Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Critical Care 1/2021

01-12-2021 | Esmolol | Research

Hemodynamic and anti-inflammatory effects of early esmolol use in hyperkinetic septic shock: a pilot study

Authors: Bruno Levy, Caroline Fritz, Caroline Piona, Kevin Duarte, Andrea Morelli, Philippe Guerci, Antoine Kimmoun, Nicolas Girerd

Published in: Critical Care | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Several studies have shown that heart rate control with selective beta-1 blockers in septic shock is safe. In these trials, esmolol was administered 24 h after onset of septic shock in patients who remained tachycardic. While an earlier use of beta-blockers might be beneficial, such use remains challenging due to the difficulty in distinguishing between compensatory and non-compensatory tachycardia. Therefore, the Esmosepsis study was designed to study the effects of esmolol aimed at reducing the heart rate by 20% after the initial resuscitation process in hyperkinetic septic shock patients on (1) cardiac index and (2) systemic and regional hemodynamics as well as inflammatory patterns.

Methods

Nine consecutive stabilized tachycardic hyperkinetic septic shock patients treated with norepinephrine for a minimum of 6 h were included. Esmolol was infused during 6 h in order to decrease the heart rate by 20%. The following data were recorded at hours H0 (before esmolol administration), H1–H6 (esmolol administration) and 1 h after esmolol cessation (H7): systolic arterial pressure, diastolic arterial pressure, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, heart rate, PICCO transpulmonary thermodilution, sublingual and musculo-cutaneous microcirculation, indocyanine green clearance and echocardiographic parameters, diuresis, lactate, and arterial and venous blood gases.

Results

Esmolol was infused 9 (6.4–11.6) hours after norepinephrine introduction. Esmolol was ceased early in 3 out of 9 patients due to a marked increase in norepinephrine requirement associated with a picture of persistent cardiac failure at the lowest esmolol dose. For the global group, during esmolol infusion, norepinephrine infusion increased from 0.49 (0.34–0.83) to 0.78 (0.3–1.11) µg/min/kg. The use of esmolol was associated with a significant decrease in heart rate from 115 (110–125) to 100 (92–103) beats/min and a decrease in cardiac index from 4.2 (3.1–4.4) to 2.9 (2.5–3.7) l/min/m−2. Indexed stroke volume remained unchanged. Cardiac function index and global ejection fraction also markedly decreased. Using echocardiography, systolic, diastolic as well as left and right ventricular function parameters worsened. After esmolol cessation, all parameters returned to baseline values. Lactate and microcirculatory parameters did not change while the majority of pro-inflammatory proteins decreased in all patients.

Conclusion

In the very early phase of septic shock, heart rate reduction using fast esmolol titration is associated with an increased risk of hypotension and decreased cardiac index despite maintained adequate tissue perfusion (NCT02068287).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Domizi R, Calcinaro S, Harris S, et al. Relationship between norepinephrine dose, tachycardia and outcome in septic shock: a multicentre evaluation. J Crit Care. 2020;57:185–90.CrossRef Domizi R, Calcinaro S, Harris S, et al. Relationship between norepinephrine dose, tachycardia and outcome in septic shock: a multicentre evaluation. J Crit Care. 2020;57:185–90.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lee YR, Seth MS, Soney D, et al. Benefits of beta-blockade in sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review. Clin Drug Investig. 2019;39:429–40.CrossRef Lee YR, Seth MS, Soney D, et al. Benefits of beta-blockade in sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review. Clin Drug Investig. 2019;39:429–40.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sanfilippo F, Santonocito C, Morelli A, et al. Beta-blocker use in severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31:1817–25.CrossRef Sanfilippo F, Santonocito C, Morelli A, et al. Beta-blocker use in severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31:1817–25.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Unger M, Morelli A, Singer M, et al. Landiolol in patients with septic shock resident in an intensive care unit (LANDI-SEP): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19:637.CrossRef Unger M, Morelli A, Singer M, et al. Landiolol in patients with septic shock resident in an intensive care unit (LANDI-SEP): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19:637.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference van Loon LM, van der Hoeven JG, Lemson J. Hemodynamic response to beta-blockers in severe sepsis and septic shock: a review of current literature. J Crit Care. 2019;50:138–43.CrossRef van Loon LM, van der Hoeven JG, Lemson J. Hemodynamic response to beta-blockers in severe sepsis and septic shock: a review of current literature. J Crit Care. 2019;50:138–43.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Morelli A, Ertmer C, Westphal M, et al. Effect of heart rate control with esmolol on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310:1683–91.CrossRef Morelli A, Ertmer C, Westphal M, et al. Effect of heart rate control with esmolol on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310:1683–91.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference De Backer D, Annane D. Beta-blockers in septic shock to optimize hemodynamics? We are not sure. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1613–4.CrossRef De Backer D, Annane D. Beta-blockers in septic shock to optimize hemodynamics? We are not sure. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1613–4.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Morelli A, Romano SM, Sanfilippo F, et al. Systolic-dicrotic notch pressure difference can identify patients with septic shock at risk of cardiovascular decompensation in case of heart rate reduction. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125:1018–24.CrossRef Morelli A, Romano SM, Sanfilippo F, et al. Systolic-dicrotic notch pressure difference can identify patients with septic shock at risk of cardiovascular decompensation in case of heart rate reduction. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125:1018–24.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165–228.CrossRef Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165–228.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1935–47.CrossRef Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1935–47.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference De Backer D, Ospina-Tascon G, Salgado D, et al. Monitoring the microcirculation in the critically ill patient: current methods and future approaches. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:1813–25.CrossRef De Backer D, Ospina-Tascon G, Salgado D, et al. Monitoring the microcirculation in the critically ill patient: current methods and future approaches. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:1813–25.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sakka SG, Koeck H, Meier-Hellmann A. Measurement of indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate by two different dosages. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:506–9.CrossRef Sakka SG, Koeck H, Meier-Hellmann A. Measurement of indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate by two different dosages. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:506–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Morelli A, Donati A, Ertmer C, et al. Microvascular effects of heart rate control with esmolol in patients with septic shock: a pilot study. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:2162–8.CrossRef Morelli A, Donati A, Ertmer C, et al. Microvascular effects of heart rate control with esmolol in patients with septic shock: a pilot study. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:2162–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Martin L, Derwall M, Al Zoubi S, et al. The septic heart: current understanding of molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. Chest. 2019;155:427–37.CrossRef Martin L, Derwall M, Al Zoubi S, et al. The septic heart: current understanding of molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. Chest. 2019;155:427–37.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Levy B, Buzon J, Kimmoun A. Inotropes and vasopressors use in cardiogenic shock: when, which and how much? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019;25:384–90.CrossRef Levy B, Buzon J, Kimmoun A. Inotropes and vasopressors use in cardiogenic shock: when, which and how much? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019;25:384–90.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ince C. Hemodynamic coherence and the rationale for monitoring the microcirculation. Crit Care. 2015;19(Suppl 3):S8.CrossRef Ince C. Hemodynamic coherence and the rationale for monitoring the microcirculation. Crit Care. 2015;19(Suppl 3):S8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Hemodynamic and anti-inflammatory effects of early esmolol use in hyperkinetic septic shock: a pilot study
Authors
Bruno Levy
Caroline Fritz
Caroline Piona
Kevin Duarte
Andrea Morelli
Philippe Guerci
Antoine Kimmoun
Nicolas Girerd
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03445-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Critical Care 1/2021 Go to the issue