Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2016

Open Access 01-04-2016 | Preclinical study

Equivalence of MammaPrint array types in clinical trials and diagnostics

Authors: Inès Beumer, Anke Witteveen, Leonie Delahaye, Diederik Wehkamp, Mireille Snel, Christa Dreezen, John Zheng, Arno Floore, Guido Brink, Bob Chan, Sabine Linn, Rene Bernards, Laura van ’t Veer, Annuska Glas

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

MammaPrint is an FDA-cleared microarray-based test that uses expression levels of the 70 MammaPrint genes to assess distant recurrence risk in early-stage breast cancer. The prospective RASTER study proved that MammaPrint Low Risk patients can safely forgo chemotherapy, which is further subject of the prospective randomized MINDACT trial. While MammaPrint diagnostic results are obtained from mini-arrays, clinical trials may be performed on whole-genome arrays. Here we demonstrate the equivalence and reproducibility of the MammaPrint test. MammaPrint indices were collected for breast cancer samples: (i) on both customized certified array types (n = 1,897 sample pairs), (ii) with matched fresh and FFPE tissues (n = 552 sample pairs), iii) for control samples replicated over a period of 10 years (n = 11,333), and iv) repeated measurements (n = 280). The array type indicated a near perfect Pearson correlation of 0.99 (95 % CI: 0.989–0.991). Paired fresh and FFPE samples showed an excellent Pearson correlation of 0.93 (95 % CI 0.92–0.94), in spite of the variability introduced by intratumoral tissue heterogeneity. Control samples showed high consistency over 10 year's time (overall reproducibility of 97.4 %). Precision and repeatability are overall 98.2 and 98.3 %, respectively. Results confirm that the combination of the near perfect correlation between array types, excellent equivalence between tissue types, and a very high stability, precision, and repeatability demonstrate that results from clinical trials (such as MINDACT and I-SPY 2) are equivalent to current MammaPrint FFPE and fresh diagnostics, and can be used interchangeably.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Coates AS, Winer EP, Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Gnant M, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thürlimann B, Senn H-J (2015) Tailoring therapies-improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015. Ann Oncol 26:1533–1546CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Coates AS, Winer EP, Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Gnant M, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thürlimann B, Senn H-J (2015) Tailoring therapies-improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015. Ann Oncol 26:1533–1546CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Glas AM, Floore A, Delahaye LJMJ, Witteveen AT, Pover RCF, Bakx N, Lahti-Domenici JST, Bruinsma TJ, Warmoes MO, Wessels LFA, Veer LJV (2006) Converting a breast cancer microarray signature into a high-throughput diagnostic test. BMC Genomics 7:278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Glas AM, Floore A, Delahaye LJMJ, Witteveen AT, Pover RCF, Bakx N, Lahti-Domenici JST, Bruinsma TJ, Warmoes MO, Wessels LFA, Veer LJV (2006) Converting a breast cancer microarray signature into a high-throughput diagnostic test. BMC Genomics 7:278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Drukker CA, Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, Retèl VP, van Harten WH, van’t Tinteren H, Wesseling J, Roumen RMH, Knauer M, van Veer LJ, Sonke GS, Rutgers EJT, van de Vijver MJ, Linn SC (2013) A prospective evaluation of a breast cancer prognosis signature in the observational RASTER study. Int J Cancer 133:929–936CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Drukker CA, Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, Retèl VP, van Harten WH, van’t Tinteren H, Wesseling J, Roumen RMH, Knauer M, van Veer LJ, Sonke GS, Rutgers EJT, van de Vijver MJ, Linn SC (2013) A prospective evaluation of a breast cancer prognosis signature in the observational RASTER study. Int J Cancer 133:929–936CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Sapino A, Roepman P, Linn SC, Snel MHJ, Delahaye LJMJ, van den Akker J, Glas AM, Simon IM, Barth N, de Snoo FA, van’t Veer LJ, Molinaro L, Berns EMJJ, Wesseling J, Riley LB, Anderson D, Nguyen B, Cox CE (2013) MammaPrint molecular diagnostics on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. J Mol Diagn 16:190–197CrossRefPubMed Sapino A, Roepman P, Linn SC, Snel MHJ, Delahaye LJMJ, van