Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Esketamine | Research

Effects of adding low-dose esketamine to sufentanil and propofol sedation during cervical conization: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial

Authors: Jiguo Si, Xiaomin Li, Yuqi Wang, Nianhai Feng, Min Cui

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cervical conization is a brief but painful procedure that can be performed under sufficient sedation with propofol and opioids. However, this sedation approach comes with a high risk of sedation-related adverse events (SRAEs). Esketamine, an N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, causes less cardiorespiratory depression than opioids. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of adding a low dose of esketamine to propofol and sufentanil sedation as an opioid-reduced regimen.

Methods

A total of 122 consecutive patients with ASA I-II, body mass index < 30, and STOP-BANG score < 3 who underwent cervical conization were enrolled and randomly divided into Group S and Group ES. Using a closed-loop target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump with a target bispectral index (BIS) value of 60 ± 5, patients in Group S were sedated with 0.2 mcg·kg-1 sufentanil and propofol, while patients in Group ES were sedated with 0.15 mg·kg-1 esketamine, 0.1 mcg·kg-1 sufentanil and propofol. The primary outcome was the incidence and severity of SRAEs, while the secondary outcomes included effectiveness of sedation, awakening time, psychotomimetic side effects, postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient and gynaecologist satisfaction.

Results

Data from 120 patients were analysed. The incidence of composite SRAEs was significantly higher in Group S than in Group ES (85.0% vs. 56.7%, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the severity of SRAEs was higher in Group S than in Group ES (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the effectiveness of sedation, awakening time, psychotomimetic side effects, postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting, or patient and gynaecologist satisfaction between the two groups.

Conclusion

Adding low-dose esketamine to propofol and sufentanil sedation reduces the incidence and severity of SRAEs in patients undergoing cervical conization, with equal sedation efficacy, recovery quality, and no additional psychomimetic side effects.

