Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 5/2017

Open Access 01-10-2017 | Statement

ESR concept paper on value-based radiology

Author: European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The European Society of Radiology (ESR) established a Working Group on Value-Based Imaging (VBI WG) in August 2016 in response to developments in European healthcare systems in general, and the trend within radiology to move from volume- to value-based practice in particular. The value-based healthcare (VBH) concept defines “value” as health outcomes achieved for patients relative to the costs of achieving them. Within this framework, value measurements start at the beginning of therapy; the whole diagnostic process is disregarded, and is considered only if it is the cause of errors or complications. Making the case for a new, multidisciplinary organisation of healthcare delivery centred on the patient, this paper establishes the diagnosis of disease as a first outcome in the interrelated activities of the healthcare chain. Metrics are proposed for measuring the quality of radiologists’ diagnoses and the various ways in which radiologists provide value to patients, other medical specialists and healthcare systems at large. The ESR strongly believes value-based radiology (VBR) is a necessary complement to existing VBH concepts. The Society is determined to establish a holistic VBR programme to help European radiologists deal with changes in the evolution from volume- to value-based evaluation of radiological activities.
Main Messages
• Value-based healthcare defines value as patient’s outcome over costs.
• The VBH framework disregards the diagnosis as an outcome.
• VBH considers diagnosis only if wrong or a cause of complications.
• A correct diagnosis is the first outcome that matters to patients.
• Metrics to measure radiologists’ impacts on patient outcomes are key.
• The value provided by radiology is multifaceted, going beyond exam volumes.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Ribera J, Antoja G, Rosenmöller M, Borrás P (2015) Hospital of the Future. A new role for leading public hospitals in Europe. Center for Research in Healthcare Innovation Management (CRHIM), IESE, Barcelona Ribera J, Antoja G, Rosenmöller M, Borrás P (2015) Hospital of the Future. A new role for leading public hospitals in Europe. Center for Research in Healthcare Innovation Management (CRHIM), IESE, Barcelona
5.
go back to reference Porter ME, Larsson S, Lee TH (2016) Standardising patient outcomes measurement. N Engl J Med 374:504–506CrossRefPubMed Porter ME, Larsson S, Lee TH (2016) Standardising patient outcomes measurement. N Engl J Med 374:504–506CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kaplan RS, Porter ME (2011) The big idea: how to solve the cost crisis in health care. Harv Bus Rev 89:46–52 54, 56-61 passimPubMed Kaplan RS, Porter ME (2011) The big idea: how to solve the cost crisis in health care. Harv Bus Rev 89:46–52 54, 56-61 passimPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lee VS, Kawamoto K, Hess R, Park C, Young J, Hunter C, Johnson S, Gulbransen S, Pelt CE, Horton DJ, Graves KK, Greene TH, Anzai Y, Pendleton RC (2016) Implementation of a value-driven outcomes program to identify high variability in clinical costs and outcomes and association with reduced cost and improved quality. JAMA 316:1061–1072CrossRefPubMed Lee VS, Kawamoto K, Hess R, Park C, Young J, Hunter C, Johnson S, Gulbransen S, Pelt CE, Horton DJ, Graves KK, Greene TH, Anzai Y, Pendleton RC (2016) Implementation of a value-driven outcomes program to identify high variability in clinical costs and outcomes and association with reduced cost and improved quality. JAMA 316:1061–1072CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Patti JA, Berlin JW, Blumberg AL, Bryan RN, Gaschen F, Izzi BM, Larson PA, Lewin JS, Liebscher LA (2008) ACR white paper: the value added that radiologists provide to the health care enterprise. J Am Coll Radiol 5:1041–1053CrossRefPubMed Patti JA, Berlin JW, Blumberg AL, Bryan RN, Gaschen F, Izzi BM, Larson PA, Lewin JS, Liebscher LA (2008) ACR white paper: the value added that radiologists provide to the health care enterprise. J Am Coll Radiol 5:1041–1053CrossRefPubMed
10.
12.
go back to reference Boland GW, Duszak R Jr, McGinty G Jr, Allen B Jr (2014) Delivery of appropriateness, quality, safety, efficiency and patient satisfaction. J Am Coll Radiol 11:7–11CrossRefPubMed Boland GW, Duszak R Jr, McGinty G Jr, Allen B Jr (2014) Delivery of appropriateness, quality, safety, efficiency and patient satisfaction. J Am Coll Radiol 11:7–11CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Patel S (2015) Value management program: performance, quantification, and presentation of imaging value-added actions. J Am Coll Radiol 12:239–248CrossRefPubMed Patel S (2015) Value management program: performance, quantification, and presentation of imaging value-added actions. J Am Coll Radiol 12:239–248CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sarwar A, Boland G, Monks A, Kruskal JB (2015) Metrics for radiologists in the era of value-based health care delivery. Radiographics 35:866–878CrossRefPubMed Sarwar A, Boland G, Monks A, Kruskal JB (2015) Metrics for radiologists in the era of value-based health care delivery. Radiographics 35:866–878CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Boland GW, Glenn L, Goldberg-Stein S, Jha S, Mangano M, Patel S, Schoppe KA et al (2017) Report of the ACR’s Economics Committee on value-based payment models. J Am Coll Radiol 14:6–14CrossRefPubMed Boland GW, Glenn L, Goldberg-Stein S, Jha S, Mangano M, Patel S, Schoppe KA et al (2017) Report of the ACR’s Economics Committee on value-based payment models. J Am Coll Radiol 14:6–14CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2015) The ESR patient advisory group (ESR-PAG). Insights Imaging 6:167–171CrossRef European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2015) The ESR patient advisory group (ESR-PAG). Insights Imaging 6:167–171CrossRef
20.
go back to reference European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2017) Summary of the proceedings of the international forum 2016: “imaging referrals guidelines and clinical decision support—how can radiologists implement imaging referral guidelines in clinical routine?”. Insights Imaging 8:1–9CrossRef European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2017) Summary of the proceedings of the international forum 2016: “imaging referrals guidelines and clinical decision support—how can radiologists implement imaging referral guidelines in clinical routine?”. Insights Imaging 8:1–9CrossRef
21.
go back to reference European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2015) Summary of the European directive 2013/59/Euratom: essentials for health professionals in radiology. Insights Imaging 6:411–417CrossRef European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2015) Summary of the European directive 2013/59/Euratom: essentials for health professionals in radiology. Insights Imaging 6:411–417CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Dendl L-M, Teufel A, Schleder S, Rennert J, Stroszczynski C, Mueller-Schilling M, Schreyer AG (2017) Analysis of radiological case presentations and their impact on therapy and treatment concepts in internal medicine. Rofo 189:239–246CrossRefPubMed Dendl L-M, Teufel A, Schleder S, Rennert J, Stroszczynski C, Mueller-Schilling M, Schreyer AG (2017) Analysis of radiological case presentations and their impact on therapy and treatment concepts in internal medicine. Rofo 189:239–246CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Brook OR, Hakmon T, Brook A, Dudnik E, Kuten A, Engel A (2011) The effect of a radiology conference consultation on cancer patients management. Ann Oncol 22:1204–1208CrossRefPubMed Brook OR, Hakmon T, Brook A, Dudnik E, Kuten A, Engel A (2011) The effect of a radiology conference consultation on cancer patients management. Ann Oncol 22:1204–1208CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Mangano MD, Rahman A, Choy C, Sahani DV, Boland GW, Gunn AJ (2014) Radiologists’ role in the communication of imaging examination results to patients: perceptions and preferences of patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:1034–1039CrossRefPubMed Mangano MD, Rahman A, Choy C, Sahani DV, Boland GW, Gunn AJ (2014) Radiologists’ role in the communication of imaging examination results to patients: perceptions and preferences of patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:1034–1039CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Koney N, Roudenko A, Ro M, Bahl S, Kagen A (2016) Patients want to meet with imaging experts. J Am Coll Radiol 13:465–470CrossRefPubMed Koney N, Roudenko A, Ro M, Bahl S, Kagen A (2016) Patients want to meet with imaging experts. J Am Coll Radiol 13:465–470CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1992) The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev 72:71–79 Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1992) The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev 72:71–79
28.
go back to reference Kaplan RS (2009) Conceptual foundations of the bilance score card. In: Chapman CS, Hopwood AG, Shields MD (eds) Handbook of management accounting research. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1253–1269 Kaplan RS (2009) Conceptual foundations of the bilance score card. In: Chapman CS, Hopwood AG, Shields MD (eds) Handbook of management accounting research. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1253–1269
29.
