Skip to main content
Top

20-04-2024 | Epilepsy | Review Article

The role of neuromodulation in the management of drug-resistant epilepsy

Authors: HusamEddin Salama, Ahmed Salama, Logan Oscher, George I. Jallo, Nir Shimony

Published in: Neurological Sciences

Login to get access

Abstract

Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) poses significant challenges in terms of effective management and seizure control. Neuromodulation techniques have emerged as promising solutions for individuals who are unresponsive to pharmacological treatments, especially for those who are not good surgical candidates for surgical resection or laser interstitial therapy (LiTT). Currently, there are three neuromodulation techniques that are FDA-approved for the management of DRE. These include vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS). Device selection, optimal time, and DBS and RNS target selection can also be challenging. In general, the number and localizability of the epileptic foci, alongside the comorbidities manifested by the patients, substantially influence the selection process. In the past, the general axiom was that DBS and VNS can be used for generalized and localized focal seizures, while RNS is typically reserved for patients with one or two highly localized epileptic foci, especially if they are in eloquent areas of the brain. Nowadays, with the advance in our understanding of thalamic involvement in DRE, RNS is also very effective for general non-focal epilepsy. In this review, we will discuss the underlying mechanisms of action, patient selection criteria, and the evidence supporting the use of each technique. Additionally, we explore emerging technologies and novel approaches in neuromodulation, such as closed-loop systems. Moreover, we examine the challenges and limitations associated with neuromodulation therapies, including adverse effects, complications, and the need for further long-term studies. This comprehensive review aims to provide valuable insights on present and future use of neuromodulation.
Literature
7.
go back to reference Engelborghs S, D’Hooge R, Deyn PP De (2000) Pathophysiology of epilepsy. Acta Neurol Belg 100(4):201–213 Engelborghs S, D’Hooge R, Deyn PP De (2000) Pathophysiology of epilepsy. Acta Neurol Belg 100(4):201–213
30.
go back to reference Chow EY, Cong P (2023) Neurostimulation device technology. In: Rao VR (ed) Neurostimulation for Epilepsy. Elsevier, pp 31–49 Chow EY, Cong P (2023) Neurostimulation device technology. In: Rao VR (ed) Neurostimulation for Epilepsy. Elsevier, pp 31–49
40.
go back to reference Sussman NM, Goldman HW, Jackel RA et al (1988) Anterior thalamic stimulation in medically refractory epilepsy. Part II: preliminary clinical results Epilepsia 29:677 Sussman NM, Goldman HW, Jackel RA et al (1988) Anterior thalamic stimulation in medically refractory epilepsy. Part II: preliminary clinical results Epilepsia 29:677
49.
go back to reference Sayed D, Chakravarthy K, Amirdelfan K, et al (2020) A comprehensive practice guideline for magnetic resonance imaging compatibility in implanted neuromodulation devices. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface 23:893–911. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13233 Sayed D, Chakravarthy K, Amirdelfan K, et al (2020) A comprehensive practice guideline for magnetic resonance imaging compatibility in implanted neuromodulation devices. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface 23:893–911. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ner.​13233
61.
go back to reference Chan HY, Wijnen BFM, Majoie MHJM et al (2022) Economic evaluation of deep brain stimulation compared with vagus nerve stimulation and usual care for patients with refractory epilepsy: a lifetime decision analytic model. Epilepsia 63:641–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.17158CrossRef Chan HY, Wijnen BFM, Majoie MHJM et al (2022) Economic evaluation of deep brain stimulation compared with vagus nerve stimulation and usual care for patients with refractory epilepsy: a lifetime decision analytic model. Epilepsia 63:641–651. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​epi.​17158CrossRef
65.
go back to reference Oluigbo CO, Rezai AR (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging safety of deep brain stimulator devices. Handb Clin Neurol 116:73–76 Oluigbo CO, Rezai AR (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging safety of deep brain stimulator devices. Handb Clin Neurol 116:73–76
77.
79.
go back to reference Cukiert A, Cukiert CM, Burattini JA, Mariani PP (2021) Long-term seizure outcome during continuous bipolar hippocampal deep brain stimulation in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy with or without mesial temporal sclerosis: an observational, open-label study. Epilepsia 62:190–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.16776CrossRefPubMed Cukiert A, Cukiert CM, Burattini JA, Mariani PP (2021) Long-term seizure outcome during continuous bipolar hippocampal deep brain stimulation in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy with or without mesial temporal sclerosis: an observational, open-label study. Epilepsia 62:190–197. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​epi.​16776CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The role of neuromodulation in the management of drug-resistant epilepsy
Authors
HusamEddin Salama
Ahmed Salama
Logan Oscher
George I. Jallo
Nir Shimony
Publication date
20-04-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Neurological Sciences
Print ISSN: 1590-1874
Electronic ISSN: 1590-3478
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07513-9