Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Erenumab | Research

One-year prospective real-world assessment of effectiveness and safety of erenumab in migraine prevention: results of the French FHU INOVPAIN registry study

Authors: M. Lanteri-Minet, R. Fabre, C. Martin, K. Pradat, A. Alchaar, E. Bozzolo, M. L. Duchene, E. K. Van Obberghen, A. Donnet, D. Fontaine

Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy and safety of erenumab. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of erenumab in a real-world setting in French patients with migraine associated with extreme unmet needs.

Methods

This is a one year-prospective real-word study with enrolment of all consecutive adult patients included in the FHU InovPain registry who participated in a compassionate erenumab use program.

Results

Of 144 patients included, 140 patients (82.1% female / mean age of 50.9 ± 11.4) received at least one dose of erenumab and were concerned by effectiveness and safety assessment. All patients had failed 11 oral preventive treatments. Most of them suffered from chronic migraine (88.6%) and presented a medication overuse (90.7%) at baseline. Thirty-eight (27.1%) discontinued treatment during the 12-month follow-up, with 22 (15.7%), 11 (7.9%) and 5 (3.6%) patients before 3, 6 or 9 months of treatment. The proportion of ≥ 50% responders at M3, M6, M9 and M12 was 74/140 (52.9%), 69/118 (58.5%), 61/107 (57.0%) and 60/102 (58.8%) respectively. At M3, the rate of reversion from chronic migraine to episodic migraine was 57.3% and the rate of transition from medication overuse to non-overuse was 46.5%. For monthly migraine days, the median (IQR) was 18.0 (13.0–26.0), 9.0 (5.0–17.0), 7.5 (5.0–14.0), 8.0 (5.0–12.5) and 8.0 (5.0–12.0) at M0, M3, M6, M9 and M12 respectively. For HIT-6 score, the median (IQR) was 68.0 (63.8–73.3), 60.0 (54.0–65.0), 60.0 (50.3–53.0), 59.0 (50.0–63.0) and 58.0 (50.0–62.9) at M0, M3, M6, M9 and M12 respectively. Fifty-three (37.9%) patients reported at least one of the following adverse events: cutaneous erythema and/or pain at the injection site for 42 (30%) patients, constipation for 22 (15.7%) patients, muscle spasm for 2 (1.4%) patients, alopecia for one (0.7%) patient and blood pressure increase in one (0.7%) patient. There was no serious adverse event. One female patient became pregnant after 5 months of exposure to erenumab with a safe evolution after treatment discontinuation.

