Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Updates in Surgery
Published in: Updates in Surgery 3/2016

01-09-2016 | Review Article

ERAS and pancreatic surgery: a review

Authors: J. Perinel, M. Adham

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Pancreatic surgery is still considered as a high-risk abdominal surgery. While the mortality rate is low, the morbidity remains high ranging from 30 to 60%. In 2012, the ERAS study group published the official recommendations to implement the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program in patients undergoing PD. Non-randomized studies have shown that ERAS was safe and feasible. They reported a significantly shortened LOS with lower morbidity in ERAS group. However, the level of evidence remains low due to absence of randomized study and because of a substantial heterogeneity in the content of ERAS protocols. Future studies should be prospective, multicentric and designed with a structured implementation of standardized ERAS pathway.
Literature
1.
Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617CrossRefPubMed
2.
Anderson AD, McNaught CE, MacFie J et al (2003) Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care. Br J Surg 90:1497–1504CrossRefPubMed
3.
Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH et al (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutrit 29(4):434–440CrossRef
4.
Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, et al (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database of System Rev (2):CD007635
5.
Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM et al (2000) Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232:786–795CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) 1423 pan- creaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10(9):1199–1210 (discussion 1210–1211)
7.
Balzano G, Zerbi A, Capretti G et al (2008) Effect of hospital volume on the outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy. Br J Surg 95:357–362CrossRefPubMed
8.
Coolsen MM, van Dam RM, van der Wilt AA, Slim K, Lassen K, Dejong CH (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery with particular emphasis on pancreaticoduodenectomies. World J Surg 37:1909–1918CrossRefPubMed
9.
Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231CrossRefPubMed
10.
Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M et al (2008) Fast-track recovery programme after pancreaticoduodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. Br J Surg 95(11):387–393CrossRef
11.
Porter GA, Pisters PWT, Mansyur C et al (2000) Cost and utilization impact of a clinical pathway for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 7:484–489CrossRefPubMed
12.
Vanounou T, Pratt W, Fischer JE et al (2007) Deviation-based cost modelling: a novel model to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of clinical pathways. J Am Coll Surg 204:570–579CrossRefPubMed
13.
Kennedy EP, Rosato EL, Sauter PK et al (2007) Initiation of a critical pathway for pancreaticoduodenectomy at an academic institution: the first step in multidisciplinary team building. J Am Coll Surg 204:917–923CrossRefPubMed
14.
Kennedy E, Grenda T, Sauter P et al (2009) Implementation of a critical pathway for distal pancreatectomy at an academic institution. J Gastrointest Surg 13:938–944CrossRefPubMed
15.
Nikfarjam M, Weinberg L, Low N et al (2013) A fast track recovery programme significantly reduces hospital length of stay following uncomplicated pancreaticoduodenectomy. JOP 14:63–70PubMed
16.
Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Badran A et al (2013) Implementation of enhanced recovery programme after pancreatoduodenectomy: a single-centre UK pilot study. Pancreatology 13:58–62CrossRefPubMed
17.
Coolsen MM, van Dam RM, Chigharoe A et al (2014) Improving outcomes after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: experiences with implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. Digest Surg 31:177–184CrossRef
18.
19.
Kagedan DJ, Ahmed M, Devitt KS et al (2015) Enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the evidence. HPB (Oxford) 17(1):11–16
20.
ERAS Compliance Group (2015) The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg 261(6):1153–1159CrossRef
21.
Braga M, Pecorelli N, Ariotti R et al (2014) Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 38:2960–2966CrossRefPubMed
22.
Pearsall EA, Meghji Z, Pitzul KB et al (2015) A qualitative study to understand the barriers and enablers in implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery program. Ann Surg 261(1):92–96CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
ERAS and pancreatic surgery: a review
Authors
J. Perinel
M. Adham
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0406-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Updates in Surgery 3/2016 Go to the issue

Original Article

Surgical margins for duodenopancreatectomy

Original Article

Parenchyma-sparing surgery for pancreatic endocrine tumors

Original Article

Indications, technique, and results of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy

Review Article

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: many meta-analyses, few certainties

Original Article

Role of local ablative techniques (Radiofrequency ablation and Irreversible Electroporation) in the treatment of pancreatic cancer

Review Article

Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy