Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 8/2005

01-08-2005 | Experimental

Evaluating the effect of a wavelet enhancement method in characterization of simulated lesions embedded in dense breast parenchyma

Authors: L. Costaridou, S. Skiadopoulos, P. Sakellaropoulos, E. Likaki, C. P. Kalogeropoulou, G. Panayiotakis

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Presence of dense parenchyma in mammographic images masks lesions resulting in either missed detections or mischaracterizations, thus decreasing mammographic sensitivity and specificity. The aim of this study is evaluating the effect of a wavelet enhancement method on dense parenchyma for a lesion contour characterization task, using simulated lesions. The method is recently introduced, based on a two-stage process, locally adaptive denoising by soft-thresholding and enhancement by linear stretching. Sixty simulated low-contrast lesions of known image characteristics were generated and embedded in dense breast areas of normal mammographic images selected from the DDSM database. Evaluation was carried out by an observer performance comparative study between the processed and initial images. The task for four radiologists was to classify each simulated lesion with respect to contour sharpness/unsharpness. ROC analysis was performed. Combining radiologists’ responses, values of the area under ROC curve (A z ) were 0.93 (95% CI 0.89, 0.96) and 0.81 (CI 0.75, 0.86) for processed and initial images, respectively. This difference in A z values was statistically significant (Student’s t-test, P<0.05), indicating the effectiveness of the enhancement method. The specific wavelet enhancement method should be tested for lesion contour characterization tasks in softcopy-based mammographic display environment using naturally occurring pathological lesions and normal cases.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jackson VP, Hendrick RE, Feig SA, Kopans DB (1993) Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. Radiology 188:297–301 Jackson VP, Hendrick RE, Feig SA, Kopans DB (1993) Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. Radiology 188:297–301
2.
go back to reference Heine J, Malhotra P (2002) Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis and digital mammography. Acad Radiol 9:298–316CrossRef Heine J, Malhotra P (2002) Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis and digital mammography. Acad Radiol 9:298–316CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankansas BC (1992) Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184:613–617 Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankansas BC (1992) Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184:613–617
4.
go back to reference Van Gils GH, Otten CH, Hendricks JH (1999) High mammographic breast density and its implications for the early detection of breast cancer. J Med Screen 6:200–204 Van Gils GH, Otten CH, Hendricks JH (1999) High mammographic breast density and its implications for the early detection of breast cancer. J Med Screen 6:200–204
5.
go back to reference Nishikawa RM (2002) Detection of microcalcifications. In: Strickland RN (ed) Image-processing techniques for tumor detection. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 131–153 Nishikawa RM (2002) Detection of microcalcifications. In: Strickland RN (ed) Image-processing techniques for tumor detection. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 131–153
6.
go back to reference Cole EB, Pissno ED, Kistner EO et al. (2003) Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type. Radiology 226:153–160 Cole EB, Pissno ED, Kistner EO et al. (2003) Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type. Radiology 226:153–160
7.
go back to reference Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AAS (1994) Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 191:241–242 Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AAS (1994) Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 191:241–242
8.
go back to reference Giger ML, Huo Z, Kupinski M, Vyborny CJ (2000) Computed-aided diagnosis in mammography. In: Sonka M, Fitzpatrick JM (eds) Handbook of medical imaging, vol 2, medical image processing and analysis. SPIE, Bellingham, pp 915–1004 Giger ML, Huo Z, Kupinski M, Vyborny CJ (2000) Computed-aided diagnosis in mammography. In: Sonka M, Fitzpatrick JM (eds) Handbook of medical imaging, vol 2, medical image processing and analysis. SPIE, Bellingham, pp 915–1004
9.
go back to reference Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O’Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA (2001) Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 219:192–202 Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O’Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA (2001) Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 219:192–202
10.
go back to reference Freer TW, Ulissey MJ (2001) Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220:781–786 Freer TW, Ulissey MJ (2001) Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220:781–786
11.
