Published in:
Open Access 01-05-2013 | Original Article
Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 5/2013
Login to get accessAbstract
Purpose
The purpose of the research described here is to assess the overall effectiveness of the workshop format as a Knowledge Exchange (KE) strategy in (1) disseminating scientific evidence, clinical experience, and systems information related to professionally led Online Support Groups (OSG) for cancer survivors and (2) facilitating the implementation of this intervention by a select group of end users—decision makers and clinical leads in psychosocial supportive care.
Methods
The KE–Decision Support (KE-DS) Model, operationalizing the Health Technology Approach, guided the development of pre- and postworkshop questionnaires, and a follow-up questionnaire administered 5 months after the workshop. Questionnaire results were categorized according to participants’ responses to these elements: methods of engagement, evidence (scientific, experiential, systems) and the delivery of this evidence, and external factors at the institutional level, such as administrative support, budgetary issues, etc., that influence decision-maker abilities and strategies.
Results
Traditional KE strategies such as peer-reviewed journal articles are optimal for disseminating scientific evidence, while face-to-face interactions, such as in a workshop, are best used to disseminate systems-level implementation information, such as fiscal implications, budgetary requirements, and policy relevance, which is not found in journal articles or conferences. An apparent shift in workplace culture signifies the availability of institutional support for high-level staff to engage in KE.
Conclusions
As a KE strategy with identified end users, the workshop format is effective in facilitating the implementation of this intervention in participants’ institutions.