den Akker J, Glas AM, Simon IM, Barth N, de Snoo FA, van’t Veer LJ, Molinaro L, Berns EMJJ, Wesseling J, Riley LB, Anderson D, Nguyen B, Cox CE (2013) MammaPrint molecular diagnostics on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. J Mol Diagn 16:190–197CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Drukker CA, Schmidt MK, Rutgers EJT, Cardoso F, Kerlikowske K, Esserman LJ, van Leeuwen FE, Pijnappel RM, Slaets L, Bogaerts J, Veer LJV (2014) Mammographic screening detects low-risk tumor biology breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 144:103–111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Drukker CA, Schmidt MK, Rutgers EJT, Cardoso F, Kerlikowske K, Esserman LJ, van Leeuwen FE, Pijnappel RM, Slaets L, Bogaerts J, Veer LJV (2014) Mammographic screening detects low-risk tumor biology breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 144:103–111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Krijgsman O, Roepman P, Zwart W, Carroll JS, Tian S, de Snoo FA, Bender RA, Bernards R, Glas AM (2011) A diagnostic gene profile for molecular subtyping of breast cancer associated with treatment response. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133:37–47CrossRefPubMed Krijgsman O, Roepman P, Zwart W, Carroll JS, Tian S, de Snoo FA, Bender RA, Bernards R, Glas AM (2011) A diagnostic gene profile for molecular subtyping of breast cancer associated with treatment response. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133:37–47CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Veer LJV, Dai H, Hart AAM, Voskuil DW, Schreiber GJ, Peterse JL, Roberts C, Marton MJ, Parrish M, Atsma D, Witteveen A, Glas A, Delahaye L, van der Velde T, Bartelink H, Rodenhuis S, Rutgers ET, Friend SH (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1999–2009CrossRefPubMed van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Veer LJV, Dai H, Hart AAM, Voskuil DW, Schreiber GJ, Peterse JL, Roberts C, Marton MJ, Parrish M, Atsma D, Witteveen A, Glas A, Delahaye L, van der Velde T, Bartelink H, Rodenhuis S, Rutgers ET, Friend SH (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1999–2009CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Buyse M, Loi S, Veer LV, Viale G, Delorenzi M, Glas AM, d’Assignies MS, Bergh J, Lidereau R, Ellis P, Harris A, Bogaerts J, Therasse P, Floore A, Amakrane M, Piette F, Rutgers E, Sotiriou C, Cardoso F, Piccart MJ (2006) Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1183–1192CrossRefPubMed Buyse M, Loi S, Veer LV, Viale G, Delorenzi M, Glas AM, d’Assignies MS, Bergh J, Lidereau R, Ellis P, Harris A, Bogaerts J, Therasse P, Floore A, Amakrane M, Piette F, Rutgers E, Sotiriou C, Cardoso F, Piccart MJ (2006) Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1183–1192CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, van Harten WH, Veer LJV, van Dam FSAM, Karsenberg K, Douma KFL, van Tinteren H, Peterse JL, Wesseling J, Wu TS, Atsma D, Rutgers EJT, Brink G, Floore AN, Glas AM, Roumen RMH, Bellot FE, van Krimpen C, Rodenhuis S, van de Vijver MJ, Linn SC (2007) Use of 70-gene signature to predict prognosis of patients with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective community-based feasibility study (RASTER). Lancet Oncol 8:1079–1087CrossRefPubMed Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, van Harten WH, Veer LJV, van Dam FSAM, Karsenberg K, Douma KFL, van Tinteren H, Peterse JL, Wesseling J, Wu TS, Atsma D, Rutgers EJT, Brink G, Floore AN, Glas AM, Roumen RMH, Bellot FE, van Krimpen C, Rodenhuis S, van de Vijver MJ, Linn SC (2007) Use of 70-gene signature to predict prognosis of patients with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective community-based feasibility study (RASTER). Lancet Oncol 8:1079–1087CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Parker JS, Mullins M, Cheang MCU, Leung S, Voduc D, Vickery T, Davies S, Fauron C, He X, Hu Z, Quackenbush JF, Stijleman IJ, Palazzo J, Marron JS, Nobel AB, Mardis E, Nielsen TO, Ellis MJ, Perou CM, Bernard PS (2009) Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J Clin Oncol 27:1160–1167CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Parker JS, Mullins M, Cheang MCU, Leung S, Voduc D, Vickery T, Davies S, Fauron C, He X, Hu Z, Quackenbush JF, Stijleman IJ, Palazzo J, Marron JS, Nobel AB, Mardis E, Nielsen TO, Ellis MJ, Perou CM, Bernard PS (2009) Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J Clin Oncol 27:1160–1167CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Mook S, Schmidt MK, Viale