Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2017

01-02-2017 | Clinical trial

Estimating the OncotypeDX score: validation of an inexpensive estimation tool

Authors: Anne A. Eaton, Catherine E. Pesce, James O. Murphy, Michelle M. Stempel, Sujata M. Patil, Edi Brogi, Clifford A. Hudis, Mahmoud El-Tamer

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

OncotypeDX, a multi-gene expression assay, has been incorporated into clinical practice as a prognostic and predictive tool. However, its use in resource-constrained international healthcare systems is limited. Here we develop and validate a simplified model using clinicopathologic criteria to predict OncotypeDX score.

Methods

Patients with estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive and HER2-negative invasive ductal carcinoma for whom the OncotypeDX test was successfully performed between 09/2008 and 12/2011 were retrospectively identified. Tumor size, nuclear and histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion, and ER and PR status were extracted from pathology reports. Data were split into a training dataset comprising women tested 09/2008–04/2011, and a validation dataset comprising women tested 04/2011–12/2011. Using the training dataset, linear regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with OncotypeDX score, and to create a simplified risk score and identify risk cutoffs.

Results

Estrogen and progesterone receptors, tumor size, nuclear and histologic grades, and lymphovascular involvement were independently associated with OncotypeDX. The full model explained 39% of the variation in the test data, and the simplified risk score and cutoffs assigned 57% of patients in the test data to the correct risk category (OncotypeDX score <18, 18–30, >30). 41% of patients were predicted to have OncotypeDX score <18, of these 83, 16, and 2% had true scores of <18, 18–30, and >30, respectively.

Conclusions

Awaiting an inexpensive test that is prognostic and predictive, our simplified tool allows clinicians to identify a fairly large group of patients (41%) with very low chance of having high-risk disease (2%).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ross JS, Hatzis C, Symmans WF, Pusztai L, Hortobagyi GN (2008) Commercialized multigene predictors of clinical outcome for breast cancer. Oncologist 13(5):477–493CrossRefPubMed Ross JS, Hatzis C, Symmans WF, Pusztai L, Hortobagyi GN (2008) Commercialized multigene predictors of clinical outcome for breast cancer. Oncologist 13(5):477–493CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Turaga K, Acs G, Laronga C (2010) Gene expression profiling in breast cancer. Cancer Control 17(3):177–182PubMed Turaga K, Acs G, Laronga C (2010) Gene expression profiling in breast cancer. Cancer Control 17(3):177–182PubMed
4.
go back to reference Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Wale C, Forbes J, Mallon EA, Salter J, Quinn E, Dunbier A, Baum M, Buzdar A, Howell A, Bugarini R, Baehner FL, Shak S (2010) Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. J Clin Oncol 28(11):1829–1834CrossRefPubMed Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Wale C, Forbes J, Mallon EA, Salter J, Quinn E, Dunbier A, Baum M, Buzdar A, Howell A, Bugarini R, Baehner FL, Shak S (2010) Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. J Clin Oncol 28(11):1829–1834CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Habel LA, Shak S, Jacobs MK, Capra A, Alexander C, Pho M, Baker J, Walker M, Watson D, Hackett J, Blick NT, Greenberg D, Fehrenbacher L, Langholz B, Quesenberry CP (2006) A population-based study of tumor gene expression and risk of breast cancer death among lymph node-negative patients. Breast Cancer Res 8(3):R25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Habel LA, Shak S, Jacobs MK, Capra A, Alexander C, Pho M, Baker J, Walker M, Watson D, Hackett J, Blick NT, Greenberg D, Fehrenbacher L, Langholz B, Quesenberry CP (2006) A population-based study of tumor gene expression and risk of breast cancer death among lymph node-negative patients. Breast Cancer Res 8(3):R25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, Norton L, Ravdin P, Taube S, Somerfield MR, Hayes DF, Bast RC Jr, American Society of Clinical O (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(33):5287–5312CrossRefPubMed Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, Norton L, Ravdin P, Taube S, Somerfield MR, Hayes DF, Bast RC Jr, American Society of Clinical O (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(33):5287–5312CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (2008) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Breast Cancer 2:2008 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (2008) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Breast Cancer 2:2008
8.
go back to reference Toi M, Iwata H, Yamanaka T, Masuda N, Ohno S, Nakamura S, Nakayama T, Kashiwaba M, Kamigaki S, Kuroi K, Japan Breast Cancer Research Group-Translational Research G (2010) Clinical significance of the 21-gene signature (Oncotype DX) in hormone receptor-positive early stage primary breast cancer in the Japanese population. Cancer 116(13):3112–3118CrossRefPubMed Toi M, Iwata H, Yamanaka T, Masuda N, Ohno S, Nakamura S, Nakayama T, Kashiwaba M, Kamigaki S, Kuroi K, Japan Breast Cancer Research Group-Translational Research G (2010) Clinical significance of the 21-gene signature (Oncotype DX) in hormone receptor-positive early stage primary breast cancer in the Japanese population. Cancer 116(13):3112–3118CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kondo M, Hoshi SL, Yamanaka T, Ishiguro H, Toi M (2011) Economic evaluation of the 21-gene signature (Oncotype DX) in lymph node-negative/positive, hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer based on Japanese validation study (JBCRG-TR03). Breast Cancer Res Treat 127(3):739–749CrossRefPubMed Kondo M, Hoshi SL, Yamanaka T, Ishiguro H, Toi M (2011) Economic evaluation of the 21-gene signature (Oncotype DX) in lymph node-negative/positive, hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer based on Japanese validation study (JBCRG-TR03). Breast Cancer Res Treat 127(3):739–749CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Allison KH, Kandalaft PL, Sitlani CM, Dintzis SM, Gown AM (2012) Routine pathologic parameters can predict Oncotype DX recurrence scores in subsets of ER positive patients: who does not always need testing? Breast Cancer Res Treat 131(2):413–424CrossRefPubMed Allison KH, Kandalaft PL, Sitlani CM, Dintzis SM, Gown AM (2012) Routine pathologic parameters can predict Oncotype DX recurrence scores in subsets of ER positive patients: who does not always need testing? Breast Cancer Res Treat 131(2):413–424CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cuzick J, Dowsett M, Pineda S, Wale C, Salter J, Quinn E, Zabaglo L, Mallon E, Green AR, Ellis IO, Howell A, Buzdar AU, Forbes JF (2011) Prognostic value of a combined estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemical score and comparison with the genomic health recurrence score in early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29(32):4273–4278CrossRefPubMed Cuzick J, Dowsett M, Pineda S, Wale C, Salter J, Quinn E, Zabaglo L, Mallon E, Green AR, Ellis IO, Howell A, Buzdar AU, Forbes JF (2011) Prognostic value of a combined estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemical score and comparison with the genomic health recurrence score in early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29(32):4273–4278CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kamal AH, Loprinzi CL, Reynolds C, Dueck AC, Geiger XJ, Ingle JN, Carlson RW, Hobday TJ, Winer EP, Goetz MP (2011) Breast medical oncologists’ use of standard prognostic factors to predict a 21-gene recurrence score. Oncologist 16(10):1359–1366CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kamal AH, Loprinzi CL, Reynolds C, Dueck AC, Geiger XJ, Ingle JN, Carlson RW, Hobday TJ, Winer EP, Goetz MP (2011) Breast medical oncologists’ use of standard prognostic factors to predict a 21-gene recurrence score. Oncologist 16(10):1359–1366CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Kim H, Umbricht C, Illei PB, Magalhaes MCF, Pesce C, Gage MM, Mylander C, Rosman M, Tafra L, Visvanathan K, Cope L, Wolff AC (2014) An estimation model for Oncotype DX recurrence score using routine histopathologic variables. J Clin Oncol 32(5s) (suppl; abstr 559) Kim H, Umbricht C, Illei PB, Magalhaes MCF, Pesce C, Gage MM, Mylander C, Rosman M, Tafra L, Visvanathan K, Cope L, Wolff AC (2014) An estimation model for Oncotype DX recurrence score using routine histopathologic variables. J Clin Oncol 32(5s) (suppl; abstr 559)