Trial registration

ChiCTR2000040457​, 28/11/2020.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Oh C, Kim Y, Eom H, et al. Procedural sedation using a propofol-ketamine combination (ketofol) vs. propofol alone in the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP): a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2019;8(7):943.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oh C, Kim Y, Eom H, et al. Procedural sedation using a propofol-ketamine combination (ketofol) vs. propofol alone in the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP): a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2019;8(7):943.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Lena K, Suzanne E, Anne C, et al. Safety of moderate-to-deep sedation performed by sedation practitioners: a national prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018;35(9):659–66.CrossRef Lena K, Suzanne E, Anne C, et al. Safety of moderate-to-deep sedation performed by sedation practitioners: a national prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018;35(9):659–66.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kim R, Pelletier A, Donnenfeld B, et al. Safety of deep sedation without intubation during surgical abortion in the independent clinic setting. Contraception. 2020;101(5):298–301.CrossRefPubMed Kim R, Pelletier A, Donnenfeld B, et al. Safety of deep sedation without intubation during surgical abortion in the independent clinic setting. Contraception. 2020;101(5):298–301.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Casoni D, Spadavecchia C, Wampfer B, et al. Clinical and pharmacokinetic evaluation of S-ketamine for intravenous general anaesthesia in horses undergoing field castration. Acta Vet Scand. 2015;57(1):21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Casoni D, Spadavecchia C, Wampfer B, et al. Clinical and pharmacokinetic evaluation of S-ketamine for intravenous general anaesthesia in horses undergoing field castration. Acta Vet Scand. 2015;57(1):21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Doenicke A, Kugler J, Mayer M, et al. Influence of racemic ketamine and S(+)-ketamine on vigilance, performance and wellbeing. Anaesth. 1992;41:610–8. Doenicke A, Kugler J, Mayer M, et al. Influence of racemic ketamine and S(+)-ketamine on vigilance, performance and wellbeing. Anaesth. 1992;41:610–8.
6.
go back to reference White PF, Schüttler J, Shafer A, et al. Comparative pharmacology of the ketamine isomers. Studies in volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 1985;57(2):197–203.CrossRefPubMed White PF, Schüttler J, Shafer A, et al. Comparative pharmacology of the ketamine isomers. Studies in volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 1985;57(2):197–203.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Zhu T, Zhao X, Sun M, et al. Opioid-reduced anesthesia based on esketamine in gynecological day surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22(1):354.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhu T, Zhao X, Sun M, et al. Opioid-reduced anesthesia based on esketamine in gynecological day surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22(1):354.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration. Application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration. Anesthesiology. 2017;126:376–93.CrossRef Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration. Application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration. Anesthesiology. 2017;126:376–93.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, et al. Validity and reliability of the Observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990;10(4):244–51. Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, et al. Validity and reliability of the Observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990;10(4):244–51.
10.
go back to reference Steward DJ. A simplified scoring system for the post-operative recovery room. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth. 1975;22(1):111–3. Steward DJ. A simplified scoring system for the post-operative recovery room. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth. 1975;22(1):111–3.
11.
go back to reference Mason KP, Green SM, Piacevoli Q. Adverse event reporting tool to standardize the reporting and tracking of adverse events during procedural sedation: a consensus document from the world SIVA international sedation task force. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(1):13–20.CrossRefPubMed Mason KP, Green SM, Piacevoli Q. Adverse event reporting tool to standardize the reporting and tracking of adverse events during procedural sedation: a consensus document from the world SIVA international sedation task force. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(1):13–20.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Angelini G, Ketzler JT, Coursin DB. Use of propofol and other nonbenzodiazepine sedatives in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin. 2001;17(4):863–80.CrossRefPubMed Angelini G, Ketzler JT, Coursin DB. Use of propofol and other nonbenzodiazepine sedatives in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin. 2001;17(4):863–80.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Eberl S, Koers L, van Hooft J, et al. The effectiveness of a low-dose esketamine versus an alfentanil adjunct to propofol sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020;37(5):394–401.CrossRefPubMed Eberl S, Koers L, van Hooft J, et al. The effectiveness of a low-dose esketamine versus an alfentanil adjunct to propofol sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020;37(5):394–401.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ledowski T, Wulf H. The influence of fentanyl vs. s-ketamine on intubating conditions during induction of anaesthesia with etomidate and rocuronium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2001;18(8):519–23.CrossRefPubMed Ledowski T, Wulf H. The influence of fentanyl vs. s-ketamine on intubating conditions during induction of anaesthesia with etomidate and rocuronium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2001;18(8):519–23.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference De Waha S, Seeburger J, Ender J, et al. Deep sedation versus general anesthesia in percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve reconstruction using the MitraClip system. