Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2021

01-11-2021 | Esophagus Resection | ASO Author Reflections

ASO Author Reflections: R0 Resection After Oncologic Esophagectomy—Cutting on the Edge (0 cm) is Not Enough

Authors: Penelope St-Amour, MD, Markus Schäfer, MD, FACS, Styliani Mantziari, MD, MSc, PD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 12/2021

Login to get access

Excerpt

The Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system has one outstanding characteristic: the individual definitions of the T, N, and M stages can be changed if novel evidence is occurring.1 Indeed, for many tumor entities, including esophageal cancer, these definitions have been adapted over time. Yet, the definition of the resection status (R) seemed to be carved in stone for a long time. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sudo N, Ichikawa H, Muneoka Y, Hanyu T, Kano Y, Ishikawa T, et al. Clinical utility of ypTNM stage grouping in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:650–60.CrossRef Sudo N, Ichikawa H, Muneoka Y, Hanyu T, Kano Y, Ishikawa T, et al. Clinical utility of ypTNM stage grouping in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:650–60.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chan DS, Reid TD, Howell I, Lewis WG. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of circumferential resection margin involvement on survival in patients with operable oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:456–64.CrossRef Chan DS, Reid TD, Howell I, Lewis WG. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of circumferential resection margin involvement on survival in patients with operable oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:456–64.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference St-Amour P, Winiker M, Sempoux C, Fasquelle F, Demartines N, Schäfer M, Mantziari S. ASO visual abstract: the “real R0”: a resection margin < 0.1 cm is associated with poor prognosis after oncological esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10160-5. St-Amour P, Winiker M, Sempoux C, Fasquelle F, Demartines N, Schäfer M, Mantziari S. ASO visual abstract: the “real R0”: a resection margin < 0.1 cm is associated with poor prognosis after oncological esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​s10434-021-10160-5.
4.
go back to reference Ghadban T, Reeh M, Koenig AM, Nentwich MF, Bellon E, Izbicki JR, et al. Prognostic significant or not? The positive circumferential resection margin in esophageal cancer: impact on local recurrence and overall survival in patients without neoadjuvant treatment. Ann Surg. 2017;266:988–94.CrossRef Ghadban T, Reeh M, Koenig AM, Nentwich MF, Bellon E, Izbicki JR, et al. Prognostic significant or not? The positive circumferential resection margin in esophageal cancer: impact on local recurrence and overall survival in patients without neoadjuvant treatment. Ann Surg. 2017;266:988–94.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
ASO Author Reflections: R0 Resection After Oncologic Esophagectomy—Cutting on the Edge (0 cm) is Not Enough
Authors
Penelope St-Amour, MD
Markus Schäfer, MD, FACS
Styliani Mantziari, MD, MSc, PD
Publication date
01-11-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 12/2021
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10167-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2021

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2021 Go to the issue