Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2015

01-04-2015 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Esophageal Reinforcement with an Extracellular Scaffold During Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Authors: Cheguevara Afaneh, MD, Jonathan Abelson, MD, Mark Schattner, MD, Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, David Ilson, MD, Sam S. Yoon, MD, Vivian E. Strong, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Esophagojejunal (EJ) anastomotic leaks after total gastrectomy (TG) for malignancy lead to significant morbidity and mortality, thus affecting long-term survival. Preclinical and clinical trials have shown promise in utilizing degradable extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds in buttressing anastomoses. We describe our experience buttressing the EJ anastomosis after TG with a ECM scaffold.

Methods

From February 2012 to January 2014, a total of 37 consecutive patients underwent TG buttressing of the EJ anastomosis with the degradable ECM scaffold composed of a porcine urinary bladder called MatriStem (ACell Inc.). The scaffold was circumferentially wrapped around the EJ anastomosis. The primary end point was the EJ leak rate, while the secondary end point was the EJ stricture rate.

Results

The mean ± SD age and body mass index were 59 ± 16 years and 28.1 ± 4.9 kg/m2, respectively. Most patients were male (51 %), white (78 %), and former smokers (51 %). Over half (59 %) underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A minimally invasive TG was performed in 70 % of patients. Signet ring was the most common tumor type (48 %), and most patients had midstage disease (59 %). The mean number of lymph nodes procured was 36 ± 16. Eighteen patients (49 %) experienced a complication, mostly minor. One patient (2.7 %) developed an EJ leak, while three patients (8 %) developed an EJ stricture. Median follow-up was 7 months (range 2–12 months). There was no operative or in-hospital mortality.