Conclusion

This first French real-world study related to migraine prevention with CGRP-mAbs confirms effectiveness and safety of erenumab in patients with extreme unmet needs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Edvinsson L, Haanes KA, Warfvinge K, Krause DN (2018) CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies - successful translation from bench to clinic. Nat Rev Neurol 14:338–350CrossRefPubMed Edvinsson L, Haanes KA, Warfvinge K, Krause DN (2018) CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies - successful translation from bench to clinic. Nat Rev Neurol 14:338–350CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Haghdoost F, Puledda F, Garcia-Azorin D, Huessler EM, Messina R, Pozo-Rosich P (2023). Evaluating the efficacy of CGRP mAbs and gepants for the preventive treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomised controlled trials. Cephalalgia. https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024231159366. Haghdoost F, Puledda F, Garcia-Azorin D, Huessler EM, Messina R, Pozo-Rosich P (2023). Evaluating the efficacy of CGRP mAbs and gepants for the preventive treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomised controlled trials. Cephalalgia. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​0333102423115936​6.
3.
go back to reference Messina R, Huessler EM, Puledda F, Haghdoost F, Lebedeva ER, Diener HC (2023). Safety and tolerability of monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway and gepants in migraine prevention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cephalalgia. https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024231152169. Messina R, Huessler EM, Puledda F, Haghdoost F, Lebedeva ER, Diener HC (2023). Safety and tolerability of monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway and gepants in migraine prevention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cephalalgia. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​0333102423115216​9.
4.
go back to reference Reuter U, Goadsby PJ, Lanteri-Minet M, Wen S, Hours-Zesiger P, Ferrari MD et al (2018) Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study. Lancet 392:2280–2287CrossRefPubMed Reuter U, Goadsby PJ, Lanteri-Minet M, Wen S, Hours-Zesiger P, Ferrari MD et al (2018) Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study. Lancet 392:2280–2287CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ferrari MD, Diener HC, Ning X, Galic M, Cohen JM, Yang R et al (2019) Fremanezumab versus placebo for migraine prevention in patients with documented failure to up to four migraine preventive medication classes (FOCUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet 394:1030–1040CrossRefPubMed Ferrari MD, Diener HC, Ning X, Galic M, Cohen JM, Yang R et al (2019) Fremanezumab versus placebo for migraine prevention in patients with documented failure to up to four migraine preventive medication classes (FOCUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet 394:1030–1040CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mulleners WM, Kim BK, Láinez MJA, Lanteri-Minet M, Pozo-Rosich P, Wang S et al (2020) Safety and efficacy of galcanezumab in patients for whom previous migraine preventive medication from two to four categories had failed (CONQUER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol 19:814–825CrossRefPubMed Mulleners WM, Kim BK, Láinez MJA, Lanteri-Minet M, Pozo-Rosich P, Wang S et al (2020) Safety and efficacy of galcanezumab in patients for whom previous migraine preventive medication from two to four categories had failed (CONQUER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol 19:814–825CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ashina M, Lanteri-Minet M, Pozo-Rosich P, Ettrup A, Christoffersen CL, Josiassen MK et al (2022) Safety and efficacy of eptinezumab for migraine prevention in patients with two-to-four previous preventive treatment failures (DELIVER): a multi-arm, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol 2:597–607CrossRef Ashina M, Lanteri-Minet M, Pozo-Rosich P, Ettrup A, Christoffersen CL, Josiassen MK et al (2022) Safety and efficacy of eptinezumab for migraine prevention in patients with two-to-four previous preventive treatment failures (DELIVER): a multi-arm, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol 2:597–607CrossRef
8.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP et al (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP et al (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pavelic AR, Wöber C, Riederer F, Zebenholzer K (2022) Monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide for migraine prophylaxis: a systematic review of real-world data. Cells 12:143CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pavelic AR, Wöber C, Riederer F, Zebenholzer K (2022) Monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide for migraine prophylaxis: a systematic review of real-world data. Cells 12:143CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Murray AM, Stern JI, Robertson CE, Chiang CC (2022) Real-world patient experience of CGRP-targeting therapy for migraine: a narrative review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 26:783–794CrossRefPubMed Murray AM, Stern JI, Robertson CE, Chiang CC (2022) Real-world patient experience of CGRP-targeting therapy for migraine: a narrative review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 26:783–794CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Vandenbussche N, Pisarek K, Paemeleire K (2023) Methodological considerations on real-world evidence studies of monoclonal antibodies against the CGRP-pathway for migraine: a systematic review. J Headache Pain 2023(24):75CrossRef Vandenbussche N, Pisarek K, Paemeleire K (2023) Methodological considerations on real-world evidence studies of monoclonal antibodies against the CGRP-pathway for migraine: a systematic review. J Headache Pain 2023(24):75CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Cevoli S, Egeo G, Fofi L, Messina R et al (2021) Long-term (48 weeks) effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of erenumab in the prevention of high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine in a real world: Results of the EARLY 2 study. Headache 61:1351–1363CrossRefPubMed Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Cevoli S, Egeo G, Fofi L, Messina R et al (2021) Long-term (48 weeks) effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of erenumab in the prevention of high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine in a real world: Results of the EARLY 2 study. Headache 61:1351–1363CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Schoenen J, Timmermans G, Nonis R, Manise M, Fumal A, Gérard P (2021) Erenumab for migraine prevention in a 1-year compassionate use program: efficacy, tolerability, and differences between clinical phenotypes. Front Neurol 12:805334CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schoenen J, Timmermans G, Nonis R, Manise M, Fumal A, Gérard P (2021) Erenumab for migraine prevention in a 1-year compassionate use program: efficacy, tolerability, and differences between clinical phenotypes. Front Neurol 12:805334CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Cullum CK, Do TP, Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Hugger SS, Iljazi A et al (2022) Real-world long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in adults with chronic migraine: a 52-week, single-center, prospective, observational study. J Headache Pain 23:61CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cullum CK, Do TP, Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Hugger SS, Iljazi A et al (2022) Real-world long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in adults with chronic migraine: a 52-week, single-center, prospective, observational study. J Headache Pain 23:61CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Andreou AP, Fuccaro M, Hill B, Murphy M, Caponnetto V, Kilner R et al (2022) Two-year effectiveness of erenumab in resistant chronic migraine: a prospective real-world analysis. J Headache Pain 23:139CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Andreou AP, Fuccaro M, Hill B, Murphy M, Caponnetto V, Kilner R et al (2022) Two-year effectiveness of erenumab in resistant chronic migraine: a prospective real-world analysis. J Headache Pain 23:139CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Diener HC, Lipton RB, Aurora SK et al (2015) Assessing clinically meaningful treatment effects in controlled trials: chronic migraine as an example. J Pain 16:164–175CrossRefPubMed Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Diener HC, Lipton RB, Aurora SK et al (2015) Assessing clinically meaningful treatment effects in controlled trials: chronic migraine as an example. J Pain 16:164–175CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Tepper SJ, Silberstein SD, Kudrow D, Ashina M, Reuter U et al (2021) Reversion from chronic migraine to episodic migraine following treatment with erenumab: Results of a post-hocanalysis of a randomized, 12-week, double-blind study and a 52-week, open-label extension. Cephalalgia 41:6–16CrossRefPubMed Lipton RB, Tepper SJ, Silberstein SD, Kudrow D, Ashina M, Reuter U et al (2021) Reversion from chronic migraine to episodic migraine following treatment with erenumab: Results of a post-hocanalysis of a randomized, 12-week, double-blind study and a 52-week, open-label extension. Cephalalgia 41:6–16CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tepper S, Ashina M, Reuter U, Brandes JL, Doležil D, Silberstein S et al (2017) Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 16:425–434CrossRefPubMed Tepper S, Ashina M, Reuter U, Brandes JL, Doležil D, Silberstein S et al (2017) Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 16:425–434CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Tepper SJ, Diener HC, Ashina M, Brandes JL, Friedman DI, Reuter U (2019) Erenumab in chronic migraine with medication overuse: subgroup analysis of a randomized trial. Neurology 92:e2309–e2320CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tepper SJ, Diener HC, Ashina M, Brandes JL, Friedman DI, Reuter U (2019) Erenumab in chronic migraine with medication overuse: subgroup analysis of a randomized trial. Neurology 92:e2309–e2320CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Hong JB, Lange KS, Overeem LH, Triller P, Raffaelli B, Reuter U (2023) A scoping review and meta-analysis of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: predicting response. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 16:934CrossRefPubMed Hong JB, Lange KS, Overeem LH, Triller P, Raffaelli B, Reuter U (2023) A scoping review and meta-analysis of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: predicting response. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 16:934CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Schoenen J, Van Dycke A, Versijpt J, Paemeleire K (2023) Ten open questions in migraine prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies blocking the calcitonin-gene related peptide pathway: a narrative review. J Headache Pain 24:99CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schoenen J, Van Dycke A, Versijpt J, Paemeleire K (2023) Ten open questions in migraine prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies blocking the calcitonin-gene related peptide pathway: a narrative review. J Headache Pain 24:99CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Lampl C, Kraus V, Lehner K, Loop B, Chehrenama M, Maczynska Z et al (2022) Safety and tolerability of erenumab in individuals with episodic or chronic migraine across age groups: a pooled analysis of placebo-controlled trials. J Headache Pain 23:104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lampl C, Kraus V, Lehner K, Loop B, Chehrenama M, Maczynska Z et al (2022) Safety and tolerability of erenumab in individuals with episodic or chronic migraine across age groups: a pooled analysis of placebo-controlled trials. J Headache Pain 23:104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Ashina M, Kudrow D, Reuter U, Dolezil D, Silberstein S, Tepper SJ et al (2019) Long-term tolerability and nonvascular safety of erenumab, a novel calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for prevention of migraine: a pooled analysis of four placebo-controlled trials with long-term extensions. Cephalalgia 39:1798–1808CrossRefPubMed Ashina M, Kudrow D, Reuter U, Dolezil D, Silberstein S, Tepper SJ et al (2019) Long-term tolerability and nonvascular safety of erenumab, a novel calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for prevention of migraine: a pooled analysis of four placebo-controlled trials with long-term extensions. Cephalalgia 39:1798–1808CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference de Vries LS, van der Arend BWH, Maassen VanDenBrink A, Terwindt GM (2022) Blood pressure in patients with migraine treated with monoclonal anti-CGRP (Receptor) antibodies: a prospective follow-up study. Neurology 99:e1897–e1904CrossRef de Vries LS, van der Arend BWH, Maassen VanDenBrink A, Terwindt GM (2022) Blood pressure in patients with migraine treated with monoclonal anti-CGRP (Receptor) antibodies: a prospective follow-up study. Neurology 99:e1897–e1904CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Noseda R, Bedussi F, Gobbi C, Zecca C, Ceschi A (2021) Safety profile of erenumab, galcanezumab and fremanezumab in pregnancy and lactation: analysis of the WHO pharmacovigilance database. Cephalalgia 41:789–798CrossRefPubMed Noseda R, Bedussi F, Gobbi C, Zecca C, Ceschi A (2021) Safety profile of erenumab, galcanezumab and fremanezumab in pregnancy and lactation: analysis of the WHO pharmacovigilance database. Cephalalgia 41:789–798CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Sacco S, Amin FM, Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Deligianni CI, Gil-Gouveia R et al (2022) European Headache Federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway for migraine prevention - 2022 update. J Headache Pain 23:67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sacco S, Amin FM, Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Deligianni CI, Gil-Gouveia R et al (2022) European Headache Federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway for migraine prevention - 2022 update. J Headache Pain 23:67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Vo P, Wen S, Martel MJ, Mitsikostas D, Reuter U, Klatt J (2019) Benefit-risk assessment of erenumab and current migraine prophylactic treatments using the likelihood of being helped or harmed. Cephalalgia 39:608–616CrossRefPubMed Vo P, Wen S, Martel MJ, Mitsikostas D, Reuter U, Klatt J (2019) Benefit-risk assessment of erenumab and current migraine prophylactic treatments using the likelihood of being helped or harmed. Cephalalgia 39:608–616CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Sacco S, Braschinsky M, Ducros A, Lampl C, Little P, van den Brink AM et al (2020) European headache federation consensus on the definition of resistant and refractory migraine: developed with the endorsement of the European Migraine & Headache Alliance (EMHA). J Headache Pain 2:76CrossRef Sacco S, Braschinsky M, Ducros A, Lampl C, Little P, van den Brink AM et al (2020) European headache federation consensus on the definition of resistant and refractory migraine: developed with the endorsement of the European Migraine & Headache Alliance (EMHA). J Headache Pain 2:76CrossRef
Metadata
Title
One-year prospective real-world assessment of effectiveness and safety of erenumab in migraine prevention: results of the French FHU INOVPAIN registry study
Authors
M. Lanteri-Minet
R. Fabre
C. Martin
K. Pradat
A. Alchaar
E. Bozzolo
M. L. Duchene
E. K. Van Obberghen
A. Donnet
D. Fontaine
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer Milan
Keywords
Erenumab
Migraine
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1129-2369
Electronic ISSN: 1129-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01680-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2023 Go to the issue