Published in:
01-07-2006 | Short communication
Estimating glomerular filtration rate in diabetes: a comparison of cystatin-C- and creatinine-based methods
Authors:
R. J. MacIsaac, C. Tsalamandris, M. C. Thomas, E. Premaratne, S. Panagiotopoulos, T. J. Smith, A. Poon, M. A. Jenkins, S. I. Ratnaike, D. A. Power, G. Jerums
Published in:
Diabetologia
|
Issue 7/2006
Login to get access
Abstract
Aims/hypothesis
We compared the predictive performance of a GFR based on serum cystatin C levels with commonly used creatinine-based methods in subjects with diabetes.
Subjects, materials and methods
In a cross-sectional study of 251 consecutive clinic patients, the mean reference (plasma clearance of 99mTc-diethylene-triamine-penta-acetic acid) GFR (iGFR) was 88±2 ml min−1 1.73 m−2. A regression equation describing the relationship between iGFR and 1/cystatin C levels was derived from a test population (n=125) to allow for the estimation of GFR by cystatin C (eGFR-cystatin C). The predictive performance of eGFR-cystatin C, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease 4 variable formula (MDRD-4) and Cockcroft–Gault (C–G) formulas were then compared in a validation population (n=126).
Results
There was no difference in renal function (ml min−1 1.73 m−2) as measured by iGFR (89.2±3.0), eGFR-cystatin C (86.8±2.5), MDRD-4 (87.0±2.8) or C–G (92.3±3.5). All three estimates of renal function had similar precision and accuracy.
Conclusions/interpretation
Estimates of GFR based solely on serum cystatin C levels had the same predictive potential when compared with the MDRD-4 and C–G formulas.