Discussion

The use of urinary bladder matrix scaffolds may be helpful in decreasing the incidence of EJ anastomotic leak and/or stricture. A prospective phase II trial at our institution is currently under way.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Doglietto GB, Papa V, Tortorelli AP, Bossola M, Covino M, Pacelli F. Nasojejunal tube placement after total gastrectomy: a multicenter prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2004;139:1309–13.CrossRefPubMed Doglietto GB, Papa V, Tortorelli AP, Bossola M, Covino M, Pacelli F. Nasojejunal tube placement after total gastrectomy: a multicenter prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2004;139:1309–13.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Carboni F, Lepiane P, Santoro R, Mancini P, Lorusso R, Santoro E. Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: preliminary experience. Gastric Cancer. 2005;8:75–7.CrossRefPubMed Carboni F, Lepiane P, Santoro R, Mancini P, Lorusso R, Santoro E. Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: preliminary experience. Gastric Cancer. 2005;8:75–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lamb PJ, Griffin SM, Chandrashekar MV, Richardson DL, Karat D, Hayes N. Prospective study of routine contrast radiology after total gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1015–9.CrossRefPubMed Lamb PJ, Griffin SM, Chandrashekar MV, Richardson DL, Karat D, Hayes N. Prospective study of routine contrast radiology after total gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1015–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sierzega M, Kolodziejczyk P, Kulig J. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival after total gastrectomy for carcinoma of the stomach. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1035–42.CrossRefPubMed Sierzega M, Kolodziejczyk P, Kulig J. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival after total gastrectomy for carcinoma of the stomach. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1035–42.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Isozaki H, Okajima K, Ichinona T, Hara H, Fujii K, Nomura E. Risk factors of esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44:1509–12.PubMed Isozaki H, Okajima K, Ichinona T, Hara H, Fujii K, Nomura E. Risk factors of esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44:1509–12.PubMed
6.
go back to reference LaFemina J, Viñuela EF, Schattner A, Gerdes H, Strong VE. Esophagojejunal reconstruction after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the transorally inserted anvil delivery system. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;20:2975–83.CrossRef LaFemina J, Viñuela EF, Schattner A, Gerdes H, Strong VE. Esophagojejunal reconstruction after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the transorally inserted anvil delivery system. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;20:2975–83.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Badylak SF, Vorp DA, Spievack AR, et al. Esophageal reconstruction with ECM and muscle tissue in a dog model. J Surg Res. 2005;128:87–97.CrossRefPubMed Badylak SF, Vorp DA, Spievack AR, et al. Esophageal reconstruction with ECM and muscle tissue in a dog model. J Surg Res. 2005;128:87–97.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Nieponice A, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF. Reinforcement of esophageal anastomoses with an extracellular scaffold in a canine model. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:2050–8.CrossRefPubMed Nieponice A, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF. Reinforcement of esophageal anastomoses with an extracellular scaffold in a canine model. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:2050–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Nieponice A, McGrath K, Qureshi I, et al. An extracellular matrix scaffold for esophageal stricture prevention after circumferential EMR. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:289–96.CrossRefPubMed Nieponice A, McGrath K, Qureshi I, et al. An extracellular matrix scaffold for esophageal stricture prevention after circumferential EMR. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:289–96.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gilbert TW, Stewart-Akers AM, Simmons-Byrd A, Badylak SF. Degradation and remodeling of small intestinal submucosa in canine Achilles tendon repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:621–30.CrossRefPubMed Gilbert TW, Stewart-Akers AM, Simmons-Byrd A, Badylak SF. Degradation and remodeling of small intestinal submucosa in canine Achilles tendon repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:621–30.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Record RD, Hillegonds D, Simmons C, et al. In vivo degradation of 14C-labeled small intestinal submucosa (SIS) when used for urinary bladder repair. Biomaterials. 2001;22:2653–9.CrossRefPubMed Record RD, Hillegonds D, Simmons C, et al. In vivo degradation of 14C-labeled small intestinal submucosa (SIS) when used for urinary bladder repair. Biomaterials. 2001;22:2653–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Brown BN, Londono R, Tottey S, et al. Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:978–87.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Brown BN, Londono R, Tottey S, et al. Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:978–87.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
13.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
14.
go back to reference Brennan EP, Reing J, Chew D, Myers-Irvin JM, Young EJ, Badylak SF. Antibacterial activity within degradation products of biological scaffolds composed of extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:2949–55.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Brennan EP, Reing J, Chew D, Myers-Irvin JM, Young EJ, Badylak SF. Antibacterial activity within degradation products of biological scaffolds composed of extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:2949–55.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
15.
go back to reference Medberry CJ, Tottey S, Jiang H, Johnson SA, Badylak SF. Resistance to infection of five different materials in a rat body wall model. J Surg Res. 2012;173:38–44.CrossRefPubMed Medberry CJ, Tottey S, Jiang H, Johnson SA, Badylak SF. Resistance to infection of five different materials in a rat body wall model. J Surg Res. 2012;173:38–44.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Reing JE, Zhang L, Myers-Irvin J, et al. Degradation products of extracellular matrix affect cell migration and proliferation. Tissue Eng A. 2009;15:605–14.CrossRef Reing JE, Zhang L, Myers-Irvin J, et al. Degradation products of extracellular matrix affect cell migration and proliferation. Tissue Eng A. 2009;15:605–14.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Agrawal V, Johnson SA, Reing J, et al. Epimorphic regeneration approach to tissue replacement in adult mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:3351–5.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Agrawal V, Johnson SA, Reing J, et al. Epimorphic regeneration approach to tissue replacement in adult mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:3351–5.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
18.
go back to reference Yoo HM, Lee HH, Shim JH, Jeon HM, Park CH, Song KY. Negative impact of leakage on survival of patients undergoing curative resection for advanced gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104:734–40.CrossRefPubMed Yoo HM, Lee HH, Shim JH, Jeon HM, Park CH, Song KY. Negative impact of leakage on survival of patients undergoing curative resection for advanced gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104:734–40.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Jeong O, Park YK. Intracorporeal circular stapling esophagojejunostomy using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil) after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2624–30.CrossRefPubMed Jeong O, Park YK. Intracorporeal circular stapling esophagojejunostomy using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil) after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2624–30.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kachikwu EL, Trisal V, Kim J, Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD. Minimally invasive total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a pilot series. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:81–6.CrossRefPubMed Kachikwu EL, Trisal V, Kim J, Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD. Minimally invasive total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a pilot series. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:81–6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Mochiki E, Toyomasu Y, Ogata K, et al. Laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for upper and middle gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1997–2002.CrossRefPubMed Mochiki E, Toyomasu Y, Ogata K, et al. Laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for upper and middle gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1997–2002.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Okabe H, Obama K, Tanaka E, et al. Intracorporeal esophagojejunal anastomosis after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2167–71.CrossRefPubMed Okabe H, Obama K, Tanaka E, et al. Intracorporeal esophagojejunal anastomosis after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2167–71.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Lee SE, Ryu KW, Nam BH, et al. Technical feasibility and safety of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2009;100:392–5.CrossRefPubMed Lee SE, Ryu KW, Nam BH, et al. Technical feasibility and safety of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2009;100:392–5.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Takimoto Y, Teramachi M, Okumura N, Nakamura T, Shimizu Y. Relationship between stenting time and regeneration of neoesophageal submucosal tissue. ASAIO J. 1994;40:M793–7.CrossRefPubMed Takimoto Y, Teramachi M, Okumura N, Nakamura T, Shimizu Y. Relationship between stenting time and regeneration of neoesophageal submucosal tissue. ASAIO J. 1994;40:M793–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Esophageal Reinforcement with an Extracellular Scaffold During Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
Authors
Cheguevara Afaneh, MD
Jonathan Abelson, MD
Mark Schattner, MD
Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD
David Ilson, MD
Sam S. Yoon, MD
Vivian E. Strong, MD
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4125-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2015 Go to the issue