Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Esophagus 3/2023

06-01-2023 | Esophageal Cancer | Original Article

Surgical outcomes and quality of life assessment of esophagectomy for cancer with colon conduit via retrosternal route

Authors: Vo Duy Long, Dang Quang Thong, Nguyen Viet Hai, Tran Quang Dat, Ho Le Minh Quoc, Doan Thuy Nguyen, Nguyen Vu Tuan Anh, Tran Anh Minh, Nguyen Lam Vuong, Jimmy Bok-Yan So, Nguyen Hoang Bac, Ichiro Uyama

Published in: Esophagus | Issue 3/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Colon conduit is an alternative to a gastric conduit for esophagectomy in patients that stomach is not available. Surgical technique is complex and has a high risk of morbidities and mortality. Outcomes of patients are still lacking in the literature, thus aims of this study are to evaluate the safety, feasibility and long-term functional outcomes of patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer with colon conduit via retrosternal route.

Methods

Twenty-six patients underwent operation between August 2016 and June 2021 for malignancies. Minimally invasive esophagectomy and laparotomy were performed in accordance with the 2017 Japan Esophageal Society’s guidelines. Colonic interposition was used for esophageal replacement. Outcomes were technical success, complications assessed using Clavien-Dindo classification, and patient’s quality of life (QOL) based on EORTC-QOL-OES18 questionnaire.

Results

Mean age was 56.0 ± 9.9 years and 21 patients (80.8%) were men. Mean operating time was 432 ± 66 min. Technical success was 100%. The average number of resected lymph nodes was 26 ± 14. Twelve patients (46.2%) experienced postoperative complications: 7/12 were classified as grade I-II, 3/12 as grade III, 1/12 as grade IV, and 1/12 as grade V (death). Patient’s QOL improved during the follow-up period with median (25–75th percentiles) global EORTC-QOL-OES18 score was 29 (17–34); 13 (9–21), and 9 (6–16) at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. During the follow-up period, there were 4 late complications, 3 lymphatic recurrences, 5 distant metastases, and 6 deaths.