go back to reference Maillet T, Maisonneuve H (2011) Long-life learning for medical specialists doctors in Europe: CME, DPC and qualification. Presse Med 40:357–365CrossRefPubMed Maillet T, Maisonneuve H (2011) Long-life learning for medical specialists doctors in Europe: CME, DPC and qualification. Presse Med 40:357–365CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Maisonneuve H, Matillon Y, Negri A, Pallarés L, Vigneri R, Young HL (2009) Continuing medical education and professional revalidation in Europe: five case examples. J Contin Educ Heal Prof 29:58–62CrossRef Maisonneuve H, Matillon Y, Negri A, Pallarés L, Vigneri R, Young HL (2009) Continuing medical education and professional revalidation in Europe: five case examples. J Contin Educ Heal Prof 29:58–62CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Zan E, Yousem DM, Carone M, Lewin JS (2010) Second-opinion consultations in neuroradiology. Radiology 255:135–141CrossRefPubMed Zan E, Yousem DM, Carone M, Lewin JS (2010) Second-opinion consultations in neuroradiology. Radiology 255:135–141CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Lakhman Y, D’Anastasi M, Miccò M, Scelzo C, Vargas HA, Nougaret S, Sosa RE, Chi DS, Abu-Rustum NR, Hricak H, Sala E (2016) Second-opinion interpretations of gynecologic oncologic MRI examinations by sub-specialised radiologists influence patient care. Eur Radiol 26:2089–2098CrossRefPubMed Lakhman Y, D’Anastasi M, Miccò M, Scelzo C, Vargas HA, Nougaret S, Sosa RE, Chi DS, Abu-Rustum NR, Hricak H, Sala E (2016) Second-opinion interpretations of gynecologic oncologic MRI examinations by sub-specialised radiologists influence patient care. Eur Radiol 26:2089–2098CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Chalian M, Del Grande F, Thakkar RS, Jalali SF, Chhabra A, Carrino JA (2016) Second-opinion subspecialty consultations in musculoskeletal radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206:1217–1221CrossRefPubMed Chalian M, Del Grande F, Thakkar RS, Jalali SF, Chhabra A, Carrino JA (2016) Second-opinion subspecialty consultations in musculoskeletal radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206:1217–1221CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Eakins C, Ellis WD, Pruthi S, Johnson DP, Hernanz-Schulman M, Yu C, Kan JH (2012) Second opinion interpretations by specialty radiologists at a pediatric hospital: rate of disagreement and clinical implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:916–920CrossRefPubMed Eakins C, Ellis WD, Pruthi S, Johnson DP, Hernanz-Schulman M, Yu C, Kan JH (2012) Second opinion interpretations by specialty radiologists at a pediatric hospital: rate of disagreement and clinical implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:916–920CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Wibmer A, Vargas HA, Donahue TF, Zheng J, Moskowitz C, Eastham J, Sala E, Hricak H (2015) Diagnosis of Extracapsular extension of prostate cancer on prostate MRI: impact of second-opinion readings by subspecialized genitourinary oncologic radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:W73–W78CrossRefPubMed Wibmer A, Vargas HA, Donahue TF, Zheng J, Moskowitz C, Eastham J, Sala E, Hricak H (2015) Diagnosis of Extracapsular extension of prostate cancer on prostate MRI: impact of second-opinion readings by subspecialized genitourinary oncologic radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:W73–W78CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Norbash J, Bluth E, Lee CI et al (2014) Radiologist manpower considerations and image 3.0: effort planning for value-based imaging. Am Coll Radiol 11:953–958CrossRef Norbash J, Bluth E, Lee CI et al (2014) Radiologist manpower considerations and image 3.0: effort planning for value-based imaging. Am Coll Radiol 11:953–958CrossRef
37.
go back to reference European Society of Radiology (ESR); American College of Radiology (ACR) (2016) European Society of Radiology (ESR) and American College of Radiology (ACR) report of the 2015 global summit on radiological quality and safety. Insights Imaging 7:481–484CrossRef European Society of Radiology (ESR); American College of Radiology (ACR) (2016) European Society of Radiology (ESR) and American College of Radiology (ACR) report of the 2015 global summit on radiological quality and safety. Insights Imaging 7:481–484CrossRef
Metadata
Title
ESR concept paper on value-based radiology
Author
European Society of Radiology (ESR)
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 5/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-017-0566-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Insights into Imaging 5/2017 Go to the issue