Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2017

01-08-2017 | Health Policy

Ethical Implications of the Electronic Health Record: In the Service of the Patient

Authors: Lois Snyder Sulmasy, JD, Ana María López, MD, MPH, FACP, Carrie A. Horwitch, MD, MPH, FACP, , American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) provide benefits for patients, physicians, and clinical teams, but also raise ethical questions. Navigating how to provide care in the digital age requires an assessment of the impact of the EHR on patient care and the patient–physician relationship. EHRs should facilitate patient care and, as an essential component of that care, support the patient–physician relationship. Billing, regulatory, research, documentation, and administrative functions determined by the operational requirements of health care systems, payers, and others have resulted in EHRs that are better able to satisfy such external functions than to ensure that patient care needs are met. The profession has a responsibility to identify and address this mismatch. This position paper by the American College of Physicians (ACP) Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee does not address EHR design, user variability, meaningful use, or coding requirements and other government and payer mandates per se; these issues are discussed in detail in ACP’s Clinical Documentation policy. This paper focuses on EHRs and the patient–physician relationship and patient care; patient autonomy, privacy and confidentiality; and professionalism, clinical reasoning and training. It explores emerging ethical challenges and concerns for and raised by physicians across the professional lifespan, whose ongoing input is crucial to the development and use of information technology that truly serves patients.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Ober KP, Applegate WB. The electronic health record. Are we the tools of our tools? Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 2015;78:8–14.PubMed Ober KP, Applegate WB. The electronic health record. Are we the tools of our tools? Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 2015;78:8–14.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kuhn T, Basch P, Barr M, Yackel T, for the American College of Physicians Medical Informatics Committee. Clinical documentation in the 21st century: executive summary of a policy position paper from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:301–3.CrossRefPubMed Kuhn T, Basch P, Barr M, Yackel T, for the American College of Physicians Medical Informatics Committee. Clinical documentation in the 21st century: executive summary of a policy position paper from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:301–3.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cimino JJ. Improving the electronic health record—are clinicians getting what they wished for? JAMA. 2013;309:991–2.CrossRefPubMed Cimino JJ. Improving the electronic health record—are clinicians getting what they wished for? JAMA. 2013;309:991–2.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2015. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2015.
9.
go back to reference Wright A. You, me, and the computer makes three: navigating the doctor-patient relationship in the age of electronic health records. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:1–2.CrossRefPubMed Wright A. You, me, and the computer makes three: navigating the doctor-patient relationship in the age of electronic health records. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:1–2.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Eliot TS. The Rock. London: Faber & Faber; 1934. Eliot TS. The Rock. London: Faber & Faber; 1934.
11.
12.
go back to reference Snyder L, for the American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism, and Human Rights Committee. American College of Physicians Ethics Manual: sixth edition. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:73–104.CrossRefPubMed Snyder L, for the American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism, and Human Rights Committee. American College of Physicians Ethics Manual: sixth edition. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:73–104.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lown BA, Rodriguez D. Lost in translation? How electronic health records structure communication, relationships, and meaning [commentary]. Acad Med. 2012;87:392–4.CrossRefPubMed Lown BA, Rodriguez D. Lost in translation? How electronic health records structure communication, relationships, and meaning [commentary]. Acad Med. 2012;87:392–4.CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Peled JU, Sagher O, Morrow JB, Dobbie AE. Do electronic health records help or hinder medical education? PLoS Med. 2009;6:1–5.CrossRef Peled JU, Sagher O, Morrow JB, Dobbie AE. Do electronic health records help or hinder medical education? PLoS Med. 2009;6:1–5.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chi J, Verghese A. Clinical education and the electronic health record: the flipped patient. JAMA. 2014;312:2331–2.CrossRefPubMed Chi J, Verghese A. Clinical education and the electronic health record: the flipped patient. JAMA. 2014;312:2331–2.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ratanawongsa N, Barton JL, Lyles CR, Wu M, Yelin EH, Martinez D, et al. Association between clinician computer use and communication with patients in safety-net clinics. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:125–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ratanawongsa N, Barton JL, Lyles CR, Wu M, Yelin EH, Martinez D, et al. Association between clinician computer use and communication with patients in safety-net clinics. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:125–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Sinsky C, Colligan L, Li L, Prgomet M, Reynolds S, Goeders L, et al. Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: a time and motion study in 4 specialties. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165:753–760.CrossRefPubMed Sinsky C, Colligan L, Li L, Prgomet M, Reynolds S, Goeders L, et al. Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: a time and motion study in 4 specialties. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165:753–760.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Duke P, Frankel RM, Reis S. How to integrate the electronic health record and patient-centered communication into the medical visit: a skills-based approach. Teach Learn in Med. 2013;25:358–65.CrossRef Duke P, Frankel RM, Reis S. How to integrate the electronic health record and patient-centered communication into the medical visit: a skills-based approach. Teach Learn in Med. 2013;25:358–65.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Riess H, Kraft-Todd G. E.M.P.A.T.H.Y.: A tool to enhance nonverbal communication between clinicians and their patients. Acad Med. 2014;89:1108–12.CrossRefPubMed Riess H, Kraft-Todd G. E.M.P.A.T.H.Y.: A tool to enhance nonverbal communication between clinicians and their patients. Acad Med. 2014;89:1108–12.