Conclusions

Colon conduit via retrosternal route after esophagectomy is feasible, safe, and could provide acceptable long-term functional outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brown J, Lewis WG, Foliaki A, Clark GWB, Blackshaw G, Chan DSY. Colonic interposition after adult oesophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of conduit choice and outcome. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(6):1104–11.CrossRefPubMed Brown J, Lewis WG, Foliaki A, Clark GWB, Blackshaw G, Chan DSY. Colonic interposition after adult oesophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of conduit choice and outcome. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(6):1104–11.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Doki Y, Okada K, Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Fujiwara Y, Takiguchi S, et al. Long-term and short-term evaluation of esophageal reconstruction using the colon or the jejunum in esophageal cancer patients after gastrectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(2):132–8.CrossRefPubMed Doki Y, Okada K, Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Fujiwara Y, Takiguchi S, et al. Long-term and short-term evaluation of esophageal reconstruction using the colon or the jejunum in esophageal cancer patients after gastrectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(2):132–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Irino T, Tsekrekos A, Coppola A, Scandavini CM, Shetye A, Lundell L, et al. Long-term functional outcomes after replacement of the esophagus with gastric, colonic, or jejunal conduits: a systematic literature review. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30(12):1–11.CrossRefPubMed Irino T, Tsekrekos A, Coppola A, Scandavini CM, Shetye A, Lundell L, et al. Long-term functional outcomes after replacement of the esophagus with gastric, colonic, or jejunal conduits: a systematic literature review. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30(12):1–11.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Jiang S, Guo C, Zou B, Xie J, Xiong Z, Kuang Y, et al. Comparison of outcomes of pedicled jejunal and colonic conduit for esophageal reconstruction. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):156.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jiang S, Guo C, Zou B, Xie J, Xiong Z, Kuang Y, et al. Comparison of outcomes of pedicled jejunal and colonic conduit for esophageal reconstruction. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):156.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Boukerrouche A. Isoperistaltic left colic graft interposition via a retrosternal approach for esophageal reconstruction in patients with a caustic stricture: mortality, morbidity, and functional results. Surg Today. 2014;44(5):827–33.CrossRefPubMed Boukerrouche A. Isoperistaltic left colic graft interposition via a retrosternal approach for esophageal reconstruction in patients with a caustic stricture: mortality, morbidity, and functional results. Surg Today. 2014;44(5):827–33.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ceroni M, Norero E, Henríquez JP, Viñuela E, Briceño E, Martínez C, et al. Total esophagogastrectomy plus extended lymphadenectomy with transverse colon interposition: a treatment for extensive esophagogastric junction cancer. World J Hepatol. 2015;7(22):2411–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ceroni M, Norero E, Henríquez JP, Viñuela E, Briceño E, Martínez C, et al. Total esophagogastrectomy plus extended lymphadenectomy with transverse colon interposition: a treatment for extensive esophagogastric junction cancer. World J Hepatol. 2015;7(22):2411–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference DeMeester TR, Johansson KE, Franze I, Eypasch E, Lu CT, McGill JE, et al. Indications, surgical technique, and long-term functional results of colon interposition or bypass. Ann Surg. 1988;208(4):460–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral DeMeester TR, Johansson KE, Franze I, Eypasch E, Lu CT, McGill JE, et al. Indications, surgical technique, and long-term functional results of colon interposition or bypass. Ann Surg. 1988;208(4):460–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Lee K, Kim HR, Park SI, Kim DK, Kim YH, Choi SH. Surgical outcome of colon interposition in esophageal cancer surgery: analysis of risk factors for conduit-related morbidity. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;66(5):384–9.CrossRefPubMed Lee K, Kim HR, Park SI, Kim DK, Kim YH, Choi SH. Surgical outcome of colon interposition in esophageal cancer surgery: analysis of risk factors for conduit-related morbidity. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;66(5):384–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mine S, Udagawa H, Tsutsumi K, Kinoshita Y, Ueno M, Ehara K, et al. Colon interposition after esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(5):1647–53.CrossRefPubMed Mine S, Udagawa H, Tsutsumi K, Kinoshita Y, Ueno M, Ehara K, et al. Colon interposition after esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(5):1647–53.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Motoyama S, Kitamura M, Saito R, Maruyama K, Sato Y, Hayashi K, et al. Surgical outcome of colon interposition by the posterior mediastinal route for thoracic esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(4):1273–8.CrossRefPubMed Motoyama S, Kitamura M, Saito R, Maruyama K, Sato Y, Hayashi K, et al. Surgical outcome of colon interposition by the posterior mediastinal route for thoracic esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(4):1273–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Renzulli P, Joeris A, Strobel O, Hilt A, Maurer CA, Uhl W, et al. Colon interposition for esophageal replacement: a single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;389(2):128–33.CrossRefPubMed Renzulli P, Joeris A, Strobel O, Hilt A, Maurer CA, Uhl W, et al. Colon interposition for esophageal replacement: a single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;389(2):128–33.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Reslinger V, Tranchart H, D’Annunzio E, Poghosyan T, Quero L, Munoz-Bongrand N, et al. Esophageal reconstruction by colon interposition after esophagectomy for cancer analysis of current indications, operative outcomes, and long-term survival. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113(2):159–64.CrossRefPubMed Reslinger V, Tranchart H, D’Annunzio E, Poghosyan T, Quero L, Munoz-Bongrand N, et al. Esophageal reconstruction by colon interposition after esophagectomy for cancer analysis of current indications, operative outcomes, and long-term survival. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113(2):159–64.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, Kato K, Kato H, Kawakubo H, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 1. Esophagus. 2019;16(1):1–24.CrossRefPubMed Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, Kato K, Kato H, Kawakubo H, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 1. Esophagus. 2019;16(1):1–24.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, Kato K, Kato H, Kawakubo H, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 2. Esophagus. 2019;16(1):25–43.CrossRefPubMed Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, Kato K, Kato H, Kawakubo H, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 2. Esophagus. 2019;16(1):25–43.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Hammerlid E, Fayers P, Sezer O, Koller M, et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(10):1384–94.CrossRefPubMed Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Hammerlid E, Fayers P, Sezer O, Koller M, et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(10):1384–94.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hüttl TP, Wichmann MW, Geiger TK, Schildberg FW, Fürst H. Techniques and results of esophageal cancer surgery in Germany. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2002;387(3–4):125–9.CrossRefPubMed Hüttl TP, Wichmann MW, Geiger TK, Schildberg FW, Fürst H. Techniques and results of esophageal cancer surgery in Germany. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2002;387(3–4):125–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, Ishihara R, Matsubara H, Muro K, et al. Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2012. Esophagus. 2019;16(3):221–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, Ishihara R, Matsubara H, Muro K, et al. Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2012. Esophagus. 2019;16(3):221–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Okamura A, Watanabe M, Mukoyama N, Ota Y, Shiraishi O, Shimbashi W, et al. A nationwide survey on digestive reconstruction following pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021;6:1–9. Okamura A, Watanabe M, Mukoyama N, Ota Y, Shiraishi O, Shimbashi W, et al. A nationwide survey on digestive reconstruction following pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021;6:1–9.
21.
go back to reference Yasuda T, Shiozaki H. Esophageal reconstruction with colon tissue. Surg Today. 2011;41(6):745–53.CrossRefPubMed Yasuda T, Shiozaki H. Esophageal reconstruction with colon tissue. Surg Today. 2011;41(6):745–53.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bothereau H, Munoz-Bongrand N, Lambert B, Montemagno S, Cattan P, Sarfati E. Esophageal reconstruction after caustic injury: is there still a place for right coloplasty? Am J Surg. 2007;193(6):660–4.CrossRefPubMed Bothereau H, Munoz-Bongrand N, Lambert B, Montemagno S, Cattan P, Sarfati E. Esophageal reconstruction after caustic injury: is there still a place for right coloplasty? Am J Surg. 2007;193(6):660–4.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Isolauri J, Markkula H, Autio V. Colon interposition in the treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;43(4):420–4.CrossRefPubMed Isolauri J, Markkula H, Autio V. Colon interposition in the treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;43(4):420–4.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Popovici Z. A new philosophy in esophageal reconstruction with colon Thirty-years experience. Dis Esophagus. 2003;16(4):323–7.CrossRefPubMed Popovici Z. A new philosophy in esophageal reconstruction with colon Thirty-years experience. Dis Esophagus. 2003;16(4):323–7.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Athanasiou A, Hennessy M, Spartalis E, Tan BHL, Griffiths EA. Conduit necrosis following esophagectomy: an up-to-date literature review. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;11(3):155–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Athanasiou A, Hennessy M, Spartalis E, Tan BHL, Griffiths EA. Conduit necrosis following esophagectomy: an up-to-date literature review. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;11(3):155–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Cense HA, Visser MR, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, Lamme B, Obertop H, et al. Quality of life after colon interposition by necessity for esophageal cancer replacement. J Surg Oncol. 2004;88(1):32–8.CrossRefPubMed Cense HA, Visser MR, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, Lamme B, Obertop H, et al. Quality of life after colon interposition by necessity for esophageal cancer replacement. J Surg Oncol. 2004;88(1):32–8.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Yildirim S, Koksal H, Celayir F, et al. Colonic interposition vs. gastric pull-up after total esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:675–8.CrossRefPubMed Yildirim S, Koksal H, Celayir F, et al. Colonic interposition vs. gastric pull-up after total esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:675–8.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Greene CL, DeMeester SR, Augustin F, et al. Long-term quality of life and alimentary satisfaction after esophagectomy with colon interposition. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:1713–9.CrossRefPubMed Greene CL, DeMeester SR, Augustin F, et al. Long-term quality of life and alimentary satisfaction after esophagectomy with colon interposition. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:1713–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Surgical outcomes and quality of life assessment of esophagectomy for cancer with colon conduit via retrosternal route
Authors
Vo Duy Long
Dang Quang Thong
Nguyen Viet Hai
Tran Quang Dat
Ho Le Minh Quoc
Doan Thuy Nguyen
Nguyen Vu Tuan Anh
Tran Anh Minh
Nguyen Lam Vuong
Jimmy Bok-Yan So
Nguyen Hoang Bac
Ichiro Uyama
Publication date
06-01-2023
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Published in
Esophagus / Issue 3/2023
Print ISSN: 1612-9059
Electronic ISSN: 1612-9067
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-023-00984-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2023

Esophagus 3/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.