Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2018

Open Access 01-02-2018 | Statement

ESR paper on structured reporting in radiology

Author: European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Structured reporting is emerging as a key element of optimising radiology’s contribution to patient outcomes and ensuring the value of radiologists’ work. It is being developed and supported by many national and international radiology societies, based on the recognised need to use uniform language and structure to accurately describe radiology findings. Standardisation of report structures ensures that all relevant areas are addressed. Standardisation of terminology prevents ambiguity in reports and facilitates comparability of reports. The use of key data elements and quantified parameters in structured reports (“radiomics”) permits automatic functions (e.g. TNM staging), potential integration with other clinical parameters (e.g. laboratory results), data sharing (e.g. registries, biobanks) and data mining for research, teaching and other purposes. This article outlines the requirements for a successful structured reporting strategy (definition of content and structure, standard terminologies, tools and protocols). A potential implementation strategy is outlined. Moving from conventional prose reports to structured reporting is endorsed as a positive development, and must be an international effort, with international design and adoption of structured reporting templates that can be translated and adapted in local environments as needed. Industry involvement is key to success, based on international data standards and guidelines.

Key Points

Standardisation of radiology report structure ensures completeness and comparability of reports.
Use of standardised language in reports minimises ambiguity.
Structured reporting facilitates automatic functions, integration with other clinical parameters and data sharing.
International and inter-society cooperation is key to developing successful structured report templates.
Integration with industry providers of radiology-reporting software is also crucial.
Footnotes
Literature
1.
go back to reference Porter ME, Teisberg EO (2006) Redefining health care: creating value-based competition on results. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston Porter ME, Teisberg EO (2006) Redefining health care: creating value-based competition on results. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston
3.
go back to reference Porter ME (2009) A strategy for health care reform--toward a value-based system. N Engl J Med 361:109–112CrossRefPubMed Porter ME (2009) A strategy for health care reform--toward a value-based system. N Engl J Med 361:109–112CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Boland GW, Duszak R Jr, McGinty G, Allen B Jr (2014) Delivery of appropriateness, quality, safety, efficiency and patient satisfaction. J Am Coll Radiol 11:7–11CrossRefPubMed Boland GW, Duszak R Jr, McGinty G, Allen B Jr (2014) Delivery of appropriateness, quality, safety, efficiency and patient satisfaction. J Am Coll Radiol 11:7–11CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Boland GW, Duszak R Jr (2014) Structured reporting and communication. J Am Coll Radiol 12(12):1286–1288CrossRef Boland GW, Duszak R Jr (2014) Structured reporting and communication. J Am Coll Radiol 12(12):1286–1288CrossRef
7.
go back to reference European Society of Radiology (2017) ESR concept paper on value-based Radiology. Insights Imaging 8:447–454CrossRef European Society of Radiology (2017) ESR concept paper on value-based Radiology. Insights Imaging 8:447–454CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Weiss DL, Bolos PR (2009) Reporting and dictation. In Branstetter IV BF: practical imaging informatics: foundations and applications for PACS professionals. Springer, Heidelberg Weiss DL, Bolos PR (2009) Reporting and dictation. In Branstetter IV BF: practical imaging informatics: foundations and applications for PACS professionals. Springer, Heidelberg
10.
go back to reference Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM et al (2017) Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14:749–762CrossRefPubMed Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM et al (2017) Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14:749–762CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference European Society of Radiology (2015) Medical imaging in personalised medicine: a white paper of the research committee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging 6:141–155CrossRef European Society of Radiology (2015) Medical imaging in personalised medicine: a white paper of the research committee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging 6:141–155CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sarwar A, Boland G, Monks A, Kruskal JB (2015) Metrics for radiologists in