go back to reference Nishikawa R (2002) Assessment of the performance of computer-aided detection and computer-aided diagnosis systems. Semin Breast Disease 5:217–222 Nishikawa R (2002) Assessment of the performance of computer-aided detection and computer-aided diagnosis systems. Semin Breast Disease 5:217–222
12.
go back to reference Kallergi M (2004) Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic microcalcifications clusters. Med Phys 31:314–326CrossRef Kallergi M (2004) Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic microcalcifications clusters. Med Phys 31:314–326CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sivaramakrishna R, Obuchowski NA, Chilcote WA et al (2000) Comparing the performance of mammographic enhancement algorithms: a preference study. Am J Roentgenol 175:45–51 Sivaramakrishna R, Obuchowski NA, Chilcote WA et al (2000) Comparing the performance of mammographic enhancement algorithms: a preference study. Am J Roentgenol 175:45–51
14.
go back to reference Pisano ED, Cole EB, Hemminger BM et al (2000) Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay. Radiographics 20:1479–1491 Pisano ED, Cole EB, Hemminger BM et al (2000) Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay. Radiographics 20:1479–1491
15.
go back to reference Aylward SR, Hemminger MB, Pisano ED (1998) Mixture modelling for digital mammogram display and analysis. In: Karssemeijer N, Thijssen M, Hendriks J, Enring L (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 305–312 Aylward SR, Hemminger MB, Pisano ED (1998) Mixture modelling for digital mammogram display and analysis. In: Karssemeijer N, Thijssen M, Hendriks J, Enring L (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 305–312
16.
go back to reference Pisano ED, Zong S, Hemminger BM et al. (1998) Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms. J Digit Imaging 11:193–200 Pisano ED, Zong S, Hemminger BM et al. (1998) Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms. J Digit Imaging 11:193–200
17.
go back to reference Rangayyan RM, Shen L, Shen Y et al. (2002) Region-based adaptive contrast enhancement. In: Strickland RN (ed) Image-processing techniques for tumor detection. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 213–242 Rangayyan RM, Shen L, Shen Y et al. (2002) Region-based adaptive contrast enhancement. In: Strickland RN (ed) Image-processing techniques for tumor detection. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 213–242
18.
go back to reference Mallat S (1998) A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic Press, London Mallat S (1998) A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic Press, London
19.
go back to reference Donoho DL (1995) De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 41:613–627CrossRef Donoho DL (1995) De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 41:613–627CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pisano ED, Cole EB, Major S et al. (2000) Radiologists’ preferences for digital mammographic display. Radiology 216:820–830 Pisano ED, Cole EB, Major S et al. (2000) Radiologists’ preferences for digital mammographic display. Radiology 216:820–830
21.
go back to reference Mekle R, Laine AF, Smith SJ (2002) Evaluation of a multiscale enhancement protocol for digital mammography. In: Strickland RN (ed) Image-processing techniques for tumor detection. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 155–185 Mekle R, Laine AF, Smith SJ (2002) Evaluation of a multiscale enhancement protocol for digital mammography. In: Strickland RN (ed) Image-processing techniques for tumor detection. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 155–185
22.
go back to reference Bowyer KW (2000) Validation of medical image analysis techniques. In: Sonka M, Fitzpatrick JM (eds) Handbook of medical imaging, vol 2, medical image processing and analysis. SPIE, Bellingham, pp 567–607 Bowyer KW (2000) Validation of medical image analysis techniques. In: Sonka M, Fitzpatrick JM (eds) Handbook of medical imaging, vol 2, medical image processing and analysis. SPIE, Bellingham, pp 567–607
23.
go back to reference Sakellaropoulos P, Costaridou L, Panayiotakis G (2003) A wavelet-based spatially adaptive method for mammographic contrast enhancement. Phys Med Biol 48:787–803CrossRef Sakellaropoulos P, Costaridou L, Panayiotakis G (2003) A wavelet-based spatially adaptive method for mammographic contrast enhancement. Phys Med Biol 48:787–803CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Skiadopoulos S, Costaridou L, Kalogeropoulou CP et al. (2003) Simulating the mammographic appearance of circumscribed lesions. Eur Radiol 13:1137–1147 Skiadopoulos S, Costaridou L, Kalogeropoulou CP et al. (2003) Simulating the mammographic appearance of circumscribed lesions. Eur Radiol 13:1137–1147
25.
go back to reference Skiadopoulos S, Costaridou L, Sakellaropoulos P et al. (2004) Performance assessment of a wavelet enhancement method of dense parenchyma based on simulated lesions. Eur Radiol 14(Suppl 2):419 Skiadopoulos S, Costaridou L, Sakellaropoulos P et al. (2004) Performance assessment of a wavelet enhancement method of dense parenchyma based on simulated lesions. Eur Radiol 14(Suppl 2):419
26.