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Pellegrino ED. Medical professionalism: can it, should it survive? J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000;13:147–9.CrossRefPubMed Pellegrino ED. Medical professionalism: can it, should it survive? J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000;13:147–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Sinsky CA, Beasley JW, Simmons GE, Baron RJ. Electronic health records: design, implementation, and policy for higher-value primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:727–8.CrossRefPubMed Sinsky CA, Beasley JW, Simmons GE, Baron RJ. Electronic health records: design, implementation, and policy for higher-value primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:727–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Linzer M, Bitton A, Tu SP, Plews-Ogan M, Horowitz KR, Schwartz MD, et al. The end of the 15–20 minute primary care visit. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:1584–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Linzer M, Bitton A, Tu SP, Plews-Ogan M, Horowitz KR, Schwartz MD, et al. The end of the 15–20 minute primary care visit. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:1584–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Braddock CH, Snyder L. The doctor will see you shortly. The ethical significance of time for the patient-physician relationship. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:1057–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Braddock CH, Snyder L. The doctor will see you shortly. The ethical significance of time for the patient-physician relationship. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:1057–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Koshy S, Feustel PJ, Hong M, Kogan BA. Scribes in an ambulatory urology practice: patient and physician satisfaction. J Urol. 2010;184:258–62.CrossRefPubMed Koshy S, Feustel PJ, Hong M, Kogan BA. Scribes in an ambulatory urology practice: patient and physician satisfaction. J Urol. 2010;184:258–62.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Gellert GA, Ramirea R, Webster SL. The rise of the medical scribe industry: implications for the advancement of electronic health records. JAMA. 2014;313:1315–6.CrossRef Gellert GA, Ramirea R, Webster SL. The rise of the medical scribe industry: implications for the advancement of electronic health records. JAMA. 2014;313:1315–6.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Sinsky CA, Willard-Grace R, Schutzbank AM, Sinsky TA, Margolius D, Bodenheimer T. In search of joy in practice: a report of 23 high-functioning primary care practices. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11:272–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sinsky CA, Willard-Grace R, Schutzbank AM, Sinsky TA, Margolius D, Bodenheimer T. In search of joy in practice: a report of 23 high-functioning primary care practices. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11:272–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Chi J, Kugler J, Chu IM, Loftus PD, Evans KH, Oskotsky T, et al. Medical students and the electronic health record: “an epic use of time.”. Am J Med. 2014;127:891–5.CrossRefPubMed Chi J, Kugler J, Chu IM, Loftus PD, Evans KH, Oskotsky T, et al. Medical students and the electronic health record: “an epic use of time.”. Am J Med. 2014;127:891–5.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Tierney MJ, Pageler NM, Kahana M, Pantaleoni JL, Longhurst CA. Medical education in the electronic medical record (EMR) era: benefits, challenges and future directions. Acad Med. 2013;88:748–52.CrossRefPubMed Tierney MJ, Pageler NM, Kahana M, Pantaleoni JL, Longhurst CA. Medical education in the electronic medical record (EMR) era: benefits, challenges and future directions. Acad Med. 2013;88:748–52.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Charon R. The patient-physician relationship. Narrative medicine: a model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA. 2001;286:1897–1902.CrossRefPubMed Charon R. The patient-physician relationship. Narrative medicine: a model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA. 2001;286:1897–1902.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Hartzband P, Groopman J. Off the record—avoiding the pitfalls of going electronic. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1656–8.CrossRefPubMed Hartzband P, Groopman J. Off the record—avoiding the pitfalls of going electronic. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1656–8.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Groopman JE. How doctors think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2007. Groopman JE. How doctors think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2007.
38.
go back to reference Siegler EL, Adelman R. Copy and paste: a remediable hazard of electronic health records [comment]. Am J Med. 2009;122:495–6.CrossRefPubMed Siegler EL, Adelman R. Copy and paste: a remediable hazard of electronic health records [comment]. Am J Med. 2009;122:495–6.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med. 2003;78:775–80.CrossRefPubMed Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med. 2003;78:775–80.CrossRefPubMed
41.
42.
go back to reference Delbanco T, Walker J, Bell SK, Darer JD, Elmore JG, Farag N, et al. Inviting patients to read their doctors’ notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:461–70. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2015;168:532. Delbanco T, Walker J, Bell SK, Darer JD, Elmore JG, Farag N, et al. Inviting patients to read their doctors’ notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:461–70. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2015;168:532.
43.
go back to reference Caine K, Kohn S, Lawrence C, Hanania R, Meslin EM, Tierney WM. Designing a patient-centered user interface for access decisions about EHR data: implications from patient interviews. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:S7–16.CrossRefPubMed Caine K, Kohn S, Lawrence C, Hanania R, Meslin EM, Tierney WM. Designing a patient-centered user interface for access decisions about EHR data: implications from patient interviews. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:S7–16.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Hatton D; for the ACP Medical Practice and Quality Committee. Letter to HHS commenting on the proposed rule: CLIA program and HIPAA privacy rule; patients’ access to test reports, 45 CFR Part 164 [CMS-2319-P]. 2011. Hatton D; for the ACP Medical Practice and Quality Committee. Letter to HHS commenting on the proposed rule: CLIA program and HIPAA privacy rule; patients’ access to test reports, 45 CFR Part 164 [CMS-2319-P]. 2011.
Metadata
Title
Ethical Implications of the Electronic Health Record: In the Service of the Patient
Authors
Lois Snyder Sulmasy, JD
Ana María López, MD, MPH, FACP
Carrie A. Horwitch, MD, MPH, FACP
, American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4030-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2017 Go to the issue

Innovation and Improvement: Innovations in Medical Education

The SGIM TEACH Program: A Curriculum for Teachers of Clinical Medicine

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.