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016;105(6):535–43.CrossRefPubMed De Waha S, Seeburger J, Ender J, et al. Deep sedation versus general anesthesia in percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve reconstruction using the MitraClip system. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016;105(6):535–43.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Patzelt J, Ulrich M, Magunia H, et al. Comparison of deep sedation with general anesthesia in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(12):e007485.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Patzelt J, Ulrich M, Magunia H, et al. Comparison of deep sedation with general anesthesia in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(12):e007485.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Chen J, Zou X, Hu B, et al. Effect of different doses of esketamine compared with fentanyl combined with propofol on hypotension in patients undergoing painless abortion surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical tria al. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22(1):305.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen J, Zou X, Hu B, et al. Effect of different doses of esketamine compared with fentanyl combined with propofol on hypotension in patients undergoing painless abortion surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical tria al. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22(1):305.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Lahtinen P, Kokki H, Hakala T, et al. S(+)-ketamine as an analgesic adjunct reduces opioid consumption after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004;99(5):1295–301.CrossRefPubMed Lahtinen P, Kokki H, Hakala T, et al. S(+)-ketamine as an analgesic adjunct reduces opioid consumption after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004;99(5):1295–301.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Gruber RP, Morley B. Ketamine-assisted intravenous sedation with midazolam: benefits and potential problems. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(6):1823–5 discussion 1826–7.CrossRefPubMed Gruber RP, Morley B. Ketamine-assisted intravenous sedation with midazolam: benefits and potential problems. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(6):1823–5 discussion 1826–7.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference St Pierre M, Kessebohm K, Schmid M, et al. Aufwachverhalten sowie Ubelkeit und Erbrechen nach einer totalen intravenösen Anästhesie mit S-(+)-Ketamin-Propofol Ein Vergleich mit Alfentanil-Propofol [recovery from anaesthesia and incidence and intensity of postoperative nausea and vomiting following a total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with S-(+)-ketamine/propofol compared to alfentanil/propofol]. Anaesthesist. 2002;51(12):973–9 German.PubMed St Pierre M, Kessebohm K, Schmid M, et al. Aufwachverhalten sowie Ubelkeit und Erbrechen nach einer totalen intravenösen Anästhesie mit S-(+)-Ketamin-Propofol Ein Vergleich mit Alfentanil-Propofol [recovery from anaesthesia and incidence and intensity of postoperative nausea and vomiting following a total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with S-(+)-ketamine/propofol compared to alfentanil/propofol]. Anaesthesist. 2002;51(12):973–9 German.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Piper SN, Beschmann R, Mengistu A, et al. Assessment of recovery, dreaming, hemodynamics, and satisfaction in postcardiac surgery patients receiving supplementary propofol sedation with S(+)-ketamine. Minerva Anestesiol. 2009;75(6):363–73.PubMed Piper SN, Beschmann R, Mengistu A, et al. Assessment of recovery, dreaming, hemodynamics, and satisfaction in postcardiac surgery patients receiving supplementary propofol sedation with S(+)-ketamine. Minerva Anestesiol. 2009;75(6):363–73.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Faigel DO, Baron TH, Goldstein JL, et al. Standards practice Committe, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Guidelines for the use of deep sedation and anesthesia for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(5):613–7.CrossRefPubMed Faigel DO, Baron TH, Goldstein JL, et al. Standards practice Committe, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Guidelines for the use of deep sedation and anesthesia for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(5):613–7.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Coté GA, Hovis RM, et al. Incidence of sedation-related complications with propofol use during advanced endoscopic procedures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8(2):137–42.CrossRefPubMed Coté GA, Hovis RM, et al. Incidence of sedation-related complications with propofol use during advanced endoscopic procedures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8(2):137–42.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Windmann V, Koch S. Intraoperatives Neuromonitoring: Elektroenzephalografie [intraoperative Neuromonitoring: electroencephalography]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2021;56(11–12):773–80 German. Windmann V, Koch S. Intraoperatives Neuromonitoring: Elektroenzephalografie [intraoperative Neuromonitoring: electroencephalography]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2021;56(11–12):773–80 German.
25.
go back to reference Nunes RR, Cavalcante SL, Franco SB. Analgesia postoperatoria: comparación entre la infusióncontinua de anestésico local y opioide vía catéter epidurale infusión continua de anestésico local vía catéter en laherida operatoria [Effects of sedation produced by the association of midazolam and ketamine s(+) on encephalographic variables]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2011;61(3):304–10 Multiple languages.CrossRefPubMed Nunes RR, Cavalcante SL, Franco SB. Analgesia postoperatoria: comparación entre la infusióncontinua de anestésico local y opioide vía catéter epidurale infusión continua de anestésico local vía catéter en laherida operatoria [Effects of sedation produced by the association of midazolam and ketamine s(+) on encephalographic variables]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2011;61(3):304–10 Multiple languages.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effects of adding low-dose esketamine to sufentanil and propofol sedation during cervical conization: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial
Authors
Jiguo Si
Xiaomin Li
Yuqi Wang
Nianhai Feng
Min Cui
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02389-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2024 Go to the issue