Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 7/2015

01-07-2015 | Original Article

EOS suspension test for the assessment of spinal flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Authors: Caroline Hirsch, Brice Ilharreborde, Keyvan Mazda

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 7/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The assessment of spinal flexibility is essential for the planning of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery. Various radiographic methods have been used but none of them has shown any superiority. The new low-dose stereography system EOS (EOS imaging, Paris, France) captures whole body images in a single scan without vertical distortion. EOS is now used in routine clinical use for AIS follow-up. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the feasibility and the reproducibility of a new suspension test during the EOS imaging for the assessment of spinal flexibility in AIS.

Materials and methods

Fifty AIS patients scheduled for surgery were prospectively included. For each patient, a standard EOS radiograph was obtained, then a suspension test in the EOS and a classic traction test on the cotrel frame were performed. The examinations were compared in terms of radiation exposure, tolerance, mean traction force, and Cobb angle reduction for each curve. Axial and sagittal reductions during suspension were analyzed on three-dimensional EOS reconstructions.

Results

The tolerance of the suspension test was lower than the traction test but it was less operator dependent. Radiation exposure was 7 times lower during the suspension test. Cobb angle reductions achieved in the proximal and main curves by the two tests were similar. The traction test achieved greater reduction of the distal curve. Flexibility in the axial plane and in the sagittal plane was analyzed with the suspension test. The reduction in apical rotation was not correlated with the reduction in Cobb angle.

