Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Esophagus 2/2021

01-04-2021 | Esophageal Cancer | Original Article

Robotic esophagectomy with total mediastinal lymphadenectomy using four robotic arms alone in esophageal and esophagogastric cancer (RETML-4): a prospective feasibility study

Authors: Hiroyuki Daiko, Junya Oguma, Hisashi Fujiwara, Koshiro Ishiyama, Daisuke Kurita, Kazuma Sato, Takeo Fujita

Published in: Esophagus | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Robotic-assisted esophagectomy is still in the implementation phase. Robotic surgical systems refine visualization via robotically-enhanced surgical anatomy (RESA), and the stable articulated robotic arms provide precise movements. This prospective feasibility study was conducted to evaluate robotic esophagectomy with total mediastinal lymphadenectomy using four robotic arms exclusively (RETML-4).

Methods

The inclusion criterion was clinical stage I–IIIB esophageal cancer with stable general condition. Patients were positioned hemi-prone with single-lung ventilation, and the operation table was tilted until the patient was prone. The first, second, third, and fourth robotic ports were inserted into the ninth intercostal space (ICS) on the angulus inferior scapulae line, seventh ICS on the posterior axillary line, and the fifth and third ICS on the mid-axillary line, respectively. RETML-4 was performed by precise sharp dissection in wide stable operation fields, with countertraction created by a tip-up fenestrated grasper with gauze. Esophagectomy was performed separately for the middle to lower, and upper esophagus. After mobilizing the middle to lower esophagus and performing lymph node dissection, the upper esophagus was mobilized, with bilateral lymph node dissection along the recurrent laryngeal nerves. The assistant surgeon was involved only during removing gauze and collecting harvested lymph nodes in the thorax.

Results

RETML-4 was performed in all ten patients enrolled in 2018. The median postoperative hospital stay was 15 days, and the complication rate was 60%. Nine cases achieved R0 resection. Recurrence occurred in two cases.

Conclusions

RETML-4 is feasible, and may facilitate minimally invasive esophagectomy by providing precise instrument movements and RESA.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Noshiro H, Ikeda O, Urata M. Robotically-enhanced surgical anatomy enables surgeons to perform distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using electric cautery devices alone. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1180–7.CrossRef Noshiro H, Ikeda O, Urata M. Robotically-enhanced surgical anatomy enables surgeons to perform distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using electric cautery devices alone. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1180–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer. 11th Edition: part I. Esophagus. 2017;14:1–36.CrossRef Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer. 11th Edition: part I. Esophagus. 2017;14:1–36.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer. 11th Edition: part II and III. Esophagus. 2017;14:37–65.CrossRef Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer. 11th Edition: part II and III. Esophagus. 2017;14:37–65.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumors (UICC international union against cancer). 8th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2017. Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumors (UICC international union against cancer). 8th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2017.
5.
go back to reference Fujiwara H, Kanamori J, Nakajima Y, et al. An anatomical hypothesis: a “concentric-structured model” for the theoretical understanding of the surgical anatomy in the upper mediastinum required for esophagectomy with radical mediastinal lymph node dissection. Dis Esophagus. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy119.CrossRef Fujiwara H, Kanamori J, Nakajima Y, et al. An anatomical hypothesis: a “concentric-structured model” for the theoretical understanding of the surgical anatomy in the upper mediastinum required for esophagectomy with radical mediastinal lymph node dissection. Dis Esophagus. 2018. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​dote/​doy119.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Biere SSAY, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–922.CrossRef Biere SSAY, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–922.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nafteux P, Moons J, Coosemans W, et al. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: a valuable alternative to open oesophagectomy for the treatment of early oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:1455–65.PubMed Nafteux P, Moons J, Coosemans W, et al. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: a valuable alternative to open oesophagectomy for the treatment of early oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:1455–65.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy; review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256:95–103.CrossRef Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy; review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256:95–103.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269:621–30.CrossRef van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269:621–30.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Robotic esophagectomy with total mediastinal lymphadenectomy using four robotic arms alone in esophageal and esophagogastric cancer (RETML-4): a prospective feasibility study
Authors
Hiroyuki Daiko
Junya Oguma
Hisashi Fujiwara
Koshiro Ishiyama
Daisuke Kurita
Kazuma Sato
Takeo Fujita
Publication date
01-04-2021
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Esophagus / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1612-9059
Electronic ISSN: 1612-9067
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-020-00788-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Esophagus 2/2021 Go to the issue