the era of value-based health care delivery. Radiographics 35:866–878CrossRefPubMed Sarwar A, Boland G, Monks A, Kruskal JB (2015) Metrics for radiologists in the era of value-based health care delivery. Radiographics 35:866–878CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Alkasab TK, Bizzo BC, Berland LL, Nair S, Pandharipande PV, Harvey HB (2017) Creation of an open framework for point-of-care computer-assisted reporting and decision support tools for radiologists. J Am Coll Radiol 14:1184–1189CrossRefPubMed Alkasab TK, Bizzo BC, Berland LL, Nair S, Pandharipande PV, Harvey HB (2017) Creation of an open framework for point-of-care computer-assisted reporting and decision support tools for radiologists. J Am Coll Radiol 14:1184–1189CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ahmed M, for the Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology (2014) Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria—a 10-year update: supplement to the consensus document) J Vasc Interv Radiol, 25:1691–1705 Ahmed M, for the Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology (2014) Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria—a 10-year update: supplement to the consensus document) J Vasc Interv Radiol, 25:1691–1705
15.
go back to reference Kahn CE Jr, Heilbrun ME, Applegate KE (2013) From guidelines to practice: how reporting templates promote the use of radiology practice guidelines. J Am Coll Radiol 10(4):268–273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kahn CE Jr, Heilbrun ME, Applegate KE (2013) From guidelines to practice: how reporting templates promote the use of radiology practice guidelines. J Am Coll Radiol 10(4):268–273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB, Schoolman HM, Barnett GO (1998) The unified medical language system: an informatics research collaboration. J Am Med Inform Assoc 5(1):1–11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB, Schoolman HM, Barnett GO (1998) The unified medical language system: an informatics research collaboration. J Am Med Inform Assoc 5(1):1–11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Langlotz CP (2006) RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. Radiographics 26:1595–1597CrossRefPubMed Langlotz CP (2006) RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. Radiographics 26:1595–1597CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rubin DL (2008) Creating and curating a terminology for radiology: ontology modeling and analysis. J Digit Imaging 21:355–362CrossRefPubMed Rubin DL (2008) Creating and curating a terminology for radiology: ontology modeling and analysis. J Digit Imaging 21:355–362CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kuru K, Girgin S, Arda K, Bozlar U (2013) A novel report generation approach for medical applications: the SISDS methodology and its applications. Int J Med Inform 82:435–447CrossRefPubMed Kuru K, Girgin S, Arda K, Bozlar U (2013) A novel report generation approach for medical applications: the SISDS methodology and its applications. Int J Med Inform 82:435–447CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (2017) IHE Radiology Technical Framework Supplement: Management of Radiology Report Templates (MRRT) Rev. 1.6 Trial implementation Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (2017) IHE Radiology Technical Framework Supplement: Management of Radiology Report Templates (MRRT) Rev. 1.6 Trial implementation
22.
go back to reference Langlotz C (2012) Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise-IHE Radiology-White paper: Management of Radiology Report Templates Rev. 1.0 Langlotz C (2012) Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise-IHE Radiology-White paper: Management of Radiology Report Templates Rev. 1.0
23.
go back to reference Winget MD, Baron JA, Spitz MR et al (2003) Development of common data elements: the experience of and recommendations from the early detection research network. Int J Med Inform 70(1):41–48CrossRefPubMed Winget MD, Baron JA, Spitz MR et al (2003) Development of common data elements: the experience of and recommendations from the early detection research network. Int J Med Inform 70(1):41–48CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Pinto dos Santos D, Klos G, Kloeckner R, Oberle R, Dueber C, Mildenberger P (2017) Development of an IHE MRRT-compliant open-source web-based reporting platform. Eur Radiol 27:424–430CrossRefPubMed Pinto dos Santos D, Klos G, Kloeckner R, Oberle R, Dueber C, Mildenberger P (2017) Development of an IHE MRRT-compliant open-source web-based reporting platform. Eur Radiol 27:424–430CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
ESR paper on structured reporting in radiology
Author
European Society of Radiology (ESR)
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-017-0588-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Insights into Imaging 1/2018 Go to the issue