Martin Inge Standal
Egil Andreas Fors
Roger Hagen
Gunnhild Bagøien
Roar Johnsen
Karen Walseth Hara
Heidi Fossen
Ida Løchting
Hedda Eik
Margreth Grotle
Lene Aasdahl
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-09964-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 4/2021 Go to the issue