14.
go back to reference Klein ME, Dabbs DJ, Shuai Y, Brufsky AM, Jankowitz R, Puhalla SL, Bhargava R (2013) Prediction of the Oncotype DX recurrence score: use of pathology-generated equations derived by linear regression analysis. Mod Pathol 26(5):658–664CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Klein ME, Dabbs DJ, Shuai Y, Brufsky AM, Jankowitz R, Puhalla SL, Bhargava R (2013) Prediction of the Oncotype DX recurrence score: use of pathology-generated equations derived by linear regression analysis. Mod Pathol 26(5):658–664CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Turner BM, Skinner KA, Tang P, Jackson MC, Soukiazian N, Shayne M, Huston A, Ling M, Hicks DG (2015) Use of modified Magee equations and histologic criteria to predict the Oncotype DX recurrence score. Mod Pathol 28(7):921–931CrossRefPubMed Turner BM, Skinner KA, Tang P, Jackson MC, Soukiazian N, Shayne M, Huston A, Ling M, Hicks DG (2015) Use of modified Magee equations and histologic criteria to predict the Oncotype DX recurrence score. Mod Pathol 28(7):921–931CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference McCarty KS Jr, Miller LS, Cox EB, Konrath J, McCarty KS Sr (1985) Estrogen receptor analyses. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 109(8):716–721PubMed McCarty KS Jr, Miller LS, Cox EB, Konrath J, McCarty KS Sr (1985) Estrogen receptor analyses. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 109(8):716–721PubMed
17.
go back to reference Guth AA, Fineberg S, Fei K, Franco R, Bickell NA (2013) Utilization of Oncotype DX in an inner city population: race or place? Int J Breast Cancer 2013:653805CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guth AA, Fineberg S, Fei K, Franco R, Bickell NA (2013) Utilization of Oncotype DX in an inner city population: race or place? Int J Breast Cancer 2013:653805CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Chen C, Dhanda R, Tseng WY, Forsyth M, Patt DA (2013) Evaluating use characteristics for the oncotype dx 21-gene recurrence score and concordance with chemotherapy use in early-stage breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 9(4):182–187CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen C, Dhanda R, Tseng WY, Forsyth M, Patt DA (2013) Evaluating use characteristics for the oncotype dx 21-gene recurrence score and concordance with chemotherapy use in early-stage breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 9(4):182–187CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Bombard Y, Rozmovits L, Trudeau M, Leighl NB, Deal K, Marshall DA (2015) The value of personalizing medicine: medical oncologists’ views on gene expression profiling in breast cancer treatment. Oncologist 20(4):351–356CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bombard Y, Rozmovits L, Trudeau M, Leighl NB, Deal K, Marshall DA (2015) The value of personalizing medicine: medical oncologists’ views on gene expression profiling in breast cancer treatment. Oncologist 20(4):351–356CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Joh JE, Esposito NN, Kiluk JV, Laronga C, Lee MC, Loftus L, Soliman H, Boughey JC, Reynolds C, Lawton TJ, Acs PI, Gordan L, Acs G (2011) The effect of Oncotype DX recurrence score on treatment recommendations for patients with estrogen receptor-positive early stage breast cancer and correlation with estimation of recurrence risk by breast cancer specialists. Oncologist 16(11):1520–1526CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Joh JE, Esposito NN, Kiluk JV, Laronga C, Lee MC, Loftus L, Soliman H, Boughey JC, Reynolds C, Lawton TJ, Acs PI, Gordan L, Acs G (2011) The effect of Oncotype DX recurrence score on treatment recommendations for patients with estrogen receptor-positive early stage breast cancer and correlation with estimation of recurrence risk by breast cancer specialists. Oncologist 16(11):1520–1526CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, Geyer CE, Dees EC, Perez EA, Olson JA, Zujewski J, Lively T, Badve SS, Saphner TJ, Wagner LI, Whelan TJ, Ellis MJ, Paik S, Wood WC, Ravdin P, Keane MM, Gomez Moreno HL, Reddy PS, Goggins TF, Mayer IA, Brufsky AM, Toppmeyer DL, Kaklamani VG, Atkins JN, Berenberg JL, Sledge GW (2015) Prospective validation of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 373(21):2005–2014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, Geyer CE, Dees EC, Perez EA, Olson JA, Zujewski J, Lively T, Badve SS, Saphner TJ, Wagner LI, Whelan TJ, Ellis MJ, Paik S, Wood WC, Ravdin P, Keane MM, Gomez Moreno HL, Reddy PS, Goggins TF, Mayer IA, Brufsky AM, Toppmeyer DL, Kaklamani VG, Atkins JN, Berenberg JL, Sledge GW (2015) Prospective validation of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 373(21):2005–2014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Estimating the OncotypeDX score: validation of an inexpensive estimation tool
Authors
Anne A. Eaton
Catherine E. Pesce
James O. Murphy
Michelle M. Stempel
Sujata M. Patil
Edi Brogi
Clifford A. Hudis
Mahmoud El-Tamer
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4069-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine