Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 8/2020

01-08-2020 | Episiotomy | Author Response (Invitation)

Response re: Letter to the editor: selective episiotomy versus no episiotomy for severe perineal trauma: systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Glaucia Miranda Varella Pereira, Renato Sugahara Hosoume, Marilene Vale de Castro Monteiro, Cassia Raquel Teatin Juliato, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 8/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

Dear Editor, …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Serati M, Salvatore S, Braga A. Letter to the editor: selective episiotomy versus no episiotomy for severe perineal trauma: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2020. Serati M, Salvatore S, Braga A. Letter to the editor: selective episiotomy versus no episiotomy for severe perineal trauma: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2020.
4.
go back to reference Nygaard I. The importance of publishing trials with negative results. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(6):541–2.CrossRef Nygaard I. The importance of publishing trials with negative results. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(6):541–2.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Response re: Letter to the editor: selective episiotomy versus no episiotomy for severe perineal trauma: systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Glaucia Miranda Varella Pereira
Renato Sugahara Hosoume
Marilene Vale de Castro Monteiro
Cassia Raquel Teatin Juliato
Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Episiotomy
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04384-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

International Urogynecology Journal 8/2020 Go to the issue