G, Pruneri G, Eekhout I, Floore A, Glas AM, Bogaerts J, Cardoso F, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Rutgers ET, Veer LJV (2008) The 70-gene prognosis-signature predicts disease outcome in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes in an independent validation study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 116:295–302CrossRefPubMed Mook S, Schmidt MK, Viale G, Pruneri G, Eekhout I, Floore A, Glas AM, Bogaerts J, Cardoso F, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Rutgers ET, Veer LJV (2008) The 70-gene prognosis-signature predicts disease outcome in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes in an independent validation study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 116:295–302CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Knauer M, Cardoso F, Wesseling J, Bedard PL, Linn SC, Rutgers EJT, van’t Veer LJ (2010) Identification of a low-risk subgroup of HER-2-positive breast cancer by the 70-gene prognosis signature. Br J Cancer 103:1788–1793CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Knauer M, Cardoso F, Wesseling J, Bedard PL, Linn SC, Rutgers EJT, van’t Veer LJ (2010) Identification of a low-risk subgroup of HER-2-positive breast cancer by the 70-gene prognosis signature. Br J Cancer 103:1788–1793CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Mook S, Schmidt MK, Weigelt B, Kreike B, Eekhout I, van de Vijver MJ, Glas AM, Floore A, Rutgers EJT, van’t Veer LJ (2009) The 70-gene prognosis signature predicts early metastasis in breast cancer patients between 55 and 70 years of age. Ann Oncol 21:717–722CrossRefPubMed Mook S, Schmidt MK, Weigelt B, Kreike B, Eekhout I, van de Vijver MJ, Glas AM, Floore A, Rutgers EJT, van’t Veer LJ (2009) The 70-gene prognosis signature predicts early metastasis in breast cancer patients between 55 and 70 years of age. Ann Oncol 21:717–722CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, Linn SC, Keijzer R, Wesseling J, Nuyten DSA, van Krimpen C, Meijers C, de Graaf PW, Bos MMEM, Hart AAM, Rutgers EJT, Peterse JL, Halfwerk H, de Groot R, Pronk A, Floore AN, Glas AM, Veer LJV, van de Vijver MJ (2008) Validation of 70-gene prognosis signature in node-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117:483–495CrossRefPubMed Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, Linn SC, Keijzer R, Wesseling J, Nuyten DSA, van Krimpen C, Meijers C, de Graaf PW, Bos MMEM, Hart AAM, Rutgers EJT, Peterse JL, Halfwerk H, de Groot R, Pronk A, Floore AN, Glas AM, Veer LJV, van de Vijver MJ (2008) Validation of 70-gene prognosis signature in node-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117:483–495CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Drukker CA, van Tinteren H, Schmidt MK, Rutgers EJT, Bernards R, van de Vijver MJ, Veer LJV (2014) Long-term impact of the 70-gene signature on breast cancer outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 143:587–592CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Drukker CA, van Tinteren H, Schmidt MK, Rutgers EJT, Bernards R, van de Vijver MJ, Veer LJV (2014) Long-term impact of the 70-gene signature on breast cancer outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 143:587–592CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Cardoso F, Piccart-Gebhart M, Veer LV, Rutgers E (2007) The MINDACT trial: the first prospective clinical validation of a genomic tool. Mol Oncol 1:246–251CrossRefPubMed Cardoso F, Piccart-Gebhart M, Veer LV, Rutgers E (2007) The MINDACT trial: the first prospective clinical validation of a genomic tool. Mol Oncol 1:246–251CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Cardoso F, Veer LV, Rutgers E, Loi S, Mook S, Piccart-Gebhart MJ (2008) Clinical application of the 70-gene profile: the MINDACT trial. J Clin Oncol 26:729–735CrossRefPubMed Cardoso F, Veer LV, Rutgers E, Loi S, Mook S, Piccart-Gebhart MJ (2008) Clinical application of the 70-gene profile: the MINDACT trial. J Clin Oncol 26:729–735CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Mook S, Veer LJV, Rutgers EJT, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Cardoso F (2007) Individualization of therapy using Mammaprint: from development to the MINDACT Trial. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 4:147–155PubMed Mook S, Veer LJV, Rutgers EJT, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Cardoso F (2007) Individualization of therapy using Mammaprint: from development to the MINDACT Trial. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 4:147–155PubMed
27.