go back to reference Mallat S, Zhong S (1992) Characterisation of signals from multiscale edges. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14:710–732CrossRef Mallat S, Zhong S (1992) Characterisation of signals from multiscale edges. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14:710–732CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Laine A et al. (1995) Mammographic image processing using wavelet processing techniques. Eur Radiol 5:518–523CrossRef Laine A et al. (1995) Mammographic image processing using wavelet processing techniques. Eur Radiol 5:518–523CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mallat S, Hwang W (1992) Singularity detection and processing with wavelets. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 38:617–643CrossRef Mallat S, Hwang W (1992) Singularity detection and processing with wavelets. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 38:617–643CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Coifman RR, Donoho DL (1995) Translation-invariant de-noising. In: Antoniadis A, Oppenheim G (eds) Wavelets and statistics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York Coifman RR, Donoho DL (1995) Translation-invariant de-noising. In: Antoniadis A, Oppenheim G (eds) Wavelets and statistics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York
30.
go back to reference Chang S, Yu B, Vetterli M (2000) Image denoising via lossy compression and wavelet thresholding. IEEE Trans Image Proc 9:1532–1546CrossRef Chang S, Yu B, Vetterli M (2000) Image denoising via lossy compression and wavelet thresholding. IEEE Trans Image Proc 9:1532–1546CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Heath M, Bowyer K, Kopans D et al. (2000) The digital database for screening mammography. In: Yaffe MJ (ed) Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Toronto, Canada. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, Wisc., pp 212–218 Heath M, Bowyer K, Kopans D et al. (2000) The digital database for screening mammography. In: Yaffe MJ (ed) Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Toronto, Canada. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, Wisc., pp 212–218
33.
go back to reference Sakellaropoulos P, Costaridou L, Panayiotakis G (1999) An image visualization tool in mammography. Med Inform 24:53–73CrossRef Sakellaropoulos P, Costaridou L, Panayiotakis G (1999) An image visualization tool in mammography. Med Inform 24:53–73CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Sakellaropoulos P, Costaridou L, Panayiotakis G (2000) Using component technologies for web based wavelet enhanced mammographic image visualization. Med Inform 25:171–178CrossRef Sakellaropoulos P, Costaridou L, Panayiotakis G (2000) Using component technologies for web based wavelet enhanced mammographic image visualization. Med Inform 25:171–178CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Erkel AR, Pattynama PM (1998) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis: basic principles and applications in radiology. Eur J Radiol 27:88–94CrossRef Erkel AR, Pattynama PM (1998) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis: basic principles and applications in radiology. Eur J Radiol 27:88–94CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Metz CE (1993) Quantification of failure to demonstrate statistical significance. The usefulness of confidence intervals. Invest Radiol 28:59–63 Metz CE (1993) Quantification of failure to demonstrate statistical significance. The usefulness of confidence intervals. Invest Radiol 28:59–63
37.
go back to reference Qian W, Li LH, Clarke LP (1999) Image feature extraction for mass detection in digital mammography: influence of wavelet analysis. Med Phys 26:402–408CrossRef Qian W, Li LH, Clarke LP (1999) Image feature extraction for mass detection in digital mammography: influence of wavelet analysis. Med Phys 26:402–408CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Hemminger BM, Shuquan Z, Muller K et al. (2001) Improving the detection of simulated masses in mammograms through two different image-processing techniques. Acad Radiol 8:845–855CrossRef Hemminger BM, Shuquan Z, Muller K et al. (2001) Improving the detection of simulated masses in mammograms through two different image-processing techniques. Acad Radiol 8:845–855CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Costaridou L (1999) Computer methods in mammography. In: Kappas C, Guerra A, Kolitsi Z, Damilakis Y, Theodorou K (eds) Proceedings of the VI International Conference on Medical Physics, Patras, Greece. Monduzzi Editore, Bologna, pp 201–206 Costaridou L (1999) Computer methods in mammography. In: Kappas C, Guerra A, Kolitsi Z, Damilakis Y, Theodorou K (eds) Proceedings of the VI International Conference on Medical Physics, Patras, Greece. Monduzzi Editore, Bologna, pp 201–206
Metadata
Title
Evaluating the effect of a wavelet enhancement method in characterization of simulated lesions embedded in dense breast parenchyma
Authors
L. Costaridou
S. Skiadopoulos
P. Sakellaropoulos
E. Likaki
C. P. Kalogeropoulou
G. Panayiotakis
Publication date
01-08-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 8/2005
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2640-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2005

European Radiology 8/2005 Go to the issue