Conclusion

The EOS suspension test can be used for the assessment of spinal flexibility in AIS. It gives a global vision of the deformity with new flexibility indices in the axial and sagittal planes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pruijs JE, Hageman MA, Keessen W, van der Meer R, van Wieringen JC (1994) Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis. Skeletal Radiol 23:517–520PubMedCrossRef Pruijs JE, Hageman MA, Keessen W, van der Meer R, van Wieringen JC (1994) Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis. Skeletal Radiol 23:517–520PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1169–1181 Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1169–1181
3.
go back to reference Davis BJ, Gadgil A, Trivedi J, Ahmed E-NB (2004) Traction radiography performed under general anesthetic: a new technique for assessing idiopathic scoliosis curves. Spine 29:2466–2470PubMedCrossRef Davis BJ, Gadgil A, Trivedi J, Ahmed E-NB (2004) Traction radiography performed under general anesthetic: a new technique for assessing idiopathic scoliosis curves. Spine 29:2466–2470PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Klepps SJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Bassett GS, Whorton J (2001) Prospective comparison of flexibility radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26:E74–E79PubMedCrossRef Klepps SJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Bassett GS, Whorton J (2001) Prospective comparison of flexibility radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26:E74–E79PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cheh G, Lenke LG, Lehman RA Jr, Kim YJ, Nunley R, Bridwell KH (2007) The reliability of preoperative supine radiographs to predict the amount of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 32:2668–2672PubMedCrossRef Cheh G, Lenke LG, Lehman RA Jr, Kim YJ, Nunley R, Bridwell KH (2007) The reliability of preoperative supine radiographs to predict the amount of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 32:2668–2672PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Labelle H, Aubin C-E, Jackson R, Lenke L, Newton P, Parent S (2011) Seeing the spine in 3D: how will it change what we do? J Pediatr Orthop 31:S37–S45PubMedCrossRef Labelle H, Aubin C-E, Jackson R, Lenke L, Newton P, Parent S (2011) Seeing the spine in 3D: how will it change what we do? J Pediatr Orthop 31:S37–S45PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Glaser DA, Doan J, Newton PO (2012) Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography. Spine 37:1391–1397PubMedCrossRef Glaser DA, Doan J, Newton PO (2012) Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography. Spine 37:1391–1397PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ilharreborde B, Steffen JS, Nectoux E, Vital JM, Mazda K, Skalli W, Obeid I (2011) Angle measurement reproducibility using EOS three-dimensional reconstructions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior instrumentation. Spine 36:E1306–E1313PubMedCrossRef Ilharreborde B, Steffen JS, Nectoux E, Vital JM, Mazda K, Skalli W, Obeid I (2011) Angle measurement reproducibility using EOS three-dimensional reconstructions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior instrumentation. Spine 36:E1306–E1313PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dubousset J, Ilharreborde B, Le Huec J-C (2014) Use of EOS imaging for the assessment of scoliosis deformities: application to postoperative 3D quantitative analysis of the trunk. Eur Spine J 23(Suppl 4):S397–S405PubMedCrossRef Dubousset J, Ilharreborde B, Le Huec J-C (2014) Use of EOS imaging for the assessment of scoliosis deformities: application to postoperative 3D quantitative analysis of the trunk. Eur Spine J 23(Suppl 4):S397–S405PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Faro FD, Marks MC, Pawelek J, Newton PO (2004) Evaluation of a functional position for lateral radiograph acquisition in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29:2284–2289PubMedCrossRef Faro FD, Marks MC, Pawelek J, Newton PO (2004) Evaluation of a functional position for lateral radiograph acquisition in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29:2284–2289PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cotrel Y, Morel G (1964) The elongation-derotation-flexion technic in the correction of scoliosis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 50:59–75PubMed Cotrel Y, Morel G (1964) The elongation-derotation-flexion technic in the correction of scoliosis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 50:59–75PubMed
12.
go back to reference Vidal C, Ilharreborde B, Azoulay R, Sebag G, Mazda K (2013) Reliability of cervical lordosis and global sagittal spinal balance measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22:1362–1367PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Vidal C, Ilharreborde B, Azoulay R, Sebag G, Mazda K (2013) Reliability of cervical lordosis and global sagittal spinal balance measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22:1362–1367PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sangole A, Aubin C-E, Labelle H, Lenke L, Jackson R, Newton P, Stokes IAF (2010) The central hip vertical axis: a reference axis for the Scoliosis Research Society three-dimensional classification of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 35:E530–E534PubMedCrossRef Sangole A, Aubin C-E, Labelle H, Lenke L, Jackson R, Newton P, Stokes IAF (2010) The central hip vertical axis: a reference axis for the Scoliosis Research Society three-dimensional classification of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 35:E530–E534PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Guo J, Liu Z, Qian B, Zhu Z, Jiang H, Qiu Y (2012) Anatomic deviation between the central hip vertical axis and central sacral vertical line in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 25:E161–E166PubMedCrossRef Guo J, Liu Z, Qian B, Zhu Z, Jiang H, Qiu Y (2012) Anatomic deviation between the central hip vertical axis and central sacral vertical line in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 25:E161–E166PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cheung KM, Luk KD (1997) Prediction of correction of scoliosis with use of the fulcrum bending radiograph. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1144–1150PubMed Cheung KM, Luk KD (1997) Prediction of correction of scoliosis with use of the fulcrum bending radiograph. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1144–1150PubMed
16.
go back to reference Ni H-J, Su J-C, Lu Y-H et al (2011) Using side-bending radiographs to determine the distal fusion level in patients with single thoracic idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior correction with pedicle screws. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:437–443PubMedCrossRef Ni H-J, Su J-C, Lu Y-H et al (2011) Using side-bending radiographs to determine the distal fusion level in patients with single thoracic idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior correction with pedicle screws. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:437–443PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hamzaoglu A, Talu U, Tezer M, Mirzanli C, Domanic U, Goksan SB (2005) Assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 30:1637–1642PubMedCrossRef Hamzaoglu A, Talu U, Tezer M, Mirzanli C, Domanic U, Goksan SB (2005) Assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 30:1637–1642PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Polly DW Jr, Sturm PF (1998) Traction versus supine side bending. Which technique best determines curve flexibility? Spine 23:804–808PubMedCrossRef Polly DW Jr, Sturm PF (1998) Traction versus supine side bending. Which technique best determines curve flexibility? Spine 23:804–808PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vaughan JJ, Winter RB, Lonstein JE (1996) Comparison of the use of supine bending and traction radiographs in the selection of the fusion area in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 21:2469–2473PubMedCrossRef Vaughan JJ, Winter RB, Lonstein JE (1996) Comparison of the use of supine bending and traction radiographs in the selection of the fusion area in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 21:2469–2473PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kleinman RG, Csongradi JJ, Rinksy LA, Bleck EE (1982) The radiographic assessment of spinal flexibility in scoliosis: a study of the efficacy of the prone push film. Clin Orthop Relat Res 47–53 Kleinman RG, Csongradi JJ, Rinksy LA, Bleck EE (1982) The radiographic assessment of spinal flexibility in scoliosis: a study of the efficacy of the prone push film. Clin Orthop Relat Res 47–53
21.
go back to reference Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Linville DL (2000) Comparison of push-prone and lateral-bending radiographs for predicting postoperative coronal alignment in thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliotic curves. Spine 25:76–81PubMedCrossRef Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Linville DL (2000) Comparison of push-prone and lateral-bending radiographs for predicting postoperative coronal alignment in thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliotic curves. Spine 25:76–81PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Luk KDK, Don AS, Chong CS, Wong YW, Cheung KM (2008) Selection of fusion levels in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using fulcrum bending prediction: a prospective study. Spine 33:2192–2198PubMedCrossRef Luk KDK, Don AS, Chong CS, Wong YW, Cheung KM (2008) Selection of fusion levels in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using fulcrum bending prediction: a prospective study. Spine 33:2192–2198PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Lamarre M-E, Parent S, Labelle H, Aubin C-E, Joncas J, Cabral A, Petit Y (2009) Assessment of spinal flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: suspension versus side-bending radiography. Spine 34:591–597PubMedCrossRef Lamarre M-E, Parent S, Labelle H, Aubin C-E, Joncas J, Cabral A, Petit Y (2009) Assessment of spinal flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: suspension versus side-bending radiography. Spine 34:591–597PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Büchler P, de Oliveria ME, Studer D, Schumann S, Zheng G, Schneider J, Hasler CC (2014) Axial suspension test to assess pre-operative spinal flexibility in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3386-8 Büchler P, de Oliveria ME, Studer D, Schumann S, Zheng G, Schneider J, Hasler CC (2014) Axial suspension test to assess pre-operative spinal flexibility in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-014-3386-8
26.
go back to reference Martin L, Ruddlesden R, Makepeace C, Robinson L, Mistry T, Starritt H (2013) Paediatric x-ray radiation dose reduction and image quality analysis. J Radiol Prot 33:621–633PubMedCrossRef Martin L, Ruddlesden R, Makepeace C, Robinson L, Mistry T, Starritt H (2013) Paediatric x-ray radiation dose reduction and image quality analysis. J Radiol Prot 33:621–633PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A et al (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 1–8 Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A et al (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 1–8
28.
Metadata
Title
EOS suspension test for the assessment of spinal flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Authors
Caroline Hirsch
Brice Ilharreborde
Keyvan Mazda
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3771-y

Other articles of this Issue 7/2015

European Spine Journal 7/2015 Go to the issue