go back to reference Barker AD, Sigman CC, Kelloff GJ, Hylton NM, Berry DA, Esserman LJ (2009) I-SPY 2: an adaptive breast cancer trial design in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 86:97–100CrossRefPubMed Barker AD, Sigman CC, Kelloff GJ, Hylton NM, Berry DA, Esserman LJ (2009) I-SPY 2: an adaptive breast cancer trial design in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 86:97–100CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Larkin JE, Frank BC, Gavras H, Sultana R, Quackenbush J (2005) Independence and reproducibility across microarray platforms. Nat Methods 2:337–344CrossRefPubMed Larkin JE, Frank BC, Gavras H, Sultana R, Quackenbush J (2005) Independence and reproducibility across microarray platforms. Nat Methods 2:337–344CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Fedorowicz G, Guerrero S, Wu TD, Modrusan Z (2009) Microarray analysis of RNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and matched fresh-frozen ovarian adenocarcinomas. BMC Med Genomics 2:23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fedorowicz G, Guerrero S, Wu TD, Modrusan Z (2009) Microarray analysis of RNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and matched fresh-frozen ovarian adenocarcinomas. BMC Med Genomics 2:23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Delahaye LJ, Wehkamp D, Floore AN, Bernards R, van’t Veer LJ, Glas AM (2013) Performance characteristics of the MammaPrint(R) breast cancer diagnostic gene signature. Personalized Med 10:801–811CrossRef Delahaye LJ, Wehkamp D, Floore AN, Bernards R, van’t Veer LJ, Glas AM (2013) Performance characteristics of the MammaPrint(R) breast cancer diagnostic gene signature. Personalized Med 10:801–811CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Tholen DW, Kallner A, Kennedy JW, Krouwer JS, Meier K: Evaluation of precision performance of quantitative measurement methods. Approved Guideline. Second Edition. EP5–A2. National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards 2004, 24 Tholen DW, Kallner A, Kennedy JW, Krouwer JS, Meier K: Evaluation of precision performance of quantitative measurement methods. Approved Guideline. Second Edition. EP5–A2. National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards 2004, 24
33.
go back to reference Cobleigh MA, Tabesh B, Bitterman P, Baker J, Cronin M, Liu M-L, Borchik R, Mosquera J-M, Walker MG, Shak S (2005) Tumor gene expression and prognosis in breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes. Clin Cancer Res 11:8623–8631CrossRefPubMed Cobleigh MA, Tabesh B, Bitterman P, Baker J, Cronin M, Liu M-L, Borchik R, Mosquera J-M, Walker MG, Shak S (2005) Tumor gene expression and prognosis in breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes. Clin Cancer Res 11:8623–8631CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Ma X-J, Salunga R, Dahiya S, Wang W, Carney E, Durbecq V, Harris A, Goss P, Sotiriou C, Erlander M, Sgroi D (2008) A five-gene molecular grade index and HOXB13:IL17BR are complementary prognostic factors in early stage breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14:2601–2608CrossRefPubMed Ma X-J, Salunga R, Dahiya S, Wang W, Carney E, Durbecq V, Harris A, Goss P, Sotiriou C, Erlander M, Sgroi D (2008) A five-gene molecular grade index and HOXB13:IL17BR are complementary prognostic factors in early stage breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14:2601–2608CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Filipits M, Rudas M, Jakesz R, Dubsky P, Fitzal F, Singer CF, Dietze O, Greil R, Jelen A, Sevelda P, Freibauer C, Müller V, Jänicke F, Schmidt M, Kölbl H, Rody A, Kaufmann M, Schroth W, Brauch H, Schwab M, Fritz P, Weber KE, Feder IS, Hennig G, Kronenwett R, Gehrmann M, Gnant M (2011) A new molecular predictor of distant recurrence in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer adds independent information to conventional clinical risk factors. Clin Cancer Res 17:6012–6020CrossRefPubMed Filipits M, Rudas M, Jakesz R, Dubsky P, Fitzal F, Singer CF, Dietze O, Greil R, Jelen A, Sevelda P, Freibauer C, Müller V, Jänicke F, Schmidt M, Kölbl H, Rody A, Kaufmann M, Schroth W, Brauch H, Schwab M, Fritz P, Weber KE, Feder IS, Hennig G, Kronenwett R, Gehrmann M, Gnant M (2011) A new molecular predictor of distant recurrence in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer adds independent information to conventional clinical risk factors. Clin Cancer Res 17:6012–6020CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Equivalence of MammaPrint array types in clinical trials and diagnostics
Authors
Inès Beumer
Anke Witteveen
Leonie Delahaye
Diederik Wehkamp
Mireille Snel
Christa Dreezen
John Zheng
Arno Floore
Guido Brink
Bob Chan
Sabine Linn
Rene Bernards
Laura van ’t Veer
Annuska Glas
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3764-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine